existing airports, considering physical obstacles, on an alignment that would ensure completion of the road as a practical military highway in the minimum possible time employing the maximum of forces and equipment that could be marshalled and maintained. The story of the tapid completion of the highway in the time required, the difficulties met, the obstacles Overcome, and the extra- ordinary measures adopted has been told in wide and varying detail and needs no recitation. Possible routes to Alaska had been under consideration prior to 1942 and two reports had been submitted, one by the International Fact-Finding Committee in 1931-32 and the other by the British Columbia-Yukon-Alaska Highway Commission (Canada) in 1941. However, in locating the military highway no consideration could be given to features affecting its post-war use, such as the tapping of economic sections, the opening of undeveloped areas, and its integra- tion with future channels of transportation. No factors could be considered other than those involved in construct- ing, in the minimum time, a military road along the air route to Alaska. The project caught the imagination of the Canadian and American people. The Yukon was a land of romance and mystery; the Klondike story was still fresh in the public mind, suggesting the promise of untold wealth yet to be tapped in the great hinterlands of the northwest. The prospect of a highway through British Columbia and Yukon to Alaska, which had been projected in 1929 by various public bodies in the Northwestern States and in British Columbia, was warmly received by the public generally, and particularly in Alaska, where pressure for a land route connecting that territory with the United States had long been exerted. Volumes were written, following breathless trips through the area, by journalists—often not too well informed—and press releases, magazine stories, and books poured off the presses. The result of this publicity has been that the peacetime possibilities of the highway have become exaggerated in the public mind. The Alaska Highway does not follow a scenic route (as compared with present highway routes through British Columbia, Alberta, and the Northwestern States) nor was this intended. Primarily it is a military road to connect airports, and, second, a supplemental military supply route. The numerous scenic sections that are traversed are, to a degree, prejudiced by the great distances that must be driven to reach them. PHYSICAL CHARACTER OF THE HIGHWAY ‘The magnitude of the project, which was carried out by the United States Corps of Engineers, the need for speedy construction, and the limited accessibility of the region suggested the advisability of a two-phase construction program; the first phase to provide, with utmost rapidity, a rough minimum road to make possible the early distribution of a multiplicity of additional crews which, in the second 3681—8} phase, would complete the road to final standards. The requirements set forth for the pioneer road were very broad; specifically as follows: A pioneer road to be pushed to completion with all speed within the physical capacity of the troops. The objective is to complete the entire route at the earliest possible date to a standard sufficient only for the supply of troops engaged on the work. The second phase was the construction of a permanent road of high standard under the direction of the United States Public Roads Administration. Early in 1943 these plans were changed and the United States Corps of Engineers was given seniority in all matters relative to the highway. The objective was to complete, in 1943, a good gravel road for military traffic between Dawson Creek, B.C., and Fairbanks, Alaska. A route connecting the series of airfields from Fort St. John, B.C., to Big Delta, on the Richardson Highway in Alaska, was selected. The nearest railhead was Dawson Creek, which thus became the southeastern starting point of the highway. From Dawson Creek to Fort St. John there was a dirt road passable in dry weather and in winter. From Fort St. John to Fort Nelson, about 260 miles, there was a winter trail located mostly on the low ground, impassable at certain seasons. For the rest of the nearly 1,000 miles from Fort St. John to Whitehorse there was nothing but a wilderness crossed by an occasional winter or pack trail. Although the road was to serve the established system of airports there was a fair amount of latitude in its loca- tion since the airports could be reached by branch roads. Final decision was to abandon the old winter trail to Fort Nelson and follow the higher ground to the west. This meant difficult location and construction as much of the route is in rolling, heavily forested country and does not always follow well-defined ridges or streams. (There appears to have been here an undue fear of the soil con. ditions in the valley sections.) The result is that from Fort St. John to Fort Nelson the road keeps as much as possible to high ground, thus limiting its peacetime utility as a development highway. From Fort St. John to the upper valley of the Cameron River the route is northwestward, thence across the Sikanni Chief and down the Prophet River to a crossing of the Muskwa at Fort Nelson. Thence it ascends the valleys of the Muskwa and tributary Tetsa to Summit Lake, 88 miles west of Fort Nelson, where it crosses the divide of the Rockies at an elevation of approximately 4,251 feet, the highest point on the entire road. Descending the west slope of the Rockies the road follows MacDonald Creek and Racing River, and ascends the Toad River Valley to a low divide which it crosses to the Muncho Lake Basin. From Muncho Lake, it descends the valley of the Trout River to the confluence of that river with the Liard, crosses the Liard at this point, and follows its north bank to Watson Lake. {115}