STAGING RELATIONSHIPS: USING DEVISED THEATRE TO EXPLORE FIRST NATIONS YOUTHS' EXPERIENCES AND PERCEPTIONS OF THEIR RELATIONSIDPS WITH HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS by Julia Petrasek MacDonald BSc., University ofWaterloo, 2013 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COMMUNITY HEALTH UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA May 2016 ©Julia Petrasek MacDonald, 20 16 ABSTRACT In Canada, vast inequities exist between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal youth, especially in northern, rural communities. Research has shown positive relationships with physicians greatly impacts on health, yet, to date, research on relationships between healthcare providers and Aboriginal peoples has not widely consulted or involved the younger population. The goal of this research was to explore relationships between Nisga'a First Nations youth (ages 19-25) and their healthcare providers by identifying cultural and social factors that encourage or hinder meaningful access to healthcare. Using a social determinants of health framework, this research employed communitybased participatory approaches and deco lonizing methodologies as well as arts-based methods (devised theatre). Four key themes emerged exemplify ing two Nisga'a First Nations youths' experiences of relationships with healthcare providers. The most important fmding was that Nisga'a youth participants identified ' relationships' as a determinant of their interactions with healthcare providers. Furthermore, using theatre proved to be a successful way to engage youth in research. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTAACT ........................................................................................................................ i LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ v LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................... vii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... ! 1.1 Study Objectives and Rationale ............................................................................ 1 1.2 Motivation for pursuing this research ................................................................... 4 1.5 Outline of Chapters ............................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE ......................................................... ll Part I: The Social Determinants of Aboriginal Peoples Health .............................. 13 2.1 Health Disparities and the Aboriginal Population of Canada ............................. 13 2.2 Aboriginal Youth ................................................................................................ 17 2.3 Social D eterminants of Aboriginal Peoples Health ............................................ 19 Part 0: Aboriginal Encounters with Health Care Systems .................................... 22 Part III: Storytelling and Theatre as Emerging Methods ....................................... 28 2.4 Storytelling .......................................................................................................... 28 2.5 Theatre ................................................................................................................ 30 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 32 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY AND METHODS ................................................. 35 Part 1: Methodology and Approaches ....................................................................... 35 3.1 Social Determinants of H ealth Framework......................................................... 35 3.2 Community-Based Participatory Research ......................................................... 37 3.3 Decolonizing Methodologies .............................................................................. 44 Part II: Methods .......................................................................................................... 47 3.4 Devised Theatre: A participatory research method and approach ...................... 49 3.5 Research Steps .................................................................................................... 51 3.6 Data Analysis ...................................................................................................... 75 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 76 CHAPTER4: FINDINGS .............................................................................................. 78 4.1 Disconnect. .......................................................................................................... 78 4.2 When the body speaks- receiving incomplete care ............................................ 82 4.3 Empathy .............................................................................................................. 83 4.4 E mpowerment ..................................................................................................... 87 CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION ......................................................................................... 91 5.1 Disconnect from providers .................................................................................. 91 5.2 When the body speaks - receiving incomplete care ............................................ 96 5.3 Experiences of empathic and compassionate care ............................................ 100 5.4 Empowering encounters .................................................................................... 103 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 106 CHAPTER 6: LIMITATIONS, CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS 107 6.1 Limitations, Challenges, and Learnings ............................................................ 107 iii 6.2 Conclusions and Future Directions ................................................................... 11 2 APPENDIX I. NORTHERN HEALTH AUTHORITY SERVICE REGION ........ 116 APPENDIX II. LOCATION OF NASS VALLEY IN BRITISH COLUMBIA ...... 117 APPENDIX III. LETTER OF CONSENT FROM NASS VALLEY ....................... 118 APPENDIX IV. OPEN DIALOGUE QUESTIONS .................................................. 119 IV LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Research stages 51 Table 2. Research questions explored during drama workshop 57 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Screenshot of HARC art worksheets. 57 Figure 2. What makes me healthy? 62 Figure 3. Experiences with healthcare providers. 65 Figure 4. First frozen tableau representing ' disconnect. ' 70 Figure 5. Second frozen tableau representing 'control. ' 71 Figure 6. Final frozen tableau representing 'empowerment.' 72 Figure 7. Words taken from transcript representing youths' experiences. 78 Vl ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, to my participants, for sharing your stories and teaching me To the Nisga 'a First Nation, for welcoming me to the Nass Valley To the community of Gitlaxt'aamiks, and the staff at the Rcc Centre, for your support and partnership in this project- it would not have been possible without you To my supervisor, Dr. Sarah de Leeuw, and my committee members, for your encouragement and direction throughout the entire process To Marsha Knight, for your constant help and gu idance in creating the drama workshop1 am truly grateful for your friendship and support To my parents, Ron and Annemarie, and my sisters, Joanna, Megan and Marta - for your love and support ALL THE MATERIALS USED, AND RESULTS OF THE RESEARCH REMAIN THE SOLE PROPERTY OF THE WILP WILXO'OSKWHL NlSGA ' A Vll CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Study Objectives and Rationale Aboriginal (i.e. the descendants of the original inhabitants of Canada) youth across Canada experience vast health inequalities and significant health disparities, however measured, compared to non-Aboriginal youth (Adelson, 2005; Peiris, Brown, & Cass, 2008; Reading & Wien, 2009). Aboriginal youth, in particular, are significantly vulnerable to a variety of socially-determined and biomedical health risks, such as increased rates oftecn pregnancy, HIV/AJDS, violence, malnutrition and unemployment (Ning & Wilson, 20 12). One factor in enhancing health outcomes for this population, as well as more generally for Aboriginal peoples, is the strengthening of relationships between a patient and their physician. To date, research bas not substantially explored Aboriginal youths ' use of healthcare services or their interactions with healthcare providers (Ning & Wilson, 2012). This is surprising given the numbers of studies that have investigated Aboriginal peoples' experiences with the healthcare system, given that Aboriginal youth suffer from poorer hea lth than non-Aboriginal youth, and given welldocumented knowledge about the link between positive health outcomes and one's use of health services and interaction with healthcare providers (Browne, 2007; Ning & Wilson, 20 12). The purpose of this Masters thesis research project was to address this gap in knowledge and explore two Nisga'a First Nations youths' perceptions and lived experiences of their relationships with hcalthcare providers in a Nisga ' a First Nation community in Northern British Columbia. The categorization of bealthcare providers was purposefully left open so as to allow participants to voice their interpretation of what constituted a bealthcare provider in their life - such an open ended orientation to healthcare providers allows participants to orient to the healthcare provider they perceive having the greatest impact in their life. It is important to note that for participants ', the term ' healthcare provider' translated as doctor or nurse. This could be read as the power invested in doctors and nurses, particularly in the imagination and minds of these young Aboriginal people in northern BC. The main objectives of this work were thus to: I. document the Aboriginal youths' understandings of ' health', 2. explore youth perceptions of, and lived experiences with their healthcare providers, 3. ask Aboriginal youth what they want to say to those who provide health services, 4. devise strategies with youth for the healthcare system and providers that are consistent with Aboriginal youth perspectives and needs around health, and 5. pilot the use of devised theatre as a youth-led-data-gathering-method to narrate the lived experiences of Aboriginal youth with current & future bealthcare providers. To meet these objectives, a cross-cultural, community-based participatory action research project informed by decolonizing methodologies was designed and undertaken in a Nisga'a First Nations community in the Nass Valley region of Northern British Columbia. The project used devised theatre methods, complemented by an open dialogue, to gather data with Aboriginal youth participants. As defined by the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (20 16), 'youth' refers to a person "between the age where he/she may leave compulsory education, and the age at which be/she finds his/her first