Over The Edge Page 4 EDITORIAL April 1, 1998 From the Bureaucracy Files: “Mucked-Up” by Purred Alba And now, a lesson in objectivi- Objective: to the object; relat- ing to that which is external to the mind; unbiased; (Gram.) denoting the ease of the object. (Websters Dictionary) Okay, now for a reality check. For those of you who believe what you read, grab onto something. Objective: forced effort to relate events; intensely over- rated; an impossibilty on par with lightspeed travel in a Tin Can; something expected by readers so we try it, but can’t ever get there, really. (Over The Edge informal training session) Because news and newspa- per articles are, by definition, written by a human and not a group of monkeys locked in a room, there is a vast amount of bias included in them. This is not something that journalists try to do, it is something that we try our best to avoid. Over The Edge has a policy to report events as we see them, make an attempt at suggesting things for the future and mov- ing on. In short, constructive criticism has a place, direct slander or libel is not cool at all. Case in point. The Muckabout article published in the last issue of Over The Edge has caused some controversy on the UNBC “flames” newsgroup. For those of you who don’t know what it is, the Muckabout is an annual feature put on by the Outdoors Club and is basi- cally an evening out dancing with a band, getting along with others and having a little bit of alcoho! flowing around. The first post on the news- group is from a character who calls himself “Sideshow Bill.” His real name is William Floyd and it is his posting that gets this whole ball rolling with “(Nicole Larson, the reporter said] the DJ was shitty.” At this | must turn to Ms. Larson’s arti- cle which states, “A determined group (of about 6) danced to the musical styling of Ruby Trout, the guest DJ.” There is nothing in this which states that the DJ was inadequate for his position, merely that the partic- ipation of the audience was lower than might have been expected. “Sideshow” continues forward in his rant to point out that Over The Edge recieved “a whole bunch of promo stuff and offered them an interview with the band “The Clumsy Lovers’.“ To this, he also adds that Over The Edge agreed to this and was also going to “advertise the dance in the “paper”.” Unfortunately, advertising space is not free. It costs us a fair amount to print the paper, and we have no choice but to charge for it. Advertising rev- enue is one of the ways in which we keep the cost of the paper to students down. Nobody gets paid at Over The Edge, but the paper comes out regularly every two weeks. Something in that equation says that we do a lot of work and still get critized for it. When Shannon Whissell, a fourth year student seeking election to the UNBC Academic Senate, sought to defend the newpaper against those crying out for objectivity, the ever omniscent “Sideshow Bill” showed up stating that he wanted “to have someone as openminded and full of shit as yourself representing the stu- dents at this school” and Bill was Some whot unclear as to what “letting itall han g out” was about. expressed his desire that “the 350 students who attended the dance still vote for you.” Several of the messages posted to the newsgroup called for “objective reporting” and reporting “about the facts.” The basic fact of the matter is, what are those facts people? If the reporter goes, and looks around and sees a few people dancing to music that they haven’t heard much of, then the chances are that their article will be less than favourable. Over The Edge is not here to provide the. stu- dents with the ‘happy, shiny viewpoint’, if you want that, go to UNBC Communications. They get paid by UNBC to make you look good. Over The Edge is here to provide multi- ple viewpoints on various issues. | have even published the reponses of those who took the time to come out and respond intelligently to this matter in this issue. As far as the article goes, it's history. LETTERS Much ado about the Muckabout ! am writing in regard to the recent article by Nicole Larson concerning the “Muck About.” The article disgusted me thoroughly, as in my opin- ion the event was a complete success. The “Muck About’, as you probably know, is an annual fundraising event put on by the Outdoors Club. To my knowledge, the event has received a very good reputa- tion over the past four years. To all the prospective painters I have loved before, Who’ve wandered door. Anyway, | did some inves- tigative work on the painting issue. My findings go some- thing like this. In order to paint one’s room or room area, one must make a proposal to President's Council in the form of a memo. The memo is | am sure you well know the challenges a club faces at this university. Student spirit is not a strong point of this school. To help with this cur- rent shortcoming, many clubs are forming to hopefully meet the recreational needs of the student body. To me it would only make sense that the dif- ferent clubs help each other rather than bashing each other. The article reviewing the to be addressed to the Pres. Council and is to be submit- ted to the secretary /office manager Allison Truent. The meetings for the above men- tioned council occur once every three weeks (approxi- mately). The memo should be event was unfair. | am truly sorry to hear that the author did not enjoy herself at the event. However, the compari- son to a “High School Dance” is going overboard. Personally, | have the time of my life, and | can speak for many of my friends (both members and non-members of the Outdoors Club) that the evening was a blast. The DJ and the band were chosen due to their uniqueness. The submitted at least one week before the meeting, just to be safe. One should attempt to produce about one dozen copies of the memo as every member of the council will need to see one. | guess they do not like to share. To con- event was not meant to con- sist of the mainstream music that can be encountered at some of the local bars. Dances such as this are sup- posed to be a highlight of the year for those attending. | have the general impression that this goal. was met. | fully understand that every- one is entitled to his or her own opinion; and this opinion can be expressed fully. It is sad to see however, that a tact Ms. Truent one should call the local 5540 number. Peace Y'all. Happy painting. Oh, yes! There is also a nasty union situation that may com- plicate things further, | do not know much about that. One could be naughty and just do public review of an event, which successfully raised the spirits of the attendees for the evening, was so misrepre- sented. It should be the goal of the student paper to fairly represent the student body’s opinion, not the dislikes of one individual. Sincerely, Carmen Holschuh in and out my it themselves and face the consequences, but | would never suggest such a thing. One more thing. Try the chicken, it’s delicious! Yours fallaciously, David A.T. Nagel