fatal bullet, but that it had been fred from the friend’s rifle. In another instance of horse shoot- ing, there were no suspects, but six rifles of the same caliber as the fatal bullet were sent down to Headquar- ters. One of the rifles was identified positively as having fired the shot which injured the horse. It turned out that this rifle belonged to the son of the animal’s owner. In a recent murder case there was a great deal of difficulty in determin- ing if the man had been shot or stabbed to death. Medical examina- tion tended to the belief that the man had been shot, but no fatal bullet could be found on the premises. The deceased was taken to a hospital and x-rayed from head to foot in an endeavour to find if the bullet had been deflected by a bone into another part of the body. No bullet was found. To make sure of the cause of death, a piece of the deceased’s under- shirt was sent to Headquarters, con- taining one of the holes (there had been several). This hole was un- doubtedly a point of entry as the fibres of wool were all forced in- wards. Another garment of exactly the same type and taken from the deceased’s possession was also sent to Headquarters for tests. The garment was taken and hung up at the range and a number of shots were fired through it with different kinds of ammunition. A small section of cloth adjacent to the hole was then removed from each test hole and submitted to spectro- graphic analysis. In each instance the passage of the bullet had left traces of metal behind, regardless of the distance from which the shot was fired. A section was then cut from the hole in the garment which the deceased was wearing at the time of his death. Tihis was also subjected to spectrographic analysis, but no trace of metal could be found. Further pathological examination supported this finding, that the deceased had met death by means of a sharp in- strument and not by gun shot. In a recent attempted murder case, the defendant had shot the victim With a shotgun, but the shot had only wounded the victim, who ran towards his assailant and wrestled the gun away from him, then knocked him into insensibility during the struggle. The victim called the police, who took both attacker and attacked to hospital. In his defence the assailant contended that he had been attacked by the victim and that during the struggle the shotgun had gone off accidentally and wounded the other. The victim, however, had told a story of being ambushed and shot from a distance. Medical testi- NINETEENTH EDITION mony indicated that the pellets in the victims back had covered a fairly wide area. Firearms Identification were then called in to determine the distance at which the shot was actually fired. A number of tests were made with the weapon used employing identical cartridges. Shot patterns were made from a distance of one foot up to fifteen feet. This information after being checked and rechecked was graphically illustrated in a chart setting forth the cone of fire and divergence of the pattern together with a scale demonstrating the dis- tances and relative sizes. The jury was satisfied that the shot could not have been fired from a distance of less than eight or 10 feet and found the accused guilty. The latter drew a term of 20 years. In another case a few years ago, two empty cartridges were found at the scene of the murder. These were sent in to Firearms Identification to be checked with the suspect’s rifle. It was determined that one cartridge had been fired from this weapon, but the other one had been fired, presumably some time before from the victim’s rifle and had been ejected at the same spot. The suspect was convicted and sentenced to death. One of Sub-Inspector Young's oddest cases from the standpoint of firearms identification came in the case of Rex vs. Prince—murder. Prince, it will be recalled, was sen- tenced to death and executed for the double murder of two trappers in the northern part of the Province in 1944. The accused's rifle was of good make and kept in wonderful condi- tion. In fact he had a special scabbard made for the weapon, and kept it well oiled and free from rust or dirt. It was the only thing upon which this untutored savage lavished his affection. When the fatal bullets were banded to Young for identification, he was surprised to find that one of the land engravings was a great deal wider than the others. He had never run into a case like this before. He then inspected the rifle and fired test bullets from it and found the same peculiarity. It seemed that this was an error in manufacture which had either been overlooked, or thought of too little importance to reject the rifle barrel. NOT PARTICULAR OLD LADY, TO STREET MUSICIAN: “Do you play by ear?” MuSICIAN: ‘Yes. ma'am, some- times ‘ere and sometimes there. When on Vancouver Island, Make Your Headquarters at THE LORNE HOTEL COMOX, B.C. F. R. COY, Manager Licensed Premises kk * PATRONIZE OUR ADVERTISERS kkk Good Beach—Good Beds—Good Fishing Shade Trees — Stores — Cafe — P.O. Within Walking Distance Royston Beach Auto Court Miss Farrow, E. R. Yeo, Props. On No. 1 Highway, near Courtenay BOX 246 ROYSTON, B.C. Phone Courtenay 269-L-2 Where Vacation Dreams Come True After you and your family have read THE SHOULDER STRAP pass it along to your friends, don’t throw it away. They will enjoy reading it. Courtenay Florist Phone 404 249 4th Street COURTENAY, B.C. Right or wrong? YOU BE THE JUDGE! LET'S STOP AN’ CLEAN THE WINDSHIELD YEAH=ITLL ONLY TAKE A MINUTE \F YOU CAN'T SEE-LET'S pass g it “ioc