The Case of Small Pockets Robert Corbin Guest Contributor A human beings living on this world, everyone usually needs clothing. Be it to protect oneself from the environment, or creatures that live in nature, much like those that live in the far northern reaches of The Territories do, or as a means of exclaiming to the surrounding throngs: I’m interesting, I’m available, or even I’m colour blind. Most fashion designers that tend to cater towards the male side of their customer base tend to produce monotone simple coloured articles of clothing that aren’t likely to force a man to have to consult with a female friend to find a name for a shade of dye that is beyond the standard male 16 colour vision settings. Several other notable things present in men’s clothing would be that the fabrics tend to be fairly heavy, and there is no such thing as too many pockets. Cargo pants are a fantastic invention that prevent people from having to stop while preparing to leave their house and say “I don’t think I can carry that with me today; I don’t have space.” duluthtrading.com Student Voice 7 popsugar.com A pair of pants with thirteen to fifteen pockets, and with pockets hidden inside other pockets? This is a veritable man’s dream. At some point in the splitting of the fashion industry into equal and opposite halves however, while one side accrued a lifetime supply of pockets, the other side had donated all their pockets away. Women’s fashion for the most part is strangely devoid of pockets, and in many cases makes use of imitation pockets consisting of a small line of stitching above a small fold of material. This creates a small bulge that would be seen with a real pocket, minus the pocket and serving no actual material use. Many have theorized that this was a move devised in a closed door meeting between fashion big-wigs and purse manufacturers to force women to buy as many purses as possible. Unfortunately without organization, or large moves by women’s groups to fix this problem, the chances of fashion designers announcing that usable and sizable pockets are coming in the next iteration of fashion are slim to none. is that over time as that bag with nearly limitless holding potential will get heavier and heavier, and will eventually risk damaging to one’s posture and possibly doing other harm. Critical analysis of that last sentence by men and some women would say: simply don’t carry that much stuff around, and while that would make sense, there are times when you need to carry a week’s worth of clothing with you to the mall. How many items in apocalypse movies has the female lead been holding a purse, but didn’t have fresh underwear? Clearly a lack of critical insight here, though I jest, and yes no single person should be carrying tens of pounds of junk with them everywhere they go. Unfortunately as students, we all do this in the form of textbooks, pens, paper, notebooks, loose change, packages of gum and whatever else we happen to have picked up while roaming around school. Women everywhere have experienced at least one, but usually many times of sliding a hand with keys or loose change down to what they assumed was a pocket on inspection in a store; only to find out it is actually an optical illusion. The key or change then in a fit of shock tends to end up on the ground while she frantically searches around the garment, trying to find a real pocket that could hold these items. Women that have adapted to these experiences will shrug, sigh, and exclaim “at least I have this nice purse that is nearly large enough to smuggle a medium sized dog inside.” The problem with shifting items from pockets that are fairly close to the body; on pants or sweater, to a purse that typically dangles at the end of an outstretched arm, Due to this reason, we feel unfairly targeted when people say don’t carry so much junk with you. So I ask you, the readers: side with me in agreeing that women’s clothing should have large and usable pockets. Break the monopoly on storage space held by the purse manufacturers, before the next apocalypse happens if possible.