222 OCCURRENCE OF THE MAGNETITE Magnetite occurs in a number of isolated pockets and lenses, strung out in a northeast-southwest direction through a total distance of 770 feet. The main part of the prospecting has been carried out over 400 feet of this distance, and at a distance of 370 feet to the southwest the last isolated deposit is found. The largest exposure of the better grade of magnetite measures about 350 square feet in area, and the size of the remaining ones is very much smaller. Elongated patches of rocky magne- tite (magnetite mixed with a large quantity of contact metamorphosed rock) up to 35 feet in length and 9 feet in diameter occur, but these also are disconnected. Most of these outcrops are bounded by drift, so that the relations of the individual occurrences are not clear, and their actual sizes may be greater than their outcrops. The western of the two tunnels crosses a contact between diorite and limestone, but exposes only a small mass of magnetite in a drift to the east. This tunnel demonstrates the lack of continuation between the magnetite exposure 30 feet west of its portal, and the exposures around the eastern tunnel. CHARACTER OF THE MAGNETITE Very little high-grade magnetite was seen either in place or on the dumps. Most of it is intimately mixed with garnet, siderite, and calcite; some of it is richly impregnated with chalcopyrite in grains and stringers. é ORIGIN OF THE DEPOSIT The magnetite is clearly of contact metamorphic origin, and is the result of the replacement of small elongated roof pendants of limestone in the diorite, by the action of iron-bearing solutions derived from the intrusive. The actual underground extent of these replacements has not been determined, but there is nothing to indicate that they are of large size. ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS The deposit is developed by considerable stripping, and open-cutting, and by two tunnels, 100 feet and 35 feet in total length. There are two selected analyses published by Lindeman and Brewer, which are here quoted, simply to complete the descriptions. — A B Cc LrOn eye rete gangoapnooosnsodasonononeoaseoos 66-89 52-6 66-0 Phosphorus 9, esac eee eA eae nee 0-024 nil nil Sulphursehsso suite ee eeeecee ee aeay ie eeeee ae ceeeere 0-060 4-2 trace ANSOLUB Las tsciace tiene MR ote CRT TE ee ee 4-37 12-1 3-3 Coppercnayeccee ecco ee ee ee ee en era oe hd | eon ae 3-3 A. Lindeman, E.: Bibliography, No. 16, ‘‘average sample.” B. Brewer, W. M.: Bibliography, No. 21, sample of ore from tunnel No. 2. C. Ditto, ‘‘average sample from a large dump at the portal,”’ tunnel No. 1. The deposit is of no value as an immediate source of iron ore.