Mani Samani Team Member t does not matter that the creation of India’s Mars Orbiter, Mangalyaan, cost one- tenth the cost of NASA's Maven spacecraft (or less than many Hollywood blockbusters). What is significant is that their spacecraft reached the red planet’s orbit as soon as its US counterpart arrived there. Now these two are in orbit and collecting data together. NASA's mission cost $637 million “... and we came in under budget!” said the primary investigator on the project, Bruce Jakosky, in an interview with NPR. “It's essentially buying a Honda Civic verses buying a Mercedes S-Class,” said Amaresh Kollipara, a managing partner of Earth 2 Orbit, a company that pairs private satellite providers with the Indian Space Research Organization. The Mangalyaan satellite is alot less mature than MAVEN, and is not designed to last as long as NASA’s spacecraft. In terms of the technical view, NASA’s spacecraft still has the advantage, since India chose a cheaper orbit around the Mars. The Indian satellite did not go as close to Mars as the US spacecraft. Less engine use means that Mangalyaan requires less fuel, keeping the weight down to half of the NASA mission. A lower fuel load also made the Indian project much cheaper to launch. The primary investigator of the project said, "We had, at one point, over 600 people working on the project." Although it takes a lot of people to build a spacecraft, and of course they need to be paid, India claimed that their top-notch aerospace engineers are cheap. The average payment for Indian engineers in this project was $12 000 per year which is significantly less than a regular minimum wage worker in North America. Chairman of Indian Space Research Organisation, Mr. Radhakrishnan, called the Mars Orbiter Mission “The cheapest interplanetary mission ever to be undertaken by the world.” Despite India’s achievement in space, is it an appropriate comparison to NASA's big spacecraft? Dr. Erik Jensen, Professor and Chair of Physics department at UNBC said, “I would say the biggest milestone... is showing that India can do these things because for $00,000,000 - $700,000,000 ~ $600,000,000 - $500,000,000 $400,000,000 + $300,000,000 $200,000,000 $100,000,000 ~ More Expensive things than Mangalyaan S- Indian Edvard Munch's New York's most The production The Most NASA MAVEN Mangalyaan The Scream expensive home of GTAV Expensive Space Probe Satellite Movie; Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End India Times so long [the] Americans and the Soviets, and then the Japanese and Chinese, have done some interesting things in space... as far as exploration, there are so many countries that have done so many... exploration kind of missions. This is... India making [a] statement that they are reaching... [the] ability to [do] these kind of things.” Although Canada has the infrastructure and technical expertise available, there is not the national will to spend money on extensive space exploration. Can we actually compare India’s orbit mission with NASA's spacecraft? “They published some pictures from... the surface of Mars and they are nothing like the high resolution images that... NASA’s spacecraft is giving... it would be hard to imagine that it will be equal in quality.” Dr. Jensen continued, “There is no cheap way to do that, because most of the things that NASA does is of the highest quality... and it is extremely expensive because they are only building one of them.” Despite the capability to make cheaper satellites, NASA doesn’t have any interest in doing so because it is not beneficial to send low capability spacecraft to that kind of distance. India's space ambitions are not over either. The next step may be putting an astronaut into orbit for cheap.