MOLE ULAR H RA BIND! G PROT RIZ TIO OF TH ODI R I T RA TIO WITH KRA 0 ION D T RMIN NT0 NE MRNA by eba tian J. Ma k d en ki . c. TH 111 r it f rthem r1 ti h lumbia, 20 12 I BMITT D IN PARTIAL F LFILLM THE REQ IREM TS FOR TH D RE I E M TEROF IN BI HEMI TRY UNIVERSITY OF N RTHERN BRIT! H July 20 15 © eba tian J. Mack den ki, 2015 T OLUMBIA F Abstract Th - P) pla ding r gi n d t nninant binding pr t in ( r gulating gen pr RD - P binding t R c nt mutat dan or m cane r r, and tran lati nal repr traffi n thr ugh In a r le in m - apr nc gen frequently d in an er, leading t up -regul ati n. mRN interacti n ther [! r ent an v 1 therapeuti i the aim of thi th lectr ph retic m bilit and immun precipitati n experiment pre ent d h r u mg -mutan t pp rtunity t RD- P ariant -dri en cancer and h w D ur K-hom 1 gy dom ain are required to bind a 57-nucleotide minimum binding eq u nee in the coding region ofKRA RNA· the e mutati n d not c mpromi e pr teinD lding a e idenced by circul ar di chr i m spectro copy. DNA-ba ed anti- en e oligonu cleotid inhibitor were devel ped ba ed on the 'minimun1 binding vitro. Finally a quence that ucce sfull y abroga te the RD-BP-KRA mRNA intera ction in RD-BP KHl toKH4 construct purified usin g a nove l "o n-co lumn "-re[i !ding scheme suggests a pos ible role for RRM-domains a negati ve regulators of RNA-binding. II Table of Content b tra t. ..................................................................................................................................· · · · ·· · 1 nt nt .................................................................................................................. ........ .11 i t f abl Li t f igur v ·································································································································· ······························································································································VII kn w l dg rn nt ....................................................................................................................... X ·····································································································································XI hapter 1 - Introduction pre n rn cancer. .................................... ........................................ I 1.1 lmp rian e f g n 1.2 P 1. 3 RN -bindin 0 pr tein and mR t tran 1 ripti nal g n r gu lati n and m RN tu rn tability .................................................... 2 er ..................................................................... .. . 1.4 bri cf hi t ry f 1.5 RD -BP in earl y de elopment and carc in gene i ...... ................................ ....................... 6 1.6 VICKZ protein famil y tructure and function ....... .......... .... .............. .. ............................... . 1. 7 neogeni c KRA RD -BP ................................... ......... ............... ....................................... 5 gene ex pre ion and RD-BP .. ......................................... ........... ....... 12 1. 8 Targeting KRA in KRA -driven cancer ........... ....... .. ... ..... ........... .. ............................... 14 1.9 R e earch goal ......... ..... ............ ... ... .... .. ......... .. ....... ........ .......... ......................................... 19 Chapter 2 -In vitro characterization of KRA mRNA bindin g to CRD-BP and development of antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor . 2.1 M eth dology - Mapping f 2.1.1 2. 1.2 2.1. 3 2 .1.4 2.1.5 2 . 1.6 RD-BP binding ite n KRA mRN ............................ 2 1 Tran formati n of BL2 1(D ) cell with p T 28 b- RD -BP p ia mid .................. 2 1 Indu cti nand rowth o f p T 28 b- RD-BP .c li ell ....................................... 22 Purification & quantifi ca tion f r c mbinant RD -BP pro tein ..... ........... ............ 22 ub-region cDN templ ate .................................. 24 en ration f KRA mRN enerati n of [32P] -labe ll d KRA RN M A mapping of R -BP binding ite ub trate by 1 ............................... -6 n KR .......................... ·····- 7 mR Ill 2.2 M th d 1 gy - Anti n lig nucl tid inhibit r ........................................................ 28 li gonu 1 tid ............. ...... 28 2.2.1 M mp titi n a a ith p cifi anti- n 2. 11 ............................................................................................. ......... 0 R ult and m ub-r gi n by I T. .................................................. 0 ynth 2. .1 RD-B affinity mapping f 2. .2 M lig nucl tid inhibit r ............................. .45 pm nt f p ific anti n 2. D 2 . .4 KRA RNAn1inimum binding qu n anal i ................................................. 53 C hapter 3 - A e in g th e rol e of in vitro a nd in c IJ RD-BP KH doma in in olved in KRA mRN binding 3.1 M th d 1 gy- RD-BP KH d main requirement D r binding KRA mR A in vitro ... 57 3.1.1 Purification f RD-BP KH d main ariant ....................................................... 57 ub trate by IVT .......................................... 58 3 .1.2 nerati n f [ 2P]-labelled RN e perim nt with RD-BP KH d main variant ....................................... 88 3.1.3 EM 3.2 Methodology - CRD-BP KH domain requirements for KRA mRNA binding in cells .. 59 3.2.1 Preparation f :Unmune precipitated RNA from HeLa cell .................................. 59 3.2.2 cD A ynthesi fr m IP-RNA ............................................................................. 60 3.2.3 KRA mRNA RT-qPCR ..................................................... ............ ..................... 60 3.3 Results and Discu ion ....................................................................................................................... 62 3.3.1 CRD-BP ingle KH domain va1iant EMSA binding a ay ................................. 62 3.3.2 CRD-BP double KH domain mutant EMSA binding assays .. .............................. 66 3.3.3 KH domain requirements for KRAS mRNA binding in HeLa cells ..................... 69 C hapter 4 -Assessin g th e structural impa ct on GXXG muta tion s in KH d omains on CRDBP, conformation al cha n ge up on RNA binding, a nd KH1to4 crysta llization 4.1 Methodology- Multiple structural analyses of the CRD-BP protein-RNA interaction .... 75 4.1.1 Production of CRD-BP KH variants .. .. .. .. .............................................................. 75 4.1.2 Circular dichToism spectra .... .. ... .... ....... .. .... ........................................................... 76 4.1.3 CRD-BP secondary structure e timation ............................................................... 77 4.1.4 CD monitoring f CRD-BP confonnation upon RNA titration ............................ 77 4.1.5 Generation of 18S RNA ........................................................................................ 79 4.1.6 Thennal stability of RD-BP -RNA complexe .................................................... 79 4.1.7 Denaturing purification ofCRD-BP KH1to4 ........................................................ 0 4.1.8 Native purification ofCRD-BP KHlto4 ............................................................... 1 4.1.9 Denaturing on-column refolding purification of RD-BP KH l to4 ...................... 2 IV 4.1.1 0 Fluor c nee larizati n anal .i f KH 1t 4 binding .............................. .. ........ 4 ntru tin fp T-41 c( )- RD- PK lt 4plamid .............. ... .. ..... ..... .. .. .... .. 5 4.1.11 4.2 R ult and Di cu i n ..... ... ............................................ ....... .... .... ............. ..... .... .. ........... 91 4 .2.1 ir ular dichr i m anal i [ - P K mut nt ariant ..... ...... ........ .... ... .. .. .91 4 .2.2 ircular dichr i m m nit ring of binding in itr ....... ... ...... ... .... 94 Th tmal tabilit f R - P-RN mpl ........... ............................... 104 4 .2. 4 .2.4 RD-BP K.Hl t 4 pr t in cry tal. ........................................................................ 10 Chapter 5- General Di cu ion 5. 1 Pr j ct gen ral 5.2 R f KRA Mapping f the RD-BP bindin g it on th e c din g reg i n and 3' mRN u ing th le troph retic m bili ty hift a ay ............... .......................... ... ....... .. 116 5.3 T ting the pecifi c anti- en e lig nucl eotid e inhibit r again t the RD-BP-KRA rnRNA interaction in itro u ing EM ..... ....... .... ..... ... ..... .... ........ ........ ......... .......... .. ... ! 19 5.4 Examining 5.5 IP-qRT PCR analy i ofCRD-BP KH domain requirements for KRAS 1nRNA binding in HeLa cell ... .... ...... ...... .. .............. .. ........ .......... .... .... .. ............... ............. ... ... .. .. 123 5.6 Structural analysis of CRD -BP KH variant containing point mutation in the GXXG motif at the KH domain ........... ... .. .. .. ... ... ... ........ ..... .. ......... ....... .... ....................... 124 5.7 Monitoring ligand-induced conformational change in full-l ength CRD-BP and the KH 1to4 truncation variant. ............ ........... .... ....... .... .. .. ... .... ....... ...... ................................ 126 5.8 RRM1 -RRM2 didomain as a negative regulator of RNA-binding ... ....... ..... ................... l 29 5.9 Assessing CRD-BP-RNA complex stability u ing then11al shift analysi ....................... 129 5.10 CRD-BP KH 1t 4 protein cry tal.. .... ..... ..... ......... ..... ..... .. .. .... ... .. ..................................... 1 1 5.11 Summary & concluding remarks .. .... .. .. ....... ........ .. .... .. .. ..... ...... ....................................... l3 3 rvi w ....................... ...................................... ............ ..... ............... .. ... 11 5 RD-BP KH domain requirement for binding KRA mRNA in vitro .. .... . 12 1 v List of Tables r t inmutati n tudi Tabl 1.1: Tabl 2.1: mJ 1t1 n f buff! r u d in d naturing purificati n f r c mbinant RD -BP pr tein fr m tran £1 1m d Tabl 2.2: omp Tabl 2.3: R - ) -F £1 r in itr tran r u .c li c ll ............................... 22 rag f purifi d r t in ................................................................................ 2 P R prim r u ed fl r th gen rati n f K t mplate Tabl 2.4: -21 ( iti n f buf.G r u ed fl r r £1 !ding nd r c mbinant ..................................... 12 mRN ub-r gi n c N ription ................................................................. 24 d £1 r th e g n rati n f K m ub-r gi n c A - ( 1-4) £1 r in itr tran cripti n ... .............................................. 25 Table 2.5: P R primer u ed .G r the gen rati n f KRA m template KRA - ub-r gi n c NA 4(a-f) fl r in v itro tran cription ..... ......................................... 25 Table 2 .6 : IVT reagents used for KRA mRNA ub-regi n RN Table 2 .7 : EM A reagent u ed for KRA -CRD-BP affinity mapping and synthe i ........ ................. 26 screening of anti en e oligonucleotide inhibitor ..... ............. ................... ............. 27 Table 2.8: DNA sequence (5' to 3 ')of candidate inhibition anti sen se oligo nucleotides used in EMSA inhibition assays ........... .......... ................. ................... 28 Table 2.9: Concentration of antisense oligo nucleotides (AON ) used in EM A inhibition as ays .......... .. .............. ..... .. .. .. ... .... ...... ........ ...... ... .................................. 29 Table 3.1: Smrunary of generated CRD-BP KH domain variant ................ .......................... 5 Table 3 .2: KRAS RT-qPCR amplification primers and TaqMan probe ................................. 6 1 Table 3.3: Reagents used for KRAS qPCR reaction .. ... ..... ................................................... 62 Table 4 .1: Mea urement parameter for CD sp ctra of RD-BP KH variants ...................... 76 Table 4.2 : Buffers u ed in native purification of RD-BP KHlto4 ....................................... 2 VI Tabl 4. : Buf~ r Tabl 4.4 : P R r ag nt u Tabl 4.5: Re tricti n di ge t r ag nt ~ r K.H 1to4 Tabl 4.6: Reagent u d fl r KH 1t 4 pi a mid li gati n ........................... ........ ....... 90 Tabl 4.7: Reag nt ~ r c Table 4 . Pr t in c nd ary tructure Table 5.1: u d in d natming n- I KZ mRN lumn r fl !ding pr t in purifi d t g n rate KH 1t 4-p T -41 (- ti n .. ................ 4 ) pla mid ub -cl ning ............................................. 9 lon P R ere ning ............................... .. ....................... .............. 91 targ t iz timati n fl r RD - P vari ant ... ........... ............... 94 ........................................................ .......... ........... ..... 11 8 VII List of Figures Figur 2.1 : Pla mid map f p T 2 b + - Figur 2.2 : raphical r ( th.r ugh - P ................................................................... 2 1 ntir c ding .G r K ub -r gi n lab !led qu nee nd partial ' ub-r gi n TR .............. 0 thr ugh F .................................. 0 Figur 2. : I T Figur 2.4: M a ing din g qu cnce RN u -regi n t for RD-BP binding ......................................................................... ......................... 3 1 Figur 2.5: M a ing KR RR ub -regi n t for RD- P binding .................................................................................................................. 32 Figur 2.6: Kd plot for KRA mRN Figure 2.7: EM Figure 2.8: aturation binding curve for Figure 2.9: Graphical repre entation of KRAS -A(l through 4) RNAs ................................... 36 Figure 2.10: KRAS ub-region eDNA template for in vitro tran cription ...... ........... ......... ..... 36 Figure 2.11: EMSA assessing KRAS -A 3' truncated sub-regions A 13 A 12 and A 1 for CRD-BP binding ......................... .. ......................................................................... 37 Figure 2.12: EMSA assessing KRAS -A 5" truncated sub-regions A24, A34 and A4 for CRD-BP binding ................................................. .. .............. .... ......... ...................... 3 8 Figure 2.13 : EMSA assessing RNAs KRAS-Al2 and KRAS-A34 for CRD-BP binding ......... 39 Figure 2.14: Saturation binding curve for CRD-BP vs KRA - 34 RNA ............................... .40 Figure 2.15 : EMSA asse sing KRA -A3 RNA for CRD-BP binding ...................................... .40 Figure 2.16: Graphical representation ofKRA -A34(a-f) RNAs ............................................. .42 Figure 2.17 : EM A assessing the KRAS -A3 4(d, e and f) RNA , for t mpl at aturation binding ub-region , D and F ............................................. 34 p riment between RD-BP and KRA -A .............. 34 RD -BP vs KRA -A InRNA ................................. 35 RD-BP binding .......... .43 VI II - P binding ........................... .44 Figur 2.1 M igure 2.1 M Figure 2.20: Bar graph f anti n e lig nu 1 tid m 1 ule M( 1- inhibit ry effect n c mpl n ............................................................ 4 7 RD- P- Figur 2.21 : M a mg f anti hara t rizing 4(a band II r n e li g nu 1 tid - M(l - ) inhibit r ................. .46 compl inhibiti n by ...............................................................................................................48 Figur 2.22 : A c mpl x inhibiti n by charact rizing - P-K - M7 .............................................................................................................. 49 Figur 2.23: Inhibiti n pl t of M6 ( ) and M7 (B) again t RD-BP-KRA RN mple fl nnation ........................................................................................ 50 Figure 2.24: omputer imulated RN folding of KRA -A RN with KRA -A3 4(b) and N inhibitor M6 and M7 target region indicated ........................................ 52 Figure 2.25: Local DN alignment ofKRAS-A34 and putative binding equence for IMP-1 and ZBPl CRD-BP orthologs ..................... ....... ............. ........................... 56 Figure 3.1: EMSA a se ing CRD-BP KH variant with single point mutation for binding to sub-region KRAS-A RNA; (A) KH l and KH2 variants, (B) KH3 and KH4 variants ....... ............................. ..... ................. .. ... ...... ...... .... ............................. ....... 64 EMSA assessing CRD-BP KH variants with single point mutation for binding to KRAS-A and c-myc RNAs ; (A) KHl variant, (B) KH2 variant, (C) KH3 variant, (D) KH4 variant. ........ .. ... ........................................................... 67 Figure 3.2: Figure 3.3: EMSA assessing the CRD-BP KH variant with two point mutation for binding to sub-region K.RAS-A RNA; (A) KH1-2 , K.Hl-3 (B) KHl -4, KH2-3 (C) KH2-4 a11d KH3-4 ............ ... .... ..... .... .... .... ....................................................... 68 igure 3.4: Box plot pf the RT -qPCR cycle threshold values from immune-precipitated KRAS mRNA as ociated with CRD-BP KH variants ........................................... 70 Figure 3.5: Relative KRAS mRNA associated with KH domain variant from immuneprecipitation of RD-BP in He La cells a determined by RIP R T -qPCR ............. 7 1 IX Figur 4.1: Diagram f n- 1gur 4.2: p lmnn r £ lding KH 1t 4 pr t in purificati n che1n ............... . T pla mid multiple cl ning it 41 c(+) - n Figur 4. : p ctra f ild -typ Figure 4.4 : p ctra f R - P titr t d Figur 4.5: MRE at 222 run f Figur 4.6: Figure 4 .7 : Figure 4 . : Figure 4.9: - P and KH mutant ariant ................................. . ith ari u titrated D pe tra f KH It 4 titrated w ith RN ith R ub trat ....................... 