An Aboriginal Mental Health Approach To Personal Wellness: A Formative Evaluation William Thomas BFNAC, Brandon University, 2000 Thesis Submitted In Partial Fulfillment Of The Requirements For The Degree Of Master Of Social Work The University Of Northern British Columbia November 2005 © William Thomas, 2005 1^1 Library and Archives Canada Bibliothèque et Archives Canada Published Heritage Branch Direction du Patrimoine de l'édition 3 9 5 W e llin g to n S tre e t O tta w a O N K 1 A 0 N 4 C anada 3 9 5 , ru e W e llin g to n O tta w a O N K 1 A 0 N 4 Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-28378-3 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-28378-3 NOTICE: The author has granted a non­ exclusive license allowing Library and Archives Canada to reproduce, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, communicate to the public by telecommunication or on the Internet, loan, distribute and sell theses worldwide, for commercial or non­ commercial purposes, in microform, paper, electronic and/or any other formats. AVIS: L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou autres formats. The author retains copyright ownership and moral rights in this thesis. Neither the thesis nor substantial extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author's permission. L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement reproduits sans son autorisation. In compliance with the Canadian Privacy Act some supporting forms may have been removed from this thesis. Conformément à la loi canadienne sur la protection de la vie privée, quelques formulaires secondaires ont été enlevés de cette thèse. While these forms may be included in the document page count, their removal does not represent any loss of content from the thesis. Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu manquant. Canada 11 Abstract This study field-tested a six-session Aboriginal mental health personal wellness program. The cross-cultural integrated program combined the Aboriginal healing circle with the psychotherapy technique known as “focusing.” This study located in Winnipeg, Manitoba and involving 6 Aboriginal participants was formative in nature and grounded in qualitative inquiry. Conversational style interviews were conducted with each participant, followed by a participant focus group. Out of the data analysis process, five salient themes surfaced that captured the breadth of the participants’ first-hand experiences of the piloted program. Ill Table of Contents Abstract................................................................................................................................ ii Table of Contents...............................................................................................................iii List of Figures..................................................................................................................... v List of Tables...................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................vii Chapter 1; Introduction.......................................................................................................1 Purpose of the Study.............................................................................................. 4 Rational of the Study..............................................................................................4 Research Design......................................................................................................5 Theoretical Orientation of the Research...............................................................6 Chapter 2: Literature Review............................................................................................. 9 The Colonization of Aboriginal Peoples in C anada............................................9 Impacts of Canadian Social Policy on the Well-Being and Health of Aboriginal Peoples...........................................................................................15 Focusing............................................................................... 20 Traditional Healing C ircles................................................................................. 24 Integrative Approaches to Mental Health .........................................................27 Chapter 3: Research D esign........................................................................................... 30 Case Study D esign.............. 30 Data Collection M ethod...... 35 Data A nalysis...................... 39 43 Ethical Considerations........ Methodological Integrity.... 43 46 Limitations of the Research Chapter 4: Data Analysis..................................................................................................48 Experience.............................................................................................................50 Relationships.........................................................................................................53 Spirituality and Connectedness........................................................................... 57 Empowerment.......................................................................................................63 Self Awareness..................................................................................................... 66 Chapter 5: Discussion on the Research Findings.......................................................... 73 Focusing................................................................................................................77 The Healing Circle.............................................................................................. 77 IV Chapter 6: Implications of the Research Findings......................................................... 84 The Participants’ Journey.................................................................................... 84 My Journey............................................................................... 85 Research on Aboriginal Issues by Aboriginal Practitioners 86 The Need for Greater Numbers of Aboriginal Therapists.... 87 Aboriginal Frameworks for Social Work Education............ 88 Conclusion 89 References......................................................................................................................... 90 Appendix A: Self-Reporting Mental Health Assessment...........................................112 Appendix B: Interview Questions..................................................................................114 Appendix C: Therapeutic Criteria..................................................................................115 Appendix D: Information Letter and Informed Consent............................................. 116 Appendix E: Informed Consent .................................................................................... 118 List of Figures Figure 1 Mortality rates, 1996/97.......................................................................... 17 Figure 2 Age-standardized suicide rates, 1996/97................................................18 Figure 3 Integrated medicine wheel and focusing model....................................79 VI List of Tables Table 2.1 Chronic Disease....................................................................................... 16 Table 3.1 Column 1, 2, and 3 of the Data Analysis W orksheet...........................41 Table 3.2 Column 2 , 3 and 4 of the Data Analysis Worksheet............................42 vil Acknowledgments I wish to acknowledge the Creator for life and health and for giving me the inner strength to achieve my academic and personal dreams. I wish to acknowledge my mother, who has passed on to the spirit world, for giving me inspiration to further my academic and personal healing. I wish to acknowledge my wife Ely, who has supported and motivated me in my darkest moments during this process. I wish to acknowledge the survivors of the Residential School Experience and their voice, as without their voice, pain, suffering and spirit to carry on after this Aboriginal holocaust this study would not have been possible. I wish to thank Anne and Shirley who have guided, motivated and supported in fulfilling my academic and career dreams. I wish to acknowledge the social work educators of the University of Northern British Columbia for their dedication and commitment to Aboriginal and Northern social work practice. Chapter 1: Introduction The domination, oppression, and exploitation of the Aboriginal peoples^ in Canada is well documented in a large number of governmental committee and task force reports (Alberta, 1991; Manitoba, 1991; Nova Scotia, 1989; Saskatchewan, 1992), scholarly publications (Adams, 1999; Armitage, 1995; Assembly of First Nations, 1994; Fournier & Crey, 1997), academic research journals and articles (Chrisjohn, 1991; Ing, 1990), and critical policy reviews by royal commissions and parliamentary committees (Berger, 1977; Canada, 1996a; Fenner, 1983) dating back over several generations. Regarded as a watershed event in the history of Aboriginal Canadians, the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry, commonly known as the Berger Commission,^ is largely credited with raising public awareness of the plight of Aboriginal peoples when it ruled that a 10-year moratorium should be placed on the construction of the pipeline (Berger, 1977). In the commission’s final report, entitled Northern Frontier, Northern Homeland: The Report o f the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry (Berger, 1977), Justice Thomas Berger presented a retrospective assessment of the cultural impact of white civilization on native people. He described this relationship as follows: Euro-Canadian society has refused to take native culture seriously. European institutions, values and use of land were seen as the basis for culture. Native ’ The term Aboriginal peoples does not imply or refer to one homogeneous group. The Aboriginal population is described as including four categories: North American (First Nations) Indians registered under the Indian A ct (Registered Indians); North American Indians not registered under the Indian Act; Métis people; and Inuit (Canada, 1996a). ^ The Berger Commission was established in 1974 “to consider the social, environmental, and economic impacts” o f building a pipeline from the shores of the Arctic Ocean south through sections o f the Yukon Territory and the Northwest Territories (Berger, 1977). institutions, values and use of land were rejected, ignored or misunderstood and— given the native people’s use of land—the Europeans had no difficulty in supposing that native people possessed no real culture at all. (p. 