employment" (para. 2) and is thus defined as people between the 2 ages of 19 and 24: youth can also, however, include persons up to the age of 35 years (United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 20 16). For the purposes ofthis project, 'youth' was defined as those between the ages of 19 and 25. The relationship between the Canadian state and the first peoples of Canada is complex and entrenched in a colonial history of oppression of Aboriginal peoples. While this will be discussed in more detail in Chapter 2, along with how this history shapes, or impacts this research project, it is important to mention it at the onset of the thesis, esp ecially wi th respect to the impact this has on terminology used throughout this thesis. It is important to note that, "terminology can represent something more than just a word. It can represent certain colonial histories and power dynamics" (University of British Columbia, n.d., para. 3). Furthermore, terminology around Indigenous peoples can ' clump' together these peoples and, disregard the diversity between each Indigenous group around the world. With this in mind, I try to use the most appropriate term when discussing Indigenous peoples. Throughout this thesis, the term 'Aboriginal' refers to the descendants of the original inhabitants of Canada, including First Nations, Inuit and Metis peoples. The term 'First Nations ' is specifically in reference to this Aboriginal group, and if available, the specific First Nation band will be named. The use of the term 'Indigenous' will refer to Indigenous peoples globally. Furthermore, throughout this thesis I use the term 'Nisga'a youth' to represent the Nisga'a youth who participated in this project. It is important to note that in using this term, I am in no way shape or form generalizing at a community, or even nation level, the feeling ofyoung Nisga'a citizens. However, having said that, much can be learned from 3 listening deeply and listening with focused attention to stories of people and their experiences. There is always room to learn from the stories of even one or two people. Based on extensive background and literature searches, this research is, to my knowledge, the frrst of its kind in Canada, using as it does an arts-based method to explore patient-physician relationships between Aboriginal youth and their bealthcare providers. It is my hope that this work will contribute to documenting Aboriginal youth perspectives and experiences about health care systems and contribute to the development of meaningful, culturally-appropriate, youth-relevant strategies to improve health and wellbeing for Aboriginal youth in Canada - this, may in turn, address disparities in health. 1.2 Motivation for pursuing this research. As an individual with interdisciplinary interests, including cross-cultural work, the social determinants of health, and theatre, I sought a Masters program and a research project in which I could combine these diverse interests. 1 chose to pursue a Masters of Community Health that explored First Nations youths' experiences with their healthcare providers, using devised theatre techn iques. Having participated in a health-focused cross-cultural youth exchange with Canada World Youth (CWY) in the third year of my undergraduate degree, I learned the value and importance in working respectfully with people from various backgrounds and perspectives. In this experience I engaged in conversations around the differences in access to healthcare resources based on race and power of certain racialized groups. These discussions were bad with people who brought different perspectives than my own. By the end of the program I had become very 4 interested in the topic of healthcare inequities from a cross-cultural perspective, and I recognized the richness of having multiple perspectives to health care discussions. While it was through my experience with the CWY that I began to learn and appreciate the impact of social factors on health, it was through a course on the Social Determinants of Health in my fourth year of my Bachelor degree when I delved into and began to learn about the complex factors that contribute to the health and wellbeing of humans, especially those that go beyond biomedical definitions of health. Collectively these past experiences and studies brought me to an interest in the intersection of health inequities, social determinants of health, and cross-cultural work. It is important to note that while the first time I delved into issues of health inequities was in a developing country, known globally for health disparities, I was aware that health inequities also exist in my own country, and are especially prominent within Aboriginal contexts and communities. Indeed, more recently and in a time of Canada's Truth and Reconciliation Commission and resulting report, it is increasingly understood that non-Aboriginal settler Canadians MUST take a more active role in understanding the places of privilege from which we operate and the important role we play in the current landscape of inequalities lived by so many Aboriginal peoples today (see Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, 20 15). My interest in using an arts-based method came from my lifelong passion for theatre. In 2013 , Tjoined the Kitchener-Waterloo Youth Theatre (KWYT) group, a theatre company that uses "Devised Theatre" or "Collective Creation" rather than traditional theatre methods or approaches. This type of theatre includes actors collectively creating a piece or story and conveying their story through physical movements. 5 Furthermore, each actor brings his or her own lived experiences to the story. I found this process inspiring, the method profoundly moving, and it resonated strongly with me as a way to tell a story without (or even beyond) words. Based on my involvement with the KWYT and my experience with devised theatre, when it came to designing a research project with arts-based methods, it was a natural fit to bring in this type of theatre to my research. I felt devised theatre would provide a creative and powerful way for First Nations youth to tell their stories of experiences with healthcare providers- without the pressure and constraints of using only words. It was a pleasure to unite diverse interests into one project and, perhaps more fulfilling and encouraging, was the discovery of how these seemingly different areas could be powerfully combined and complement one another to create a unique environment in which I could explore First Nations youths' experiences of relationships with their healthcare providers, in Northern British Columbia. 1.3 Northern British Columbia Northern British Columbia is a unique geography spanning approximately 600,000 square kilometers ofthe province, and approximately 64% of British Columbia's land base (First Nations Health Authority, 20 15). Northern B.C. is sub-divided into three regions, including the Northeast, Northwest and Northern Interior regions (Northern Health, n.d.; University ofVictoria, 201 1). For the purpose of this research, the Northern Health Authority's definition of Northern British Columbia is used, which, broadly speaking, is defined as reaching north to the B.C.-Yukon border, west to the BC-Alaska border, east to the BC-Alberta border, and south, stretching just past Quesnel and Valemount (Northern Health, n.d.) (see Appendix I). 6 The population ofNorthern British Columbia is approximately 300,000, or 6.5% of B.C.'s population, with the majority of the population clustering in the Northern Interior region in the city of Prince George (approx. 70,000 people) (University of Victoria, 20 11 ). According to the First Nations Health Authority, Northern B.C. is home to 35.6% of First Nations peoples in the province, with approximately 34% of First Nations living on-reserve and 54% living off-reserve (First Nations Health Authority, 20 15). 1.4 T he Nass VaUey and the Nisga'a First Nation T he Nass Valley, situated in Northwestern British Columbia, is home to the Nisga'a First Nation, people of the Nass River (see Appendix 11). There are four Nisga'a communities located along the Nass River: Gitlaxt'aamiks, Gitwinksihlkw, L~alts'ap and Gingolx. This proj ect took place in the community of Gitlaxt'aamiks, formerly known as New Aiyansh, and home to 1,800 people. The community of Gitlaxt'aamiks is located lOOkm northwest from the city of Terrace, BC. All members ofthe Nisga'a First Nation belong to one of four Pdeek (i.e. tribes): The Ganada Clan whose crest is represented by a Raven/Frog; Laxgibuu Clan whose crest is represented by a Wolfi'Bear; Gisk'aast Clan whose crest is represented by the Killer Whale/Owl; and the Laxsgiik Clan whose crest is an Eagle/Beaver (Nisga'a Lisims Government, n.d.). The Nisga'a First Nation is matriarchal, and therefore, men and women hold memberships in their mother's clan. The official language of the N isga'a First Nation is Nisga'a (Nisga'a Lisims Government, n.d.). Covered with lava beds from a volcanic eruption that occurred over 200 years ago, the Nass Valley is a unique landscape in British Columbia (Nisga'a Lisims 7 Government, n.d.). The Nisga'a First Nation describes the story of the erupting volcano through their oral traditions: Two children were playing by the river, catching salmon and slitting open their backs. One child slit a salmon's back, stuck a stick into the wound and lit the stick on fire. The other child slit a salmon's back and stuck a piece of shale into the wound. As the children placed the salmon back in the water they were amused by the panic and struggle of the fish. An elder saw what the children were doing and warned them of their actions saying, "Take care what you do . The salmon will curse you and the creator will respond kind" (Nisga'a Lisims Government: Volcano, n.d., para. 3). Shortly after, the ground began to tremble and the volcano began erupting with lava that covered two communities and killed more than two thousand people. This story and the lava beds that cover the Nass Valley to this day serve as a reminder to the Nisga'a people of those who lost their lives to the volcano, as well as the importance of respecting the earth and wisdom of the Elders (Nisga'a Lisims Government, n.d.). Having signed the first modern day treaty in British Columbia's history, the N isga'a First Nation are self-governing and hold control over their population and their land. This makes the N isga 'a a unique First Nation in British Columbia. On May 11 , 2000, the N isga'a Final Agreement was finali zed between the Canadian Government and the N isga 'a First Nations, marking British Columbia's first modern treaty (Nisga'a Lisims Government, n.d.). Therefore, the Indian Act no longer applies to the Nisga'a First Nation. The Nisga'a First Nation is governed by the Nisga'a Lisims Government (NLG), and each community has a local government. The vision of the NLG is SaytK ' il ' im-Goot: one heart, one path, one nation (Nisga'a Lisims Government, n.d.). 