October 7 2002 Over The ie Pages Rate Your Professors...on sexiness Students, profs, debate merits of Web site By Cortney Pachet, Central Bureau WINNIPEG (CUP) — Students across North America can rate the sexiness of their professors on a popu- lar Web site, but some stu- dents and professors are call- ing it mean-spirited and irrele- vant. Over 8,000 students in Central Canada have used RateMyProfessors:com _ to grade’ their _— professors. Universities of Manitoba and Winnipeg have less than 4,000 ratings combined, but the University of Regina is amongst the five most rated Canadian universities with 4,853 comments. The site gives students the opportunity to rate their profes- sors based on a list of four cat- egories: helpfulness, clarity, easiness and sexiness. Mare Ducusin, a fourth year English Honours student at the University of Winnipeg, believes the site is mean-spir- ited. “Generally, I'm against cen- sorship,” said Ducusin. “But | certainly hope professors won't go to see this site. They would have to have a really thick skin” He also fells the sexiness category is irrelevant. “[Sexiness} never enters my mind at all,” said Ducusin. “That’s not something | look for in a professor. | think I’m a bit more concerned about the way they speak, their teaching style and the assignments they give.” “| think that sexiness can be relevant in terms of the stu- dents engagement with the course,” said Dr. Mark Morton, Assistant Professor of English at the University of Winnipeg, who has been rated favourably on the site. “If | were creating that site | wouldn't call it a sex- iness rating, but a charisma rating.” RateMyProfessors.com founder and California soft- ware engineer John Swapceinski believes the sexi- ness rating enhances the entertainment value of his Web site. “| thought it would be fun for In A Van Down By The River Man lives on Dal campus, solution to student housing crisis? By Christopher A. Walsh, The Gazette HALIFAX (CUP) — A man named Jim has solved the same housing crisis faced by many university students in Halifax this year. He lives in a van on the Dalhousie campus. Now comes the part in his story where we discuss the nagging cocaine and alcohol addiction that cost him his job and his wife... Only that would- n't be true. Jim lives in a van like a*vagrant at Dalhousie in the warmer months because he wants to. At 53, the self- proclaimed miser lives on less food a day than even the poor- est student. “| eat cornmeal and raisins for lunch everyday,” he said. “My stomach doesn’t know the difference once I’m full.” But all of this is self-inflicted. Jim used to work for the feder- al government in the Arctic Circle where he watched for Russian missiles aimed at the United States. There he saved all of his money and lived well below his means. He had $50,000 that he invested and now lives off the interest-or the smallest amount he can, now saving up for nothing. He drives his van to Florida in the winter where he sleeps at rest stops and Wal-Marts. The road calls Jim and he answers only to it, begging for his privacy and scrounging for respect. “A lot of people walk by me and think it’s disgusting. | think they think, ‘this guy is living in his vehicle and can’t afford anything else,” he calmly states. “For me, it’s not out of desperation, it’s out of choice and | like it.” Today, Jim has splurged for lunch and the thick stench of peanut butter hangs heavy on his breath as he steps out of the van. He’s not particularly tall or stocky, just average build with short gray hair anda smooth face that smiles lightly, echoing his quiet demeanor. In other words, he fits the stale profile of a serial killer. But Jim doesn’t like that kind of action. He’s a little dull, entertaining himself with books about investing. “I's not an entertainment, its a distraction” he admits. “And it’s a challenge to try to keep myself from being too depressed about the meaning- lessness of life.” He finds the meaning of his life in the freedom of going wherever he wants to go, when he wants to. That absolute independence affords him a different view of things—a choice of what to do next. He has no idea what's next, but doesn’t seem to mind. “| might live like this the rest of my life” he says. “I might want to live inside sometime. But it’s having the choice that’s important to me.” It's the choice that drives Jim. He hangs out at Dalhousie to use the books and Internet on campus, dis- appearing into the shadows of the maple trees that cover the campus. Perhaps some of you have seen him lurking about, with thoughts of investing and the general calmness that comes with having no sched- ule or specific place to be. He has become a type of phan- tom, with rumors and folklore made up to explain him. He’s already flown south for the winter, planning to return to Dalhousie next spring. “Why should there be an end?” he said. “I don’t want to be aware of my end. To me, that’s like watching a movie when you know the ending. | don’t want to know the ending, | want it to be a surprise.” the students,” said Swapceinski. “In the com- ments students were writing ‘he’s cute’ or ‘she’s cute.” Swapceinski says the site should act as a source for stu- dents selecting professors or courses, not as a measure of their attractiveness. Morton agrees, pointing to the practical uses. “| think ifs a think that any- thing that stu- dents can do to empower them- selves is a good idea.” Ducusin says that students could miss the point of the site and might use it to attack their professors . “Ideally the site could pro- vide students with a chance to express their feelings about their professors without feeling a need to censor themselves,” he said. “In actuality, you have students looking at the site as an excuse to bash a professor mercilessly or just be witty. | see problems with people going overboard and writing things that aren’t appropriate.” Swapceinsky says RateMyProfessors.com goes through several levels of screening to ensure nothing libelous or profane is present- ed on the site. A filter automat- ically removes any profanity and comments are read by screeners within 24 hours of being posted. A red flag sys- tem is also in place for users to. alert the screeners of any inappropriate comments. “If it reflects the teaching style [of a professor], people have a right to their opinion. If “It's not a great resource.1| CONCern Of mine if professors like the site” they want to say ‘this teacher is a terrible teacher’, they have a right to say it,” Swapceinski said. “Its a form of freedom of speech,” stated Morton. “As long as the comments on the site are not targeting qualities of the individual that are irrele- vant to teaching.” One thing all three seem to agree on is the merit of being able to criticize a professor. Swapceinski said the focus of the Web site is on the stu- dent not on the teacher. “It’s not a concern of mine if pro- fessors like the site,” he said. “Professors, by virtue of the job they have, legitimately open themselves up to that kind of feedback and criticism,” said Morton, noting the site could serve as an alternative or a compliment to the institu- tional course evaluations. Ducusin says the site can offer one thing course evalua- tions might not be able to - comfort. “You almost feel because you’re being evaluated by your professors, that you can’t be as open as you'd like to be,” he said. The Web site has had mixed reviews from professors. “Some professors have writ- ten in and demanded to be taken off,” admitted Swapceinski. “Others write in and jokingly complain that they have no chili pepper [the sexi- ness symbol].” Scott Fanshaw Service and Fixed Operations Manager Honda North 105 Brunswick Street Prince George, B.C. V2L 2B2 Sales: (250) 562-9391 Parts & Service: (250) 562-4744 Fax: (250) 562-5151 Email: info@hondanorth.ca