Over The Edge Page 6 ril 6, 1999 Students examine Northwood’s proposed road through Carp Lake Provincial Park Submitted by Mike Gray, Sara Robinchaud and Josh Sears Recently, controversy over a proposed logging road through Carp Lake Provincial Park was brought to our attention through the local press. Northwood Inc has pro- posed to build a road through the north east corner of Carp Lake Provincial Park in order to gain access to timber. This has raised con- cerns among various interested parties such as BC Parks, park users, public interest policy watch group and others having a stake in land management. Given that Our group project is com- posed of two resource recreation students and one environmental plan- ning student, this issue naturally drew our atten- tion. The following out- lines our results: Our initial reaction We disagreed with the proposal since we strongly feel that park- land should be used for recreational use only, not resource extraction. Additionally, we lacked sufficient Knowledge on the subject to make an effective analysis of this complicated issue. In order to gain a broad- er understanding of the issue, we decided to solicit the opinions of some of the stakehold- _ ers. We chose three sample stakeholders that we felt represented key interests in the issue, then we conduct- ed personal interviews with them. They were Northwood Inc., the Nechako Environmental Coalition and BC Parks. We soon realized the issue was more complex that originally anticipat- ed. We have identified four possible options: 1) No extraction of tim- ber and no road. This option eliminates the © potential for stream and fish degradation, as well as traffic conflicts between industry and the public. In addition, there would be no reduc- tion in the total park area. 2) Road east of the park. There would no intrusion on the park boundaries; however, this option requires the construction of a new bridge and the addition of five kilome- tres of road. This may effect fish populations of trout and grayling, given “In our opinion, leaving the park untouched remains the best option.” that the bridge exists downstream already (in the park). 3) Road through the park. This option would use an existing bridge, minimizing additional fish and stream damage, and requires one kilome- tre of road construction through the north east corner of the park. The road would only damage 500 metres of untouched timber since an old skid trail, predat- ing the park, exists and has already disturbed the area. Additionally, there are not important wildlife habitat noted here that most extraction would take place in the winter, reducing traffic conflicts 4) Assess rout from the north. This route would connect with and exist- ing road network near Mackenzie. It is a partic- ularly damaging option since the road would dis- sect a large area of wildlife habitat. In addi- tion, it would cross multi- ple riparian zones and be extremely costly due to road and bridge con- struction. Our Conclusions: In our opinion, leaving the park untouched remains the best option. It is consistent with the purpose and classifica- tion of parklands as pre- served land. This option is also logical given the large amount of land available for commercial- ly extractable develop- ment in the Prince George region (59%). Only 7% percent was identified for preserva- tion during LRMP plan- ning stages. However, give the participation of numerous stakeholders in the area, we acknowl- edge the “through the park” option may be a reasonable alternative. This choice meets the demands for timber sup- ply, while minimizing environmental damage to the area. The addition of 19,000 hectares (for a total 37,000 hectares) implemented by the Prince George Land and Resource Management Plan also increases the park size by more than 100%. Consequently, the deletion of 3 hectares of parkland is a minimal loss overall. Our only misgivings regard- ing this option is that is may justify further dele- tions from parks else- where. We_ sincerely hope this will not set a precedent of other National Firearms Awareness Day parks. Although the request of any one stakeholder cannot be fully satisfied, the LRMP allows workable compro- mises for all stakehold- ers involved. It can be anticipated these kinds of issues will continue to arise in the future. The agencies/firms we researched are aware of the challenges facing the, and should be able to co-operate amongst each other, in order to maximize benefits. We fell public participation and decisions specific to individual sites are clear- ly necessary when mak- ing land resource man- agement decisions. Multiple land use is now a permanent feature in management planning. THE UN GSCOPE ‘ es by. TAMS, ue Aries aiec 21-April 19) A freak snow storm occurs and you almost freeze to death. You realize why Daisy Duke lives south of the Mason-Dixon line and decide to buy pants. Taurus (April 20-may 20) Things are looking up. The toenail fungus is gone and you still smell spring time fresh. The only downer: after that antiperspirant binge everyone at the drug store looks at you funny. Better find a new phar- macy. Vegetarian (Carrot-tofu) (in the continuing saga of Gemini) No mad carrots in sight, unfortu- nately the cabbage in the back of the fridge has grown a mind of its own, so stay away from coleslaw. Cancer (June 21-July 22) After walking everywhere for the past couple of weeks your legs are really buff, unfortunately your upper body has not followed suite and you have started to look like a human pear. Don’t worry too much carrying your school bag some more should even things out. Leo (July 23-Aug 22) You’ve changed your major and you really enjoy English, but thoughts of primates still pop into your head. No more Not Wanted On_ the Voyage for you. Virgo (Aug 23-Sept 22) You sew up the hole in your pocket and your luck seems to have turned. All of the snow on the sides of the road has melted and thou- sands of coins appear. f ~~ | ‘Libra (Sept 23-Oct 22) Your craving for chocolate has become an obsession and your mood swings cause you to attack small children on their way to school and bite the ears off of their chocolate bunnies. Don’t despair time and a straight jacket will cure you of this. | Scorpio (Oct 23-Nov 21) They didn’t believe your amnesia defense. Hide in a dark corner and lick your wounds until the bruises heal. Sagittarius (Nov 22-Dec 21) You have finally woken up, unfortu- nately you slept through all of your valuable study time, better hurry, you’ve got an exam in 5 minutes. Capricorn (Dec 22-Jan 19) The nasty notes you faxed to Abudabee seem to have worked. You are in for a stretch of good luck. Watch out for that phone bill on the 10, 11 or 12. Too pay this you'll have to be creative: try tele- marketing, or just leaving the coun- try. Aquarius (Jan 20-Feb 18) Men’s hockey has come to a close. The guys are sad to see you go, but at least you have got Rugby and Lacrosse to look forward to. Try not go into one of those feminist rants during the games again. Pisces (Feb 19-Mar 20) Your new scissors skill has gotten you into trouble, especially after your roommates new hair cuts. Better find somewhere to hide real- ly fast, talk to a Scorpio they always seem to need a handy hiding place, 10am - 4pm Tuesday, April 6, 1999 UNBC Wintergarden Tables with information from local and national organizations dealing with firearms and related activities 10am - 3:30 pm Guest Speakers and Discussion