over The EDGE page 6 Wednesday, Oct 25, 1995

Poison Pen

It was once thought that the governments using high technology to
spy on and control the masses was a construct of fiction writers such as
George Orwell. Sadly, we can no lorger say that this is true. Yes,
photo radar has come to British Columbia and with ‘it all the injustice
and oppression that such a technological terror creates.

The government has taken away more of our privacy and individual
rights in the name of safety. The government is using the name of
safety as a smoke screen to hide its attempts to milk yet more money
out of an increasingly tax weary population. Speed is a factor in many
accidents, however this speed is usually excessive and/or too fast for
the road conditions. When we look at the statistics we also see that the
experience level of the driver is a much better indicator of a likely acci-
dent than the speed traveled.

The government is not concerned with safety here. If they were con-
cerned with safety a much better way to spend the money would have
been to hire a few more graders for the Yellow Head Highway. So that
I wouldn’t have to slog through eight inches of powder every winter

just to get home. What the government is concerned with is the ex-
pected millions that photo radar is promising to bring to government
coffers. The problem is that if the government were run by sane indi-
viduals they might just have noticed that photo radar was recently
scrapped in Ontario not only because of mass public protest but be-
cause the promised revenue just didn’t materialize. Why didn’t the
money roll in? This can be easily traced to the good people of Ontario
who showed their government that they would pay what amounts to a
very expensive highway toll. What did they do? It is really simple, any
ticket you are given via photo radar you take to court. When the gov-
ernment realizes that for every $75 ticket it hands out that they will
have to pay $150 in court costs... well let’s just say that the cash cow
stops giving milk. Even if you lose your case you have still beaten the
government.

Photo radar is an infringement on my privacy and my rights. What’s
next, random drug testing for university students? If the government

wants to catch me breaking one of its foolish laws let them hire a cop!
Fines are an unfair way to enforce the law at any rate. The rich and well
off speed at will, paying off the fines as if they were simply another bill
while a starving university student may not eat for a week in order to
pay the government for his (or her) slight transgression. But then again
it is the rich that make the laws, so can we really be surpassed that the
system favors them?

Well I am a little off topic, so to get back to the matter at hand...
photo radar is an attempt by the government to use technology to spy
on you and coerce you into doing as they say. Photo radar is only the
beginning. As technology grows other restrictive measures will fol-
low. Since up to 80% of the population feels the speed limit is too low
I can only infer that a majority of British Colombians don’t support this
technology and threats to force obedience on its citizens.

The following are some ideas that brought about the end of photo
radar in Ontario. Please note that some of the following are considered
illegal by the Canadian government and could lead to imprisonment by
the same government.

Non compliance - Go to court! Make the government work to:collect
your money. Stand up and tell the bureaucracy that you believe that
this law unjust on all moral and legal grounds. You will most likely
lose your case, but you have done your part to fuck the system. This
robs the government of any profit they would have made from you.

Subterfuge - These photo radar systems cost over 4 million dollars
each. Even if just one is destroyed it will cancel the governments prof-
its for thousands of tickets. This could be accomplished by something
as simple as a Motlov cocktail or as complicated as a homemade bomb.
However, if that is a little extreme for you simply try spraying the cam-
era lens with shaving creme. This will cause problems for a short time.

The government has no right to spy on us and we must do everything
in our power to fight these Orwellian speed police. If the government
is really that keen on electronic surveillance maybe we could put a
camera in every MP’s office (see how many votes that gets in the House
of Commons). Think of all the money we could save catching these
“Mulroney Types” making secret deals and immortal contracts with
powerful elites. Remember if they are doing it for you, they will prob-
ably be doing it to you. :

by ian lorenz

Seeing the truth about Small town Crime

To the editor:

I am writing in response
to the letter from Gerogina Nelson,
about her ignorant opinions on the
Prince Rupert Police and the vio-
lence going on there. I myself am
from Rupert, born and raised there.
Anyone who doesn’t think vio-
lence happens a lot in our town is
blind or stupid, probably both.
Either that or they’re living in a
cocoon of blissful myopicity. I
used to think the way she does
when I was younger, but now that
P’ve “grown up”, I can see that I
was wrong. This summer espe-
cially opened my eyes, as I was
forced into being a witness to the
brutal slaying of Trygue
Magnusson. I knew the “boys”
involved extremely well, and
there’s lots more like them, steal-
ing, killing beating, just being little
drunken goofs who are going to
grow up into big drunken goofs,
and if it takes stiff jail sentences,
too bad, it’s gotta stop somewhere.