99 ub trate ........................................... 101 MRE at 222 run f KHlt 4 titrated with RN pl t ub tra te ........................................ 96 ub trate .................... ............... 8 RD- P titrat d with - P ampl D-HT qu nee ............................... 6 ub trate ............................. .. .... 102 f KHl to4 ampl e titrat d with RN ub trat .. ..................... ] 03 Figure 4.10: TM of KH1to4 RD -BPproteinin compl exwithRNA ub trate ................... 105 Figure 4.11 : Plasmid pET41 c(+)-CRD-BP KH1to4 ... ........................................................... .. 108 Figure 4.12: Comparison of native and denatu1ing KHl to4 protein purification ................... ! 09 Figure 4.13 : CRD-BP KH1 to4 construct binding activity and protein cry tal.. ............. .......... 111 Figure 4.14: Thermal aggregation buffer optimization for CRD-BP KH1 to4 ......................... 11 4 X Acknowledgements I uld lik t thank fir t nd :fl r m pportunit t w rk in cane r r tim earch . r tm u ed in a i ntifi c nv1r nm ent. a i tanc and ften m ightful c n er ati n I a kn tark a w ell a eni t an R n b rg and Mark I would al like to Young :fl r pr tend m thank t r. .G r gi ing me th h lp d m gr w a an p ent in hi lab h a ad mic and all wed m t pa1ii ipat in m ea ningfu l r kill r quir d t h r. ' arch pr j ct w hil e dev J ping th r th much apprecia t d techni cal ndr a agg1 n ell , Ma1iha arne :fl r preparing the IP - :fl r thi pr j e t. r. r . Jan tephen R ader, rent Munay, and iding my recormnend at i n for admi i n int th e M . c . Bi ch emi try pr gram at UNB , without whom thi e c ll ent e pen ence w uld not have been p family and clo e fri nd - Bany, Lauri e, Kri Li a, Brahm, gratitude for their upport throu gh the rough tim lex and ibl . inall y my orbin, de erve m y utmo t , and company during the good . 1 Chapter 1 Introduction llular r p n regularl y e p th t d t d p nd h a il pr CI c ntr 1 of erting influenc borneo ta i t bl g1 al c nditi n that rga m m are ide an nth appr priat r gu lati n f g n m nth ari u bi ithin th cell i n . uch y tem f igna lling m I cule cap abl h m i al p athway in d cl tting t indu ti n f vari u protein 1 el c mpl pr d in cell acti vitie . rom und h aling the ability t el ctiv ly m dulate ritical [! r appr priate re p n e t timuli and optima] functioning. Fir t d fm d in th lat 1950 , the central d gm a of m olec ul ar bi logy state that D A i transcrib ed into an RN m nger m olecul e (mRNA) and ub equ entl y translated into a tring of amino acids w ith defined tructur known a protein. Much work ha focu ed on the fme details of tllis proce and tho e efforts have delivered an ever-growing body of know ledge regarding the preci e workings of how genetic sequences tored in D A tum into the full y functioning mol ecul ar m achine and building blocks that cell ar e largely m ade of. As astonishing as this proce s of protein production m ay be, it i not enough to imply have protein being made in the cell ; to avoid diseases like can cer, they must also be regulated . 1.1 Importance of gene expression in cancer Cancer is a particularly devastating disease among a host of other , and i there ult of gen etic instability fo stering the deregul ation of bioch emical pathway effecting cell gro wth, cell death (apoptosis), proliferation, repli cati ve inm1ortality, angio gen e i , and m etastasi (re iew ed in Hanahan and W einberg, 2011) . enetic mutation affecting tran c1iption or altering th functioning of important nzyme in terms of reaction rat can lead to change in pathw ay activity. When thes altered pathw ays affect ell cycl event , notab le abnon11aliti e can ari e 2 that impa t th h alth and of 1nelan ma 2010 . a ignalling m 1 cui ntain mutati n in th ind u ti n f the many gen 11-b ing fan afflict d indi idual. F r P-Kina in luding bn nnal iated with hyp - pr ic di receptor ignalling in ol path . hi lead t hi h in tum au nhan a cular end th lial gr rd r nd n din th un-g ern d bl n tituti d tran ripti n and pr n f a 1 and amu 1 , )gn 1 th fact r ( ignalling, and p tentiat d imat ly 40% -Raf r ulting in chang f th gem 1nple appr ftn height n d c 11 el fo1mati n r quir d by aggre 1ve olid tum ur (Ferrara 2010 . Th can nical epithelial -me nchymal tran iti n ( MT) i a key tep in the initiation f carcin ma meta ta i and can re ult from the ct pic inducti n and chronic o ere pr n f e era! tran cription fac t r in luding Zeb 1/2 and wi t a reviewed by Yang and Weinberg (2008 . Gen expre ion i influenced by many cellular proc ses and between tran ctiption and the final protein product po t-transcriptional regulation mechani m provides a major source of gene control. 1.2 Post transcriptional ge ne regulation and mRNA stability Control of cell activities, stability and even the complex tring of events that guide embryo development i dependent on mRNA encoded information the trength of th ese signal affected by steady-state mRNA levels- the balance between tnRNA production and destru ction (Brewer 2003) . Initial transcription rates, RNA plicing, RNA transp011, and mRNA degradation all play major roles in determining steady-state mRNA levels and in pm1icular the modulation of the mo lecu le's longev ity, or half-life , within the cell is proving to be increasingly important (reviewed in Filipowicz eta!., 2008). Evidence for the importance of tabilizing/destabilizing effects on steady state mRNA level com from global eDNA array experiment comparing stress-induced transcription rate and steady- tate mRNA level f many gene , a well a kin tic 3 tudi a £1 und t de a . tabiliz ti n f m fmR man g n gr up und r an u tr r du min d mamm ali an g n e pr mR half-li£1 ng act r af£1 ting mR it in th ha b n a rapid! mg pr ), it ha b c m tight! regulating mRN 2) . riti ca ll y, it ha b n are n t a in the ll are di e . With th di I ar that p ef a /. 1 , and ur und r tanding f th ry f interil r nee by ire t-tran cripti nall e el regul atJ n 1 a c r mea n A tability. i -element are intrin ic i t thr ugh ut th I ngth fa tran cript, £1 und in th e c ding regi n , 5' and the 3' TR, that ar a 5). 11. In gen ral a dynamic c mbinati n f ci -element and tran acting fa ct r pr du e the ari ati n in m qu nee that ll ( an ' fa/ . 2 th g ne e pre i n f tabilit can dramati all alt r g n n mall chang and Mel! ( 19 hang nhan cia ted ith mR (in tability, with th e latt r being the m c mmon region of de tabilizing i -element in the form f R, t -ri ch equ ence element , r ARE ( haw et a/. 19 6) . i -el ment can ex i t ingly or together with ther regulatory element on a ingle tran cript and collecti vely provid e rapid , adaptive re p n to a number of different cell signal ( hen et a!. 199 ). Ci -element often act in concert with tran -acting factors to achi eve their effect, a group con i ting of prot in and non-coding nucleic ac id , uch as tibonuclea e , RNA-binding protein (RPB ) and mi croRNA capable of recognizing the mature RNA tran cript and modulating it phy iological urvivability (Neugarbauer et al. 2002). 1.3 RNA bindin g protein s and mRNA turnover Mechani m of gene regulati n are multipl e, and the pecific interplay b tween r gu lating factors increa e in complexity in eukaryotic cell (Hayne 1999). ntrol of gene expre ion by mRNA regulati n begin irmnedi at ly foil wing tran cription in the nucl u , and ' n e p 11 f 4 int the yt pla m a het r g n u nu l ar rib nucl f prot in call d RN -binding pr t in ( r unp rtant la 50 kDa ann t fr 1 diffu regulat p rt are r qu ired pore compl (D nig t a/. 2 and m dulat d nRNP) patii 1 r qmr r 200 ). 00) . pr an prot in larger than th nu lear m mbran , pecific nuclear and are of particular int r t b cau equen pr t in p rt ignal that P :D r rec gniti nand tran it tl11· ugh the nuclear pia an in trum ntaJ r 1 in R a an adapt r betw n mRN metab li m , regulat ry ion f th g ne . RBP ar a large f mily of pr t in and hundred e i t (mo tly un hara t riz d) within the human gen m . Together with all the REPbinding ite within the tran criptome, the e RPB form an imp rtant tier of gene regulation ba don equ nee el ti it and p cific affinity r gu latory cod "(Ke n 2007) . v ral type ofRN llecti ely t rmed the' po ttran criptional binding protein have been identified and each function in different way by identifying uniqu ci -elem nt , binding different mRNA regions and altering tran lation rate or tabilizing/de tabilizing the mRNA transcript. P27Kipl for example is a regulator of cyclin during G l phase, and its activity is down-regulated by the association of its 5'UTR mRNA with AU-rich binding protein , HuR and HuD . Such physical interaction restricts ribosome access to the tran cript and therein reduce tran lation (Yeh eta!., 2008). BRF-1 is another RNA binding protein which functions not by regulating tran lation, instead achieving its effect by destabilizing AU-rich mRNA target tran cripts (interleukin-3 , interleukin-6 and TNF-alpha) through deadenylation (Raineri eta/., 2004) . RBP canaL o erve to stabilize mRNAs and increase relative gene expression, a phenomenon that when kept incheck serves to appropriately regulate various cell events. Enoneous over-expres ion of RBPs however can bolster multipl e downstremn mRNA targets simultaneously, leading to global cell 5 m 1 ular pr fil hift impli at d in th d dy fun ti n, and n anc r ( in t a/., 200 1.4 A brief hi tory of t 1min nt prot in that wa fir t hara t riz d aft r imately 70 equ nc 9 %identity VglRBP a that f c-myc mRN protein fmnil (al 4· b d a t aI., 2 0 1 1) . RD-BP ding R gi n tability appr an t a I., 2 -cr inding Pr t in ( R - P) i an RN -binding linking e p eriment re 1 cti el bind and tabiliz B ern t in eta!. 1 92) . al d an P of th c ding r gi n d t nninant R - P i a m mber f th "VI KZ" kn wn a zipc de-binding pr tein ), a m all g r up f hi ghly con erved (77 - it and tandmi, 2002) orth I g u RBP with imilar functi n that include RA (X nopu la e1•i ), IMP-1, 2, (Homo apien ) and ZBP 1 ( Gallu H om o api n ) RDBP (Mus musculus ), K allu dom e ti u ) (revi ewed in Yi raeli 2005) . There is however no e tablished tandard for the naming, and th de ignati n are ft n used interchangeably depending on the laboratory. For example, Patel t a!., (20 11) refer to ZBP 1 a IMP1 , with IGF2BP1 (another name for CRD-BP) li ted in bracket . Member ofthi family have been identified as important po t-transcriptional mRNA regulators with roles in mRNA stability, as well as translational control and mRNA localization involved in lamellipodia formation and bleb extensions in motile cell types (Bern tein et al. 1992 ; Condeeli and Singer, 2005 ; Poincloix eta!., 2011) . VICKZ proteins are therefore each multifunctional and ha ve been further implicated in early developmental stages where they are involved in critical events uch as oogenesis, synaptogenesis, cell motility, and embryo polarization (Boylan et a!., 2008). Of particular intere tis CRD-BP ' ability regulate gene e pres ion by affecting the half- li fe of mRNA targets which influences protein level . Demon trating the potency of CRD-BP ' s effect on steady-state n1RNA levels, an experiment utilizing tran genic mi ce over-e pre m g 6 RD-BP r p rt d a dramatic l 0-:fl ld incr a 2, h prot in. i1nilarly B n1 t in pr t in ' in I 11-fr ffe t n target mR le I and path a ntributi n t di a i n t yet fu ll pictur and it and in ol em nt in rtain path a tabli h d targ t f th 1 v 1 wer d that -m yc mRN RD-BP in a mRN , an II n d ca a a . h re are num r u ign I ling, th tabiliz d by at amp! f thi it fi t int an verall d. are b ginning t r al th imp rtance f P. 1.5 CRD-BP in ea rl development a nd carcin o en e i RD-BP i n rm all y und r tri t pati t mp ral c ntr 1 with tage pre i n p aking between th n mbry rue day 12.5 in mice. In th day leading up to birth, zygote and arl mbr CRD-BP becom und tectabl or 1 pre d at ry 1 w le el in all r d nt ti ue (Han en et al. 2004). in1ilarly, adult human ti ue h w li ttl IM P- 1 xpre ion comp ared to the robu t level found in variou embryo tage (Leed et al. 1997 · iel en et al. 1999; L et a!. 20 12) . Ilnportantly, CRD-BP expre ion in rats does not re-em erge during liver ti ue regeneration (partial hepatectomy) agreeing with the standing theory that CRD -BP i norm all y limited to developmental stage only and not ju t ti ue grow th/regeneration (Leed eta!. 1997) . Also consi stent with the notion that CRD-BP i an important player in the earliest life stage in mammals, CRD-BP-defi cient mice generated by gene trap insertion show severe abnormalitie such as dwarfism, improper gut fonnation and higher perinatal mortality rates (Hansen eta!. , 2004). On the other hand, over-expression ofCRD-BP in a mouse mod el all owed for nonnal development, but produced populations with a high incidence of mamm ary adenocarcinomas (95 % occurrence compared to no tumours in the non-transgenic mice) demonstrating a potent proto-oncogene feature of CRD-BP (Tes i r et a!. 2004). 7 with f anc r. Ind v ra l typ 1 at d RD- P IMP- I in 1 t r liD f R -e pr pre 1 n f 1 a!. 200 f n n- mall ). In imilar tudi en more in riminatin g iti trongl a iated % f human pri1nar br a t car in rn a , with - 1 %a h r th half f n ur R -BP g n i 1 cat d pith li al (brain tum ur , nearl y a third lllung ar in rna , 7 % f m ali gn nt m cancer w r fl und t te t p ur and i al d a r ult of g ne duplicati ninth 17q2 1 band r gi n (I annidi an a1nining r a t anc r pati ent tum ur r d, a tud -BP in tag fl r RD - P I annidi en h yma l tum ur and 69% f varian t a/. 200 1, 200 id n e r gardin g thi pr tin · mv that found 81 % (1 7 out f 2 1) f t t d c 1 rectal tumour w r p ; K bel I a/. 2007). m nt in n opla ia i a tud y itive fl r ignificant RD-BP expre ion, whil e normal colon ti ue and infl ammatory b w 1 di ea ed ti ue howed no detectable level (Ro et al. 200 1). Rea on fo r thi re- xpre i n are mo tl y unkn wn howev r recent tudy of CRD-BP in m elanom a cell cultured und er hypox ic conditi n that mimi c the tumour micro environment ha hown CRD -BP modulati on by th e HIF J a (hypox ia indu ced factor 1 alpha) tran cription factor through acetylation of the CRD -BP gene. MT cell proliferation assays in the same paper also uncovered a strong link between CRD -BP and the melanoma cell' s pro liferative capacity, as sh-RNA ( h011 hairpin RNA) directed against RD- BP was ab le to abrogate the cancer 's growth (Crai g et al. 20 12) . Interestin g ly, HIF I a indu ction is al o seen in other cancers where CRD-BP appears to pla y a role, such as breast and colorectal tumours (Kieth et al. 201 2). Hypoxia-independent induction ha also been observed by Noubissi et al. (2006) , where the researchers demonstrated that CRD-BP can be indu ced by en hanced ~­ catenin/Tcf signalling, a common feature in many colorectal cancer (Morin eta/. 1997). The clinical value of RD-BP is evid ent in prognostic stati stics, and in general, human CRDBP expression level correlate with the dia gnosed grad of m alignancy for evera l cancer 8 Yani and Yi ra li 2 2 . r du d r CUIT n -fr and ingl ariat and multi riat anan can tr ngl r pati nt ith dditi nall n !at it ha b n [! und that rall u i al rat m it i un lear anan cancer. far b ed n [! r heth r a tu I pr gn ti (K b 1 t a/. 2 07) . In ith r e r h requirin g larg r mple iz h re t r va l nt, p iti e te ting c n elated R - n1 m nd ffcr a m lecul ar fact r 111 pr gn erall aggr (Dimitriadi 1 a/. 2 7 . Whil th r , it i lear that R -BP i g nerall an imp rtant ingr di ent D r carcin g ne 1 me can er it preci e ontributi n and m d how preci el it intera ith lth ugh facti n app ear t b c mple , kn wledge fit target and ith th progno tic and e en th rapeutic m rc ignifi cant than in ill all w cienti t t take aim at RD- P in a n e. nD rtunately th re i much gr und yet t tread in thi realm, but h w thi RBP d e it j b i pr gr ming t li ght. 1.6 VICKZ protein famil y tructure and function I KZ protein have been h wn t bind multipl e target including the mRNA fi r c-myc, IGF-II, beta-actin, Hl9, tau and other (reviewed in Yi raeli 2005). How th ey accompli h thi through the multiple RNA-binding domain present in the e protein . RD-BP and other VI KZ family member are composed of six RNA-binding domain ; 4 K-homology domain (KHl -4) with a ~a.a~~a. topology, and 2 RNA recognition motif (RRM 1-2) with a 0 a.~ ~ a.~ topology that make up the majority of th e protein' tructure . Hi gh eq uence con ervation f the VI KZ family RNA-binding domain , as well a the linker region between KH l -KH 2 and KH -KH4, ugge t that the domain may function together a did main (KH 12 and KH34) (Git and Standart, 2002). lnd ed, tudie f the ZBP 1 hom log how that linker region amino acid ar critical [i r proper protein function . In thi e periment, a trun a ted KH 4 ZBP 1 con tru twa 9 ynthe iz d and the link r armn a id j ining Z P 1 KH and KH4 p udo-d mam w r replac d with th e fr m th adjac nt KHl - KH2 link r r gi n. a id wa chang d, maintaining th ralll ngth f th link r. id ntitie al n produc d a mark d nega ti d tennin d thr ugh M af[i ct n th nl the id ntity [ th amm hang in the amin a id b rved Kd D r zip d binding a , indi ating th imp rtant r le the e link r r gi n play in RN binding ( hao t a!. 2010 . h i 1 gical ignificance a d termin d thr ugh ell-ba ed experimentati n wh r a FP-fu d ZBP 1 linker mutant full length pr t in c ntaining th linker mutation) ed in mou e embryonic fibr bla t t a a pr am any functional impact. When analyzed by confocal micr copy the linker mutant n 1 nger r tained th e wild-type ubcellular localization and wa found t with th in-b tween amin acid erving a more than ju t a hinge ( hao eta /. 