12 News Prince George Mayoral Race James Mangan Team Member t is election season in Prince George, and students need to get into the electoral mindset. The overall tone PG residents are voicing in this race seems to be one of dissatisfaction, especially towards our current mayor Shari Green, who announced that she will not seek re-election. Campaigning to take over the position as mayor are two former city councillors, Lyn Hall and Don Zurowski. The first mayoral debate took place on October 15 at the public library, where the candidates were asked about their stances on some of Prince George’s most pressing issues. Students, who often feel underrepresented and underappreciated in municipal affairs, have as mucha stake in the outcome of this election as any other residents of Prince George. Unfortunately, if students remain apathetic towards municipal politics, they'll remain underrepresented and underappreciated. Both Hall and Zurowski have much to offer the citizens of Prince George. Zurowski has served on city council from 1999 to 2008. This is Zurowski’s second run for mayor, as he lost to Dan Rogers in the 2008 municipal election. During the 2005 election, Zurowksi received more votes than any other city councillor. On his campaign website, Zurowski states that he holds the position of Chair on both the BC Passenger Transportation board and the International Bioenergy Conference & Exhibition Society. He is also currently serving as Director for both the Prince George Airport Authority, as well as the BC Pavilion Corporation. In the 2011 municipal election, Hall received more votes than any other city councillor. Hall offers three years of service on city council prior to this election, as well as 10 years working on the Board of Education for School District #57, including five years as Chairman. Hall and Zurowski have made their priorities clear. Building off of Prince George’s dissatisfaction with City Hall’s management, Hall promised to strengthen communication between staffers, senior staff, and council members. Hall detailed his view of a city council made up of individual councillors voicing their opinions upon policy deliberation, yet practicing consensus upon adopting said policy. Hall also prioritized continued investment in local infrastructure, specifically referencing council’s increased funding for road renovation and snow removal over the past three years. Residents of Prince George remember last winter, when disputes between city employees and their managers halted snow removal, rendering many streets unusable. Zurowski began the debate by stating his “three pillars:” growing Prince George, needs before wants, and civic pride. Zurowski promised that as Mayor, he’d see Prince George’s population grow by another 20,000 residents, bringing the total population to around 100,000. He claimed this could be done by proving to British Columbia that Prince George is “open for business.” In regards to public infrastructure, Zurowski has stated that the city needs to concentrate on its needs, such as road infrastructure, while putting the cities wants, such as the renovation of the Library’s front entrance, “on the backburner.” Zurowski is confident that civic pride will increase as Prince George grows, but this requires effort from the local residents, who have a role to play in selling Prince George to the rest of the province. Students have not been ignored during this election. As a part of Suln Lee | OTE downtown revitalization, both Hall and Zurowski support the development of student residences in the downtown region to accommodate students of both UNBC and CNC. Both candidates also discussed bolstering downtown entertainment in order to make downtown a destination at which students, as well as other residents, can spend their evenings. Hall specifically discussed the possibility of improved transportation routes for students from their schools to the downtown region. Such promises to students are easy to make as they can be incorporated into a larger downtown revitalization policy, which is overwhelmingly supported by the voters of Prince George. However, the candidates will determine how important these issues are to students after examining the young-voter turnout rate. Both candidates are not interested in paying for costly infrastructure projects unless they are held as important to the residents of Prince George. If students aren’t even willing to give a candidate their support by ballot, why should the candidates bother fulfilling a student-oriented campaign promise?