Physiognomy of British Columbia Coastal Indians. 31 Asland and regarded as free from European blood, were tested, with results shown in Table 2, together with those of the Bushmen, and Australian aborigines for comparison. TaBLE 2.—Blood Groups. == O A B AB Total. Maori ... Ss ate oes ee aoe sae 46 26 1 = 73 Percent. ... 090 ae a st be 63 35-6 1-4 = = MevArawa s.. Be 508 ue Soe on 49 53 1 24 127 Percent. ... 206 206 200 a oe 38-6 41-7 0-8 18-9 200 ‘Bushmen, per cent. ... ba a a0 = 56-1 29-6 7-5 6°8 615 Australian aborigines, percent. ... Be oh 56 37:7 5:3 1 815 The Te Arawa are a group of Maori who lived in proximity with the Moriori survivors. and are believed to have crossed with them. Their blood grouping is remarkably different, and the very high proportion of AB can best be explained by numerous crosses having taken place between A and B individuals in the respective races. That this has happened is confirmed by the presence of a fair skin and a reddish tint in the hair—characters possessed by the Moriori—in some of the Te Arawa people. The recent work with blood groups thus shows that their evidence can throw clear light on the relationships and history of peoples. The pan-human distribution of the four groups is given by Routil (1932)—37 per cent. O, 38 per cent. A, 18 per cent. B, 7 per cent. AB. This also supports the conception that A originated and began its spread earlier than B. The view appears still to be generally held that A and B originated at a particular time and place, spreading from that centre by inheritance and migration. This is, however, not strictly compatible with modern genetical knowledge. The genetical evidence goes to show that any species of plant or animal produces a particular mutation not once only but repeatedly, with a certain frequency which is more or less characteristic, some mutations being produced with a much higher frequency than others. Hach species, as we know it, has the capacity for producing various mutations with particular frequencies. Thus the innumerable abnormalities in man which are inherited as simple Mendelian differences, dominant or recessive to the type, must each have arisen at some time as a mutation in the germplasm. Each has probably arisen repeatedly as a mutation which recurs with a characteristic frequency of say one in ten thousand or one in ten million individuals. It will then be transmitted in some of the descendants of the individual in which it has appeared. On some genetical grounds it is reasonable to suppose that this capacity for producing mutations is as old as the species itself and has in fact arisen with the origin of the species, however that may have occurred! On the other hand, there are reasons for believing that 1 The alternative is to assume that the human line of descent derived its A and B blood groups from their anthropoid ancestors, since one or both are known to occur in orang, chimpanzee and gorilla. IPf that were the case, it is difficult to see how the modern human blood grouping could have much significance, but it seems more probable that they arose independently in human phylogeny, as parallel mutations.