THE ALKATCHO CARRIER OF BRITISH COLUMBIA 363 sat opposite him with legs spread. The man could not attend properly to the game, which involved some skill in recognizing cues from facial expression, and invariably lost. Informants were emphatic in their claims that an ordinary woman would not do this because of shame. But a noble woman was all the more re- spected for her dominant behavior. Women as a rule never gam- bled with men. POLITICAL ORGANIZATION Formal political authority was at a minimum. Within the sadeku the headman regulated economic activity and attempted to settle disputes. His success as a leader depended largely upon his personal prestige, but his authority grew when matters of potlatching were at stake. At that time, as the spear-head of the potlatch he received the willing economic codperation of the family group, for the potlatching success of any chief reflected upon his family. Furthermore, since no single person of the family could potlatch alone, codperation was essential. Where the headman was the leading noble and his siblings lesser nobles, they all had the opportunity of participating in the joint pot- latch in their own right. Each could distribute property and in- crease his own status. The potlatch in this case involved re- ciprocal benefits. When a number of sadekus occupied a village, the family chief recognized as the greatest noble was a village chief. And here again, the authority vested in him was only by virtue of his position as the potlatch spear-head in the inter-village potlatches. And the sanctions supporting his authority rested in the recipro- cal benefits between the village chief and the supporting nobles. The authority of the village chief did not usurp that of the family chiefs. Outside of the potlatch realm, chiefs had relatively few special privileges. Still, these few were of some importance economically. In portage, before the coming of the horse, the family chief made but one trip with a load, while the others made three or four, or as many as necessary. Disputes between individuals of different sadekus over prop- erty and over women were settled, if necessary, by force, the sadeku usually supporting its own. member. There are no case