201 0) . Part of RD-BP' function i to bind and localize mR within the cell. How it accompli she thi task and the question of which, if any, individual domains are primarily re ponsible for binding has been an wered with varying results by tudying CRD-BP and its clo ely related orthologs. Granular RNP formation as ists in localizing vmiou mRNA tran cripts within the cell, and systematic deletion of the individual domains of IMP 1 revealed nuclear export signals (NES) in KH2 and KH4 domains (Nielsen et al. 2004) . To addre s the question of domain redundancy in target-binding, Nielsen et al. (2002) de igned an experiment using GFP-tagged deletion constructs of IMP 1 that had the RRM and KH domains systematically removed, and subsequently analyzed for presence of IMP ! -containing RNP granule fonnation, sub-cellular localization and mRNA binding capacity. It was found that in terms of cytoplasmic trafficking, loss of both RRM domains had little impact on subcytopla mic localization, with all four KH domain proving nece ary and uffi cient for nonnal IMP-1 10 btain d with regard t RN -binding di tributi nand granular app aranc . imilar r ult to kn wn targ t Hl 1 tr ph r tic m bilit £ r f£ cti h r th mRN binding hift a a an u d l ti n d M n t a/. 2 02 . t bind it targ t b ta-a tin mR unabl t bind Z er a ayed u ing r all £ und t b r quired 1 - th £ unding memb r fthe p riment nly r quir KH -4 d mam ith the th r ~ ur d main (RRMl-2 and Kl 1-2 con truct) ith an appreciable Kd ( ha Jf a/. 20 10) . identical b ha i ur in am - ub trat binding a a demon trat that d main 1-4 n er el I KZ pr tein fami1 , wa £ und through imilar n truct I KZ prot in (including target ba i (VI KZ protein truncati n tudi e pit high imilarity and therwi e , the different d main r quirem nt RD-BP) may interact differently nan individual ummarized in Table 1.1). Further in ight into the tructural detail of VI KZ family pr tein and h w they bind RNA wa addre ed by mean of X-ray cry tallography. tudying ZBPl in complex with beta- actin mRNA, it was found that binding of RNA wa mediated by interaction with a minimum 29 nt RNA fragment in 2 spots with both the KH3 and KH4 domain arranged in an anti-parallel fashion such that the RNA binding urface ran in oppo ite directions (revealed by a IMP-1 KH3-KH4 crystal structure). This didomain configuration was found to induce a unique 180° looping of the RNA strand with two non-sequential, spaced RNA sequences bound. It i thought that this is likely the in vivo confonnation and mechanism of binding for VICKZ proteins because the interaction of the KH domains is stabilized by sequestering a large surface area and several hydrophobic residues present in all VICKZ homologs (Chao eta/. 201 0). Adding another level of complexity, surface plasmon resonance and NMR experiments have demonstrated that the KH3-4 didomain contains a dimerization motif. Weak protein-protein interaction between the separate KH-3-4 didomains was observed and this interaction is stabilized by the pre ence of 1 RN 1 ading t alt n1ati c mp iti n ( it ibiliti tan dart 2002 · analy i and ad an ed at mic D rc mi r m I KZ RNP t a!. 2000) . In fur1h r upp rt f thi n ti n, kin ti p fl 1 ugg t p int ra ti n in thi m d 1 characterized by a highl tran i nt int rm diat iti c p rati ity with n t a/. 20 4; J n multipl IMP- 1 m 1 ul e binding t a ingl mR 2007). Pr t in-RN and granul ur ith th fir t binding f 1 w tabili ty, [! 11 w d by a n t a!. ent c nd IMP 1 binding. Prot in-pr t in int ra ti n ia a KH -4 dimeriza ti n m ti f th n furth er tabilize the RNP comple , l nding target mRN aero pl anati n t the hyp r- tabl e th c 11 P granul e re n ibl e D r tran p rting i 1 n eta /. 2004 ). Littl info rmation r garding the actual tran port of the e protecti e RNP c mpl e e i t . H wever, immun - taining and con[! cal microscopy r v aled that IMP-I doe co-localize with mi cr tubul e and f-ac tin , u gge ting cytoskel eton a ociation with TP -dependent movem ent ( iel en eta!. 2002). Despite the numer us studi e di playing tight a ociation with whittl ed-down target mRNA regions, and even X -ray stru ctural model no con en us binding equence fo r VI KZ proteins as a family or individually, has been identified with only case- p ecific gen eralizations having been made that do not fully account for observed binding. For example, CRD-BP interaction with c-myc mRNA has b een shown to predominantly occur in the region corresponding to nucleotid es 1763 to 177 7 (5 '-AGCCACAGCAUACAU-3 '), but it i un known which nucleotides comprise the actual binding motif (Coulis et al. 1999). Even between experiments using identical proteins in similar conditions, different conclusions have been drawn. Jonsen et al. (2007) , conclud ed that ZBPl has a high affinit y for guano ine-1ich and cytosine-poor RNA regions, and putati ve ly identifi ed a 5' -CCYHH U, H = A or -3' bin d in g motif (Y=C or or U) . U sing a different experimental approach, other re earchers later c n luded 12 that th ZBP l c n n u bindin g m tif tran ript (Hafn r t a/., 2010 . n nn hm nt f '- a I KZ pr t in R tran cript are till1arg 1 t ntati ,h afl r m nti n d " R rna ay -binding r quir m nt ~ r mRN r Pat 1 r al. (2011 , d m n trat d a tri t binding r quir m nt fl r ju t th Z P 1 KH 4 did mam, qu nc , and th KH d m 111 re - ' r peal in th targ t ith the KH4 d main r c gnizin g a 5 '- . . gmz mg equ n e, in line with th -1 ping" m d I (Pat I eta /. 2 11 · ha ct a/. 2010 . Tb e di cr pancie m thing ab ut th m th d u ed, r it ma b that the di f~ r nt id entifi d equ ence tern fr m diffl r nt KH d main pr fl r n . It ma al be that the multi-RN -binding- domain pr tein ar targ ting a c rnm n thre -dimen iona1 tru ture a opp ed t ju t a linear equence. Ta bl e 1.1. ummary of mention ed VI CKZ protein mutation stu di e Type of S tudy Conclusion R ef. Cell-based, GFP-tagged In vitro EMSA NES pre ent in KH2 & KH4 Increa ed zipcode RNA binding Kd . Reduced granulation and cytopla rnic sublocalization KH domains 1-4 all required for effective binding ofH- egment (173 nt fragment) H 19 RNA KH 3-4 didomain impm1ant in binding beta-actin mRNA (54 nt binding region) Niel en et al. 2004 Chao et al. 2010 CRD-BP Ortholog IMPl Type of Mutation Deletion construct ZBPl KH3-4 linker ZBPl KH3 -4 linker Cell-based, GFP-tagged IMPl Deletion construct In vitro, EMSA Cell-based, GFP-tagged ZBPl Deletion construct In Vitro, EMSA Chao et al. 2010 Nielsen et a/. 2002 Chao et al. 2010 13 ne 1.7 Onco enic KRA pre ion and r gulati n f riti al path ar f an t th r.Mn f an eta/. 2 nn e J 5 . nd ar f p c ifi c kah a hi ' I a/. R path way mm n t c ch th e 1 a n titu ent ignalling pr t in all d th Kir t n rat arc rn a iral nc gene h m 1 g (K Abn rmaliti 1 al. 200 ). ignall ing m le ul ar implica t d in 0% f pancrea ti ca ncer , 60% in thi color ctal anc r ( R ), and 50% . Ma cau h w up -rcgul ati n including th Wn b ta- at nin . PI 1995 ; R dri gu z I a/. 19 ntr cl taL pan rea ti , nd m tri al, r that ll- 11 har t nc g 111 p th a fth mpl TPa d in c 11 ignalling and m nt m trun n path a RD -BP ). flun g ca ncer ergham c n1n1 n mutati ninth glyc in e- 12 p redu c TPa e ac ti it , effec ti preventing hydrol y i f th e ac ti ating "' 7 / a! . 19 7; B f ' I a/. 1987; iti n t a parti e ac id tr ngly I ekin g th e m lec ul e in th e" n" tate by TP m ol cule nee it ha bound , and i co n id ered an impotiant biological fa ctor in man y can cer (G e rge et a! . 1993; Pylayeva- upta el a ! . 20 11 ). Thi in effect bypas e externally regulated ign alling and prov id e th e nece ary biochemi cal env ironment to induce th e cancer phenotyp e and i in fa ct the ing le mo t con1m on acti ating mutation in human cancer ( ha w el a /. 2011 ). R A interferen e experim ent ha e fu rth r hown that chan ge in KRA expre ion can independ ently regul ate the down tr am effector of all the aforementioned pathway V F, and apoptoti c fa ctor F X therapi e (Miura l a/. 2005) . u ch a the mitoti c fa ctor eye linD 1, tran lation enhancing 6K, m akin g Kra a lucrativ target for future antineop la ti 14 r gulat d KRA a ti ity in man an r h e tud f th wild-typ D rm. Inde d a c mpr h pati nt found that high rat and unfa pre ild-typ K urabl tr atm nt utc m 1 n r an al an fr m r 1 i n 111 nd m trial carcin rna ith rrelat r than did an mutant ariati n . 1 ated nand KRA g n amplifi ati n p ci I C lly c ne lat d ith an aggre 1 e 11 a in r a d fr m prim ary t m ta tatic le i n ( irkeland t a/. 20 12). for wild-typ K ch l11 KRA gen amplificati n c IT lat and panitumumab in me R ith anti- db r le alt 1ia t a/. 20 13) wh dem n trated FR antib dy th rapy re i tance with cetuximab pati nt . KRA inducti n i ind pendentl y abl e t indu ce a cancer phenotyp in rat pancrea , and kn ckd wn ha demon trated th at m any pancreatic cancer cell line ar dep nd nt n KRA o er-e pre ion Tuve n et a l. 2004; Zhang e/ a l. 2006) IMP1 has been found to be a maj or pl ayer in th e regulati n of KRA level by binding directl y to the mRNA transcript (Mongroo et al. 2011 ). directly interacts with KRA mRN V -cro slinking ha demonstrated that IMP -1 in th e codin g re gion ( D ) and the 3' TR and th at down- regulation of IMP 1 directl y results in the reduced mRN A level and protein level of Kras in RC cell lines (Mongroo et al. 2011 ). Positive regulation ofKRAS expre ion by IMP l!CRD-BP therefore presents a novel opportunity to target KRAS in cancer that co-express CRD-BP . 1.8 Targetin g KRAS in KRAS -driven cancers KRAS driven malignancies are very cmnmon, effecting up to a third of all cancers but most prominent in leukemias, colorectal, pancreatic and lung cancers and as such, a diverse range of anti-KRAS therapeutic strategies have been pursed. There i still no prescti babl e go-to drug for targeting KRAS in cancer, with many experim ental treatments falling short du e to systemic toxicity or poor inhibition, which ha limited the degree to which KRA cancer can be treated 15 (Bain ral pr m1mga tal.20ll).H thu far. The pr t in· hall thi ar a t m lecul in apabl pr t in gr ith mall m 1 ul ha pr nan ill-fat d trat gy and lack f binding p ck t ha e limit d th ub tantiall m dul ating K binding intera ti n (Maur r t a!. 2 12; u ce lll acti ity du e t 1 w-affinity un r a!. 20 1 ; hima et a!. 20 13 ). H wever, tal. (201 ) mad a r c nt KRA targeting br akthr ugh inhibit r arch that ha fr rec ntl . pr du ed h p ful candidat Directly targ ting th nu h n trem p riment utilizing thi 1-based h w d tr ng pr t in binding character. The e inhibit r f01m a di ulphide b nd with nth KRA pr t in, and are abl t c ax KRA tabilizing the int it inactive D 1m by DP-bound c n£ rmati n. Furthermore, th t p candidate m lecule di play an inherent preference for cell ex pre ing the 12D mutant ver ion f KRA commonly found in many cancer and achieve ome pecific anti-proliferati n activity. How ever despite the promising binding data, it is empha ized that the e thiol-based inhibitors are un uitable as cancer drugs in the current form , a Ras ignalling wa only marginally reduced . Development of thi s class of inhibitors remains an active area of re earch pursing chemical "warhead ''more capable of inhibiting KRAS signalling. Famesyl-transferase inhibitors (FTl's) have been thoroughly explored in the laboratory and in the clininc (reviewed in Appels et al. 2005). This class of KRAS inhibitor di rupts a po ttranslational farnesylation modification of the KRAS protein, whereby non11ally a large 15carbon hydrophobic tail is added to allow effective membrane as ociation. A KRAS achieves it signalling function through interactions with other proteins near the cell membrane, failure to attach a lipid anchor results in a significant inhibition of KRAS signalling. In practice, FTis such as Lonafarnib and Tipifamib only proved effective against the le common H-RA and N-RA 16 me1nb r f the RA alt tnati 1y p tran :D ra nlik th mp n at r r dund an nzym u I pr a it turn pr t in th r t-tran lati nail m difi d b geran 1 tran f ra again t KRA dri imu1tan up rfamil . ut c n b n inhibiti n f fa1n larg 1 limiting th TI ucce r . Targ ting th th f n 1 and g ran 1 tran fera e nzym d 1 th 1 t n n-can r u and c c r u cell alike, a many pr tein n an ary £ r ba ic cell fun ti n ar ub trat f th yJ e am enz me . Pre enting KRA fr m fun ti ning at the cell m mbrane r main d an enduring therapeutic trat gy ith th intr du ti n f P pho phodi e t ra inhibit r . i th d Ita ubunit of c MP and i a KRA binding partner that preferentiall y interact with fame ylated KRAS and aid in th tran lo ation of KRA to the membrane ( handra eta/. 20 12). m all molecul dev loped to inhibit thi critica l tep, b pec ifi ca ll interruptin g P ciati on with the famesylated tail of KRA but till allow ing the actual fane ylation tep to occur culminated in the introduction and pre-clinical trial of Deltarasin. Do e-dep end ent delocalization of famesylated KRAS using deltrarasin was recently demonstrated in human pancreatic cancer cell line and in a mouse model of pancreatic du ctal adenocarcinoma where tumour growth wa noticeably reduced, providing promi ing evidence that thi strategy is a valid method to target KRAS . However, the dru g's lack of specificity produces hi gh ystemic toxicity and future work still needs to be done before pushing tllis proto-drug to human trials (Zimmerman eta!. 2013 ). Salirasib (S-trans,trans-fatnesylthiosalicylic acid) is another small mol ecule that has been shown to interfere with proper membrane as ociation of KRA . Salirasib however do e not directly target any protein or enzym e important in the po t-translational modification or intracellular transport of KRAS , instead binding th hydrophobic famesyl tail directly, reducing the overall hydrophobicity of the tail and impairing it effectivene to interact with the cell 17 m mbran (W i z tal. 1 99) . R cent pre-clinical and lini al d 11-t 1 rat d in pati nt furth r h wn that them 1 cul i ad n car in rna (PD ) and nhan e th ffecti n 1 pm nt n alira ib ha ith m eta t ti pan reati du tal gemcitabin in c mbination ( ah ru t al. 2012 . imilar pr bl m limit th ef.[i cti uni er ally aH ct all RA i D rm Inhibit r d ign d t bl kK chang KRA and ha been th p f nly enting th ac ti ati n f KRA by inhibiting the F , required t induce TP -binding and DP D r ific targ t of Patgiri et a/. (20 11 ) wh have produ ced a mall molecule, a ynthetic a-helix that mimic the binding m tif of the with the KRA -Ra -GEF f alira ib as it fr m reaching. r int racting with th membrane ar chan g fact r: R a - turn KRA "o n '. Th ne ith n cane r cell p cifi ci ty. trategy, but an th r pr mi ing a enu e i pr RA guanin nucle tid h moth rapy wh n u d protein, that competes protein-protein interaction blocking the exchange of GDP for GTP and hindering KRAS activation through receptor tyrosine kinase stimulation. Whil e thi work has been limited thus far to cell line only, it is undoubtedly a promising avenue of research. Attacking KRAS at a genetic level by altering the rate of transcription is a more recent approach pioneered by Cogoi et al. (20 13 ). Within the promoter region of the KRAS gene, it was detennined that stretches of the DNA fonn G4-quandruplex structures which are recognized by a myc-associated zinc finger transcription factor (MAZ). MAZ protein binding promotes KRA transcription, and by using a synthetic DNA oligonucleotide G4-quadrupl ex rnin1ic that acts as a MAZ decoy, KRAS expression could be effectively reduced in human pancreatic cell lines (Pane-l) and reduce KRAS-driven tumour growth in mice by 64%. The pancreati c cancer cell were shown to display increa ed apopto i upon admini tration of the MAZ-decoy and validate 18 th con £ cu Z- p cifi pt of t bili n in rea ing ph achie e the f£ c mp tit r m 1 ul fth rn 1 cul t pr umabl du t degr dati n fth It i cl ar that h 4 quadrupl 1 urr nt t pi , and pit lit rall d e rd mpl ity in targeting thi fr TPa functi nally di tinct memb r ear h, -b a r quired to larg d d rn 1 cul . trategic th rap utic t. rg t in th war n cane r r rnam an lu i target in th linic. ignalling m lecule ari e fr rn the true turall y imilar, but f th Ra famil target th oth r relat d pr t in unint nti nally. have only rec ntly ho n m d rat a . urt.h r w rk in t.hi ar a will u c hereb targeting K u uall y inadv rtently ppr ache wh r by KRA i dire tly targeted , u ing a thi 1-ba ed binding cheme, but the e till are limit d in ability t actuall kn ckd wn KRA acti ity. FTI h wed gr at early promi e by preventing a critical po t-tran lati nallipid modification nece ary for KRA m mbrane a ociation, but the co-acti ity ofb th fame yl- and geranyl-tran fera e inhibitors pr ved toxic to cell . Similar toxicity plagues the alira ib approach, where ob truction of the hydrophobic tail of KRAS by a masking molecule delocalize the protein. Interfering with the proper transport of fame ylated KRA protein to the inner cell membrane u in g a PDE8 inhibitor has hown some promise in mou e model but again ystemic toxicity and poor dru g tolerance ha limited the effectiveness of this molecule and requires further optimization till . Inhibiting the activation of KRAS showed moderate success. Ras-GEF SOS is required to induce KRAS to bind GTP, a necessary step in KRA signa lling, and with the u e of ynthetic a.