1.5 Outline of Chapters This thesis details the journey of the research and unfolds in five chapters. Throughout all of these chapters it is important to note that any generalization of 8 Aboriginal peoples is unintentional, and this thesis is based on the recognition of the diversity and unjqueness of all First Natjons, lnujt and Metis. Following from this ftrst chapter, Chapter Two provides an overview of the literature and includes in-depth discussions on social determinants and Aboriginal peoples' health, focusing specifically on Aboriginal youth, and also outlines existing scholarship on Aboriginal peoples' experiences and encounters with healtbcare systems and personnel in Canada. This discussion ends with a piece on the emergence of storytelling and theatre methods in qualitative research. The background literature included in this chapter demonstrates that Aboriginal peoples, both globally and in Canada, continue to experience an overwhelming burden of health inequities. Furthermore, Aboriginal peoples continue to be targets of racism and discrimination in healthcare settings, where Aboriginal peoples have experienced negative and positive encounters with their healthcare providers. Chapter Three provides a discussion on my research methodologies, which lay the philosophical foun dation for this research and for the methods chosen to undertake the work. The methodologies chosen for this work were based around a social determinants of health framework and included a community-based participatory research approach and dccolonizing methodologies. The methods chosen for the project were informed by the choice of methodologies, and as such are participatory, arts-based methods. The primary method of data collection was devised theatre, complemented by an 'open dialogue. ' Chapter Four covers the results from this research. Four themes emerged from the data and include: disconnect, when the body speaks- incomplete care, empathy, and 9 empowerment. Following the results, Chapter Five discusses the findings of this work at length while engaging with existing literature. To conclude, Chapter Six outlines the limitations of this project and highlights overall findings. The conclusion ends with considerations and recommendations for further research. 10 CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE In Canada vast health inequities and significant health disparities exist between Aboriginal peoples compared to non-Aboriginal peoples (Adelson, 2005; Peiris, Brown & Cass, 2008). Specifically, research has shown that Indigenous youth in Canada and around the world are significantly vulnerable to a variety of socially-determined and biomedical health risks, such as increased rates of teen pregnancy, HIV/AIDS, violence, malnutrition and unemployment (Gracey & King, 2009; Ning & Wilson, 2012; Worthington et al., 201 0). These risks are particularly heightened by lack of access to and use of health clinics, in addition to feelings of distrust with healthcare professions (Browne, 2007; Gracey & King, 2009). Much of the literature cites Indigenous health disparities as primarily stemming from social, political, cultural and economic inequities that are rooted in a history of colonialism (Adelson, 2005). Common to many groups of Indigenous peoples around the world are the effects of colonization, which can be defmed as "the implanting of settlements on distant territory" (Said, 1993, p. 8). In Canada, Euro-colonial groups claimed lands now known as Canada as 'empty, ' literally 'creating the grounds' to forcefully marginalize and remove Aboriginal peoples from their traditional lands and territories (Castleden, Morgan & Lamb, 20 I 2). Furthermore, colonial policies and practices were forced upon Aboriginal peoples in an attempt to assimilate Aboriginal peoples into European society. These included removal of traditional lands and foods , forced relocation to reserves, the involuntary attendance of children in residential schools, banning of traditional ceremonies, and laws that put into place discriminatory and oppressive practices towards Aboriginal Canadians (Adelson, 2005). The effects of colonialism (those larger set of 11 laws, policies and discursive structures that buttressed the more material act of colonization, or forced removal of territory) on Aboriginal peoples in Canada, and Indigenous peoples globally, continues to be profound, impacting their physical, social, mental, and emotional health and wellbeing (Gracey & King, 2009). Northern British Columbia is a unique geography in which Aboriginal peoples have been affected by colonial governments who "literally mapped Indigenous peoples out of British Columbia and onto Indian reserves" (de Leeuw, Maurice, Holyk, Greenwood & Adam, 2012, p. 905). This has resulted in First Nations across Northern British Columbia facing many health disparities that are further affected by lack of access to health services (de Leeuw et al., 2012). In responding to current health disparities, and working to enhance health outcomes, it is important to privilege understanding of this colonial history and how it has influenced Aboriginal perceptions of and relationships with Western health care practitioners. Indeed, research shows that an important factor in enhancing health outcomes for Indigenous youth is confident, empowered, culturallyappropriate clinical encounters that increase willingness to access a healthcare professional and promote positive relationships between patients and their physician (Browne & Fiske, 2001). Furthermore, as Chandler and Lalonde (1998) found, First Nations communities with high levels of safe and culturally relevant services experience lessened risks for youth suicidal ideations. Yet, to date, research on relationships between healthcare providers and Indigenous peoples has not widely consulted or involved younger populations. Gathering youth perspectives and experiences, from a First Nations community in Northern British Columbia, about health care systems may thus contribute to 12 conversations about the development of meaningful, culturally-appropriate, youthrelevant strategies to improve health and wellbeing for Aboriginal youth and address disparities in health. Indeed, because this project will be returned to the Nisga'a Nation in which it was conducted, my hope is that the people who participated in and supported the work might be able to use this research to extend their calls for equitable and culturally appropriate health services. The background to this goal is explored in this chapter, which unfolds in three sections. Section one is a comprehensive discussion of existing literature examining health inequities between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal peoples and the social determinants of Aboriginal peoples health. Section two discusses Aboriginal encounters with healthcare systems and section three explores the use of storytelling and theatre as emerging methods in research with Aboriginal peoples. Together, these three sections situate this project within an extensive body ofliterature, all of which informed and contextualized this project. For the purpose of this thesis, the term 'health disparities' is referring to "those indicators of a relative disproportionate burden of disease on a particular population" while the term 'health inequity' refers to "underlying causes of the disparities, many if not most of which sit largely outside the typically constituted domain of 'health"' (Adelson, 2005 , p. S45). Part 1: The Social Determinants of Aboriginal Peoples Health 2.1 Health Disparities and the Aboriginal Population of Canada. Over the past few years, health research globally bas consistently reported Indigenous peoples suffering from higher rates of infection and disease, and dying much younger than their non-Indigenous counterparts (Allard et al., 2004; Gracey & King 13 2009). Indeed, Indigenous populations worldwide experience a broad range of health and social challenges such as high infant and child mortality, malnutrition, obesity and diabetes, HIV/AIDS, low educational attainment and unemployment (Gracey & King, 2009). For example, the increasing rates of Type II Diabetes in Australian Indigenous populations has reached an epidemic proportion where nearly 60% of Indigenous peoples over 35 years old living in the remote northwest have the disorder (Gracey & King, 2009). In addition, rates ofHIV/AIDS are quickly increasing in numerous Indigenous groups including American Indians, Alaskan Natives, Indigenous African populations, inhabitants of the Asia-Pacific region (which includes Asia, and countries in the Pacific Rim) and Aboriginal Canadians (Gracey & King, 2009). In 201 1, the National Household Survey reported more than one million people in Canada who identify as Aboriginal (4.4% of the Canadian population), including 851 560 identifying as First Nations, 451 795 Metis and 59 445 Inuit (NHS, 20 II). Collectively this population suffers from disproportionate burdens of illness and disease compared to their non-Aboriginal counterparts and experience ' third world conditions of health ' (Adelson, 2005; de Leeuw, Greenwood & Cameron, 2010). Such conditions include low educational attainment, poor living conditions including over-crowding and underserviced homes, unemp loyment, poverty and increased rates of disease and illness (Adelson, 2005). Research about health inequities among Aboriginal groups provides unshakable evidence that health disparities existing between Aboriginal and nonAboriginal peoples are embedded in a history of colonization and poor relations between Aboriginal peoples and the nation state (Adelson, 2005; de Leeuw et al. , 2012). The forced relocation to reserves, removal of children from their families to residential 14 schools and racist attitudes towards Aboriginal peoples are only a few factors that underlie the poor health experienced by Aboriginal Canadians (Adelson, 2005). Among other pressures and stresses, poor socioeconomic conditions and lack of access to resources continue to cause additional and significant challenges for the Aboriginal population (Adelson, 2005). Furthermore, approximately half of the Aboriginal population in Canada lives onreserve, in the territories or in rural communities (NHS, 2011). Northern, rural and remote communities in Canada are unique geographies where health inequities are especially prominent. These communities experience a broad range of health inequities including decreased life expectancy, higher rates of chronic illness such as diabetes and obesity and decreased access to health services due to shortage and turnover of health professionals (Pulla, 2012). Lack of access to resources, in particular access to healthcare, is especially a barrier for Aboriginal peoples living in more northern, remote geographies. de Leeuw, Maurice, Holyk, Greenwood & Adam (2012) argued that when examining and working towards improving Aboriginal peoples health, we must consider geographical location. The authors noted that "First Nations' poor health can only be ameliorated if understood as