85) The Penner Report,^ released by the Special Committee on Indian SelfGovernment six years later, in 1983, described the relationship between Indian people and the federal government as not working. While the focus was on control of the system rather than on designing a new approach, it emphasized the need for a more holistic approach to health care. It also suggested that Canada’s federal policies and agencies were operating in a manner that was leading to increased Indian poverty and dependence (Penner, 1983): We have come to appreciate very much the relevance and the utility of traditional approaches, particularly to mental health problems—approaches which address the suicide rate, approaches which address addiction problems. We believe that in areas such as those the application of traditional medicine and native culture perhaps can be more successful than anything we could offer in terms of contemporary psychiatric approaches to those kinds of problems, (p. 35) More recently, the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples’ (RCAP) fivevolume report, released in October 1996, not only linked the disproportion of social and health problems among Aboriginal peoples to decades of oppressive social policies, it also underscored the inability of “mainstream” institutions to effect significant change (Canada, 1996a). The report (Canada, 1996b) observed that: ^ The Special Committee of the House o f Commons on Indian Self-Government, also known as the Penner Commission, was appointed in 1982 to review legal and institutional issues related to the status, development, and responsibilities o f band governments on reserves (Penner, 1983). ...non-Aboriginal health and social programs have not served Aboriginal people very effectively, and in response to pressure from Aboriginal organizations, the courts, and human rights authorities, policy makers have instituted a number of strategies over several decades in an attempt to sensitize mainstream health and social services providers to the needs and aspirations of Aboriginal peoples. It is instructive to examine some of these approaches, to analyze why they have generally produced such limited results, and to explore what can be done differently in the future, (section 3.4, para. 11) The report also acknowledged that “a clinical one-to-one approach” does not work well for Aboriginal people because they “cannot divorce the healing of individuals from the healing of families and communities” (section 2.1, para. 43), and stressed that Aboriginal people “need to redefine professional training to make it more holistic, more grounded in Aboriginal experience, and more relevant to Aboriginal circumstances” (section 3.3.19, para. 14). Hart (1997) further insisted that ethnocentric social work practice maintains a condition of colonial domination over Aboriginal peoples. This view is also expressed in a report submitted to RCAP by the Canadian Association of Social Workers (1994), where it was argued that mainstream ethnocentric social work practices contribute largely to the distrust and rejection of the social work professional by the Aboriginal community. The report called upon the social work academic establishment to support the development of culturally relevant social work education and models of practice. Purpose o f the Study This study field-tested a six-session Aboriginal mental health personal wellness program that brought together the healing properties of the Aboriginal healing circle and the self-awareness and empowerment powers of the psychotherapy technique known as “focusing” to form a safe, effective, and culturally appropriate means for Aboriginal people to meet their healing needs. This study located in Winnipeg, Manitoba and involving 6 Aboriginal participants was formative in nature and grounded in qualitative inquiry. Rational o f the Study Aboriginal issues have achieved a prominence on the agendas of governments, the media, and the public that would scarcely have been imaginable a decade ago. Yet this heightened interest in and attention to Aboriginal issues has not been matched by a decolonizing pedagogical approach to education that is currently grounded by dominant cultural theories using Western frameworks for teaching (Battiste, 1998; Castellano, 2002; Smith, 2001). The forms, content, and intent of post-secondary social work education have not been challenged nor has there been reconsideration of the practice of social work from an Aboriginal worldview. Sinclair (2004, p. 49) argues that “culturally appropriate and sociologically relevant teaching and healing models must evolve and translate into practice and service delivery that will meet the needs of future generations.” While I acknowledge that schools of social work are beginning to address the demands for Aboriginal social work education by hiring Aboriginal faculty, developing curriculum and educational streams that focus on specific Aboriginal issues, and offering culturally appropriate practicum placements, the gap remains wide. The rapid devolution of social programs and services to Aboriginal authorities has dramatically increased employment opportunities for Aboriginal people and raised the demand for new culturally appropriate services and models of practice. The increased interest among both Aboriginal and non-Aboiiginal people in Aboriginal traditions, culture, and spirituality has resulted in the use of spiritual healing, traditional healers, and ceremonies and rituals in Aboriginal homes, communities, institutions and workplaces. Aboriginal spirituality is not perceived as a “cure-all,” but is effective in conjunction with certain mainstream treatment modalities. Thus, it is increasingly important that Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal graduate social work students and educators take a more active stance and engage in research opportunities that can contribute to the knowledge base of Aboriginal social work education and practice. Research Design The case study design employed a formative approach to evaluation and was grounded in qualitative inquiry. Conversational style interviews were conducted with each participant, followed by a participant focus group. Out of the data analysis process, five salient themes surfaced that captured the breadth of the participants’ first-hand experiences of the piloted program. The three research questions addressed in the study were: 1. What is the perceived experience of Aboriginal participants engaged in the piloted personal wellness program? 2. Can combining a mainstream psychotherapy technique (focusing) with the traditional healing approach of the Aboriginal healing circle provide an effective cultural alternative to mainstream mental health treatment models? 3. What are the implications of the results of this study for social work practice and education? Theoretical Orientation o f the Research This study is informed by the theory and practice of the “seventh moment” of qualitative inquiry, which “asks that the social sciences and the humanities become sites for critical conversations about democracy, race, gender, class, nation-state, globalization, freedom, and community” (Denzin & Lincoln, 2003, p. 3). Further, the study is informed by critical theory, which raises the questions of knowledge defined by whom, about whom, and for what purpose (Lather, 1986; Wallerstein, 1999), and invites a more critical stance by challenging current ideology and initiating action towards the search for social justice (Foucault, 1980; Freire, 1982; Gitlin & Russel, 1994). It views knowledge as historically and socially constructed and mediated through perspectives of the dominant society. The main task of critical inquiry is seen as being one of social critique, in which the restrictive and alienating conditions of the status quo are brought to light. Thus, it calls for knowledge that challenges researchers to go beyond conventional worldviews and create new social relations (Guba & Lincoln, 1994; Flabermas, 1987; Kemmis, 2001). To date, traditional social work education and research has led to little advancement in practice within the Aboriginal community (Canada, 1996a; Collins & Colorado, 1987; Hoare, Levy, & Robinson, 1993; Morrisette, McKenzie, & Morrissette, 1993; Webster & Nabigon, 1992). From a critical perspective, this is largely the result of the dominant epistemological European positivist paradigm upon which Western social work education and research was founded (Beardsley, 1980; Ellis, 1990). As Hartman (1994, p. 459) asserts in Setting the Theme: Many Ways o f Knowing, there is “nothing more crucial in shaping and defining the social work profession and its practice than that profession’s definition of the truth.” According to Hartman, it is essential that researchers declare their epistemologies and worldviews, their biases, and their convictions about the nature of knowledge and knowledge-seeking, as these affect the entire research process, from conceptualizing a problem, to collecting and analyzing data, to interpreting findings. My own theoretical foundation—that is, the context within which I undertake this study—is firmly grounded in critical theory, including feminism, anti-oppressive theory. Aboriginal worldview, structural social work, and social constructionism. As an Aboriginal person committed to anti-oppressive practice, I am conscious of the broader issue of the research context in relation to the history of Aboriginal people in this country. I submit that the direction of much research under the Eurocentric “positivist” research paradigm since the early 1800s has acted to oppress Aboriginal peoples and served to literally destroy entire communities and ways of life (Collins & Colorado, 1987; Hoare, Levy, & Robinson, 1993; Webster & Nabigon, 1992). Hart (1997) points to the conflicting values inherent in Eurocentric research approaches. He explains that the natural worldview is based on natural knowledge that originates from Mother Earth, whereas the technological worldview is based on manmade technology. According to Hart (1997), the natural worldview is in direct conflict with the technological worldview, an approach which aggressively exploits and 8 dominates the natural world for monetary gain or academic acclaim. From this starting point, I elected to proceed with a qualitative approach, because it is more in line with the cultural oral traditions (Clarkson, Morrissete, & Régallet, 1992) and non-positivist epistemological worldview of Aboriginal people. Unlike a positivistic approach, which would “tend to discount intuitive wisdom, and indigenous knowledge” (Hoare, Levy, & Robinson, 1993, p. 46), a qualitative method allows participants to be more actively involved in the research process. 1 believe that a qualitative approach can better address the previously mentioned issues of distrust, oppression, and lack of involvement in the research process experienced by Aboriginal people. A qualitative approach also allows participants to have and give voice, and captures unique contextual nuances within the research process. Chapter 2; Literature Review In order to frame the issues that provide relevance and background to the study, an extensive literature review was conducted. The review encompassed a critical review of the literature on the colonization of Aboriginal peoples in Canadian society and its impact on the well-being and health of Aboriginal peoples, an examination of the literature on the psychotherapy technique of “focusing” and Aboriginal healing circle as established methods of interventions within the field of mental health, and a review of integrated approaches in dealing with mental health needs of Aboriginal peoples. The Colonization o f Aboriginal Peoples in Canada The history of the European colonization of North America is a disturbing story of the Aboriginal population’s decimation by infectious disease, the destruction of Aboriginal social and cultural institutions, and the active suppression of culture and identity, which was tantamount to genocide (Frideres & Gadacz, 2001). It is estimated that before the arrival of the Europeans, there were thousands of autonomous Aboriginal bands, tribes, or nations, with a population of about 7 million (Trigger & Wasbum, as cited in Kirmayer, Brass, & Tait, 2000). It is further estimated that 90% of the Aboriginal population died “as a result of the direct and indirect effects of culture contact” (Kirmayer, Brass, & Tait, 2000, p. 6). 10 The colonization of Canada’s Aboriginal peoples is a legacy of over a century of colonial policies (Canada, 1996a). Both the federal and provincial governments have subjected Aboriginal people to many forms of systematic abuse and discrimination over several generations in an attempt to assimilate them into the dominant society through education, religion, law, and theft of land (Morrissette, McKenzie, & Morrisette, 1993; Waldram, 1997). The impacts of these policies are clearly visible today among the Aboriginal peoples of Canada. While the federal government has made some effort to rectify this situation by developing programs specifically designed to assist Aboriginal people in their healing processes, significant change in the overall social, economic, and health status of Aboriginal people has not occurred (Smylie, 2000; Voss, Douville, Soldier, & Twiss, 1999). The Residential School Era Residential schools for Aboriginal children were established by the Canadian government, and run by churches and governments, to provide for the education of Aboriginal children (Miller, 1996). Under the authority of the Indian Act, children were forcibly removed from their parents, homes, and communities and relocated to residential schools (Chrisjohn, Young, & Maraun, 1997). It is estimated that from 1879 to 1973, over 100,000 children were taken to residential schools, often far removed from their home communities, for the entire school year (Law Commission of Canada, 2000). According to RCAP (Canada, 1996b), the removal of Aboriginal children to residential schools was based on an explicit policy of assimilation: 11 Residential schools were more than a component in the apparatus of social construction and control. They were part of the process of nation building and the concomitant marginalization of Aboriginal communities. The department's inspector of education wrote in 1900 that the education of Aboriginal people in frontier districts was an important consideration, not only as an economical measure to be demanded for the welfare of the country and the Indians, themselves, but in order that crime may not spring up and peaceful conditions be disturbed as that element which is the forerunner and companion of civilization penetrates the country and comes into close contact with the natives, (residential schools, para. 8) Sealey (1980, p. 34) explains, “the ties between parents and children were broken during the years of school attendance.” The vast majority of the children who returned to their home reserves after their years of residential schooling felt out of place and confused, and were not well received by their communities: Upon returning to the normal social and economic life of the reserves, the students were baffled and discouraged. They are often condemned as shiftless because most lack finesse and the skills necessary to follow the traditional means of livelihood such as trapping, hunting and fishing. (Sealey, 1980, p. 34) Kelm (1988, p. 79) further points out, what better way to break down a culture than by attacking the weakest link, “the defenseless children.” Not only did children experience trauma as a result of being taken away from their parents, but many experienced added trauma upon their return, as they were not easily accepted back into the community, having “changed” as a result of their assimilated residential school 12 experience. The physical and sexual abuse that some of the survivors lived through was not spoken about for many years, as the survivors carried the shame of what they had experienced. Dolha (1998, p. 1), in a study of the impact of the residential school system on individuals, offers the following account of the experience of Nahanee, a residential school survivor: “I didn't bring it to mind (sexual abuse) until 1984, when my daughter committed suicide. Then I began to look at myself. Why 1 was addicted to alcohol? Why 1 wasn't a good parent?” This is one of many similar stories that are now told by other survivors as they continue on their healing journey. In the same interview, Nahanee describes the torture that she witnessed as a child in residential school: Before speaking of the murder she witnessed at the age of 11, Nahanee stopped to compose herself to dry her eyes. I did not consider it a murder because when you are just a kid it is just another painful memory. On December 24, 1946, school administrators told Nahanee she would not go home for the holidays because she did not bow her head in prayer. While in the playroom, she heard someone shouting. Nahanee followed the sound, went to the bottom of the staircase, and climbed them half way. She saw Mr. Caldwell and a female supervisor at the top of the stairs. There were arguing about a little girl who was running up and down the stairs. Mr. Caldwell was always drunk. You could smell the liquor on his breath all the time. While batting her eyelashes to hold back the tears. Nahanee continued telling her nightmare. He kicked a little girl and she fell down the stairs and died. That’s murder. There are other kids in the infirmary that had their appendix burst. That is murder. Other children were beaten so badly they died. 13 That’s murder no one bothered to take to hospital. (Dolha, 1998, p. 2). It has been estimated that two-thirds of Aboriginal people have suffered a trauma as a direct result of the residential school era (Manson, 1996, 1997, 2000). The unfortunate reality of this number is that the effects of the residential school era can be expected to be felt for many generations to come (Canada, 1996b). Residential school syndrome. According to Fournier and Crey (1997, p. 63), far from becoming assimilated members of mainstream Canadian society, many residential school students went on to “experience symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.” Fournier and Crey (1997, p. 63) further argue that survivors of residential schools experienced symptoms “not unlike those suffered by war veterans or police officers,” including “panic attacks, insomnia, uncontrollable anger, alcohol and drug use, sexual inadequaey or addiction, the inability to form intimate relationships, eating disorders.” Similarly, Brasfield (2001), a British Columbia psychiatrist with over 20 years of experience working with Aboriginal people traumatized by their time spent in residential school, writes: Whether residential schools are seen as an attempt at benevolence or a plan to annihilate a culture, many native people who attended the schools present with symptoms similar to those of post-traumatic stress disorder. This constellation of symptoms has come to be known as residential school syndrome, (p. 1) Brasfield is an advocate for having the disorder Indian Residential School Syndrome (IRSS) included in the D SM IV TR (personal communication, January 13, 2003). The American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and Statistic Manual o f 14 Mental Disorders (DSM IV TR) describes Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) as an experience of or exposure to a traumatic event with the presence of actual or threatened death or serious injury, or a threat to the physical integrity of self or others. The symptoms of PTSD include persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma and numbing of general responsiveness (not present before the trauma) indicated by at least three of the following symptoms: (a) efforts to avoid thoughts, feelings, or conversations associated with the trauma, (b) efforts to avoid activities, places, or people that aroused recollections of the trauma, (c) inability to recall an important aspect of the trauma, (d) markedly diminished interest or participation in significant activities, (e) feeling of detachment or estrangement from others, and (f) restricted range of affect (g) sense of foreshortened future (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). There also may be persistent symptoms of increased arousal (not present before the trauma), as indicated by at least two of the following symptoms: (a) difficulty falling and/or staying asleep, (b) irritability or outbursts of anger, (c) difficulty concentrating, and (d) hyperviligence and exaggerated startle response. If the symptoms last less than three months, then it is considered acute PTSD. If the symptoms last three months or more, it is considered chronic PTSD. With delayed onset, the symptoms occur at least six months after the stressor (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). As revealed by this literature review, the process of colonization has had an ongoing impact on the health and well-being of Aboriginal peoples. Virtually every contemporary social pathology or health issue facing Aboriginal peoples can be attributed directly to the fallout of colonialism (Midgely, 1998). 