GOSSIP ABOUT BIRDS’ NESTS. 231 my recollection a year or two ago by the somewhat com- plaining remark of an official at one of the churches in this district, that he had just been removing about three barrow-loads of sticks introduced through a small loophole in the church tower by “thae nasty bods (birds).” But it was the work, no doubt, of many pairs of birds in this instance: in the other it was the doing of a single couple; and very marvellous was the application of so much labour and perseverance carried on to such a result. The scene of the transaction was a winding or corkscrew staircase in a turret tower, to which admission was gained by the birds through one of the usual slits in the solid masonry. Strange to say the foundation of the intended nest was laid nearly ten feet below the level of the aperture, and with incredible labour stick after stick was brought and deposited until a sort of resting-place for the platform which was to bear the nest was obtained, and then the piling up was continued, until at last the nest proper was built at no great distance below the bottom of the slit, the eggs were laid, and the young reared. I have seen ravens nests, one over another, the accumulation of successive years, continued until the architect birds, dis- trusting the capability of the supporting boughs, left the old pile, and built a new nest in an adjoining limb or tree. But the largest structure of this kind I ever saw was one which reached up about the height of my breast, when I was a boy of fourteen or fifteen. Yet this jack- daw’s nest was built on a heap of new sticks more than twice my height at that age. Tn fact there is scarcely any limit to the industry and resolution of our feathered friends when the nest-building impulse is fully on them; and it is by no means confined to the collection and compilation of the necessary materials which what seems an abnormally selected site appears to call for. Here is an instance of another sort, Mr. Gurney of Cotton Park being the narrator :—‘ About the end of June a spotted fly-catcher began to build a nest over the door of the lodge at the entrance of my grounds. The lodge-keeper not wishing the bird to build there, destroyed the commencement of the nest; every day for a week the bird placed new materials on the same ledge over the door, and every day the woman removed them, and at the end of the week placed a stone on the ledge, which effectually baflled the fly-catcher’s efforts at that spot. But the bird then began building at the farther end of the ledge, from whence it was also driven; and, three stones being then placed on the ledge, the bird relinquished the attempt to build at either end of it, and commenced building a nest on a beech-tree opposite, which it com- pleted, and laid two eggs in it. When the bird was thus apparently established in the tree the stones over the door were taken away, when the fly-catcher immediately forsook its nest and eggs, and again commenced building over the door, on the part of the projecting ledge which it had first chosen. The nest was again destroyed, and two slates placed over the spot. The bird contrived to throw one of the slates from a slanting to a horizontal position, and then began to build upon it. The nest was again destroyed and the three stones replaced, and kept there a fortnight, after which they were again removed, and directly after they were taken away the bird again began building. The nest was subsequently destroyed several times in succession; the bird was twice driven away by a towel being thrown at it; a stone, wrapped in white paper, was placed on the ledge to intimidate it; pam” but the fly-catcher still persevered, completed a nest, and laid an egg. On hearing the circumstances I directed that the persecution of the poor bird should cease, after which it laid two more eggs, hatched all three, and successfully brought off its brood.” This narrative is very remarkable, for in so many cases birds generally are only too ready not only to give up or discontinue projected or commenced nest-building, if subjected to annoyance or disturbance in their proceed- | ings, but even to forsake them, and notwithstanding the circumstance that their full complement of eggs may have been laid, or their young actually hatched and in part reared. Instances of the opposite description, how- ever, are not rare, and the following is one of the sort, recorded by the eminent bird historian, Mr. Yarrell:— “Tn the spring of 1832, walking through an orchard, I was attracted by something on the ground in the form of a large ball, composed of dry grass. I took it up in my hands and upon examination found it was a domed nest of the willow wren. Concerned at my precipitation I put it down again as near the same place as I could, but with very little hope that the architect would ever claim it again after such an attack. I was, however, agreeably surprised to find next day that the little occupier was still proceeding with its work. The feathers inside were increased, as I could perceive by the alteration in colour. In a few days two eggs were laid, and I thought my little protégés safe from harm, when a flock of ducks that had strayed from the poultry-yard, with their usual curiosity went straight to the nest (which was very conspicuous, as the grass had not grown high enough to conceal it) and with their bills spread it quite open, displaced the eggs, and made the nest a complete ruin.. I now despaired; but immediately driving the authors of the mischief away, I tried to restore the nest to its proper form, and replaced the eggs inside. That same day I was astonished to find the addition of another egg, and in about a week four more. The bird sat, and ultimately brought out seven young ones. But I cannot help supposing it a singular instance of attachment and con- fidence, after being twice so rudely disturbed.” In another case, implicating another pair of little willow- wrens, and occurring under my own notice, the upper half, or at least one-third, of the domed nest was taken off by a sweep of the gardener’s svythe. Notwithstand- ing which trenchant blow, and the utter ruin to a build: ing consequent on removing its roof and upper story at one cut, damages were speedily repaired, the eggs already laid added to, sat upon, and in due time hatched. But there are still other instances on record, in some respects more remarkable than the last, connected with birds and their nests. In one such instance a pair of robins built their nest in the tilt of a covered carrier's cart or waggon. The nest, it would seem, had been completed during a temporary cessation of travelling by the cart and its owner; but when the habitual goings and comings were resumed, the robins so far from forsaking their nest, commenced “ going and coming,” too ; were the companions of the carrier in all his journeyings and stop- pings ; hatched, fed, reared, and, finally, brought off their brood. Another instance, stranger still, it almost seems, shows us a pair of robins building withinside the paddle- box of a small ferry-steamer, which was almost perpetu- ally in motion as it plied between the two limits of its restless voyages. The nest was built amid the rushings,