geographically and historically determined, linked to colonial practices, and associated with dominant systems of social power that spatially and socially (re)produce Indigenous peoples as perpetually otbered" (de Leeuw et al., 2012, p.905). Indeed, the implementation of colonial legislation that forced the relocation of Aboriginal peoples from their land on to government issued land (i.e. reservations) has bad a tremendous impact on the health oflndigenous peoples (de Leeuw et al., 2012). For First Nations peoples living on-reserves in Northern British Columbia, factors such as 15 having to travel long distances to get to a healthcare clinic, experiencing racism due to being from a reserve, and differences in Aboriginal perspectives of health and biomedical models of health have negatively impacted First Nations peoples health and experiences with healthcare (de Leeuw et al., 2012). When thinking about Aboriginal peoples health, then, it is imperative that we as researchers and healthcare practitioners include in our discussions the impact of physical geographies, such as the impact of being from a northern, rural, remote community, and socio-imaginative geographies "that racialize people precisely based on being from an Indian reserve" (de Leeuw et al., 2012, p. 909). Although there exists tremendous health disparities in the Aboriginal population, First Nations, Metis and Inuit communities have developed strategies that have enabled Aboriginal peoples to 'do well' despite the horrific trauma and impacts colonialism has had, and continues to have, on the Aboriginal population of Canada. To be resilient is to "do well despite severe hardships, trauma and deprivation" (Kim1ayer, Dandeneau, Marshall, Phillips & Williamson, 2011, p. 84). Examples from Mi'kmaq, Mohawk, Metis and Inuit communities have illustrated factors and strategies that have enabled Aboriginal peoples to 'do well' (Kirmayer et al., 2011). For the Mi'kmaq peoples who come from Atlantic Canada, some resilience stems from the treaties made with British colonizers, which have stood as symbols of sharing knowledge and living in peace with European settlers (Kirmayer et ai., 20 II). For some Mohawk communities in Canada, resilience can take the form of resisting colonial systems and reasserting control ofMohawk communities through governing their land and systems (i.e. health services, education, economic development) throughout Mohawk territories (Kirmayer et al. , 2011). Much like Mohawk communities, resilience in Metis communities comes from being self- 16 reliant, autonomous and independent by asserting control over their lives and doing things 'their own way.' For Inuit peoples of Canada, being able to adapt to social environments influenced by southern practices and policies, responding to the shift in Arctic climate, and maintaining a connection with the land and mother earth have all contributed to resilience of the Inuit (Kirmayer et al., 20 11). Importantly, all groups mentioned above are simi lar in that resilience, broadly speaking, is rooted in the continuation of traditional knowledge, practices and values (Kirmayer et al., 2011). 2.2 Aboriginal Youth Among the demographics most vulnerable to poor health and socioeconomic conditions, including increased rates ofHJV/AIDS and low educational attainment, are Aboriginal youth in Canada (Ning & Wilson, 2012). According to Statistics Canada's 2011 National Household Survey, youth make up a substantial proportion and fastest growing group of the Canadian Aboriginal population with almost 50% of the Aboriginal population under the age of24 (NHS, 2011). Research has shown this young population faces higher rates of disease and illness compared to non-Aboriginal youth (Ning & Wilson, 2012). Although health research with Aboriginal peoples continues to stress the importance of understanding health and wellbeing from a social determinants of health perspective, literature pertaining to the health of Aboriginal youth fails to address many ofthe 12 key determinants outlined by the Public Health Agency of Canada (Ning & Wilson, 20 12). These 12 key determinants include: income and social status, social support networks, education and literacy, employment/working conditions, social environments, physical environments, personal health practices and coping skills, healthy 17 childhood development, biology and genetic endowment, health services, gender, and culture ("Public Health Agency of Canada", 2011). However, recent research has begun to turn to Aboriginal youth voices to understand how this demographic understands and experiences health. A study done by Isaak and Marchessault (2008) with First Nations adults and youth in a Northern First Nations community in Manitoba collected infonnation on the perspectives of what 'health' means to Aboriginal youth. The authors noted that although health statistics of Aboriginal youth are documented, First Nations peoples, specifically youths' understanding of these diseases, bas been overlooked (Isaak and Marchessault, 2008). Isaak and Marchessault (2008) explained that Aboriginal youth have showed interest in being part of conversations around the implementation and effectiveness of progran1s aimed at health promotion. Using a qualitative methods approach, the authors conducted in-depth interviews with First Nations adults and focus groups with First Nations youth to explore both the old and young's understandings of health. Interestingly, both adult and youth participants described health as having emotional, spiritual, physical and mental components, reflecting the teachings of the Med icine Wheel. Although some youth did not directly reference the Medicine Wheel, it was clear that Aboriginal youths' understandings and perspectives of health include the interconnectedness of mental, spiritual, physical and emotional (Isaak and Marchessault, 2008). Although research has begun to include the younger Aboriginal population in discussions around health, to date, research has not substantially explored Aboriginal youths' use of healtbcare services or their interactions with healthcare providers (Ning & Wilson, 20 12). This is surprising given the numbers of studies that have investigated 18 Aboriginal peoples experiences with the healthcare system more generally, given that Aboriginal youth suffer from poorer health outcomes than non-Aboriginal youth, and given that the link between use ofhealth services/interaction with healthcare providers and positive health outcomes has been well-documented (Allan & Smiley, 2015; Browne, 2007; Browne & Fiske, 2001; de Leeuw et al., 2012; Ning & Wilson, 2012; Gracey & King, 2009). 2.3 Social Determinants of Aboriginal Peoples Health Over recent years, attention has been given to the important role the social determinants of health (SDoH) play in understanding health inequities (Marmot et al., 2008; Raphael, 2009). Social determinants of health include, but are not limited to: income, education, unemployment, housing, and early childhood development. Indeed, the SDoH allow one to understand how systems and structures can influence health, by acknowledging the link between health and the social context in which one lives (Marmot et al., 2008). In 2008, Marmot and his colleagues summarized key fmdings and recommendations in a report for the Commission on Social Determinants of Health, in which they called for urgent action by governments, civil society, communities, businesses, and international agencies to address the wide gap in health that exists around the globe. The authors explained how health inequities primarily stem from unequal allocation of power, income, resources and services within countries. Indeed, research has shown that people in a lower SES bracket have poorer health than those with a hjgher socioeconomic status (Marmot et al., 2008). The social determinants of health take into account the wider social, political and economic conditions that people live in, and how these circumstances affect people' s health: "Social determinants foci move away from 19 genetic or biomedical inquiries and instead examine why some people and communities are more prone to health deficits, or suffer more severely from their outcomes, as a function of social contexts" (de Leeuw, Greenwood & Cameron, 2010, p. 285). Recently, literature pertaining to Aboriginal people's health has stressed the importance of using social determinants of health to understand inequities experienced by Indigenous peoples that underlie their health (de Leeuw, Greenwood & Cameron, 2010; Marmot et al., 2008; Nelson, 2012; Reading & Wien, 2009). Although understanding health from a SDoH perspective has been widely accepted by Indigenous peoples and communities, in part because it reflects values of a holistic understanding of health and wellbeing, the academic SDoH framework requires critical examination as it also risks representing a 'Western' model of understanding how health is determined. The SDoH model may not necessarily encompass Indigenous approaches and perspectives of health and could further perpetuate inequalities and the dominance of white, European settler systems (Czyzewski, 2011). Many Indigenous authors have thus identified 'distal' determinants of Indigenous peoples health, such as the impacts and roles of colonialism, a process that has played a significant part in shaping the circumstances leading to poor health outcomes of Aboriginal peoples past and present (Reading & Wien, 2009; Richmond & Ross, 2009; Smylie, 2009). Czyzewski (2011) offered a comprehensive discussion about the importance of including colonialism as a distal determinant of Indigenous peoples health, using examples of how discourses around mental health perpetuate and reinforce colonialism. For example, Czyzewski (2011) explained how literature on mental health of Aboriginal peoples does not take into account the role that culture plays in mental wellness. Rather, the majority of literature blames mental illness 20 on the "disordered Aboriginal," a concept that comes from anthropologists', psychologists' and psychiatrists' idea that Indigenous peoples are unable to "deal with their problems." This further perpetuates othering and racialized stereotypes, according to Czyzewski. In addition, intergenerational trauma, caused by colonial processes such as residential schools, continues to impact the mental health and wellness of Aboriginal peoples. Indeed, scholarship has explored the ways in which colonialism acts as a distal determinant of health that continues to produce poor socio-economic conditions. In addition, and as mentioned above, colonialism elicits a discourse around mental health that blames Indigenous individuals rather than understanding their wellness as being affected by social, economic and political contexts, which have been shaped by a history of colonial practices (Czyzewski, 2011 ). Colonialism is addressed in this research through use of community-based participatory methods, decolonizing methodology, and methods informed by these approaches, which are discussed in Chapter three. Other authors have also explored determinants of health specific to Aboriginal peoples. Richmond and Ross (2009) explored determinants of first Nation and Inuit health in rural and remote communities, and discussed ways in which environmental dispossession has affected these determinants. The authors argued that environmental dispossession (i.e. processes such as colonialism that removed Aboriginal peoples from their traditional land) has negatively affected Indigenous peoples wellbeing and is essentially at the heart of social and health inequalities between Aboriginal and nonAboriginal peoples (Richmond & Ross, 2009). Through interviews with 26 Community Health Representatives, six determinants of health were uncovered: balance, life control, education, material resources, social resources and environmental/cultural connections. 