-helix mimic de igned to mimic the KRAS binding site, KRAS docking with the guanine nucleotide exchange factor could be inhibited and overall activity reduced. Perhaps the single mo t promi ing work, including cell and mouse-model data wa the G4-quadiuplex MAZ-decoy approach, a it wa able to specifically target KRAS at the genetic level, and not the other RAS i oforms, but ha not yet 19 d t human clinical trial . pr gr mpl targ t KRA n 1 ad ne itating th n d £ r fut1h r r a w 11 a new no il n£ rtunat 1 d pite the di r bull t ha b en pr r atTa f trat gi n alth ugh th r ar ome I r m1 m g n f f arch int th 1 appr a h 1. 9 R e ea rch Goal RD-BP ha a prrm r le in th initiati nand pr gr pat1icular int re t i th recent di c ry that ral ancer . R - P bind th KRA mRN tran cript, 11-e tabli hed nc g n pre alent inc lor ctal, pancreatic and lung can r . Targ ting KRA -dri n can er ha proven e tremely difficult and de pite thorough in e tigati n of a wid variety f anti-KRA target d therapy. Importantly, trategie there remain till n effective RD-BP i an one fetal pr tein , and i nonnally only expr ed during early zygotic and embryonic tage of development. Adult ti ue nonnall y ha virtuall y no detectable levels of CRD-BP ; however robust re-expression occur in man y cancer cell s and therein lies a novel therapeutic oppm1unity that targets the core of some cancers and also i inherently specific. Abrogating the KRAS mRNA interaction with CRD-BP therefore may be an effective means of attacking some KRAS-driven cancers, and is the focus of thi re earch. The first major research aim was to confirm that CRD-BP bind s KRAS mRNA in the coding region and 3'UTR using the EMSA assay and to further thi s work by mapping CRD-BP binding sites on the KRAS mRNA transcript using pmified recombinant CRD-BP protein and IVT generated KRAS sub-regions. Determination of a minimum binding sequence wa the end goal for these experiment c ntributing elements toward a fmal CRD-BP consen u and serv ing as a focus for further study of the mol ecular nature ofth equence RD-BP-KRA mRNA interaction. The second major goal was the development of binding inhibitor , pearheaded u ing 20 D -ba d lig nu 1 tid c ntigu u tr t h that c m 1 m ntaril bind thr ugh Wat dru g m t u 11 a a -dri and m u a minimum binding equ n d main r quir ment goal of ~ rK inding. or ibl e u e a pr t - n cancer . h third maj r g al wa abr ga ting R - P interacti n ar an ultimat ledge f th unique KH d main r quirement II r each ary pr perti e mRNA targ t hed light nt properti p nal anal i t ga in in ight int th KH and I KZ pr t in re earch kn which ub- et fKH d main n and ha r c gniti n pairing t m nt uld all fa minimum binding f th ir ability t bl ck K n- ri k ba mall m I cul e inhibit r mu t have - db bl eked. The final bj ecti e wa t elu cidate tructural RD-BP . Pr t in cry tallizati n fl r u e in X-ray di ffracti n wa to be explored t re eal the preci me hani m f RD -BP I KZ protein RN -binding. dditi nall y, circul ar dich.roi m wa to be employed in order to a es the po ibility fa dynamic RD-BP pr tein that undergoes confonnational hift in econdary structure upon target- pecific mRNA-bindin g. Determining tructural change that occur upon binding target RNA would offer an additional means of creening potential RNA target molecule u ing CD spectroscopy. 21 Chapter 2 In vitro characterization of KRA mRN binding to CRDBP and development of anti en e oligonucleotide inhibitors. h [! ll mg h qu nc forK mR t r ver p rim nt arried ut t d t m1ine a minimum binding r quircd to bind 'R -BP. dditi nally. the devel pment of anti- int raction will b pre ent d and di cu ed. 2.1 M ethodolo gy - Mappin g of RD -BP bindin g ite on KR ' mR A 2.1.1 Tran formati on of BL2l (D 3) cell with p T 28b- RD -BP pi a mid. Pia mid containing wild-typ F':Jll-l ngth mou R -BP v.a pre iou I acquired fr m the RD-BP coding equ n cut with Nc I and Xhol wa r. J. Ro ss lab . ubcl ned int p T28b( +) (No agen). -flank d by an T p ro m o tt>r 68 amino tem1inu FLAG epitope and a - terminu 6x Hi -tag. The pla mid contain a kanamycin resistance gene and expression is driven by a T7 promoter as depicted in Figure 2.1. Approxi1natel y 100 1 7 tt>rminator 2D·B 111 of competent BL21 (D 3) cells were thawed from -80°C storage on ice for one half hour before adding 10 ng of Figure 2.1. Plas m id map of pET28b(+)-CRD-BP p -< T28b-CRD-BP plasmid DNA. ells were ubsequently placed on ice for an additional 25 minute followed by 90 seconds at 42° . el l were immediately upplemented with 00 ~LI of 22 L.B. br th (In itr g n) and in ubat d at 7° ntaining 25 ug/ml kanam cin ulfat ( i h r (In itr g n) plat w r th n all d t in ubat rnight D r appr ci ntifi ) antibi ti . Plat imat 1 1 h ur , i lding col nie f tran D nnant harb uring th 2.1.2 Induction and rowth of pET28b - RD-BP Tran D tmant c 1 nie ntaining th inoculat 100 ml f R - P e t r wer u edt . . br th (In itr g n) c ntaining 25 ug/ml kanamycin ulfate ( i her cientific in a 250 ml ew Brun wick .c li c II rl enm r f1a k. ientific, m d 1 Inn 11 u p n i n wa plac d n an incubator- haker a 40) et at 200 rpm, 1 inch tr ke, at 3 7° for 3 h ur before being tran £ n d to a 1L e111bach fla k containing 900 ml of L. . broth with 25 IJ. g/ml kanamycin. Culture wa gr wn until cell .D .60 o equal ed 0.5 at which point th e cell were _induced with 1mM I opropyl-~-D-1-thiogala c t pyrano id e (IPT Bio Ba ic lnc.) and in cubated under the same conditions for another 6 hour . Centrifugation of 1L culture at 4 °C, 2, 100 xg, for 15 minute (sub-divided into 4 volume of 250 ml) produced 4 cell pell ets which were tored at 80 °C . 2.1.3 Purifica tion & qu antification of recombinant CRD-BP protein R ecombinant CRD-BP purification was achieved using the following buffers and schem e as outlined in table 2.1 below . Table 2.1. Composition of buffers used in denaturin g purification of recombi nant CRD-BP . f rom t ran sf orm e d BL -2 1(DE3) E .co r1 ce ll s. pro t em Tris-Cl pH Urea Buffer NaH2P04 lOmM 8 lOOmM 8M B 6.5 lOmM c 100mM 8M 6.3 10mM lOOmM 8M D 5.9 lOmM 100mM E 8M lOmM 4 .5 100mM 8M F 23 ) 11 pellet u p nd dint 12 ml f 1 buf~ r whil b ing agitat d u ing a a .c li clear db 21 ( d n1 g~ r ntrifu gati nat 2 1 buf~ r ell in 1 r n m dium up 111atant wa th n yring filter d 0. fi r 15 min u t i ntifi Pr tting ( minut and incubating th £ r 1 h ur. R in-1 at m1 ti a id 1- ml f bu f~ r B, £ 11 buf~ rD . a lut d b pa ing 12 ml of bu ffer l2mlofbufferF,colle ting 0.5ml frac ti n T d by 5 ml f bu ffe r f pr tein ad agar iag n) a applied t a m1m-c lumn (Qiag n) and wa hed u ing RD-BP pr t in y at w J.ll11 ) nd pr par d [! r batch-binding by mi ing in l nick 1-nitril tri n1 u t ). at 4 ° , pr du cing a p 11 t f c 11 debri . 1nl f pre- quilibrat d (bufD r lurr re in u bated .G r 1 h ur n 1 !uti n. and finally 5 ml f r th e c lumn £ 11 wed by naturedprotein ampl e were immediat ly tored at - 0 ° . Purifi ed recombinant mou e RD-BP ampl e were re- natured using 3,5 00 MW mm1 dialysis units (Thermo cientific) in a multi- tep bu ffer exchange. D en atured pr tein samples containing 8M urea were dialyzed again t a 500 -fold volume of refolding buffer for 24 hours. Following the protein refoldin g stage, ampl e wa then di alyzed again t a 500 -fo ld volum e of fmal buffer (buffer recipe below in table 2 .2) for 2 hours follow ed by another dialysis against a 2,500-fold volume of final buffer to compl etely remove all traces of urea. Finall y concentration of protein was determined using a BCA Protein A ssay Kit (Thermo Scientific). ' f ld'mg an d st orage of pun'fi1e d recom b mant CRD -BP protem. T a bl e 2.. 2 B u ffers use dfor reo Refolding buffer Storage (final) buffer 200 mM NaCl 200 n1MNaCl 20 mM Tris-Cl 20 mM Tris-Cl 2 M urea 10% glycerol 10% glycerol 0.01 % triton-X 0.01 % triton-X pH 7.4 1 mM Glutathione - reduced 0.1 mM Glutathione - oxidized pH 7.4 24 2.1.4 ub-r neration of KRA mR K In rd r t a u -r g1 n ffinit [! r mR b ntigu u tr t h ign d t m lify th full hi ch inc lu parti I · untran lat d r gi n c ding equ n ign d t am lif Prim r pair r d pr m t r qu n e Ill t mplat , mall r fra gm nt R hain re c ti n P R u ing prim r fir t g nerat f cD t mplat ion cD [! r p ifi 5' nd ub qu nt u R ( n g ne, mR ub -rcgi n fall~ r in binding a a ). ard prim r t dri c 111 with 7 itr tr n cripti n (tabl e , 4 and 5) and P R reacti n carri d uta c rding t th e t mplat Templat 10 P R buf:D r d TP (2.5 mM) forward prim r revere pnm r Taq. Polymera e (5 ,000 Water /ml) 10 ng 3. 5 J..d .5 ~~ 100 ng 100 ng 0.5 ~~ t 35 ~I h nn cycler pr gram 94° 30 ec 30 cyc le 50° 30 ec 45 c 72° Table 2.3 . PCR primer used for the generation of KRAS mRNA ub-region cD templates A-F for in vitro transcription. KRA mRNA ub-regi n nucl tide po ition 111 bracket are relative to the KRAS A G tart codon. Region A(l-185) B(175-401) C(388-610) D(568-793) E(772-988) F(971-1155) Primer DNA se9.uence forward rever e forward reverse forward rever e forward rever e forward rever e :£1 rward 5'GGAT CTAATACGACT TT 3' 5' -TCATGAC TG T TGT G-3' -3' 5'-GGATCCTAATAC A TCA TATAGG G AGGTCATG GGA T TGT-3' 5' -G TAAGT TGAG GA-3' 5'-G A GATT 5' 5'-G 5'5 '- TT-3' T A TATAGGAT TT - ' T A T __..,, . T G 5'TA TT T TT -3' 25 Table 2.4. P R prim r u ed f r th n template KRA - (1-4) f r in vitr tran p iti n in br k t ar r lati t th m d n. ub - r gion cD ub-r gi n nu 1 tid A3-4 93-185) A4(139-185) A3(93-138) Table 2.5. P R primers u ed for the oeneration of KRA mRN template KRA -A34(a-.f) for in vitro tran cription . KRA mRN po ition in bracket are relati e to th KRA A tart cod n. ub-region cD ub-regi n nucl e tid e Re ion A3-4a (111-185) 3' A3-4b(l29-185) 3' A3-4c(l4 7 -185) A3-4d(93-167) A3-4e(93-149) A3-4f{93-131) rever e forward reverse forward reverse forward reverse forward reverse 3' 3' 26 2.1.5 Generation of eP)-labelled KRA R 2 In itr tran ripti n (IV ) f e 2 P] -lab 11 d mitur TP a u dt w r prepar d £ r a h ub trate b IVT ub-r gi n c t pl at in th pr ub trat . I int 111all lab 11 r acti n ub -r ion R nthe i . IVT reagent 5x tran cripti n buf£ r mount in 20 ul reaction volume 4 )ll 100mMDTT 20 U/ul RNa in 2 )ll 10 mMATP 1 )ll 1 )ll 10 mMCTP 1 )ll 10mMGTP 1 Ill 2. 5 )ll DEPC H 2 0 (3 2P]-UTP f t mpl at ace rding t tabl e 2 .. Table 2.6. IVT reagent u d for KRA mRN 100 J.1M UTP 15 U/ul T7 RNA polyrnera e nc 1 Jll To 20 Jll 2. 5 )ll IVT reactions were mixed and incubated at 3 7°C fo r 1 hour prior to a 10 min incubation with 10 )ll ofRNase-free DNase (l U/ )ll) at 37°C. IVT reactions were topped with a urea loading dye (9M urea, 0.01 % bromophenol Blue, 0.01 % xylene cyanol , 0.01 % phenol) and RNA transcripts gel purified using an 8% polyacrylamid e (29: 1 bi :acrylamide) denaturing gel (7M urea) ran at 25 rnA for 1 hour with 0.5x TBE buffer. Excised gel-slices w ere cru hed and RNA extracted in 400 )ll of H 2 0 at 70 °C for 5 minutes prior to further purifi cation by Perfo rma DTR gel-filtration cartrid ges (Edge Bio) . RNA wa then subj ected to phenol -chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation before being resuspended in 25 )ll ofDEPC H 2 0 . Purified [32 P]-labelled IVT produ cts were quantified u sing a liquid scintill ation counter (Hid ex) and stored at -20 ° . 27 2.1.6 M mappm of RD-BP bindin Binding r a tion r g1 n RN n KRA mRN h g n rat d e 2 ]-lab ll d 4 nM. M a c rding t tabl 2.7 and n u d £ r mapping high affini t RN it binding it ntain d 20 0 cpm pr b . T able 2.7 . EM A r eagent u ed for KRA - RD-BP affini mappin g and er e nin g of anti en e oli gonucl eotid e inhibitor . Final C oncentration Volume E MSA binding reaction reagent (1 ul) Binding buffer ( e b 1 r) 4 ~1 0.53 mg/ml 1 ~~ 10 mg/ml bak r' ea t tRN (Sigma Aldrich) 0.53 mg/ml 1 ~~ 10 mg/ml B A (New England Biolab ;) 1 ul 2 /~1 40 U/~1 rRNa in (Promega) X Ot 540nM CRD-BP 32 20,000 cpm/reaction [ P]-labelled RNA probe 2 ~1 to 19 ~~ H20 Bindin g buffer r eagents (per 1 ml) 1M tris-Cl pH 7.4 0.5 M EDTA (pH 8.0) 100mM DTT 50% glycerol 10% triton X-100 H20 50~~ 25 ~1 100 ~1 500 ~1 1 ~1 324 ~1 50InM 12. 5 mM 101nM 25% 0.01 % - RNA probes prior to reagent mixing were first heated to 55 ° for 5 minutes and allowed to cool to room temperature for 7 minutes in order to facilitate proper fo lding. Reagents were added separately in a 1.5 ml eppendorf tube and centrifu ged at 3000 g for 10 seconds to begin binding reaction; mixtures wer then incubated at 3 7 ° for 10 minute follow d by a 5 mi nute 28 in ubati n n 1 , an th r 1 minut at 7 ° nd a final 11 i ting f 2 1 11 .2% an 1 an 40% t tailing ri -H 1, .2°-o r m ph n 1 blue mM edb 1 ading l 5 ~1 h amp! add d t -r d n n-d naturing g 1 in 0. nt an % p [! r e p minute t p n 1 minut gel w r at 2 m . M d and i uali z d u ing a mplet d n ftwar er 1 11 4.0 Packard In trum nt 2.2 - Methodology 2.2.1 EM A Inc . nti en e oligonucleotide inhibitor ompetition a ay with pecific anti- en e oligonucleotide I3-adiolab lled KRA of mpan ptiqu a11t (nt 1-1 5) wa ynthe iz d u ing in vitro tran cripti n in th pre ence eP] - TP (m th d de cribed in ecti n 2.1.5 and u ed in M 2 with the parallel addition f competit r molecul Table 2.8. DNA sequences (5' to 3') of candidate inhibition antisense oligo nucleotide u ed in EMSA inhibition assays. AON DNA sequence SMl SM2 SM3 SM4 SMS 5'ACCACAAGTTTATATTCAGT AT3' . M A experim ental co nditi on wer identical t pre iou I y de cribed experiment and can be reviewed in ection 2. 1.6. Anti- en e oligonucleotid (A N ) of 23-24-m r were d igned to cov r the entir ty of the KRA - r g10n SM6 SM7 SMS Technologie Inc. (table 2.8). creening of th anti- n in a compl em ntary fa hion nd-to-end, and w re ynth ized by Integrat d D lig nucleotid , labelled - M(l 29 d d initial! u ing tw c nc ntrati n : 10-~ ld and 5 -~ ld r lativ t th thr ugh KRA - RN pr b c nc ntrati n. mpl r n abrogat the int raction b tw upper high r m 1 cular - n RN g I band. ight aut radi graph u ing the ntrati n f 1, th - P a indicat d and ibit r w r gauged by th ir ability t f th indi idual w uld b th EM D r apr b th l fan inding data wa analyz d by d n it m try f cl ne t rag Ph ph r- y t m and t quantify th d gr f compl e inhibiti nand quantitati candidate A ul ly a th ptiquant ffectiven ftware f . urther range from lX to 4000X molar-fold T abl e 2.9. oncentration of anti sen e oli go nucleotid e (A O ) u ed in M A inhibition a ays . M lar-fold c ncentration s are ba d n a calculated 1 l 8 pM KRA probe. concentration (equivalent to 11 pM - 4 72 nM, A ON molar- a characterizati n pur ued u ing a great r c ncentrati n see table 2.9). Additionally AO M-2 wa fold lX sx further characterized as a negative control for lOX 25X inhibition with concentration tested from 1X to sox 1OOOX molar-fold (118 pM to 11.8 nM) . lOOX 250X Densitometry analysis using Optiquant software was utilized to produce inhibition plots using Ka leidaGraph™ software. so ox 750X lOOOX 2000X 4000X Concentration (nM) 0.118 0.590 1.18 2.95 5.9 11.8 29 .5 59 88 .5 118 236 472 30 2.3 Re ult and Di cu ion 2.3 .1 ynthe i of KRA mRN n ration f KRA b m an r pr fP R a ucc ub -r egion by IVT ub-r gi n fu l wi th all 1 t mplat in in ' 'ifro tran cripti n [I r u fragm nt , 1 b 11 d thr ugh nt d graphi all in figur 2.2. • (97 1- 1155) 0 (56 - 93) A( l -185) 5- and are ,...--------.,....-------.,....-------...,..-------"""T .. .. .. ... ..... ..... .... ·,· ·. -3' 1200 900 F igure 2.2. G raphi cal r epresenta tion of KRA m RN ub-region la b ell ed KRA -(A thro ugh F) cove rin g th e entire codin g sequ nee a nd pa rti a l 3' UT R . ucleo tide p siti n m bracket ar r lati e to the KRA mR tart codon ( G) and th remainin g un tudi d 3' UTR region i repre ented by the double-peak dotted line . DNA bands were of the expected size 506 as determine d by ethidium bromide : 6 ~44 _9R UV visualization on a 1% agarose gel 220 154 anal ysis (figure 2.3} . Subsequent T7- Figure 2.3. IVT eD NA t empl ates for KRAS subregions A through F. DNA samples were run on a 1% agarose gel with invitrogen 1 Kb ladd er and visualized with ethidium bromide staining. driven in vitro transcription reactions produ ced eP]-i nterna lly labelled 2 ra d ioactive RNA probe s of the expected relative size with the gel extraction purification method typically yielding 30 111 of 0.5 2 million cpm/~-tl. RNA sub-regions were de igned to contain a small amount of sequence overlap with the neighboring fragments (approxin1ately 20 nucleotid e ) to avoid plitting a potential binding-sequ ence or di srupting a pecifi c RNA tructure such as a hairpin loop. While the full 31 rati nal il r thi in th fa t th t R - id ding r gi na ~ r~ th fth hundr d nu I tid al. 2 09 ; Pr kipcak ' I a/. 1 4· ' 11' -m r PL ha \) ith ~- tin I a/. 2 1 ' t i all ind nd -m m F u 1 ubi i 7/ I a/. 2 pr be (20, R w r titrat d with din g r gi n and parti al rin g th entir r v ithin th fir t ~ w d u ing el ctr ph r ti c . Radi a ti hift a a ( M ' I a/. 2 ffil RD-BP affinit il r m bilit ith r in th f RD-BP affini ty mappin 2.3.2 EM red. he nu I in I ngth , nl th fir t Ri a pr KRA 0 cpr r acti n) - P and th ir ability ed b th £ rmati n fa band wi th r duced mi grati n di tan e, to £ rm a c mpl e a D rm d by binding f indicati e of a hi gh r m 1 cul ar w ight c mpl RD -BP with the RNA fragment. Fir tl KRA c din g r gion fragm nt · '(nt 1- 1 5). · 8 ' ( I 75-40 I) and ' · (3 -6 l 0) were te ted (figure 2.4.) KRA revion B KR r gi n ( nt l- 185) KR.\ . region (nt 388-61 0) (n t 175-40 1) CRD-B P: (nl\ J) Bound [ R~ lJnhou nd RN 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 1-t 15 Figure 2.4. EM SA asse in g KRAS codin g equ ence RNA ub-region to for C RD-BP 2 bindin g. P] -labelled unbo und RNA (20,000 cpm/reacti n) with no prot in add d (lan L6 and 11) form a larg r m le ular weight compl up n titrati n with RD -B P, a indicat d b the bound RNA fra cti n (Ian 2-5, 7- 10, 12- 15). Binding r a ti on wer in uba t d il r a total of 20 minu te at 37° and 10 minute on ic b £ re ing re lved n an % polyacr ]amide gel. e 32 R lati a D und £i r ub -r gi n K -BP affinit tr ng b th ing abl t £i rm a high r- rd r band u gge ting th fl 1mati compl . Wh n - mparing Ian 1- (Ian t 1n -pr tein - K and K (1 an e 1 1-1 ) th tw f the c ding f the fir t l 5 nucle tid qu nc fl rm a m r di tin t c mpl at 540 nM f larger b und fra ti n f R and h 6-1 0) c n i tentl y h wed a weak affinity with the gradual RD -BP . In c ntra t, KRA -B (lan ut up to 540 nM concentrati n, and thu a c n ider d t be a relativ ly low affinity regi nand inve ti gated no furth r. RN ith an gligibl change in th unbound R fracti n app aranc of tw faint high r band fragm nt repr enting ub -r g io n of th partial KRA R 3' mRNA were n e t te ted for affinity in the arne manner. r eo ion E (nt 772-988) KR KR region D (nt 568-793) CRD-BP: ~ '\,: ::0 ,~ '\. ,..,~ ~ ,.,~ ~ ::0 'V 'o ,.:,~ reojon F KRA ~ (nt · 971-1155) '""~ ' ~ (n~'l) ~ '\,.\:) 'V ,..,':¥'>. '""'); Bound Rl\A .. nbound RNA 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 F igure 2.5. EMSA assessin g KRAS 3' UTR RNA sub-regions D to F for CRD-BP binding. 32 P] -labelled unbound RNA (20,000 cpn11reaction) with no protein added (lane 1,6 and 11) forms a larger mol ecular weight com plex upon titration with CRD-BP , a indicated by the bound RNA fraction (lanes 2-5, 7 - l 0, 12- 15). Binding reactions were incubat d for a total of 20 minute at 37° and 10 minute on ice b efore being resolved on an 8% p o lyacrylamide gel. [ 33 RN KRA - th di pla and chang in th unbound fracti n fRN c un d ith in rea ing Inter tingly th KRA -F r gi nand t a le er n - t nt th K ith a faint band D nnin g ju t ab high r rd r c mpl - P and a ignificant d th ability t bind ntrati n r gi n , D rm multiple th unb und R fra c ti n in tandem with a m re pr min nt band ab that fl r on] the how regi n (nt er the phen m n n d 7 1- 11 5 and 772- n rep rt d pr IMP-1, which ha a % pecw to H 19 mRN and app ar II mR ith n t appear t c binding m de ha e b i u 1 quenc id ntity t EMSA much like KRA -F and KRA -E (Niel ccur eparately; rail affinity fl r ith ari u targ t of - P. th KZ pr tein . RD -BP , and i capabl e f binding a a ingle ry imilar to th e 'zip ode" re g ion bind IMP-I in a , tw binding e ent M hift pattern f KRA - . The I qu ential dim riza ti n m d e a detennined by n et al. 2002· hao et al. 201 0) . Binding data for all six fragments was analyzed by den itometry of the autoradiog:raph u ing the yclone Storage Phosphor-System and Optiquant oftware and Kd plot generated by fitting to the Hill equation for quantitative comparison (figure 2.6). KRAS-C region was not included in the Kd calculation due to repeated inability to achieve greater than 70% bound fraction in the EM A . KRAS mRNA regions D (nts 568-793) and F (nts 971-1155) , representing the first 588 nucleotides of the 3' UTR, also revealed multiple binding sites for CRD-BP (figure 2.5, lanes 15, and 11-15 respectively) . 34 KRAS r eg 1on A 00 '0 c ::J KRAS reg1on D 100 '0 c 80 ::J '0 c 80 ::J .c .c ~ 60 a:: ~ 60 a:: ~ a:: 0 0 0 c :p u 40 c c t; 40 tl e 20 20 Kd=171 Kd =277 63 0± 771n 6 Cl =220 18 ± 21 45 nM 3 nM 0 ~~--~--L-~--~~ o ~~--~--~~--~~ 0 100 200 300 400 500 40 u. u. 20 0 0 ~ "'..... u. 80 0 0 .c KRAS reg1on F 100 200 600 '00 400 500 0 600 CRD-BP concentration (nM) 100 200 300 400 500 00 CRD-BP concentratiOn (nM) CRD-BP concentration (nM) ub-r 1 n D and F. ata p int ar a eraged fr m Figure 2.6 Kd plot for KRA mR p nm nt and fit t the Hill quati n D r Kd d terminati n two bioi gi al t f triplicat (Hill c effi i nt = 2) · IT r bar r pr ent tand ard d iati n . a th K mparing th calculat d Kd alue d ubl c nfirm d K ub-region p mRN ing the highe t affinity binding ite f th e amin d fragment the calculated (171.10 ± 17.71 nM) being lower than KRA - and alm t 1.6-fo ld 1 wer Kd value£ r KRA - than KRAS-D (220.1 ± 21.45 nM and 277 .63 ± 64 .13 nM, re pecti ve1y) . urther binding characterization of the KRA -A fragment wa done with additional RD-BP concentration to more accurately detennine the binding character and similarly a aturation binding curve plotted to determine the Kd and Hill Coefficient (figure 2.7 and 2.8, re pectively) . RD-BP: (oM) Bound R~ A Unbound ~t R. 2 3 4 5 6 • 7 8 9 JU 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Figure 2.7. EMSA saturation bindin g experiment between CRD-BP and KRAS-A (nts 1185). RNA (20,000 cpm) with no protein add ed (lane 1) fon11s a larger molecular weight compl ex upon titration with RD-BP, as indicat d by the bound RNA fraction (lane 2-17). 35 aturation bindin g curTe .K:& • l -185) YS BP 0 80 0 "0 c: :::1 0 .0 0 60 < 2 0 0::: c: 0 ~ 40 .... (o::l lL 10 CRD-BP concentration (nM} Figure 2.8. EM SA Saturation binding curve for CRD-BP vs KRAS-A (nts 1-185). Data wa derived in t1iplicate from aturation EM e periments where RD-BP wa inc ubated with 2 P]-labelled KRAS-A RNA(20 ,000 cpm) and fit to the Hill equation. e Further refmement of the KRAS binding equence was pursued in a imilar manner by producing 5' and 3' truncations of the high affinity KRAS-A region. Small eDNA templates covering arbitrarily assigned sub-regions ofKRAS-A (1 through 4) were succes fully generated using PCR (figure 2.1 0) . If upon retention or removal of one of the four approximately 50 nucleotide regions resulted in drastic changes in CRD -BP affinity, it could be deduced by combining data where the high affinity site(s) is located. IVT reactions canied out in the presence of radio-labelled UTP were used to synthesize RNA trands corresponding to the repre entative mRNA regions a depicted in figure 2.9. 36 KRAS-A4 ( 139- 185) ~1--~~~--~~0~~--~~~--~~0~~ 5'-------~------~--~~----~~------------~----------~ -3 I 50 100 150 200 ( .\ ' G) ~--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Figure 2.9. Graphical repre entati n of KRA - (1 through 4) R qu nee and nucle tid p ). iti n in brack t are relati ve t B A ,.,. ,.,.,,., .....,,.., .....' ' bp . ragm nt c ver th - , , .::...: \ ~ ~ ~ C...,' \ ...... ~~" . ~ "j! ~\"- . ~~~ . ~ ~ ~ ~' ....._.,~> .....~ .....~ , \ C...,' \ ....... .....• C...,' ~~ . ~ ~ . ~'\""· ,~ ~ ~ ~ 400 - 00 20 - bp 400300 - 200 - 100- 100- -- ........, ~ . . .. ... ""'~~'/11f Figure 2.10. KRAS sub-region eDNA templates for in vitro tran cription. ( ) 5' and "' truncation of KRAS region A and (B) 5' and 3' truncati on of KRA 1% agaro e gel vi ualized by V -ethidium bromide taining . regio n A34 r Synthe ized RNA fra gment were agam a e ed for relativ affinity u ing EM [ 32 P] -labelled RNA probe (20 ,000 cpm/ rea ction) titrat d w ith the bindin g a ay for the ' trun at d fra gment lane 1-5, -10 and 11 - 15 r pecti e ly. 1 , A 12 and I ed on a and RD-BP up to 540 nM . Re ult I an b e n in figure 2. 11 in f 37 K RA RO ~B P : ' ~ (n~l) 13oun d [ R .A Un bound R l 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 F igure 2.11. EMSA asses ing KRAS-A 3 trunca ted ub-r egion s A l 3, 12 and A I fo r RDBP bindin g. 2P]-labelled unbound RN 20,000 cpm/reacti n) with no pr tein add ed (lane 1 _6 and 11) form a larger molecular weight compl ex with RD -BP (lane 2-5, 7- 10, 12-15). Binding reaction were incubated for a total of 20 minute at 3 7° and 10 minute on ice before being re olved on an 8% polyacrylamide gel. e It is immediately apparent upon visual in pection of lane l to 5 (figure 2. 11 ) that only the KRAS -A l3 region corresponding, to nucleotide po itions 1-141 ofKRAS mRNA retained the ability to bind CRD-BP with measurabl e affi nity. From the systematic 3' truncation of KRA -A, it was detennined that KRAS-A1 2, one full half ofKRAS-A consistin g of 92 nucleotides, did not likely possess any binding information. Further EMSA binding experiments were carried out usin g 5' truncated fra gments of KRA -A to examine the po sibility of a binding equence present in the 3' end f KRAS -A (figure 2. 12). 38 RD-BP : ( n J) Bound [ R, A Unhound R!'i. 2 3 5 6 8 10 II 12 13 14 15 Figure 2.12. EM A as es in g KRA -A 5' trun cated ub -r egion 24, 34 a nd A4 for R D32 BP bindin g. [ P] -labell ed unb und RNA (20 000 cpn reaction) with n pr tein add ed (lan e 1_ 6 and 11 ) form a larger m lecular weight complex with RD -BP (lanes 2-5, 7- 10, 12- 15) . Binding reaction were incub ated fo r a total of 20 minute at 3 7° and 10 minute on ice before being resolved on an 8% polyacrylamid e gel. From th e EM A binding a ay with 5 · trun cati on of KRA - in fi gu re 2. 12 It can be seen that both KRAS -A24 and KRAS -A34 are both capable offmming a protein-RNA complex while KRAS -A4, th e ta ilin g 47 nucleotid e 3' end , shows no interacti on. A faint band in KRA A4 can be seen directl y above the unbound RNA, however it is pre ent in the ab enc of an y protein and its magnitude does not change with increasing CRD-BP concentration and i thus considered a non-binding region. To further confinn the binding di parity between KRA -Al2 and KRAS -A34, another experiment was completed pitting the tw o fragments side-by-side on the sam e gel and effectively doubling the protein concentration to achieve binding aturation for Kd detennination (figures 2. 13 and 2. 14). Direct compari son ofthe 2 regions how that KRA A34 bind to RD-BP more aggress iv ly than KRA -Al 2, de pite a ize diffl renee of only one 39 nu 1 tid h d that affinit imi lar t th fra ti n 540 nM nu I tid th 1 arl hil ragm nt tin zi 1 a/. 19 .K ugg ting that p rha fragm nt it it elf pr te ted fo r RD-BP affinity b th qu enc repr und dt b ap icl en '/ a/. r inding r gi n, qu nee a di pla ed binding. Hen , a mall ith an 1 m nt ar gr at r th an 100 th t c ntain d the bindin g ntaining regi n- nt h nt in th i raeli et a/. 1 a r gr n prob (20 ,000 cpr r a ti n) - 24 ( 1 f ti pr tein binding R ~-a , ' ith th 4, it an b - 2 and K 11 f th ith n arl nu in that m t 200 ; Pr kip ak R fl nnati n, th 1 rg r mp l h 4 r gi n nd that th gniz d l m nt in th ifi binding. R turning t affinity i n t u t n n- with lit ratur ifi r ing that th r i a nting r gion K nJ y eP]- Ia ell d RN 2 wa ynth e ized and II 12 am meth d (fi gur 2.15). KRA RD-BP: (n\1) Bound [ R~A nbound [ ·~ ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Figure 2.13. EM A assessing RNA KRA -Al2 and KRAS-A34 for CRD -BP bindi ng. (~P ]­ labelled unbound KRA -Al 2 and KRA -A3 4 (20,000 cpm/ reacti on) with no protein add d (la ne 1 and 7, re pectively) fmm a larger molecular w ight mpl upon titrati on with RD-BP fo r the KRA -A3 4 RNA fragm nt but onl y to a limited e tent with KRA - 12 up t 1200 nM, a - 12) . indicated by th b und RNA fraction (KRA - 12: lane 2-6; KRA - 4: Ian 40 KRAS region A34 00 "0 c: :J 0 .0 80 ~ 60 0:: c: 0 +=i u rn 40 L. u. 20 fd = 37 78 ± 25 408 n 00 CRD-BP concentration (nM) Figure 2. 14. aturation bindin g curve fo r RD-BP vs KRA - 34 R A (nt 93-185). Data wa produced from aturation M xperiment ho n in figure 13 where RD-BP was 32 incubated with [ P]-labelled KRA - 34 and KRA - 12 RNA(20 000 cpm) and fit to the Hill equation. KRA (nts 1-185) RD-BP: ~ (n:\rl) Bound[ R~ Unbound R!\A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 F igure 2.15. EMSA assessin g KRAS-A3 RNA for CRD-BP bindi ng. [32 P]-labelled unbound RNA (20,000 cpm/reaction) with no protein added (lane 1 and 4) fom1 a larger molecular weight complex upon titration with RD-BP only for the control KRA - RNA fragment but not with A3 , as indicated by the bound RNA fraction (lane 2) . 41 KRA - did n t h 972 nM. Thi un p n with any ignifi ant inding n requir m nt f nearby ted r ult rna ha qu nee r gi n ( p cifi RD- P concentrati n u t r n n- p cific) ut id e regi n RNA :D lding :D r r c gniti n b that ar in trum ntal in pr p er uld b that inding f K thr ugh a bipartit m d , wher b multipl binding ite e i t al ng th full binding. In thi may c nari , a ingl i t in th flanking regi n K ite ma fall trand t fa ilitat whil an ther ite( ) - 2 and KRA - 4 uch that nl y a c mbinati n f tw binding e ent ar r quir d :D r tabl binding. and RlP- hip ithin r gi n K achi v id n :G r thi p rim nt id nti fyi ng on erved 5 · and 3 · quen cenari c me fr m L X in man amplified R A target of I KZ prot in , ugg ting multipl e binding ite are i1np rtant :D r any given RNA target. Howe er among the coh rt of amplified RNA target , ome equ ence were pre ent that did not share any obviou equenc imilarity with the other identified (Farina et al. 2003 ; Patel et al. 20 12). Further mapping of the CRD-BP binding sequence identified in KRA -A34 wa canied out in one more set of 5 · and 3' truncation s of KRA -A34 acco rding to the graphic below (figure 2.16). While the previous systematic truncation of KRAS-A into four rou ghly equally ized segments (regions 1 through 4 ), this series of truncations aimed instead to simply have off terminal nucleotides from both the 5' and 3' end of KRAS-A34, to fmd the smallest fragment that can still produce a complex as detennined by EMSA. 42 Figure 2.1 6. Graphi ca l representation of KRAS-A34(a-f) RN . Fragment repre ent ubdivi ions of the KRA -A34 r gion covering nu cleotid e 93-185 f the codin g equ nee. ucleotide po ition in bracket are relati e t the KRA mRNA tart c d n (A G) . To further nanow down a minimum CRD-BP binding equ ence, an additional et f RNA fragments representing ub-division of the parent KRAS-A34 positive binding region were synthesized. The ability of the 3' truncated fragments to bind CRD-BP was a sessed by EMSA and the results for RNAs labelled KRAS-A34( d, e or f) can be seen in figure 2.17. Analyzing the results of the 3' truncated fragments of bindin g region KRA -A34 showed virtually no binding. As with the previously discussed fraginent KRAS-A4 which presented with a faint upper band but did not conelated with CRD-BP concentration it can be seen that KRA -A34(d)- covering nucleotides 93-167, also presents with a similar pattern, and is concluded to be a non-binding fragment. 43 RO- BP : (n 1 Bound [ R:'\A lnbound R..'\ . 2 3 4 5 6 9 J () ll 12 13 14 IS 16 17 e F igure 2.1 7. EM A a e in g th e KRA -A34(d e a nd f) RNA , for RD-BP binding. 2 P]labelled unbound RNA 20 000 cpr reac6on) with n pr t in add ed (lane 1, 3, 8 and 13) fonn a larg r molecular weight c mpl upon titrati n with RD -BP onl y in theca e f the KRA -A probe which wa u ed a po itive contr 1 and includ ed t d m n trate binding c ntra t for the e nQn-binding fragm ent . Binding reactions were incubated fo r a total of 20 minute at 3 7° and 10 minute on ice before being r ol ed on an 8% polyacrylamid e gel. To en ure that the lack of co mpl ex fo rm ati on in any of th e 3' truncated fragm ent was not due to experimental eiTor, a positive control previously determined to bind (KRA S-A) wa includ ed. From thi s, it was concluded th at the initi al 3' truncati on, th e large t of the three w hi ch removed 19 nucleotides to produce region KRAS -A34(d) likely contained binding elements. The compl ementary 5' truncated fragment , labell ed as KRA -A34(a, b and c) which retained the aforementioned 19 nucleotide sequ ence, w ere also te ted for binding using EMSA (figure 2.18 .) Complex formation can be readily observed as a di tinct band above the unbound fraction of RNA in fra gm ents KRAS -A34(a) and KRA -A34(b) with binding almo t entirely lo tin KRAS-A34(c). 44 KR RO-BP : oM ' fb Bound [ RN nbound RNA J 4 5 6 9 10 II 12 14 15 e F igure 2.18. EM A a e sin g KRA - 34(a b a nd c) for RD-BP bindin g. 2 P]-labell ed unbound RN (20,000 cpn reacti n) with n pr tein add d (lane 1, 6 and 11) .fi nn a larg r mol cular weight c mple upon titration ith RD-BP a indicated by D rmati n of a band in ".Binding reacti n wer in ubat d :D r a total of20 minute at the area labelled' b und R 3 7° and 10 minute on ice beD reb ing re lv d nan % polyacrylamid e g 1. Oddly, the addition of CRD-BP appear to shift the unbound KRA -A34(c) RNA further down the gel, increasing 1nigration di tance a indicated by the increa ingly den e autoradiographic expo ure appearing below the free RNA in lanes 11 to 15 . While this may be considered binding, a lack of a di tinct band sugge ts at mo t non-specific interaction and wa left as an anomaly. Interestingly it is possible to di tingui h an intem1ediate band between the upper shifted complexes, and the unbound RNA which was not readily apparent in the nontruncated KRAS-A34 fragment. Hence, the smallest region ofKRAS mRNA presented here capable of binding CRD-BP as dete1mined by EMSA i the 57 nucleotide region labelled KRA A34(b) ; nucleotides 129-185. 