As for Prince Rupert’s Finest, if
they’re doing such a good job, why
is it that why the largest police
force per capita in North others

America, vandalism, robbery,
break and enters, car-thefts and
HEROIN SMUGGLING rates are
all going up way faster than any-
where else in BC I worked with a
lady this summer who had to
shield her childrens’ eyes from a
group of kids shooting up heroin
on the front steps of the Moby
Dick, IN BROAD DAYLIGHT,
and there were no cops. They were
probably sleeping in their car in the
back-alley, sleeping off trading
sex-for-rides to the young girls
leaving the Surf Club all drunked
up. And don’t say that doesn’t
happen there either, because my
friend was forced into it!!! My
parents live the next street over
from the police station, and they
had to wait over an hour for a
cruiser when they made a call be-
cause of a brawl going on in the
street in front of their house. Al-
most every day we hear stories
from the fisherman on one side,
and the townies on the other, and
about the terrible fights that hap-
pen, and the police only show up
when it’s too late. One of the main
reasons that city-council there is
fighting for a curfew is because
they know THE POLICE
CAN’T HANDLE IT! That’s
why I, all my family members, and
everyone else we know signed the
petition calling for it, ‘cause we
know it too. People like Trygue
Magnusson, Scott Bishop, and all

visiting our town shouldn’t have
to be scared to walk home at night
because people like you refuse to
recognize the problem, and are too
chicken-shit to do anything about
it.

Take off your Rose-col-
ored glasses, Gerogina, and see the
town of Prince Rupert for what it
really is, a few decent people - and
a lot of DRUNKEN GOOFS.

From
Robyn, Prince Rupert BC

Politically Correct?

You have GOT to be kidding me.
Why does it seem that everywhere
I turn, there is something to remind
me that I can get punished for treat-
ing people as if they exist. The only
way you can possibly avoid not of-
fending anyone is to completely
sever contact with the rest of hu-
manity.

To exist is to have an opinion.
And to have an opinion is to of-
fend someone. Believe me, I know.
It seems that I’ve offended more
than a few people in my lifetime.

Go figure. When you say some-
thing, it is more than likely an
opinion. Thus, it will offend some-
one. You never know who it will
offend, though; that’s the fun sur-
prise at the bottom of the box of
Cracker Jacks of life. Even if what
you say is not an opinion, and is a
fact, it can still be taken the wrong
way and can still offend someone.

I find that people get too sensi-
tive about anything that pertains to
them in any possible way. Some
especially spastic people will ana-
lyze a statement or action to look
for a way that it can be considered
insulting. Thus, they will find po-
litical incorrectness where it
doesn’t exist.

An example of this happened to
a friend of mine last year. A girl
at this university tried to have a
sexual harassment suit filed
against my friend. I’m not sure
what exactly he did, but then again,
I don’t think that he even knows
what exactly he did. The interest-
ing part is that my friend is gay.
Quite gay. Suffice it to say, the
suit didn’t quite work, and he got
off. So how is it that a gay guy
managed to do something that

could be considered sexual harass-
ment, even by the university’s stan-

dards?

yong sor

Letters to the Editor....

Letters Policy:

Over The Edge has an
open letters policy and will
undertake to print every
letter received from the
University and local com-
munity. Letters must be
typewritten, and should
include your name, stu-
dent number and phone
number (for verification
purposes only). Letters
should be no more -than
200 to 400 words. Editors
reserve the right to edit
ruthlessly for length and
libelous content. Only one
submission per person per
issue. Letter will not be
edited for spelling or
grammar.

LACK OF OPINION
OR LACK OF INTER-
EST

We produce the Over The Edge
paper every two weeks for the stu-
dents of UNBC. Many people pick
it up and thumb through it only to
find that it lacks clarity or offends
them in some way.

My point is that we are working
hard to produce a quality paper
which faculty and students can be
proud of. We dedicate a great deal
of our own personal time to writ-
ing and organizing each issue for
release. It is disheartening for us
to take the time to express our
opinion on an issue, only to have
no response from the student body.

It is not merely enough to read
the paper. If something offends
you, then send in a reply to that
article! Don’t spend your time dis-
cussing it with everybody one at a
time, give it to us! We’ll put it
where everybody on campus can
see it and respond. This goes for
members of the satellite regions
too. If you are intrigued, good or
bad, give us your response.

We need your input as to how
we can serve your better. We are
unable to merely guess your ideas
or feelings. Through your input,
Over The Edge will quickly be-
come a forum for thoughts, ideas
and information. =

Thank-you
Management