21 Interestingly, al l health determinants except cnvironmentaVcultural connections aligned closely with the Canadian model of health determinants. Participants defined environmentaVcultural connections " less categorically than other determinants and more so as a process defining people's abilities to draw resources from the environment in the maintenance of culture and way of life" (Richmond & Ross, 2009, p. 407). These authors found that environmentaVcultural connections impact the other health determinants listed. For example, the reduced consumption of traditional foods and decrease in activities such as gardening and cutting wood have negatively impacted Aboriginal peoples physical and spiritual health, which arc part of the health determinant ' balance' and encompasses the four aspects of the medicine wheel (Richmond & Ross, 2009). With this in mind, the foundation of this research drew from a social detem1inants of health approach, to acknowledge and encompass broader determinants that impact Aboriginal peoples health, such as environment/cultural connections, and colonialism. This will be further discussed in the methodologies chapter of this thesis. Part II: Aboriginal Encounters with Health Care Systems The importance to well-being of the patient and bealthcare provider relationship has been consistently discussed in social science and medical literature, especially over the past 50 years (Roter, 2000). As B ellin (2002) noted, "the physician-patient relationship is as old as medicine itselr' (p.450). The ruling principle of medicine, since the time of Hippocrates, bas been to 'do no harm .' This criterion bas been the guiding principle of the patient-physician relationship, and influenced a 'paternalistic' nature of this relationship, with physicians representing a 'father' like figure that stands above his children, and the children obeying his orders (Hellin, 2002). In the past 40 years, the 22 patient-physician relationship has evolved from a paternalistic model to a more patientcentered model. This includes the patient and physician in relationship as equals, both making decisions, and the patient taking ownership over their health (Kaba & Sooriakumaran, 2007). As Shaw, Ibrahim, Reid, Ussher & Rowlands (2009) noted, "the quality of the doctor-patient relationship can affect diagnosis, treatment and recovery" (p.114). Having a good relationship with one's physician is especially important in maintaining one's health and wellbeing. Indeed, a positive relationship with one's physicians leads to improved health outcomes (Shaw et al., 2009). In Canada, there exists a history of"discriminatory practices, unjust laws and economic or political disadvantage" (Adelson, 2005, p. S46) towards Aboriginal peoples, taking the form of forced relocation of Aboriginal peoples to unfamiliar land, the implementation of the residential school system, cultural and linguistic assimilation of Aboriginal peoples into Canadian settler society, and the implementation of the Indian Act in 1876 (University of British Columbia, 2009). Indeed, Aboriginal Canadians are still affected by the trauma caused from historical relations with the nation state, including loss of traditional lands, forced relocation to reserves, the involuntary attendance of children in residential schools, and discriminatory and oppressive attitudes towards Aboriginal Canadians (see Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, 20 15). Furthermore, racism and discriminatory attitudes continue to manifest in relations with Aboriginal peoples, particularly in the context of healthcare settings (Allan & Smiley, 2015) where medical institutions continue to represent a colonial past and present. The term 'colonial present' is used to recognize that the effects and 'actions' of colonizers are still prominent and occurring today (O'Neil, 1989). Racism takes the form 23 of longer wait times, fewer referrals and disrespectful treatment (Browne & Fiske, 2001). What's more, racism directly impacts health; research has shown that reactions to racism cause "racial battle fatigue", a stress response to cope with continuing discrimination (Allan & Smylie, 2015). The Non-Insured Health Benefits (NIBH) program is an example of how racism manifests towards Aboriginal peoples within the Canadian healthcare system. This racebased legislation is a health insurance program offered only to those First Nations and Inuit who hold "Indian Status" cards. Non-status and Metis people are excluded from this insurance program, even though they face the same health inequities as those First Nations and Inuit who have access to the program (Allan & Smylie, 2015). What's more, access and funding for some services provided by the NIBH require on-reserve residency, with a constant shifting of funded medications and services (Allan & Smylie, 2015). Cass et al. (2002) explored factors that affect communication between Australian Aboriginal patients with end-stage renal disease and their healtbcare providers. The authors described how there is a gap in research about the degree of miscommunication present in clinical situations and the consequences that arise from this miscommunication (Cass et al., 2002). The goal of their research was to observe communication between Aboriginal patients and non-Aboriginal staff in a dialysis unit to understand dynamics of intercultural communication. The authors found many factors influencing communication between staff and patients. Interestingly, many factors are common to aspects influencing miscommunication in Canadian bealthcare contexts. One aspect that bas been cited in literature about communication with Aboriginal peoples in Canada and their bealtbcare providers is how discourse in bealthcare settings is dominated by a western biomedical 24 model. For example, Cass et al. (2002) explained how healthcare providers left no opportunities for Aboriginal patients to discuss their own understandings and approaches to health. Research has shown that development of effective cross-cultural communication is a long process. Physicians' changes in understanding of Aboriginal culture do, however, lead to better communication and relationships between physicians and Aboriginal patients, information important for physicians working with Aboriginal communities (Kelly & Brown, 2002). Achieving cultural understanding and a good level of communication requires a long-term process and constant interaction with Aboriginal patients that brings many opportunities for learning experiences. Physicians have noted that the journey towards a better understanding of Aboriginal patients, despite being time-consuming and complex, is rewarding and transformative (Kelly & Brown, 2002). The term 'cultural competence' has garnered attention in recent years, and has become important in reducing healthcare disparities experienced by Aboriginal peoples (Kirmayer, 20 12). Cultural competence is defmed by Betancourt et al. (2003) as "the ability of systems to provide care to patients with diverse values, beliefs and behaviours, including tailoring delivery to meet patients' social, cultural, and linguistic needs" (p. v). Cultural competence seems to be optimally developed through "experiential and reflective learning- both in the context of [medical] students' clinical training and personal life experiences" (Sinclair et al., 2016, p. 12). This was seen in a cultural immersion experience of two medical students in Northern British Columbia. In a reflective article by medical students Klopp and Nakanishi (2012), the students discussed their experience of being immersed in the First Nations communjty ofNak'azdli in 25 Northern BC and the "merit" of having knowledge and understanding of other cultures that these kinds of experiences offer. Through this experience, medical students reflected on their own assumptions and perceptions of First Nations peoples, and realized that "cultural immersion is not only meaningful, but that the experiential learning that cultural immersion provides results in heightened attainment of cultural competence" (p. 128) Similarly, nursing practices have begun to include cultural immersion as part of the nursing curricula, with the objectives of developing a higher degree of cultural competence. Morgan and Reel (2003) discussed their successes in immersing nursing students in rural cultures in the United States through community collaboration. The authors discussed the value of community participation and collaboration when doing community assessments to identify needs of a rural community. Designing medical school curriculum that includes experiential and reflective learning is one way to foster and develop medical practitioners who bring understanding of the role culture plays, and with that, cultural competence. Indeed, having deeper knowledge and understanding of culture, bearing in mind that cultural competence "engenders the belief that certain groups of people have the same, shared cultural meanings" (Klopp and Nakanishi, 2012, p. 128), is important for healthcare providers to develop a compassionate and empathetic relationship with patients, and communities. Additionally, patient-provider relationships have been situated within wider sociopolitical contexts, shaped by social and historical relations. For instance, Browne's (2007) discussion engages with the sociopolitical context of nurses ' encounters with First Nations women in a Western Canadian hospital. These encounters, Browne (2007) argued, are shaped by a historical past of colonialism, oppression and power imbalances 26 between Aboriginal Canadians and the nation state. Other recent research in Australia bas documented clinical encounters between Aboriginal peoples and their non-Aboriginal healtbcare providers and has found many factors, such as poor communication, stereotyping, and othering as contributing to negative interactions and relationships between Aboriginal patients and their healtbcare providers (Cass et al., 2002). In addition, research bas shown that many Aboriginal patients feel dismissed by nurses and doctors, as well as feeling their concerns are not heard or acknowledged by bealthcare providers (Browne & Fiske, 