— April 7, 1998 1am compelled to write a let- ter in regards to the cover of your most recent, April Fool's, issue of Over The Edge. I'll preface my comments by making clear my understand- ing that this was your April 1st issue and that you did indeed warn readers to “not take [it] too seriously.” That said, | have to ask myself who are the people that allow such mindless, ignorant, unin- formed slander to grace the front of UNBC’s only student newspaper. As our only offi- cial publication, | would have hoped that this newspaper LETTERS “We must plunge deeper into the whole philosophy of NON-violence.” would attempt to uphold stan- dards of good taste and humour. If this is too much to ask, | would at the very least expect the editors to display some degree of social aware- ness and responsibility. Your latest issue shows none of this. My point is this: | find it dis- tasteful and offensive that an issue, ANY issue, of a publi- cation put out by supposedly educated students should so blatantly misrepresent the visionary words of one of the Civil Rights movement's most admirable, pivotal figures. | write, of course, of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., a man who lived by a creed of not “incit- ing riots” or “coming for chil- dren,” but by the belief that (quoting Dr. King) “we must plunge deeper into the whole philosophy of NON-violence (my emphasis).” You may think that my take on the situation is “over the edge” given the context that this was your issue for April Fool’s day, but | would sug- gest to you that on NO day is it acceptable to slander and deprecate such monumental words and the man and Are you pleased with ICL food service? Are you pleased with ICL food service? Are you getting you money’s worth? | don't think believe so. Since | have been here, |’ve found a major decrease in food quality. There are smaller portions and they have raised the prices! There is little selection and it is getting worse. Because the cafeteria does not serve the students on weekends, we are left with the Wintergarden where selection is even more limited. I've seen the Wintergarden close for over an hour in the middle of the day because there was not enough staff it operate it. As well as a shortage of food with only one employee work- ing it is often the case that cleanliness is highly question- able. The server is going from the till and handling the money to handling the food that we have ordered. | have also seen management get upset with employees for no apparent reason. These are the employees who maintain as sanitized a work place as is possible, and thus, incurred longer service lines. The servers in the arrange- ment are not the problem - it is the management that need to make some changes. Isn't it time their contract was termi- nated? We, the students as keeping ICL in business. We deserve better service, food, and man- agement. A concerned student THE UNPOLITICAL POLITICS OF OUR NUGSS During the March 30th NUGSS meeting Brendon Kruger and Susie Dwyer sub- mitted a written complaint concerning the MAI FREE ZONE sign in the NUGSS office window. The two con- cerned students stated that NUGSS has failed to uphold sections 2.1 and 2.2 of the constitution: NUGSS will facil- itate an awareness of the rights and views of each member of the society and to promote equality among all members of the society. Their complaint states that “[t]his is an educational institu- tion. By not equally represent- ing both sides on an issue, it does not promote free thought and is therefore redundant of an academic _ institution. Sections 2.1 and 2.2 prevent NUGSS from being allowed to take a political stance on con- troversial issues. NUGSS has a responsibility to each and every member of the society to present all information in the same manner, and should therefore leave political issues to the self-proclaimed political groups on campus, making them true to their constitu- tion.” Their proposed solu- tions: “Post the opposing side or remove any and all propa- ganda on the controversial issue in question, which hap- pens to be declaring NUGSS an MA\I-free zone.” To start off my rant, Susie Dwyer stated that the issue was not the MAI in particular but rather the constitutional flaw that the NUGSS has “overlooked”. This is com- pletely contradicted by one of the proposed solutions she submitted—removing : propaganda on the controver- n sial issue in question. . .”,. therefore the complaint is about the Multilateral Agreement on Investment. Next, the so called “constitu- tional flaw’ can be interpreted in different ways. When, after a great deal of deliberation, the NUGSS voted 4 to 1 (3 abstentions) to become an MAI-free zone they were facil- itating “an awareness of the rights and views” of many members of the society. As for “promot[ing] equality among all members of the society”, other society mem- bers are also entitled to access the NUGSS to have their rights and views facilitat- ed. There is nothing prevent- ing Pro-MAI students from getting on the agenda, pre- senting research on an issue, forming a committee and proposing a vote on having a Pro-MAI sign hung in the NUGSS window. The Multilateral Agreement on Investment is an issue stu- dents must acknowledge. Two major provisions in the MAI, as it is presently pro- posed, that will obligate our governments for 20 years (yes the hands of future par- liaments will be tied) are: 1) unrestricted access to all eco- nomic sectors and 2) the immediate and full compensa- tion for any revenues (actual or potential) lost due to MAI- incompatible government action. The first opens the door to foreign ownership of our educational institutions. The second is a way to beliefs that they represent. Granted, April 1 is a day set aside for joking, but this cover goes beyond poor taste and joking and instead left me feeling sick and ashamed of this newspaper. Coming so close to the anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination (April 3), this piece of ‘writing’ is doubly insensitive and a bold-faced misrepresentation of both Dr. King and the intellectual and social awareness of the stu- dents of this university. To clarify Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s true beliefs and vision, | include an excerpt from his August 28, 1963 speech in Washington, DC: “| have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its Over The Edge Page 5 creed, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.” | have a dream that one day. . sons of former slaves and sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of broth- erhood. . .This is our hope.” Please, in the future, attempt to show a greater degree of intelligence, social awareness and good taste. The students of UNBC deserve it and the memory of Martin Luther King Jr. demands it. Rumon Carter UNBC Student Commissionaires to Remain Alert On behalf of the British Columbia Corps of Commissionaires, UNBC Site, | would like to take this opportunity to thank all those who supported us during our contract negotiations. Your kind remarks to us and about us | am sure helped us ensure foreign ownership becomes a reality because it gives investors the right to challenge—SUE!— (and therefore inhibit) public funding for education. University and College stu- dent associations across Canada are proud to have declared themselves MAI-free zones. The NUGSS was only able to muster enough politi- cal will for two weeks before caving. in. Why didn’t the NUGSS consider the first pro- posal? Why did this removal of “propaganda” proposal not require any information to convince the NUGSS that, in being an MAI-free zone, it was infringing on “free thought’. Interestingly, Jackie Eaton, Tyson Hodgson and Tami McHugh, who abstained from the previous MAI vote sud- denly acquired the political will NOT to be MAI-free. Other “representatives” who voted against being an MA\I-free zone were, Jamie Campbell and Gord Larson, the former changing his previous deci- sion and the latter consistent- secure our renewed contract. Special thanks to Kevin Larson for his efforts. J.W.G. (Bill) Bishop, Sgft. Site Supervisor UNBC Site #146 ly voting against the MAI issue. Mr. Dave Nagel, as ombudsperson was not enti- tled to vote and Chris Reid was absent from the first MAI vote and abstained from the second. This leaves Marki Sellers, Jack Lin and Matt Macrae being the only direc- tors having the political will to make decisions and stand by them. The NUGSS is political by the very fact that we have ELECTIONS! The every day deci- sions that the NUGSS direc- tors make on our behalf are political. Not all decisions are easy ones, some are highly complex and are in need_ of research—on both sides of the issue, this is one reason directors receive up to $300 a month (before taxes). The work was done on the MAI, a decision was made, and now a quick vote has made me a member of a DEMOCKERY! Leanne Chatten UNBC student