ring in Section cove, with a thickness of about 1,700 feet, so the
Maude formation is at least that thick in that locality. Over
twice the thickness observed by Dawson is exposed on King
creek, a section along which is shown in Figure 5. At least 3,800

ae een nn Tener) Smee enn

43
|
)

Li aos / :
= 2 need
Tene eee ea Sober
=o ee = LE SS ee ,
o ° D i E
—a a 8 EEE Li = as
Tat SP ALC eee Sones © se SS :
i 7S . ° z a ee
eos — ae re -F,0%

byes} waar

One-third s/ze

Geological Survey, Canada

Figure 3. Sketch of a faulted band of laminated argillites in the Maude
formation on King creek. Hit

feet of the Maude formation is visible there, with no sign of the |
basement on which the formation rests, nor any evidence of |
basal beds. If, as is probable, the basal beds are represented ;

:
.
{
|
:
:
:
t
: