161 flat is apparently an upstream continuation of the bench, the part between having been eroded away and the old pay-streak largely destroyed by the effects of glaciation. A curious fact, and one that has often been commented on by the local miners, is that the tributaries of Lightning creek on the south side were rich in gold, whereas those on the north side contained little or no gold. It has also frequently been noted that in the district as a whole the streams flowing north, northeast, and northwest contain much more gold than those flowing in the opposite directions. There are, of course, excep- tions. Keithley creek, a rich gold-bearing stream, flows southeast and there are streams that flow north in the gold belt, yet carry little or no gold. The placer gold on the creeks was derived by weathering and erosion of the vein gold deposits in the bedrock and where these are abundant the creeks in the vicinity are or were rich in gold, so that it may be largely accidental that the northward flowing streams are the richest. Neverthe- less the rule holds good in so many cases that there is probably some good reason why this is so. One theory has been suggested to the writer by Harry Jones, who has lived on Lightning creek since 1863, except for a few years absence, and is one of the ablest of the mining men in the district. He suggests that the gold was partly derived from the gold-bearing veins in the bedrock by erosion by glaciers; that the valley glaciers were much better developed on the northerly than on the southerly slopes—being less exposed to the sun—and, therefore, accomplished more erosion; and that the gold was concentrated in the northward-trending valleys and was later buried by slides from the valley sides and by lake deposits in the slide-dammed valleys. There are certain objections, however, to this theory, which has been pretty widely accepted by the prospectors. The conception of huge rock and mud slides from the mountain sides is one that has persisted since the early days. There are numerous slides in the district, especially on some of the steep-sided creeks, such as lower Lightning creek, but they are not nearly so common as is generally supposed, and the valley filling in many places consists of morainic materials, as below Stanley, deposited at the end of a glacier in the valley bottom and of boulder clay deposited beneath the ice or from the ice when it melted. The strati- fied glacial silt (slum) was deposited in water bodies which may have been dammed by ice tongues or moraines in the valley bottom and possibly in places (as Jones suggests) by slides, and the glacial gravels forming a con- siderable part of the valley filling were deposited from streams flowing from the ice. There is no evidence that the moraines and extensive sheets of boulder clay in some of the valley bottoms were formed from slides. The gold in the bottom of the channel must have been deposited before the valley was filled with the glacial drift, except perhaps such parts as may have been deposited along with the glacial gravels, and where these extend down to bedrock, may have become concentrated by working down through the gravels. It is trite that the northward- flowing valley glaciers were the most active ones, but near the heads of the creeks, for example in the upper parts of Williams, Antler, and Jack of Clubs, where erosion by valley glaciers was much greater than lower down on the streams, there is no gold. Evidence of this greater erosion is supplied by the cirques and broad, flat-bottomed i i