216

depth of at least 15 feet. The other exposures show no indications of
their depth.

In 1907 a magnetometric survey was made of this claim by E. Linde-
man (16, pages 14-15) “to obtain some information regarding the extent of
the ore. The accompanying map (No. 49) of the vertical magnetic inten-
sity, indicates that the occurrence is very irregular.” Thismap by Linde-
man shows no indications of magnetite bodies beyond present exposures
for distances of at least 100 feet.

Development

No development, except the shallow shaft above mentioned, can be
seen at the present time.

Analyses

The following analyses are taken from private and published reports
on the deposit.

Vat — A | B
ata
aa BERND eases ctebesale tural yaaive etacel atonapet esa ana ataee elem ere ER a 5: 59-69
sal Phosphorustss.4. 0 ee : : 0-016
Wh Manganesesne se ee
it Sill cae eee we eects
! i Sul pn usyeeeee eee | 0-040
| Tmsolu ble 7 Na ie eco eles tre opescte tars a Vener ence are aC on merce | sleieinerslena states 12-76
t 1

A. d’Invilliers, 1900, private report, ‘‘selected ore.”’
B. Lindeman, E.: Bibliography, No. 16, ‘average sample of the ore.”

Tonnage

can be made regarding probable or possible ore is that for every 10 feet of
depth below present exposures there would be 1,700 tons of magnetite

but no guarantee can be given that any of the separate bodies of magnetite

descend that far except the one whose depth is proved by the shaft.

| I} There is no proved ore on the property. The only statement that

| Value of Deposit

The deposit is of no value as a source of iron ore.
ere

Bibliography

See page 158 for further details

6. Carmichael, H., p. 212.
16. Lindeman, F., pp. 14-15.
bf 18. Thompson, N., pp. 198-201.
it et 20. Lindeman, E.,and Bolton, L. L., p. 12.
1 | . Whittier, W. H., pp. 52-55.

F