45 2.3.3 Development of pecifi c anti n D n 1 p ram unt t 1 pm nt f m lecular inhibit r th 1 ng t rm g al f tud ing 1 w r und t tabl 1 pr li:D rati targ t gi pr arli t k 1 in later li:D , it pr i n f thi oligonu le tide nc and i and tap nng ff t e tr m 1y ti ity in tum r ti ue 1 a clear anti- c rtain cane r and it ha b n h wn that ignalling -BPi capable f tal. 201 1) ingling ut th KRA - RD- P interaction a an ideal target :D r m 1 cular inte1 ba ed anti en g n R - P und r trict th path ay . n it in ha be n d mon trated t dri targ t . With RD- P nd it m ntr 1 during th pati t mporal enhancing oli onucl eotid e inhibi tor nti n . T approach tlu ta k 23-24 mer ere de igned t contigu u ly c ver the entire regi n f KRA -A in a compl m ntary fa hion (nt 1-1 S) with the rational being that important RNA sequence or tructural element within KRA -A, one bound thr ugh Wat on- rick base pairing, will impede RD-BP binding to KRA mRNA. Any di covered DNA-based oligonucleotide inhibitors could ub equently be synthesized a an 0-methyl RNA oligonucleotide derivative and used in the context of cell-based anti-proliferative as ays for further development. Under binding conditions identical to the previou ly outlined EMSA 32 binding experiments, [ P]-labelled KRAS-A (nts 1-18S) RNA was incubated with 216 nM CRD-BP in the presence of eight potential inhibitor oligos at 1OX and SOX molar-fold concentrations (figure 2.19). Protein concentration wa cho en to only fractionally bind the RNA probe (as opposed to full shift at S40 nM) to avoid over saturation of the RNA and increase the protein-RNA complex sensitivity to the inhibitory effe t f the oligonucleotide for scr erung. In vitro transcribed unlabelled KRAS-A RNA was also incubated with CRD-BP at 1OX and SOX concentrations to erve a a positive control for inhibition (figure 2. 19, Ian s 3-4 ). Concentration 46 of radio-lab 11 d KRA w r mad t 1.1 mp tit rm 1 cui wa d termin d t b 11 pM and thu pr 10 nM and 5.9 nM r ba ed n abilit t r du and 0 th b und fra ti n f r w r th n . uc in th M O ligon ucleotide Inhibitor Bou nd [ RN nbound [ RNA 1 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 I 19 20 e Figure 2.19. EMSA cr een of anti sense oli gonucJ eotid e 0 -SM(l -8) inhibitor . 2P] labelled KRA - RN probe (-/lane 1) wa partiall y hifted by 216 nM RD-BP (+/lane 2) in t~e pre ence of 23-24-mer anti n e oligonucleotide in 2 concentration : 1OX molar exces relative to 118 pM radioactive probe (1.1 nM), and SOX (5 .9 nM) in lane 3-20. Effectivene of potential inhibitor i evidenced by a reduction in the bound RNA fraction indicated on th figure left. Enor bars are standard deviation. Screening of SM1 to SM8 inhibitor oligonucleotide was completed in triplicate and when the bound RNA in the protein-only reaction (lane 2) i compared to those with inhibitors added , it can be seen in the representative figure that a reduction in complex fonnation occuned for inhibitors SM6 (lanes 15-16), SM7 (lanes17-18) and to a lesser extent SM4 (lanes 11-1 2). Co ld, unlabelled KRAS-A which was used as a positive control for inhibition did display a reduction of the complex as expected, however the extent of inllibition wa omewhat less than predicted possibly due to error in RNA quantification of either the radioactive pr be, or the unlab lled competitor RNA . Densitometry of the autoradiographs using the Cyclon e Storage Pho phorSystem and Optiquant software was used to construct a graphical repre ntation of the EM A 48 (figur 2 .21 , ian 1 - 17) . in additi n t a ting a an n g n m me cir um tan th am f[i nd ran g f th inhibit r li g nu tid M c nditi n rem ain d th am a hie rna imal KRA - M 7 wa fr m 1 ;\Jolar-fold: - r ting a r m ll m 1 u 1e w ith hift, and all tid r 3 4 panding th e c n entra ti n n1 d ut b , r 11 t ep t [! r - Pc n p t 1I n ntrati n a chara t riza ti n f M and KRA - RD -BP binding rang . H r , M 2 li gonucl d ba g n enefi ial u Furth r qu ntifi ati n f anti- en c pr inding u ing Ji g nu le tid r, nhan mg t rna ha it an a t a a tum r UJ pr rr lat d K (Zhang t a/. 2001 ). In u h ca a tum r uppr a bit f a mi tat d arli r in th intr du ti n a al nin g that ugg fi gure 2 .2 1) . ct at 54 nM t M 7 ver th entire includ ed [! r c mpan t d it may fun cti n a a g nb ed nth initi al d negati e c ntr 1. + 'nbound [ R~ (KRA ~ - A) 2 5 6 7 8 9 JO ll 12 13 14 IS 16 17 F igure 2.21. EMSA cha ra cteri zin g C RD-BP-KRA -A RNA compl ex inhi bition b y A O N32 SM6. [ P] -labell ed RNA - regi n KRA -A prob e (unbound in lane 1) wa incub ated with 540 nM RD-BP (lane 2). Inhibitor M6 wa pre ent (lane 3- 12) in oth erwi iden ti cal ondition to lane 2, ranging in concentration from 1X mo lar-fo ld relati ve to probe cone ntration ( 11 pM) to 1000 mo lar-fold (11 nM) which COlT lated with a lo of RD -BP- bound RN . In contra t A N- M 2 di play d dra ti cally r du ced ability to interrupt the RD -BP-K RA - RN compl ex. 46 ofradi -labell d KRA - pr b a d t rmin d t b ll wremad t 1.1 nMand .9 nMr pctiel lect d ba d on ability t r du 10 M and thu c mp tit r m 1 cul and50 ). ful inhibit r w r then uc in th th b und fracti n f M molar-fo ld : (- Bou nd [ R.'i nbou nd [ RNA 4 5 6 7 I0 II J2 13 14 J5 16 J7 I 19 20 F igure 2.19. EMSA scr een of a nti en se olioonucl eotid e AO N- M (l -8) inhibitors. [32 P] labelled KRA -A RN probe (-/lane 1) wa partially hif1ed by 216 nM RD -BP (+/lane 2) in the pre ence of23-24-mer anti en e oligonucleotide in 2 concentrations: lOX molar exce s ~elative to 11 pM radioactive probe (1.1 nM), and 50X (5.9 nM) in lane 3-20 . Effectivene s of potential inhibitor i evidenced by a reduction in the bound RNA fraction indicated on the figure left. Error bar are tandard deviation. Screening of SM1 to SM8 inhibitor oligonucleotides wa completed in triplicate and when the bound RNA in the protein-only reaction (lane 2) is compared to those with inhibitors added, it can be seen in the representative figure that a reduction in complex formation occurred for inhibitors SM6 (lanes 15-16), SM7 (lanesl7-18) and to a lesser extent SM4 (lanes 11-12). Cold, unlabelled KRAS-A which was used as a positive control for inhibition did di splay a reduction of the complex as expected, however the extent of inhibition was somewhat le than predicted possibly due to eiTor in RNA quantification of either the radioactive probe, or the unlabelled competitor RNA. Den itometry of the autoradiograph u ing th System and yclone Storage Pho phor- ptiquant oftware was used to construct a graphical repre entation of th EM 47 a r du ti n in th hang and 10 % b ing b ing n mpl t f th b und mpl inten it , with 0% band (fi gur 2.2 . * 60 50 c: 0 ·.p 0 0 :J "0 OJ 'X OJ 30 a. E 20 0 0 0 lZJ1 Ox al ar excess . ol ar e c ss 50 ~ 0 - 0 Competitor oli go Figure 2.20. Bar graph of anti en e oli gonucl eotid e molec ul e M(l-8) inhibitory effect on CRD-BP-KRA R A compl e form ation . Data i pr ented a the av rage percent redu ction of bound RNA compar d to a control w ith no inhibit r pre ent in an electr phoretic m bility VA · F=3.47, p<0.02, hift a ay. D ata wa ubj ected to tati ti cal an aly i u ing a ne-way n=3 and stud ent' t-te t (p )u\1 : Bound [ I{ \ ,.. fl"C R \ [ Jan RI>- IW [n\1 : Bouud [ H '\ \ 1 r l' H \ [ ~ !.me 4 X (l ') Ill II 12 I' 1-l 15 16 ,.., D hll4 j( RI>- BI'[ n\1 : Round [ R'\ \ 1- n •l' It'\ ,\ I an~ [ 2 ·' 4 5 (! 7 X I) 10 II 12 I1 14 15 I C. l. Figure 3.2. EM A as essing CRD-BP KH variants with ingle point mutation for· binding to KRA -A and c-myc RNA ; (A) KHI variant, (B) KH2 variant, ( ) KH3 va.-iant, (D) KH4 32 variant. [ P] -Iabelled unb und KRA - (nt 1- 1 5) and -m yc (nt 1705- 1 6) RN ( 0,000 c pm/ reacti n) with no protein add d (lane I and 7, -D) 68 I R O-BI j o \1 : Bound [ R \ l nbound [ R'\ \ Jan' . B \\ I I" 16 15 IC> 1\.lll -4 I RO-UP j o'\ 1: Bound [ R' \ KR. \ , [ (19. -J ) lane- c -..."v ').· Bound [ R~A ":~ it- ' ,~ "y KH 2-4 ,..'>-..."...., ~ '). - ~~ ' ,b ..... ww w 1 L nbound [ R"\ A lane: KH J-4 'l- 6 7 9 10 II 12 13 14 F igure 3.3. EMSA assessin g th e CRD-BP KH variant with two point mu tations for bindin g to sub-region KRAS-A RNA; (A) KHI -2, KHI -3 (B) KHI-4, KH 2-3 (C) KH2-4 and KH3-4. 32 [ P] -labelled unbound KRAS -A (nts 1-185) RNA probe (8 0,000 cpm/reaction) with no protein add ed (lanes 1 in all gel images) fom1s a larger molecular weight compl x upon titration with WT RD-BP and doubl e KH variants posses ing GXXG motif mutations (fir t glycin to aspartate), a indicated by the bound RNA fraction (lane 2- 16, A and B). Binding reaction were incubated for a total of 20 minutes at 3 7 ° and 10 minutes on ic before being resol ed on an 8% polyacrylamide gel. 69 m pl te li1nina ti n f binding in the d ubl K l mutant !ling that KRA mRN int ra t primaril and lik 1 p regi n , and n t b an th r n n-can ni al m 3.3.3 . KH domain r equirement for KRA mR RD-BP KH d main binding requir ment [! r K thr ugh th u [ ild-typ nti - L rib nucle pr t inc mple precipitated with hani m . a al a e ed in upl d ith R -qP R . H II a cell KH mutant ariant a w II antib dy \ a then u ed t immun e-pr cipitate th mRN -precipitated K a f th ciated with ach a c ntr 1 [! r ea h KH ariant ample a n BP KH mutant wa th n analyz db RT-qP R . rever e tran cripta ntir ly thr ugh the mRN immun -pr c ipitati n (RIP m th d n. ide bindin in H e a cell pia mid c ntainin g a a p nm nt pr M (- RT/n t mplat ) amp! c n i ting nly f the purifi d mR co- RD -BP wa run und er identical qP R co nditi n . Thi co ntrol pr du ced n detectable fluore c nee within the 40 cycle limit of the y tem and co nfirmed that no genomi c D A c ntamination wa pre ent in any of th amp! te ted. The KRA qP R primer were te ted for effi c iency u ing pla mid dilution c ntaining 2 KRAS eDNA template and d termined to be 97. %with an R of 0.99 . Data group (figure 3.4) from RT-qP R ample were then analyzed u ing a t alue ne Way Analy i of Variance (one-way AN OVA) te t and a <0.0001 p-value (a suming null hypothe i of all group being of the same population) wa calculated with an F- tat value of 19 . 1, indicating a ignificant difference between one or more of the analyzed group . From th rej that all sample were equal r from the same population, a p c mpari on te twa calculated fl reach tion of null hypoth t-hoc Tuke ' I I D multiple RD-BP KH mutant pair, and re ult re level ofKRA mRNA as ociated with wild-type al d that RD - P were ignificantl dif[i r nt than the 70 KI-f -mutant . Fw1h tm r KHl KRA mRN than th RD -BP mutant (p=O.Ol ). Finally an unpair d t-t twa c ndu t d t th r r maining compar th t- alu betw n ere al ild -type and ach ind i idu al analy i al o bowed that all f th qP R data gr up (K ignificantl diffi rent fr m r lati di ffi r nee in m le el b tw cal b ignifi cantly lli gh r RD- P mutant ampl . Thi ingle nd d uble mutant were ild -typ at p=O.O1. ycle thr h ld alu RD-BP and pl tt d n a 1 garithmi typ [t und t wer n rm aliz d t wild - hich wa r quired c nsidering the large n wi ld-type and the d ubl e KH mutant (figure 3.5) . -- u ~ 0 ..c Vl -~ - -= ~ L t.J ;,..... u JO I WT Kil l Kll ::! KI D K11 4 Kill ] KH IJ K l ll 4 KH1 3 KIL~-l K IU-l C R O- BP vari ant Figure 3.4. Box plot pf the RT -qPCR cycl e threshold valu es from immun e-precipitated KRAS mRNA associated with CRD -BP KH variants. H01izontal middle line in the encompassing box represents the overall m ean, the top box repre ents the third quartile and bottom box the first quartile. Bars are the absolute minimum and m aximum Ct val ue obtain d. 71 * 1 * <;( z 01 p <. 0. l ~ E (.f) ~ ~ Cl> 0 01 > ·:::: «l Cl> ~ 0 00 1 0 0001 WT H H2 KH3 KH4 -2 1-3 1-4 2-3 2 3 CRO -BP KH -variant Figure 3.5. R elative KRAS mRN A ass oci a ted with KH domain variants from immun e precipitation of CRD-BP in H eL a cells as determin ed by RlP RT -qPC R . ach cycle threshold value i from averaging 3 biological ampl e in triplicate and en or bar h re represent the standard deviation, with the exception of KH2 and KH3 of whi ch only a single bi ological replicate was available for RT-qPCR . One-way AN VA determined Pesign cheme: 5' [handle]-[Ndel]-(complementary region] 3' >NA sequence: 5' [ACCA ]-(CATA TG]-[ A TCCCTCT CGGCTCCTG] 3' ina! sequence: 5'-ACCACATATGATCCCTCTCCGGCTCCTG-3' :RD-BP K.Hl to4 rever se p r im er : >esign cheme: 5'[ complementary region ]-[1 Iind ll l]-[handle] 3' on-R . . DNA sequence: 5'[AAGCAA AGCAC AGAAG]-[ AG TT]-[AC A] 3' AAAG T CTTCT GT TGTTGCTT-3 ' inal DNA sequence: 5'-A *R.C. - reverse complement *handle (A A) not rever e-complement 86 T7 promotor ~ aa tta t c ga c t c c t a t gggg 1 BamHI EcoBI t a t cgggat ccg I BsrGI cbs Xbal tt cccc t c t g Asci Pstl Sac! a t aa ttttg tttaa c ttt Sal! tt c t gt c ggcctt ggcgcgcct gc ggcg gc t ccg t cgac g ., rgg g t ~ t ac t tg Hmdll g6 ttgt gcc cgcggt g tgcn ycy~~gc l thrombin X hoi c t c g g c cca cca cca cc cca cca cca c t ·-~..:...:..:..:...:......----.:..-- F t g tt t • 8HIS Tsg Figure 4.2. pET41c(+) - no G T pia mid multiple clonin g . ite equ ence. N te the thr mbin equenc . de 1 and 1 indllf re triction itc w reutilized clea abl 8 Hi -tag and lack of for ub-cloning fuJI-length and KH 1t 4 R -BP coding equencc . CRD-BP K.Hlto4 in ert DNA ge ner ation by P R PCR wa utilized to gen rate the D A in ert (table 4.4)~ with wild-type RD-BP pia mid (pET28b backbone) erving a the reaction template. Primer were de igned to amplify a 1J 13 nucleotide region of the coding equence encompassing KH 1 to KH4 as outlined below. CRD-BP KH1to4 forward primer : Design scheme: 5' [handle]-[Ndel]-[complementary region] 3' DNA sequence: 5' [ACCA]-[CATATG]-[ATCCCTCT CGGCTCCTG] 3' TG-3' Final sequence: 5'-ACCACATATGATCCCT TCCGGCT CRD-BP KHl to4 reverse prim er : Design cheme: 5'[ complementary region ]-[Hindiii]-[handle] 3' non-R . . DNA equence: 5'[AAGCAA AGCACCAGA G]-[AAG TT]-[AC A] 3' AA TG TGCT TTGCTT- '1! Final DNA seq uence : 5'-A *R. . - reverse complement *handle (A A) not reverse-complement 87 RD-BP KH1to4 amplicon DN etc cc gg ct cc a tcc g aaa c g ggcgctgc g c a agatgat t cccctgaa ggaacctgaa acctcacgct gcagggccga ccatgagctt cagcttcatc gctccttcat tgggcgccat cctccatcaa ctggaccccc agaatttctt cagcagccgg cc g cagctga t taagatcat tggctcaagt cctggtgcct catcacaaaa ggagaaggcc cttggagatt gatcctggct gaagg ggag ctataaccc gcaggagatc gcagtcccac cagcgc gtc gcaggc ccg cat ggcaag gattgcacca agaggctcag tggtcccaag ccgtgtca c gg gg agtg cggacatttc taagcaacag equence: acgcagtatg cagacgcagt atcagcgtgc atgcacaagg ca aacaac caggacacag gagaggacca atgaagaaag ctca ccctg cctcctcctc gagcaggaga aagggccagc ccagaaacac tcaaggccc gaggaagtaa ggcaaaggcg ccaagagacc tatgccagcc caccagaag aggcgctat ccaaaataga attcaacccc aggcaaagga tcgtcgggcg agacgaagat cactgtgaa ttcgagaggc ggc taacct ccagcagtgt tggtacaagt aca caaaca c gac ccaa agggaagaa age agagac gcaaaacgg agaccccgga agatggctca cattggcaag cgtgcatagg tgaaggc gc caccaaaacg actca tggc caeca ctca gggcgcca t ttacgagaac ggc gc g a caccggggc gttcatcccc ac ctcccgc ag cgaatg ctatggcaaa ccacatacgg gaatgagc g tgagaacgac gcggaaga c a tee gagg g t g cca aaggagaatg tcctccgcgt gcagatgaag aaggaagggc cgctccag gagaactgtt gacg ggccg ggtctcttcc gctcccta a gcccaggctg ttcgccagcg gtcgtca ca ctaaaagaag gttccggct cagaacttga caag cattg cgagacatcc PCR mixture were a embled in triplicate and later combined to provide high working concentration. Each 25 ~-tl PCR reaction wa a embled according to table x and a then11ocycler scheme programmed for optimal amplification. High-fidelity Phu ion™ DNA po lymera e ew England Biolabs Inc.) wa used in order to reduce likelihood of mutation during in ert amplification. PCR reactions upon completion were then run on a 1% agaro e gel at 120 V stained with 0.5 1-1-g/ml ethidium bromide and ubsequently gel-purified u ing a QIAEX II Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen) following the recmnmended protocol. PCR thermocycle program: Step Condition 1 98 °C 30 sec 2 98°C 15 sec 3 55 °C 30 sec 4 72 ° 2 min 6 72 ° 10 min 7 40 forever step 5 - repeat 25x 88 Table 4.4. PCR reagent u ed to generate KHlto4-pET-41c(-G T) pia mid vector. volum 2.5 Ill ector pla mid (p T41 c) £ r ub-cl nmg, concentrati on, mall £ llowing heat- h hi h wa d nated fr m lum e ampl e, wa amplifi din a 10 ml B a a1 w H5a ~ .c li ce ll culture v !urn k tran fonnati n (2. 1.1) and plating onto an LB agaro e plate with 25 ll g/ml kana1nycin antibiotic. vernight-gr wth c loni e w re cultured in 10 ml LB broth volume (25 llg/ml kanamycin) for 16 h ur , followed by pl a mid purifi cati on using a QIAprep pin mini prep kit (Qiagen). Due to pET41 c being a low-copy plasmid tw o 5 ml culture volum e were prepared eparate ly, each acco rdin g to th e manufacturer' reco mm endati ons and th en co mbined by passing both plasn1id preparations over a ingle QIAprep spin column and eluted together to yield approximately 5 ll g of plasmid D A (1 00 ng//ll, 50 )ll). Double-digest restriction endonuclea e reactions were setup for th e in ert and pET4 1c empty vector DNA sampl e in preparation for sub -cloning. Digest reaction were setup in 20 )ll volumes according to table 4.5 and allowed to continue for 2 hours at 37 °C. Digested DNA products were resolved on a 1% agaro e gel and gel-purifi ed from excised DNA bands using a QIAEX II el xtraction Kit ( iagen) fo llowing the recomn1end ed protocol (note that KH 1to4 insert DNA elution i at room temperature whil e the larg r pET4 l c v ctor DNA is eluted at 50 90 Table 4.6. Reagent u ed for RD-BP KH1to4 pia mid ligation. Pla mid p T4l c(- T) MW appr imat ly 5 kb and KHlt 4 in rt 1.2 kb ; alu u d t calculat d molar rati s. Reagent lOX T4 buf:D r (NEB) KH1to4 DN_ p T41 D T4D rt. l Jll to 20 Jll 1 Jll t 20 Jll fu i li ga ti n c ntaining th e RD -BP KH1 to4 10 ng 5 ng 50 ng 1 Jll 3:1 t 20 Jll cr n ~ r ucc w ere am pl ed dir ctl ff th L P R m 1 Jll to 20 Jll 2 J.tl liga e (NEB) H2 Vector onl~ 50 ng 7:1 2 )..tl 85 ng 50 ng 1:1 2j..d a u ed t inoculate mall P R rea ti n tube . agar 2 Jll 0 ng 50 ng pl ate u ing a t rile loop and u ed to mbl ed D r each colony ampled n reaction wa a according to tabl e 4 _6 and run on a 1% agaro e gel for UV ethidium bromid e det ction of appropriate band. u cce ful tran form ant were then u ed to in ocul ate l 0 ml LB broth culture and pla mid pmified u ing the QIAprep pin miniprep kit (Qi agen) as de crib ed previou ly for the empty pET4l c vector. DNA equencing w as completed fo r three po iti ve clone plasmids to further confi rm the presence of correct DNA insert, and also to ensure no mutations were present in the equ ence. Plasmid samples were diluted to 100 ng/Jll and 10 J.!l volumes were shipped to M acrogen for next generation sequ encing u sing three different equencing primers for each pl asmid : T7 promoter forward prim er, T7 termin ator rever e primer and a custom designed " KH I P" fo rward prim er that ann eal s to th e 3' end of KH 1 DNA sequ ence. Primers used for DNA sequ encing of pET4lc-KHlto4: A T7 promoter forward primer sequ ence: 5'- TAA TA T A T7 te1minator reverse primer equ ence: 5 ' - T AGTTATTG "KI-f 1P'' forward prim r equ ence: G T 5 '- T TT TATAGGG -3 ' G T 91 Table 4.7. Rea gent for colon P R creenin g. PCR reaction mix Thermocycle program reagent lOXP R bufD r p (2.5 mM) d volume ilil! temQera ture .5 ~1 1 .5 ~1 2 K.Hlt 4_ F prim r 1 ~~ K.Hl t 4_R primer 1 ~1 4 ° 95 ° 54 ° 72 ° Taq.P 1. 0.5 ~1 5 H2 25 .5 ~~ 6 time 5 1nin 95 t linin 90 ec 2 min t p 2 - 30X 72 ° 5 min 4.2 Re ults and Di cu ion 4.2.1 Circular Dicbroi m analy i of CRD -BP KH mutant va ri ant RD-BP KH single and double mutant variants harbouring the . previou ly for EM XX mutation u ed binding experim nt (3.3.1 and 3.3.2), were canned u ing a circular dichroism (CD) sp ectropolarimeter and far-UV pectra acquired from 240-190 m11 for each mutant protein. All protein amp les were freshly dialyzed and refolded into CD buffer and were all between 1 and 3 11M concentration prior to loading into a 0.1 em quartz cuvette for D scanning. Acquired CD spectra for each KH mutant were remarkably imilar to wild-type CRDBP following conver ion from raw CD milli-degrees to mean residue elipticity (figure 4 .3). The mean residue elipticity unit accounts for differences in scanned protein concentration and return the average CD signal per amino acid residue, making inter-protein sample compari on more feasib le. Far-UV wavelength cans of wild-type CRD-BP reveal a pectrum characteri tic fa protein with mixed alpha-helix/beta-sheet structure wi th a strong broad p ak at 222 nm, indicative of a large alpha-helical component. This finding matche known tructur of KH 92 d mam-c ntaining pr t in a w 11 a domain pr t in ( ha t a. I 201 0; ther pectra d ri ed from ingle and tand n1 KH al erd eta!. 200 7; It i inun diat ly lear up n in p ction f the global tructur p ctra p ak up n cl The lu11iel t a!. 2006) . R -BP KH mutant D p ctra that th ar rem arkabl y imilar and do not h w any large di fD r nee in the locati n of r the amplitud e f m p di f~ r nc ti on, m ignal. ubtl e dif:G r nee d e i t betw een the pectra t n ta bly at wa elength I wer th an 205 run, and higher than 23 0 nm . are m all and tr ngly ugge t tha t the verall fold of the vari u KH XX mutant app ear to be m aintain d. H w r as far- V pectra analy i i not a mea ure of the f pro tein , it remain p ible that relati ve change in alph a-helix/beta-sheet terti ary tructur orientation ha e occurTed a a re ult of intr du cing XXG mutation . A well , shift in th e preci s a-h e l i and ~- heet res idue bound aries are pos ibl e, so long as the overall fraction of each motif remain con tant. W ild -type CRD-BP wa scanned at 90 °C as a contro l for denatured protein (figure 4 .3D ), and far-UV pectra showed weaker CD ign al a expected, notably in the 208 run and 222 nm regions where protein econdary structure contributes strongly. Further tructural analysis involving econdary structure calcul ati ons fro m CRD -BP CD spectra w ere also completed with the aid of the K2 D3 econdary structure estim ation web erver, and the Dichrocalc online CD reference-spectra data base . Inputtin g th e L1£ va lu e , or mo lar circular dichroism (deciliter moJ!'- 1 cm"'- 1) at 1 run interva ls for each mutant produced hi ghly similar final secondary structure estimati ons, varying b y le s than a percent b tw een each ample (table 4. 8). Given the ti ght overlap in CD spectra between wild-type RD-BP and th e va1i ou mutant fonns, especially at the criti al wavelength s used t r omputing econdary tructure e timations, this result was expected and brings numetical cope a to th likenes of proteins within the RD-BP mutant library. 93 A B o' 0 E '0 5 5000 RD B WT H1 CRD B CRD BP KH2 CRD 8 KH3 CRD B H-1 0 CD ~ ~ ~ 0 0. .. 0 E '0 0 CD o ., '0 ~ ~~------~------~- 270 Lii RD BP VVT RO t:5 KH1 2 0 -B · KH1 -3 0 OP KH1 4 RO BP KH2 3 5 ':iOOO 730 Wave length (nm) 220 CIJ 230 __.i-4 0 /J""' Wavelength (nm) :J ~ 5000 /~ Q.l cr: 1.1 c p' Cll CD ~)l o' ~ ~~ c D o' -0 -0 E E '0 CRO BP WT (;>CRO BP KH2 4 ...... - CRO BP KH 3 4 - ·0 CRO BP Y5A ? F ~ E 5000 u C> CD u .. ~ 0 u 220 Lii Wavelength (nm ) 230 CD :J -;; 5000 Cl> cr: ~ c "'CD ::E -1 - '0 E u o· ;;:r -~~ rf / rr _g i'!O CR 5000 OP W1 Cl Q.l 'C .. ~ u a. u o· Wavelength (nm) 0 a. 200 210 240 Lii CD :J 'C ';OOQ "' G.~-&e~ zy-0 CD cr: c .,"' :'!: 10. Figure 4.3. CD spectra of wild-type CRD-BP a nd KH mutant variants. ircular dichroi m spectra of(A) wild-type, KHl , KH2, KH3 and KH4; (B) wild-type, K.Hl-2 , KHl- , KHl-4, KH2-3 ; (C) wild-type, KH2-4 , KH3-4, Y5A, and D527E. (D) Wild-type CRD-BP pectral can at 90 °C as po itive control for denatured protein. All spectra generated from 8 accumulation using a Ja co J-8 15 ; protein scanned in 20 mM Tris- 1, 10% glycerol, 200 mM Na I, pH 7.4 buffer. 94 Table 4.8. Protein econdary tructur e timation for RD-BP variants. K2D n ural n t ir ular di h ri m tructural d tenninati n w b erver wa u d inc njunction with ichr calc p tra d tab a t g nerat timati n fr m £ ( d cilit r m }/\- 1 m/\- 1) nlin / o a-helL~ o/o B- beet Wild-type 67.51 9.00 23.49 KHI 67. 2 . 9 23.59 KH2 67.7 9.10 23.17 KH3 7.51 9.02 23.47 KH4 67.51 9.00 23.49 KHI-2 67.55 9.12 23.33 KHI-3 67.53 9.00 23.47 KHI-4 67.4 9.06 23.46 KH2-3 67.51 9.00 23.49 KH2-4 67.51 9.00 23.49 KH3-4 67.51 9.02 23.47 CRD-BP variant 0 0 / o Random coil 4.2.2 Circular di chroism monitoring of CRD-BP-RNA binding in vitro Assessing whether or not CRD-BP undergoes a conformation change upon RNA interaction is impor1ant, as it may serve as a measure or indicator for RNA binding. Also, it sheds light on how the protein functions and can highlight the different relevancie of crystallographic structures publi hed with and without RNA bound . To determine if CRD-BP has such dynamic character, CD spectroscopy was u ed a before in a eries of RNA titration experunents with both high and low affinity RNA substrates. In addition to the full-length wildtype form, a truncated ver ion of CRD-BP was created containing only the KH I to KH4 binding modu le (referred to from now on simply a "KH I to4"), and used ·t n i el in the e experiments. The rationale behind this move to include KH 1to4 wa that the fun tionall in 11 95 RRM don1ain ha lik 1 t b n t nnined not t c ntribut t RN hift fr m n c nformati n t an th r. H nee, inclu ion f th wa anticipat d a p t ntiall dulling an b erved change in domain and th re£ r r m ved. ull -length mplet farmyc binding affinity, and thu ar not p R -BP D ignal temming fr m the KH a e amin ed fir t, mea uring th trum fr m 1 0-260 nm and titrated with KRA RD -r gi n, a n n-binding -m c regi n, a well a a pair f lig nucl otid e with relati el GLI(-) re p cti 4, KRA Al 2, the cLI competit r trong competiti n and w ak c mp etiti n, labell ed 1 . Furth rmor , a a n gati e c ntr I fo r B A wa titrated with KRA tatic RRM domain 4 RN Ll ( ) and -ob ervable tructural changes, and p ctra obtained in an otherwise identi cal fashi n. Each ample wa pr par d in term of pro tein :RN molar rati o equivalents; 4: 1 and 1: 1 preparation were completed and cann ed fo r ac h RN ubstrate. It can be seen in figure 4.4, that the addition of any RNA ub trate- high affini ty or low affmi ty appears to induce a change in the CD spectra in a imilar fa hion. At all wavelengths, the mea ured di chroism reduced upon titration with RNA, how ever while there is a lack of specificity fo r the general effect, it can be seen that in every experiment (figure 4.4 A-C) , the stronger binding fragment wa able to induce a larger change at the same concentration. As RNA alone possesses CD character, it is important to subtract the RNA spectra measured at the same concentration from the titration sampl es; an RNA-CD blank. In fi gure 4.4D, BSA was measured with KRAS A34 and A l 2, and the RNA spectra subtracted, produ cing es entially identi cal D spectra refl ecting both the unchanging nature of BSA in the presence of RNA, and also validating the spectral sub traction techniqu e in principle. A reduction in absolute molar elipti city, as observed in all CRD -BP-RNA titration , refl ects an un-coiling effect of the va rious alpha-helice compri ing th protein a well as betasheets. The effect i not absolute, as the D signal does not ba e-line lo ing only about 25% 96 A 8 1 10 1 10' no RNA KRAS A34(•) 4 1 KRAS A34(•) 1 KRAS A12( ) 4 1 KRAS A12() 1 1 \; E E no RNA c myc(>)4 1 c myc(+) 1 1 c myc( }4 1 c myc( ) 1 1 ~ 0 E ' E0. 0 c: ro 110' ~~----~~----~----~----~ 730 210 240 200 220 110' ~~------~----~----~----~ 210 2'30 240 200 2?0 wavelength (nm) wavetengt (nm) c D 1 10' L.... 0 E '0 "E no RNA '3 2 1 Gh •) 4 Ghl•) I 1 24 1 no RtJA KRAS A14(• J 4 1 KRAS A34(•) 1 1 KRAS A12( 4 1 KRAS A12() 1 Gil() 4 t Gh ) 1 1 sooo 1 ti 1 u 0 1l 8C 0 • UJ 5 ;; 800(. r 0:: c:: ro :::: 1 10' ~~------L-----~----~------ 200 210 220 1 10 24 1 240 wavelenqtt nm 200 21 2 IC 240 wavelength 'nm Figure 4.4. CD spectra of CRD-BP titrated w ith vanou s substrates. All ample are presented as a molar ratio of protein to RNA. with RNA concentration increasing from 4 :1 to 1:1. (A) KRAS A34 i a high affinity substrate while KRA A 12 bind poorl y. RNA ub trate also included: (B) c-myc (+ )and c-myc (-)are strong and weak binding sub trate re pectively . (C) Gli ( + ) and Gli (-) are strong and weak oligonucleotide competitor re pectively 'vVith (D) containing scans of BSA acting as a negative conformational hift control. structure, however a loss in structure doe reDect and le s stable and higher free energ) conformation. This is by itself an unlikely circumstance as RN binding is spontaneou, and doe not require energy input, however this energy barrier may be overcome by the free-energ) co ntribution of RNA binding, ati sfying charge and po sibly orienting h) drophobic rcsidm: s into more energy favourab le po itions . 97 urth r p nm ntal data a tracted fr m the e p ctra, c mparing mo t dir ctly the alpha-h li al cont nt f each titration ampl a 222 nm bar chart (figure 4.5). p tra wa m ured in tripli ate and graphed a~ the a erag each f 11 a cumulati n , the 222 nm value in figur 4 .5 i an averag \\-ith err r bar repre enting tandard deviati n. Thi 222 nm data allo~ [! r r latively ea protein tructur . It can b c mpan on of th R D ub trate effect n tracted RD-BP a ily c n in the bar chart that indeed the tronger binding ub trate . mo t n tab!~ c-myc. labelled with "( + )" arc rei iabl more able to reduce the D ignal trength. alb it n marginally more than their vv aker binding"(-)" counterparts. As can be quick] d due d fr m the ra\\- 0- pectra in figure 4.40. B A here sh w no distingui hable pattern in prot in econdary tructur chang . with neither ub trate affinity (KRA -A ...,4 vs KRA - 12) n r R A cone ntration correlating Vvith the relatively mall change in 222 nm elipticity. Another important accompanying piece of data in CD experiments i the record d high tension voltage (HTV), essentially a mea ure of the required signal amplification or gain required to di tinguish noise from CD signal. Certain buffer or protein may absorb trongly in the far UV, resulting in higher voltages being required to acquire spectra. However, protein precipitating from solution also typically how strong increases in HTV. Patel e/ a/ . (20 12) proclai1n that ZBPl bound to RNA possesse reduced solubility compared to the prot in alone, which has been a major stumb ling block in the quest for a ful l-length cry tal tructure of ZBP 1 or any of it homo logs including RD-BP . Reduced olubility of the CRD-BP-RN in the experiments presented here would indeed how lo complexes of CD signaL as i ob erved . 98 A ~ -~.... B 1 w• E E 0 ..... u • 4 1 Protem RNA 0 • 9000 E 1 1 Prote1n RNA 1 10 • 4 1 Protem RNA • I 1 Protem RNA 9000 "e-o 8000 7000 7000 000 6000 sooo '>000 4000 4000 3000 '3000 2000 2000 no RNA krasa34(•) krasa12( ) no RNA CRD BP substrat c Myc(+ c Myc( ) CRO BP substrat c D I 10• • • 0 E "E 4 1 Protem RtJA I 1 Pro1em RNA • 4 I Protem RNA • 1 1 Protem RNA 000 0 8000 7000 ' ' v; 1000 600 > soo J: 400 400 ;?()(' 300 200 0 200 240 220 210 wavelengt 1000 no Rt A 900 Gl1 • 4 1 Gh(•J 1 1 800 Gh( J 4 Gh 1 1 ~00 230 240 no RNA KRAS AJ4(•) 4 1 KRAs A14(• ) 1 1 KRAS A12 l 4 1 KRAS A12( l 1 1 4'>0 700 :r 0 400 ro (!) > 600 J: soo ..... 220 D 0 -a 210 wavelength (nm) (nrn) c Qi 200 > .. 150 400 :\)I! 300 2'>0 200 200 21 no 24 l.JC wavelength (nm) 11 220 2'30 240 wavelength (nm) Figure 4.6. CD-HTV plots of CRD-BP sa mple titrated with RN A substrates. All samples are presented as a molar ratio of protein to RNA with 4:1 having lower RNA concentration than 1:1 and measurements plotted as high tensions voltage (HT -voltage) . ( ) KRAS A34 wa detem1ined to be a high affinity substrate while KRA Al2 binds poorly. (B) c-myc (+ )and cmyc (-)are strong and weak binding substrates respectively . (C) Gli (+ )and Gli (-)are trong and weak oligonucleotide competitors re pectively with (D) B A acting a a negative confonnational shif1 control. How v r, th HTV or gain would increase proportional] and appear different than that of wi ld type alo ne. As can be e n in figure 6, no uch difference ar vi dent ugg sting that low co mp lex o lubi lity is not likely to be responsible for the CD reduction observed . I lowe\ er, co nsi dering RD-BP form . large multimer complexe a visible granules in cell ' , it cannot be 100 di unted that the formation f th larger mple ould be re pon ibl for lo of ignal, th r [! r p t ntiating th data a am a ure f granu l :D rmation and not actual tructural chang ithin th pr t -in. it int racti n tructural change in RD-BP and it homo! gs how veri lik ly, a ith it e lf a a dim r. and with ther pr tcin micro-tubul a ciat granul i R dependent (B uch as d nein and kin in w ithin ian eta/. 200 ; ll avi n eta!. 1998 ; loannidi eta!. 2005; Ni 1 en era!. ~004) and pcrhap a protein-protein interaction m otif is r ealed up n R binding a ugge ted by Wang ef a/. (1999). Furth r tructural tudie \\ere imilarly carried out with a Kll 1 to Kll4 truncation c mpri ing only the R -binding module . The e RD-BP p riment were done in an otherwi e id ntical fa hion except for an additional 16 : I, 1 \\- RN concentration amp le wa included to te t for a lovver thre hold concentration boundary for the D effect. KRA -A34( ) and KRA -Al2(-) w reemployed again a well a several alternative ubstrate that were not expected to bind: '18S', 'Orflb'. · pike' and 'tRNA' which were all u ed to broaden the earch for potential RNA ub trates that do not cause the ob erved change in 'D spectra, which wou ld offer much tronger support for the notion that these conformation changes are induced by RNA binding. D monitoring of KH 1to4 secondary structure titrated with any of the RNA ubstrates however did not uncover any particular RNA that wa ineffective at producing the previously observed reduction in D signal (figure 4.7 and 4.8) . 101 A B 1 10' 0 6000 E e 6000 0 ·D 4000 1 10' noR A RA5 A34(•) 4 1 KRA5 A34(•) 1 1 KRA5 A12() 4 1 KRA5A12() 1 1 -._ 0 no RNA 185 1 1 185 4 1 185 1 1 6000 E 6000 4000 2000 0 2000 2000 4000 4000 6000 fiOOO 190 200 210 ?'}I wavelengt 2 0 ' o 4 2oo 210 220 ?30 240 ?50 2 0 wavel ngth (nm) c D 1 10. 'o 700 (nm) 1 10 no Rt A orf1b 1 1 orf1b 4 1 6000 E 0 no RNA SPike 1 1 SPike 4 1 sp1ke 1 1 800C f: orflb 1 1 6000 6000 4000 2 0 2000 4000 4()()(. 000 f\000 2'>0 7 wavelenqttJ (nm 200 10 220 2'3C 240 2' 2 wavelength (nm) E 1 10 0 E 'C ••E Figure 4.7. CD spectra ofKHlto4 titrated with RNA ubstrates. All samples are presented as a molar ratio of protein to RNA, with RNA concentration increasing from 16: 1 to 1:] for ubstrate (A) KRA S A 3 4 and 12: (B) 18 : ( ) orb 1b: (D) pike: and ( ) tRNA . no RtJA IRIJA Hi 1 tRNA4 1 !RNA 1 1 6000 6000 u 0 (J} 4000 'C 2000 0 2000 4000 6000 19(. 