2001). The result of these negative encounters is ongoing marginalization and discrimination towards Aboriginal peoples, perpetuating distrust towards the bealtbcare system (Allan and Smiley, 2015; Browne & Fiske, 2001; Galloway 2014). Although research bas evidenced primarily negative encounters of Aboriginal peoples with health systems, affirming encounters have also been documented. Much can be learned from these. Research involving First Nations women has shown that affirming encounters include Indigenous patients being actively involved in making decisions around their health and explaining feelings of being accepted and cared for by physicians and healtbcare workers respecting culture, and identity and having a good long standing relationship with a health care provider (Browne & Fiske, 2001 ). Documenting positive encounters with healthcare providers is important. It will inform healthcare practitioners about understanding what kinds of processes and patient-physician relationships are meaningful to Indigenous peoples in healthcare systems and delivery. Still, while many researchers have shifted their focus to working with communities to identify strategies and solutions in hopes of improving these encounters, there has been no signjficant or 27 positive change that I am aware of. Considerable challenges remain (A llan & Smiley, 2015). Furthermore, research may benefit from new methods, anchored in arts-based approaches, such as storytelling and theatre, to enable in-depth narration of lived experience. This is especially the case for young people, whose voices are so lacking in the research. Part III: Storytelling and Theatre as Emerging Methods 2.4 Storytelling Arts-based methods are increasingly being used by researchers who work with Indigenous populations and who intentionally seek to decolonize their research process (see Willox, Harper & Edge, 2012; Goulet et al., 2011). Creativity and art have been cited as promising tools to address persistent health inequities that exist between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal peoples. Practitioners (i.e. researchers, physicians) moving away from solely 'biomedical' models of understanding health and turning towards more comprehensive approaches, such as the social determinants of health, may be one means of deploying arts based methods (Muirhead & de Leeuw, 2012). Included in these alternative approaches/ways of thinking about health is an idea about the connection between art and well ness. ln Canada, the inclusion of art in healing and health may be particularly significant to Aboriginal peoples, especially because before European settlers arrived in Canada and attempted to diminish Aboriginal peoples of their sociocultural practices, traditional cultural activities included many creative and artistic expressions (i.e. drumming, dancing, basket making, carving) (Muirhead & de Leeuw, 2012). Storytelling, specifically, has been cited as a form of identity and resilience for Indigenous peoples. It is a way of passing on stories from their culture, and acts as a 28 source of "knowledge, wisdom, and affirmation of identity" (Kirmaycr et at., 2011, p. 86). Bird et at. (2009) noted however, that there is a gap in literature representing Indigenous voices, especially in research around healthcare and health promotion, as well as "a lack of methodological exploration of the ways in which qualitative research strategies include Indigenous peoples" (p. 18). The authors explored the use of storytelling and narratives as qualitative methods to understand Inuit people's experiences living with diabetes (Bird et at. , 2009). Participants were encouraged to tell their story of living with diabetes. One storyteller's experience was used to demonstrate various methodological issues that arise when using qualitative research to explore people's personal experiences (i.e. in this case with diabetes). The authors present four methodological considerations about using storytelling: 1) using participatory research methods, ensuring equity through all stages of the research 2) presenting narratives rather than solely interpreting narratives 3) including aspects of culture, language and place when interpreting narratives as these aspects are not separate from peoples experiences and, 4) using multiple methods of analyses (i.e. including participants in the data analysis process to ensure the data has been presented accurately) (Bird et al., 2009). Bird et al. (2009) argued that addressing the four points above will increase rigor and trustworthiness, thus improving qualitative narrative analyses. There are important factors to consider when conducting qualitative research. They are especially pertinent to storytelling with Indigenous peoples using a participatory approach and suggest including narratives verbatim rather than just through interpretation. Bird et al 's. (2009) suggestion also enforces taking into account wider contexts in which Indigenous peoples live and using multiple methods of analyses. This was informative to my own thesis work, as the 29 main data-gathering method employed was a form of storytelling, through theatrical means. Other research has shown links between storytelling and personal empowerment. Storytelling can provide a means of healing and transformation, confidence building, reconnecting with one 's iden6ty, group building, promoting a sense of belonging, and drawing courage and inspiration from other stories (Williams, Labonte & O' Brien, 2003). In addition, storytelling within a group or community has the capacity for people to reconnect with their cultural identity as well as "strengthen new communal narratives that challenge dominant narratives, and to (re)construct communities as empowered rather than disempowered collectives." (Williams, Labonte & O' Brien, 2003 , p. 36). Furtbem1ore, the use of art has increasingly been called into the education of physicians, which has been noted to have the potential to "enhance empathy, perspective-taking, and openness to different viewpoints, and to prompt reflection on self, others, and the world" (Kumagai & Wear, 2014, p. 973). Given this research explores patient-healthcare provider relationships, arts-based methods anchored in creativity make good sense. Theatre was chosen as the main data gathering method, and is discussed in the next section. 2.5 Theatre Building from the use of storytelling in scholarship, recent research has begun to use other creative arts-based methods, such as theatre, which has proved to have great potential as a tool to create a space for Indigenous peoples to address health issues in their communities (Goulet eta!., 2011 ). The dramatic arts, more specifically acting and theatrical creations, are one such arts-based method. Indeed, theatre has long had a 30 history of being used in a political context. In his book, Theatre of the Oppressed, Augusto Boal (1979) argued that theatre was used, and is still used today, as a function to increase social awareness of structural oppression in many societies. Specifically, Boal (1979) draws on examples from Aristotelian theatre and Greek tragedy to illustrate bow theatre was a tool for elite classes to assert power and control over the public by excluding those in lower social classes from the arts. While oppressive forms of theatre still exist, there has been movement towards theatre as a tool for personal empowerment and social change (Boal, 1979). Such a movement was started by Boal himself, among others. Through his development of Theatre ofthe Oppressed, Boal introduced "forum" and "image theatre" as instruments to evoke liberation. This participatory and interactive form of theatre enables the actors and audience members to produce a theatrical space and time in which to fight against representations of oppressive forces that are present in their everyday lives (Mienczakowski, 1995). Boal's work is still very relevant today. His theatre methods are used in research to engage and empower people, especially youth, and to produce spaces to tell stories of their lived realities and work through social and personal issues and to devise strategies and solutions (Conrad, 2004; Day, 2002; Rutten et al., 2010). For instance, Goulet et al. (2011) developed a series of theatre workshops, based on Boat's Theatre of the Oppressed, working with Aboriginal youth so they could tell their stories about the socio-cultural aspects of health. These workshops were aimed at creating a safe space "where youth are asked to think for themselves, to use their bodies and to exercise their imaginations in making decisions for action" (Goulet et al., 2011, p. 89). The stories developed by Aboriginal youth revealed that various factors, including forces of social control in and outside of communities, continue to constrain 31 youth, and, more significantly, that youth do not believe they are able to be agents to effect change (Goulet et al., 2011 ). Not only does theatre provide an active, participatory approach to research (see Conrad 2004), it also ensures that participants have the opportunity to contribute their own voices and stories of lived experience. In this way, participants have a chance to create a story that narrates the social, health-related, educational, cultural, political, economic, and personal confinements or strains that impact their lives and engage in honest discussion around these issues in search of a solution. Thus, models of theatre (such as Theatre ofthe Oppressed) break out of the conventional limits of 'traditional theatre' by opening the process of play building and having participants create a story. This challenges the colonial roots embedded in society and enabling self-empowerment and agency. Devised theatre, a similar form of theatre to Theatre of the Oppressed, was chosen as the main data gathering method, and will be further discussed in Chapter three. Conclusion Research over the years has consistently shown that Indigenous peoples suffer from lowered health status as compared with non-Indigenous peoples (Adelson, 2005, Gracey and King, 2009). In Canada, Aboriginal peoples living in northern, remote geographies are especially affected by health inequities, such as lack of access to and use of healthcare services (de Leeuw et at. , 20 12). These health inequities have been, and continue to be, rooted in a history of colonialism that continues to affect the health and wellbeing of Aboriginal peoples. Due to this history, now more than ever, research methodologies and methods about Indigenous realities must address the profound impact that colonialism has had, and continues to have, on Indigenous peoples and communities 32 (L.T. Smith, 1999). In the past, research around the health of Indigenous peoples has been misrepresentative and results have not reflected Indigenous perspectives or experiences (Castleden et al., 2012). Research with Aboriginal peoples must use approaches, such as community-based participatory research, which seek to address the colonial legacy embedded in research practices, and