15 Impacts o f Canadian Social Policy on the Well-Being and Health o f Aboriginal Peoples That the framework of colonial policies directed towards the Aboriginal peoples of this country has severely weakened the social, economic, political, and cultural foundations of Aboriginal societies (Adams, 1999; Chrisjohn, Young, & Maraun, 1997; Pino, 1998), critically altering their way of life and engendering a legacy of racism and oppression (Adams, 1999; Haig-Brown, 1994), is well documented in the literature. According to RCAP (Canada, 1996a), Aboriginal peoples have a life expectancy 7 to 8 years shorter than non-Aboriginal Canadians; a higher incidence of low educational attainment and welfare dependency; a greater prevalence of family violence, physical and sexual abuse, and suicide; and elevated rates of ill health such as heart disease and cancer. Another disturbing consequence of the colonization of Aboriginal society is the disproportionately high numbers of Aboriginal youth warehoused in federal and provincial jails (Roberts & LaPrairie, 1996). In a judgment rendered on April 23, 1999 (Regina v Gladue), the Supreme Court of Canada observed that “prison has replaced residential school as the likely fate of all too many modern-day Aboriginal Canadians” (Canadian Strategy on HIV/AIDS, n.d). The court pointed out that although Aboriginal peoples only make up approximately 3% of the Canadian population, they represent 15% of the federal male penitentiary population and 16% of total provincial/territorial sentences. According to Haslip (2000, p. 1), “the trend towards the over-incarceration of Aboriginal offenders is even more pronounced” at the provincial level, particularly in the Western provinces. With respect to the health status of Aboriginal peoples. Health Canada’s (1999) 16 report, A Second Diagnostic on the Health o f First Nations and Inuit People in Canada, deserves special attention. The report describes the overall health status of First Nations and Inuit people living in Canada as much poorer than the non-Aboriginal population (Health Canada, 1999). In 1997, as shown in Table 2.1, the prevalence of self-reported chronic diseases in First Nations and Labrador Inuit people was higher than in the general Canadian population (Health Canada, 1999). Table 2.1 Chronic Disease Age-adjusted prevalence General First Nations and Chronic condition Heart problems Hypertension Diabetes Arthritis/rheumatism Canadian Sex Labrador Inuit Male 13 4 Female 10 4 Male 22 8 Female 25 10 Male 11 3 Female 16 3 Male 18 10 Female 27 18 Population Sources: First Nations and Inuit Regional Health Survey and National Population Health Survey, as cited in Health Canada (1999). * “Due to limitations in the availability o f information on the Métis and the Non-status Indian populations, the content o f this document relates primarily to First Nations and to a lesser extent to the Inuit population. However, information is provided on the Métis and the Non-status Indian where data are expressed for the total Aboriginal population.” (Health Canada, 1999, p. 4) 17 In 1996/97, First Nations and Inuit people from Eastern Canada, the Prairies and the Western provinces had mortality rates up to almost 1.5 times higher than the 1996 national rate. As Figure 1 illustrates. First Nations and Inuit people were up to about 6.5 times more likely than the total Canadian population to die of injuries and poisonings (Health Canada, 1999). 0 20 — Canada § !I BG First Nations g Saskatchew an a I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 I------- 1--------- 1-------- 1-------- 1-------- 1-------- 1--------1-------- 1— 58 - 481 442 - First Nations Manitoba First Nations 447 - Population Sources: Manitoba MSB Regional Office, Saskatchewan MSB Regional Office, British Columbia Vital Statistics Vital Agency, as cited in Health Canada (1999). Figure 1. Mortality rates, 1996/97. In 1996, 54% of the Aboriginal population aged 15 and over did not have a high school diploma, compared to 35% of the non-Aboriginal population (Health Canada, 1999). In 1995, the average employment income of Aboriginal people was $17,382, about 1.5 times lower than the national average of $26,474 (Health Canada, 1999). The rate of Aboriginal children who lived in low-income families was more than twice the national rate, which may be partly explained by the larger number of single parent 18 families in the Aboriginal population (Health Canada, 1999). Approximately 44% of the Aboriginal population was below Statistics Canada’s low-income cut-offs, compared to 20% of the total Canadian population (Health Canada, 1999). Aboriginal people appear to be the largest population sub-group that is the most at risk of becoming homeless in Canada (Health Canada, 1999). Risk factors for homelessness, which include high unemployment, welfare dependency, poverty, substance abuse, physical and mental health problems, and domestic and sexual abuse, tend to be more common in Aboriginal communities (Health Canada, 1999). Data from Eastern Canada, the Prairies, and British Columbia show that First Nations and Inuit people had a suicide rate in 1997 that was up to almost three times higher than the 1996 rate for the total Canadian population (Health Canada, 1999), as illustrated in Figure 2. 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 H ---------- 1----------1---------- 1--------- 1---------- 1----------1-----Canada 43 - § I Cl. BO F irs t N a tio n s I s S a s k a tc h e w a n