700 710 72< 0 wavelength (nrn) 240 2 0 2h0 102 A - B 6000 E E <..) -0 • 4 1 Prot m RNA • 1 1 Prot m RNA 0 E .. 5000 E: <..) 0 0 Q) ~ Q) 4000 .!( ? <.;; := Jf ~ ()()() (jj J) ']) ::; il •11 cr ::; v. Ill 2000 0: c; ro Q) ·r :::i: E c: 1000 c-. c-. C'\1 C'\o N c-. 0 CRD BP H 1104 substrate CRD BP KH1to4 substrate c -._ D -600 ~._ 0 E 500 'E 1.) ']) ']) -~ J( 1 iii 1C 1 J( ~ :t w r ;;. l1 ::; ;; 2( l' 0: c; ro 'll E c; 200C c ro ::; 3( '!) ::; · a: 5(J "'0 0 ::: ~ 6000 0 E "e 2C c; ro ::; E c; ?000 ::0 1001 (ll E. c; (' ,.. ('. N c-. CRD BP KH 1104 substrate CRD BP KH11o4 substrate E -- 6001 E '0 'e 50or 1.) 0 ']) .l(!)C ~ " := ~ iii '\C,l Q) ::; ;;. a> 0: 2000 c; ro (]) :::: E 00 c: ('" N N no RtJA Hi 1 !RNA .t 1 IR~JA CRO BP KH 1to4 substrate 1 1 !RNA F igure 4.8. M RE at 222 nm of KHl to4 titrated with RNA substrates. All samples are presented a a molar ratio of protein to RNA with RNA concentration increasing from 16: 1 to 1: 1 and mean r sidue elipticity (MR ) pre ented a absolut value . (A) KRA A 4 i a high affinity sub trate while KRA 12 bind p rJy . RNA sub trate: (B) 18 , ( ) Orfl b, (D) Spike, and ( ) tRNA are not expected to po ses high affinit) binding character. 103 B soo no RNA KRAS A 500 no RNA 18S 1 1 18S 4 1 18S 1 1 (+) 4 1 KRAs A34(•) 1 1 KRAS A12( ) 4 1 KRAS A12() 1 1 4 0 .o 400 (!) ~ •:X: 10 200 210 220 230 240 2SO 2 0 wavelenglh (nm) wave ng h (nm c D 00 no RNA 550 orf1b 1 1 orfl 4 1 orf1b 1 1 5()(' no RNA 4r0 !>prke 16 1 !>pike 4 1 SPike 1 1 500 4 ) 0 > 1- 400 3'l0 J: 3">0 300 190 200 21J 221 2'lC 23 26 E ID 0 4()() (!) > 3">0 300 190 200 210 220 230 wavelenqth (nm) 22r ~ --'-4 ----L- ____,j 26(, All sample are pre ented a a molar ratio of protein to RNA with RN concentration increasing from 16 : 1 to 1: 1 and measurement plotted a high ten ion voltage (l--IT-voltage). (A) KRA A34 i a high affinity ubstrate 'While KR A12 bind poorly . RNA sub trates (8) 18 . (C) Orfl b. (D) Spike. and (E) tR A are not expected to po ess high affinit) binding character. -';; ~ 210 Figure 4.9. C D-HTV pl ots of KH 1 to4 samples titrated w ith RNA substrates. no Rt A tRNA 1' IRt A 4 1 !RNA 1 1 450 --'-----1---'---- wavelength (nm) wavelenqth tnm) 500 2'>0 L----'--1qr 200 4 't 104 4.2.3 Thermal tability of RD -BP-RNA RBP comple e To furth r anal z the p t ntial for circular dichr i m to be u ed diagno tically in hara t rizing R -BP binding 'Aith vari u R target . m lting temp ratur f d fined a 50o/o unii ld d prot in. 'A a det rmin d in the pr ence of various R target tabili t [ th f mpl , b) reducing free-en rgy as are ult f pontaneou binding and increa e pectro copy was again utilized to monitor the protein tructure at 222 nm in th pr ence f diffi rent RNA pcci increa ed ufficiently to melt the pr t in. KR with KHl to4 truncated . target . In R -BP may ha e the potential to increase the overal l them lting t mp rature of R - P. m I cui RD-BP. a , and the temp rature wa - 12 and KRA , -A34 w reanalyzed in compl x RD-BP. a w II a n gative control ubstr te 18 and tR with the pr vi u monitoring RNA periment . multipl R A concentration were t ted including 1:1, 4:1. 16 :1. and 64:1 molar ratio . Importantly. protein concentration wa increa ed to 0.4 mg/ml (- 10 flM) for scanning. Thi d ci ion wa mad due to the ob erv d dramatic reduction in CD ignal at 222 nm (figure 4.7) with increasing RNA concentration. Because the ba eline 0 ignal prior to melting would be quite low and prone to noise a a result of RNA presence already. the overall quantity ofprotein-RNA complex wa increased ufficiently to achieve approximately 30 mdeg of raw CD at 222 nm. Re ult can be n 111 figure 10, as determined melting temperatures (Tm) which were computed by Ja co Spectral Manager Thermal-denaturation software. nly the 64:1 and 16:1 amples (figure 4.10 A and B. respectively) were scanned due to visible precipitation of the RD-BP-RNA com pi x . in the 4:1 and 1:1 sample ets. This precipitation wa not pre ent in the CD spectral analy i · sample and is attributab le mainly to the increa ·ed concentration of both protein and RN apparent reduced so lubility ofthe complc cs compared to protein alone. u ed and th 105 KH1to4-RNA (64 :1) complex Tm -- () B 45 45 44 44 43 43 0 0 ......... 0 E 1- KH1to4-RNA (16 :1) complex Tm E 1- 42 41 42 41 40 40 no RNA 18S tRNA A12 A34 no RNA 18$ tRNA A12 RNA substrate RNA substrate c ~----+---:::-=~--""'---,..._ CO [ deg) -20 .tO A34 GO empera ure [CJ HP · noR A "1111 A e of denatur hon 20 66 · 75 59 ICI (2) Fllllf19 ne of stable range A Y • 10 137062 • 1·32 3582) 8 y ·10 0119679 + (·8 63574) (31 Re.sadual of htt~ng curve SIGMA 01826 141Tm "' 40 67 • · 0 051091 (CJ 15JdH • 259251 • 4651 8 [J/moll (61 dS = 826 12 • · 14 82331J!moV I __ 80 .1] Figure 4.10. TMs of KHl to4 CRD-BP protein in complex with RNA substra tes. Plotted values were determined from 222 nm 0 D amp le trac over temperature-ramping from 20 to 80 and Tm calculated based on los of half CD signal. (A) RN A sub trate pre ent in a 64 :1 protein :RNA mol ar ratio and (B) 16 :1 in otherwise identical conditions. (C) xample Tm calcu lation from thermal melting curve of RD-BP KH 1to4 protein ample with a sociated computed valu es. 106 ther and pr alon r littl differ nee in m lting t mperature between the protein al ne ampl nd ample (le ith R r, th differenc than 4 ° ). a pr due d at th higher RN 111 m re mo t pron unced at the low r R electi ity can be e n in b th n gli gibl dif[i rene p cted , th gr at t difD r nc between protein c n entration ( 16 :1 prot in to ltin g temperatur bet een KRA -A 12 and KRA -A34 c nc ntrati n (64 : 1 protein t RN ). While ncentrati on range . in mea ured T m. both KR L, _ ith both 18 ~ and tRNA addition producin g 12 and KRA -A 4 ampl es ge ne rall y app ared to b within err r f each the r ~ ith po ibl a li ght bi a t ub trate K 4 in the I wer R me ard the stronger binding concentrati on ampl e . Toe pl a in th e more pr valent differ nee in KRA - 12 and KRA - 34 at lo\\- r co ncentratio ns co mpared to hi gh r, it co uld be that und r the D e perim ental cond ition . there is a degr e of non- pecifi c bindin g, alth ugh it cannot be complete! non- pecific a 18 and tRNA compl exe hav ignifi cantl y lowe r T m . In the context of u ing m elting temperature to assess C RD-BP compl ex tability and RNA sub trate binding, the reduced so lubility of the compl exe at the hi gh co ncentrati on required fo r Tm determination render the method limi ted . Improvements m ay fo ll ow by impro in g compl ex solubility by experimenting w ith alternati ve buffe r content , or p erhap engineerin g a more solubl e CRD-BP variant by geneti call y fusin g a tag such a Fh8 or G T. 4.2.4 CRD-BP KH l to4 protein crysta l C rystalli zati on of RD -BP was fir t attempted u ing our lab 's ex i ting \\-i ld-type. fu lllength RD-BP plas1nid con truct and stand ard prote in pro du ti o n protoco L v. hercb) a denaturing prote in purifi cati o n scheme is empl oyed and refold ed by removing urea \\ ith a 3stage buffer exchan ge process. ll owever, re fo ldin g in the di a lys is units appeared to have an effecti ve concentrati o n limit o f 0.7 mg/ml w ith additi o na l prote in prec ipitating out of so lution. 107 ombin d ith increa d difficult con ntrating (clogg d filter-concentrator ) wh n thi limit wa approached, thi tandard pr parati n method wa det rmin d to b un uitable for cry tal pr t in pr parati n. dditionall nt to r. ~ rg tr nadka' laborat ry at th d mea ur , a 15 ml denatured ample at 0.7 mg/ml was m er it facilit wh reattempt to refold the protein ia dial f riti h olumbia X-ray crystallography al o fail d for imilar rea ons. I d cid d t con truct an alternative con struct whereb th RRM d main wer removed (figur 4.11 ), a th re are large flexible region connecting the RRM domain to the Kl-11 to4 RNA-binding module that l rea oned may affect the ability tore~ ld by our standard method . A PCR amplicon co ering th KH I t KH4 d main r gion wa generated for use in ub-cloning and pro ed t b th e pect d ize ( 1,122 nt) and of high purity as determined by agaro e gel analy i (figure 4.11 A). Both the D A in ert and p dig ted with 41 c( + ) pia mid vector were ucce d I and Hindlll producing ticky end and ligat d with DHSa fully .coli tran formant able to grow on LB-agar kanam ycin plates. Pre ence of the KH 1to4 insert wa confirmed u ing a digest analysi again on mini-prepped plasmid amples from uccessful transformants (figure 4.11 B). Expression in BL21 E .coli cell s successfully produced protein with imilar purity and expression levels a with the full-length con truct. Direct ize com pari on of the full-length CRD-BP (67 kDa) and KHlto4 truncation confirms the ab ence ofRRM1 and RRM2 domain , appearing at the expected 43 kDa (figure 4.1 2A). However, dialy is-ba ed refolding u ing our 3stage buffer exchange method again proved limited to appro imately 0.7 mg/ml. implying that the limiting aggregation factor is likely present within the KH 1 to KII4 region. 108 5( 00- ~ 000- • I ( 5)- 10005065000400- r- tennmator 609 ~ c La perator l - - _ r - prom tor -l-5l pET41c - KH1to4 6166 bp Figure 4.11. Plasmid pET41c(+ )-CRD- BP KH1to4. (A) DNA agaro c gel analysi s ofPCR produ t pannin g d main KI I 1 to KI 14 of ' RI -B P ge ne. (B) Endo nuc lease di gc t anal) 'is of pE 4 1c( +)-C RD-BP KI 11 to4 using Nde l and J li nd Ill rc 'Oived on 1.5° o agarosc gel. Uncut and cut v ctor band can he seen at 5 kh and in ert DNA hands appear.' at c~pcctcd I I ~- hp (C ) Pi a mid map of pET4 1c( -+ )- ' RD-BP KJ II to4 . 109 ati e prot in purifi ati n purifi d b thi meth d 111 a ub equentl pur ued a de cribed in 4.1 .8. Fraction ntain d ignifi antly le protein. with mo t of the protein in th lubl fra ti n found in th p llet (figur 4.12 ). imilar r trictive re ult for native purificati n f R - P in r c mbinant tern ha e been dem n trat d previ u ly with Pr kipcak e/ a/. ( 199 ) and Du era/. (... 00 ) that pecificall indicat that most of the protein nd up in th in lubl fraction . B A kDa 43-- ~ative- KH lto4 0.2 mg/ml Refolded - KH 1to4 0.2 mg/ml Ill" 522 5.00- 260 nm 1.40 - I ! ::~ o.eo j oo}z 50· 060- o.o0.20- o.oo- 1 ooosoo.oo- mWndonvll> zio z9o ~ ,io l2o m nm 31 OBDI4 .00111121'9 Figure 4.12. Comparison of native and denaturing KHl to4 protein purifications. (A) Denaturing protein purification - refolding facilitated by gradual removal of ur a via dialy 1 m 3-stage buffer exchange cheme. Below: UV -spectrum of protein ample showing dominant 280 nm peak; 260/2 80 : 0.61 (B) Native protein purification with imidazole eluti on. Below: UVspectrum of purified protein howing dominant 260 nm peak: 260/280 : 2.08. While the reduced yield wa not entirel y limiting. endoge nou s bacteria RN \\ere found to co-purify with the protei n in large amounts a ' determined by UV -spcc troscop; (figur 4.12B) 110 whi h uld lik 1 interfer ith r tallization and reduc lubility . pproache including n n- pe ifi RNa e uch a b nz na e tr atment t rid th pr tein f R A were c n id r d, ho e ith the 1 wer ield f thi method , r c mbin d approach ith uperior re ult . periment c ntinued t find anoth r third approach call ed n- lumn r [! !ding was tri ed. llere th denaturing purificati n tep en ure olubili ati on of th e large oth rwi e in oluble fraction of the protein . Hi -tag binding to the to 0 M urea vera m i- T co lumn occur in M urea, which i then lowl y reduced th gradi ent prior t eluti on u in g co ne ntrated imidaz le a d scrib din cti n 4.1. 9. R uJ t fr m thi m thod v...e re e. cell ent. approach d 2 mg/ml with n ff th e co lumn. protein concentration 1gn of pr cipitatio n. As we lL optimi zati on of th e proce s e entuall y1 lded >95°/o purity ample vvith mor trin gent wa h-step . and furth er concentration up to 10 mg/mJ proved impl e with no clogged filters (fi gure 4.13 ). To en ure this alternati e method v... a providing active protein till capabl e of binding RN A, fluore cence polarization (FP ) technique was emplo ed. Thi technique expl oits the tim e-scal e whereby a fluorophore re-emit plane-polari sed li ght and can detect the increa in gly random di tributi on of un-bound, free tumbling labelled-RNA co mpared to protein-bound RNA measured a ani sotropy. A fluorescein-labelled KRAS RNA probe based on previou EM A work (2.3.2) wa synthesized by IDT and used to as ess its interaction with the CRD-BP KH1to4 protein ampl e. It is evident according to the FP analysis in fig ure 13A that unlike the BSA negative bind ing controL the degree of ani sotropy with full-l ength CRD-BP and the KHl to4 con truct increase considerably with concentrati ons similar to those seen in M A e ·per iment . Ind eed upon clo e inspection. it can be seen that the KH 1to4 vari ant appears to bind th e RN substrat \\ ith hi gher affinity than the natural form . Calcul ation of the di . oc iati on con tant fro m an RN bou nd fraction plot (fi gure 4.13B) reveal a 3- fold in crease in substrate arfinity for the Kill to4 variant 111 ( 11. ± 7.1 nM mpar d lo 9 .6 ± 4. nM), po ibl implicating the RRM domain as a re tri ting 1 m nt in binding. A B 200 .s>- 150 '0 a. :;J I Q) __.,_ KH1 o4 c: Q) --BSA u • u I ctl 04 ._ u. CRD BP Kd 311 8 50 _.__ KH 1to4 1 1 Kd=93 6t34 1 02 o ~--~----~----~----~--~ 0 ~--~----~----~----~--~ 0 :?00 400 600 800 0 1000 200 400 600 800 1000 Protein concentration (nM) Protem concentration (nM) c I £l c VJ ::I / 0 ; Q) u:: / ~ u ...0 / / z a: 06 -f '-- CRD-BP I 100 08 0 .0 ~ VJ Cll c ~ 0 ~ 0 c: --- -- ~ 12 D RD-BP KHJt 4 kDa - 250 - 130 - 100 -70 - 55 - 35 -25 - IS Figure 4.13. CRD-BP KH1to4 construct binding activity and protein crystal. ll fi gure pertain to the CRD-BP construct containing only the KHl to KH4 domain binding module, excluding theN-terminal RRM 1 and RRM2 dom ai n . (A) Fluorescence pol ari zation/ ani otropy RNA-binding activity as ay. CRD-BP KH 1to4 confirmed to bind flu ore cein-1abelled KRAS RNA probe u ing fu ll -length CRD-BP as a po itive contro l and B A a a negative binding control. (B) KH1to4 and fu ll -length CRD-BP Fluorescence ani otropy data u ing KR S RN probe co nverted to fraction RNA bound plot for di sociation con tant determination. (C) 0 , PA analys is of co lumn-refo lded RD-BP KJ I 1to4 protein. (D) Po ' itive hit protein Ct). tal of Kl I1to4 in 0.4 f.! I moth er liquor. 112 Perhap a fun ti n f the RRM d mam i t confl r enhanc d electivity .G r a giv n R ub trat , a ting a n gati e r gulat r f binding in om circum tanc . 1t ha be n d m n trat d that the RRM d main d n t c ntribute t a l wer Kd, h we acr th ari u orth l g impli r gulation po tulat d h re. a u eful functi n, n r their conservation f which c uld be the negative umer u Kl I It 4 pr tein preparation were delivered to Dr. tr nadka' X-ray cry tall graphy lab rator for cr tallizati n trial . lli gh concentration ample f I 0-11 mg/ml pr t in \\er hipped from our lab [i r direct entry into crystallization, a well a a 1 mg/ml prcparati n v.here a ubscquent thrombin digest allow d for removal of the 8 X hi -tag pri r t c ncentration and cry tallization . Two trial cone ntration were etup (4 mg/ml and 8 mg/ml) B r cry. tal crcening v.ith three eparate crystal cr ening kit : Qiagen uite, Qiagen P Ia ic T uite. and Molecular Dimen ion JCSG-Piu ™ MD1-37 uite. N protein cry tals were produced from amples in our original buffer (20 mM NaH 2P 4· 200 mM Na L pH 7.4), ho e\'er a ingle cry tal wa achieved that wa dialyz d into 0.2M lithium ulphate, 0.1 M Tri - I pH 8.5, 40°/o v/v P G400 buffer and confirmed to fluore cc under V li ght, indicating that it was comprised of protein (figure 4.130). Unfortunately the phereolyte type crystal bore un uitable characteri tics for further study. including a twinned structure and thu no diffraction pattern was obtained despite the lengthy attempt. Further attempt to reproduce th crystal did not prove successfuL however data obtained from subsequent pre-cry tallization optimization tests did reveal some u efu l information pertinent to future attempt at crystalli~:ing thi s protein (figure 4.14 ). Buffer factor including sa lt, pH. and the buffer chemical it elf v.erc varied in a thermal aggregation experiment, whereby stabe li zing elements \\ere ~ ystematicall) tested for ability to prevent non-specific protein interaction. From these experiments conducted at the trynadka laboratory, we discovered that KI II to4 CRD-BP is ' tabili7 ~d significant!) b) 113 c nferred a profound tabilizing ffi ct. High alt up t 500 mM Na 1 wa also lower pH; pH d termin d t al 111 r a the temperature f aggr galion, albeit to a I t fthe alt ~a al r e tent than the pH ffect, and th f~ buffi r h i e had a tr ng impact n protein tabilit a w lL with M dep ndent on the buffer y tern u d. The pecific gr at t d gree of tabilizati n a cording to the temperatur of aggregation endea providing the p riments. Future r int cr) tallizing ' RD-BP will ertainl benefit from this kno ledge, a it is likely an id al torag and tran port buffer. a \Veil a being optimal for cr tallization trial . 114 1( A 0 .~ Ill - 100 n MIll PI') pi I I 0. '•()nM N. 11 I - 100 mM plf 'lOrnM 0 ct - 100m Glycin pH !J 0 }'J()nM JCI c ..,