Local News | Over the Edge Feb, 07, 1996 page 3 First Time University Enrollments Rise in Northern BC By Karin Fennell The University of Northern BC is seeing a steady rise in enrollment of first time students. These are students who could be either directly from high school or adults who have never attended a college or university since graduating from high school. In addition, the number of northern residents attending diaiversity has increased. First-time student enrollment from the north has jumped to 612 first-time students from a previous 250 students in 1994. In the Prince George School district #57 alone there has been an increase of 300 students enrolling in university compared to 80 in 1993 and 129 students in 1994. 60% of students from the north are choosing UNBC compared to 50% going to UBC alone prior to the opening of the University. Now less than 20% of northern students go to UBC. This downward trend in enrollment of Northern students is also clearly evident at SFU and UVic. In addition, 73% of first-time university students now enroll at UNBC. “As expected, there was a big jump in university enrollment when UNBC opened for full operations last year,” says UNBC President Charles Jago. “We’re finding that the trend is continuing and strengthening. We are attracting more students to the University, and it’s heartening to everyone at UNBC to see that so many northerners recognize UNBC as ‘their’ university.” (note: the above statistics were taken from the UNBC Institutional Research office report on Northern BC Students attending university for the first time) Fire! Fire! Fire...or was it? ~T Since the beginning of _ being cleared to system monitors all but on this day, the completely evacuated this semester, there avoid damage tothe fire hydrants and hydrant was opened to immediately. This have been two fire pipe when one sounds if one of clear the water line theory of evacuation alarms at the University but not one fire. So why the false alarms? The cause of the first alarm was the system itself. U.N.B.C. uses a fully incorporated alarm system, the first of its kind; and as with all new things, there are always bugs to work out. So we have one less bug in the system; and for the safety and convenience of the students and faculty, hopefully the last. But that was not the last of the fire alarms. Less than one week later, the alarms sounded once again for quite another reason. A frozen water line was necessary step was ‘missed, and again the technologically advanced system came into play. Asa safety measure, the them is opened. Since they are usually only opened to fight a fire, this seems a reasonable safety precaution; | ag en) fa EP epee ee aI 5A replica of the “Residence 1 building is _tested for fire safe i pes a ed cal eal Tt a ee eee eet without first bypassing the monitoring system and, not failing to work, the alarm was sounded. So besides why the alarms were going off, many people seemed curious about the alarms themselves. There are two levels that the alarms sound at: warning and alert. The warning is an interrupted ringing, which means that there is fire on campus but not in that building and evacuation is not necessary, although could still be recommended. The. second, a steady ringing, means that the fire is = located in the building and should be did not become a reality during the two fire alarms this semester as people remained inside, not daring to brave the weather, even with the steady alarm. Since the alarms were false, this may seem justified as conditions were worse outside than they were inside; but at the time of the alarms, there was no guarantee. People did not seem to understand the seriousness had the alarms been real. Overall, although the system may have its problems, its biggest one seems to be not getting its point across.