thus address the power imbalances present between researchers and their subjects (de Leeuw, Greenwood & Cameron, 2012). There are increasingly many ways of doing this. Community-Based Participatory Research tries to ensure community ownership and involvement in all stages of the research process and recognizes Indigenous peoples' knowledge and insight. It acknowledges them as equal partners in the research process (Castleden et a!., 20 12). As mentioned above, when working toward understanding Indigenous health, it is imperative that researchers acknowledge how colonialism has shaped, and continues to shape, the overall wellbeing of Indigenous communities. Decolonizing research moves away from 'Western ' models/ approaches to research, and privileges Indigenous "perspectives, processes and ways of knowing and learning" (Bartlett, Iwasaki, Gottlieb, Hall & Mannell, 2007, p. 2376). It is important to note that, while Boal's method of theatre was influenced by "Western" approaches (i.e. Greek Tragedy and Aristotelian Theatre), the creative element of theatre makes it holistic, not favouring rational modes of being, but rather making room for spiritual, imaginative, and relational modes of being that coincide with Indigenous perspectives. Research processes must honor Aboriginal knowledge development. Research processes must also privilege narratives of lived experience rather than collection of facts/data that are translated into ' non-personalized ' knowledge. Indeed, when doing research with Indigenous peoples, it is Indigenous 33 experiences, perspectives, and insights about research questions and objectives that are at the core of research processes and part ofthe driving force when partnering with Indigenous peoples and communities around research activities. As such, all methodolog ies and data gathering methods employed in this project have been chosen with a decolonizing methodology in mind, and will be discussed in the next chapter. 34 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY AND METHODS Part 1: Methodology and Approaches In this research, the term 'methodology' refers to the theoretical and philosophical foundations on which this research is built. Three main philosophical tenants, or methodologies, frame the way this research was undertaken. I discuss these below, interweaving the discussion with thoughts about the ways these methodologies inform and are actualized in my own research project. 3.1 Social Determinants of Health Framework As mentioned in previous chapters, a social determinants of health framework informs this work. The social determinants of health are "the economic and social conditions that shape the health of individuals, communities and jurisdictions as a whole" (Raphael, 2009, p. 2). The social determinants of health, as a way of understanding health outcomes, have a long history despite its more recent ascendance in mainstream conversations about human well-being. In the mid-1800's, Friedrick Engels examined how poor housing, clothing, diet, and lack of sanitation was directly related to infections and diseases, causing premature death in the working class (Raphael, 2009). Since then, research has begun to develop around health inequities and the impacts social, economic, political and cultural factors play in these inequities (Raphael, 2009). It is no longer a normative, unquestioned practice to consider health as purely biomedical and behaviourally based (Marmot et al., 2008). Rather it has become widely accepted as imperative that health be understood broadly and holistically, as not just the absence of illness, but encompassing social and economic factors including but not limited to: living conditions, income, availability and quality of education, and access to healthcare 35 services (Raphael, 2009). The social determinants of health seek to address inequities in allocation and distribution of economic and social resources, and as such, attention is given to economic and social policies as a way of addressing inequities (Raphael, 2009). When considering the poor health realities of Aboriginal peoples in Canada, and Indigenous peoples worldwide, historical and contemporary realities that have shaped Aboriginal peoples health and wellbeing should be accounted for. Indeed, in order to fully understand the interconnected web of factors associated with health, and how the past and current social standing of Aboriginal peoples connects to health, we must expand the very ' defmition' of health (Smylie, 2009). The National Aboriginal Health Organization (2007) outlined a list of broader determinants of health specific to Aboriginal peoples including colonization, globalization, migration, cu ltural continuity, access, territory, poverty, and self-determination . Specifically and notably, the ongoing effects of colonization, including forced relocation from traditional lands, cultural and linguistic assimilation, and impacts of interpersonal and institutional racism, continue to negatively affect Aboriginal peoples' health . Indeed, the impacts of colonization have been identified as " important determinants oflndi genous peoples hea lth" (Smylie, 2009, p. 282). My own exploration of First Nations youths' experiences and perspectives on health and their relationships with healthcare providers makes an effort to include and consider the traditional social determinants of health (see Marmot 2009 and Raphael, 2009). This research also goes further by being cognizant of other determinants specific to Aboriginal peoples health (Smylie, 2009; Reading and Wien, 2009). A social determinants of Aboriginal peoples health ' framework ' further complements other 36 methodologies chosen to inform this work, including community-based participatory research and decolonizing methodologies, which are explained in the following paragraphs. 3.2 Community-Based Participatory Research A community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach was important for this work. CBPR enables researchers to build a level of communication and trust with participants, creating a research-participant relationship that can faci litate a dialogue to bring forward first person stories that may identify determinants of health specific to patient-healthcare provider relationships. As such, CBPR approaches compliment the SDoH framework also chosen as a methodology for this research. Literature bas characterized community-based participatory research as: A collaborative process that equitably involves all partners in the research process and recognizes the unique strengths that each brings. CBPR begins with a research topic of importance to the community with the aim of combining knowledge and action for social change to improve community health and eliminate health disparities (as cited in Minkler, 2005, p. ii3-ii4) Many researchers favour CPBR methodologies in their work as it provides an ethical means of conducting research and promotes co-learning and bi-directional research (Minkler, 2004; Wallerste in & Duran, 2006; Castleden et al., 2012; de Leeuw, Greenwood & Cameron, 20 12). Community-based participatory research does not focus on a specific set of research methods or techniques, but rather places emphasis on the researcher-community relationship and reaching goals of social change (Wallerstein & Duran, 2006). There are many values in using a community-based participatory approach in health research, especially with marginalized or oppressed populations (Castleden et al., 37 20 12). First and foremost, a CBPR approach is committed to developing a research question that "reflects ... issues of real concern to community members" (Minkler, 2005, pg. ii5). This means that, ideally, the research question comes from the communi ty involved, and the community then seeks partnerships with outside researchers. In addition, CBPR examines costs and benefits of the research project on the community. For example, in keeping with CBPR's value towards equitable partnerships and capacity building within commuojties, it is important to consider factors such as method appropriateness to communities and opportullities for training and capacity building for the partner communities (Minkler, 2005). Although my own research did not begin with a research question from a First Nations community, partnerships were only made with communities interested in the research topic and chosen methods (i.e. devised theatre), ensuring the research was meaningful to the participating cornmuruty. Another strength of CBPR is its opportunity to uncover local knowledge critical to better understanding of questions being asked. For example, using a CPBR approach in conducting a study in India investigating high rates ofHIV/ AIDS among men in the industrial area ofNandesari, researchers began to understand through local partnerships and ' insider knowledge' that causes of high rates ofHIV/AIDS were associated with unprotected sex due to fa lse information believed by men in this region (Shah, 2004). Due to ' insider' knowledge and guidance of local partners, which included male village health workers, the research was strengthened and led to subsequent meaningful interventions to provide correct information to men in the region (Shah, 2004). Other values and strengths of a CBPR approach include increasing community trust and ownership through gaining approval of the project from community leaders (de 38 Leeuw, Greenwood & Cameron, 2012). This leads to better recruitment and retention of participants and higher quality of data due to participant and community involvement in the project. Furthermore, CBPR improves accuracy when analyzing data and findings through participant and community involvement in data analysis stages of the research. Including participants and community partners in data analysis ensures that the knowledge provided by the community is represented accurately and truthfully, leading to better-developed and richer themes. This research aimed to explore stories of First Nations youths' experiences with their healthcare providers, a question that could only be answered through meaningful, collaborative and active participation by the youth participants and community involved. Based on the strengths of a CBPR approach discussed above, my research sought to include as many aspects of CBPR as possible, keeping in mind the challenges in using such an approach. With that in mind, a discussion about the challenges and pitfalls of CBPR follows, highlighting the challenges faced in my own research. While community-based participatory research can be a valuable and ethical approach to conducting research, there are also challenges in using this methodology. Wallerstein and Duran (2006) have written extensively on the pitfalls of using CBPR. A summary of their critiques follows throughout this next section. As mentioned above, one value in using a CBPR approach is having a research question driven by the community. However, this can become a challenge as most research projects are driven by those in privileged positions (i.e. academia), who have extensive resources and time to produce their work (Wallerstein & Duran, 2006). In the case of my own research, the research question did not come from the community 39 involved. Partnerships were, however, sought with communities who found the question meaningful and important for their community. Furthermore, it is important to be mindful of the various stakeholders participating in the research process (i.e. researcher and community members) as participants hold different expertise and knowledge (Minkler, 2005). Challenges can arise when researchers' and community interests in knowledge production differ; therefore, it is important to maintain open communication throughout the research process to address these challenges as they may arise. This was not a challenge in my own work, as I entered the community first and foremost as a learner, and the participants and community as the experts in this research. One significant challenge of CPBR is that of' insider-outsider' dynamics, especially with regards to benefits and rewards. ' Insider-outsider' dynamics are those between the outside researcher and the partner community (Minkler, 2005). Although an important aspect ofCBPR is to ensure the community involved is benefited in some way, the 'outside' researcher usually bas the most to gain from these collaborations taking the fonn of grants and publications. One challenge of taking on a communi ty-based participatory approach then, is to address the roles that power and privilege play in the community-researcher relationship. For university researchers, power and privilege take the form of expertise in scientific knowledge and ability to access resources, among others (Wallerstein & Duran, 2006). It was especially important that my own work addressed the power imbalances present in the community-researcher relationship. Thjs was done by first and foremost acknowledging such a power imbalance in research exists, and then challenging the dominance of a 'single scientific discourse' by placing value on various types of knowledge, through inclusion of methodologies such as CBPR. 40 Although CBPR approaches ostensibly commit the researchers who use them to inclusive participation by communities, there can be some constraints on community involvement, such as projects involving marginalized and vulnerable populations. For example, authors Diaz and Simmons (1999) conducted a Reproductive Health Project in Brazil and found that despite their efforts to include marginalized and vulnerable women in the research process, these women were not a position to provide their time and/or energy towards involvement in the project (Diaz and Simmons, 1999). In other words, CBPR can be challenging in so far as it demands from peoples' already overcommitted and often under valued and under-resourced time. It becomes important, then, for authentic relationships to be built so conversations can be had with community partners to discuss these kinds of challenges, and strategies for these to be overcome. Other challenges of community involvement include disagreements between researcher and community on methods chosen for projects (Minkler, 2005). Often such disagreements can privilege a researcher, who in relationship with community- even despite all good intentions - can bold greater access to power, making authentic partnership or di sagreement difficult. However, through open, respectful communication, collaborations can foster a space in which both the community and researchers' knowledge are valued for what they can contribute. This certainly takes work, but the very concept of CBPR opens up spaces for such contemplation of relationship and partnership, and a more equitable dialogue between research participant and researcher may open such spaces. Certainly that is one hope and effort of this research. Research has shown that community-based participatory research is a positive tool when addressing health inequities, and especially when working with Indigenous 41 populations (Wallerstein & Duran, 2006; Castleden et al. , 2012; de Leeuw, Greenwood & Cameron, 2012). Studies with Indigenous peoples have been, and are, rooted in colonial practices (L.T. Smith, 1999). This must be rectified if persistent health inequalities can ever authentically be addressed. Research, then, has to change form and intent exactly because it has been part of the problem of inequality for so long. For example, in the past (and to some extent into the present day), research around the health of Indigenous peoples has been misrepresentative, focusing on pathologizing the "Indian" (Kelm, 2005, see also Willie Ermine, 2007) and results have not reflected Indigenous perspectives or experiences of health and wellbeing. Furthermore, health research has focused on pathology and dysfunction rather than recognizing Indigenous perspectives or experiences and bas thus perpetuated stereotypes of Indigenous peoples (Castleden et al., 20 12). A community-based participatory research approach seeks to address the colonial legacy embedded in research practices, through honoring Indigenous knowledge and research practices, and thus addresses the power imbalances present between researchers and their subjects (de Leeuw, Greenwood & Cameron, 2012; Ermine, 2007).1t aims for community ownership and involvement in all stages of the research process, recognizes Indigenous peoples knowledge and insight, and acknowledges them as partners in the research process (Cast Ieden et al., 20 12). Therefore, my choice of CBPR as a primary methodology in this work informed my choice of methods used (i.e. devised theatre), which opens a space for decolonizing the research process, community involvement, and ownership. Indeed, "community-based participatory research has been identified as a research philosophy and methodology that has the potential to contribute to efforts to decolonize 42 the university researcher-Indigenous community relationship" (Castleden et al., 2012, p. 3). While this may be overly ambitious, and indeed substantive power imbalances seem to persist despite the best intentions of researchers (de Leeuw, Greenwood & Lindsay, 20 13) community-based participatory approaches lay a philosophical foundation for this research. ln particular for my research, CBPR further supports my choice of us ing devised theatre as a method, as devised theatre is a strategy that allows researchers to enter into a first person narrative on lived experience. This was done through facilitating a devised theatre workshop where youth participants were the scriptwriters of what was to be performed. While this research may not have fully adhered to all aspects and guidelines of a CBPR approach, all efforts within the confines of a Masters degree, were made to build equitable partnerships between a Northern, rural First Nations community and the primary researcher. This relational understanding of research, the very heart of the philosophy of CBPR, is thus arguably the central and guiding force of this project even if some of the stricter mandates of CBPR were adapted to ensure a living and flexible framework that ultimately allowed the project to be completed in the community. Furthermore, community approval, participation and ownership was sought in every stage of the research process, and power imbalances recognized, keeping in line with the parameters of a CBPR approach. A decolonizing methodology complements a CBPR approach, further addressing the colonial legacy and power differentials embedded in the research process, especially when collaborating in research with Indigenous communities, and is discussed in the next section. 43 3.3 Decolonizing Methodologies Along with a CBPR approach, a decolonizing methodology offers further philosophical fou ndation for this research. As previously mentioned, when understanding Indigenous health, it is imperative to acknowledge how colonjalism has shaped, and continues to shape, the overall wellbeing of Indigenous communities. Furthermore, constant reflection throughout the research process on bow the research activities are perpetuating or dismantling colonial practices is essential. As discussed in Smith's (1999) important work Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples, Western research paradigms are viewed as scientific and objective processes; knowledge is "to be discovered, extracted, appropriated and distributed" (L.T. Smith, 1999, p. 58). Furthermore, Western culture bas "frequently identified itself as the ethnocentric centre of legitimate knowledge" (Wilson, 200 1, p. 2 15) and has disregarded Indigenous belief systems and knowledge. Research 'done on ' Indigenous peoples by colonizers, travellers and observers has been misrepresentative of Indigenous peoples: it has created stories that have become accepted as "universal truths, marginalizing the stories of the Other" (Wilson, 2001, p. 215). Research, then, that seeks to move away from pathologizing constructions of Indigenous subjects has to carefully account for the long and damaging history of research itself as a violent and pejorative force in the lives and communities of Indigenous peoples. Researchers ourselves are implicated in the very positioning and conceptualizing of Indigenous peoples today - accounting for this, even if we do not reach absolute answers, is part of the work done by decolonjzing methodologies. Decolonizing research moves away from Western models/ approaches to research, by acknowledging, focusing, and emphasizing Indjgenous ways of knowing and being. 44 Indeed, "the development and implementation of Indigenous Methodologies have become a near necessity for the implementation of research in indigenous communities" (Evans, Hole, Berg, Hutchinson & Sookraj, 2009, p. 1). Indigenous Methodologies (IM) encompasses alternative ways of thinking about, and doing research. As noted by Louis (2006), Indigenous Methodologies are" fluid and dynamic ... [and] emphasize circular and cyclical perspective .. . [and] aim to ensure that research on Indigenous issues is accomplished is a more sympathetic, respectful and ethically correct fashion" (Louis, 2007, p. 133). Literature has outlined four principles important to Indigenous research agendas including: relational accountabi lity; respectful representation; reciprocal appropriation; and rights and regulation. Relational accountability means approaching research with an understanding that all parts of the process are related, and ensuring that the researcher recognizes their responsibility to maintain this holistic view (Louis, 2007). Respectful (re)presentation involves the researcher being mindful of how they are representing the research and the people involved in the research; it is about leaving space for others to collaborate and contribute ideas. As Louis (2007) notes, "It's about displaying characteristics of humility, generosity, and patience with the process and accepting decisions of the Indigenous people in regard to the treatment of any knowledge shared" (p.l 33). The principle reciprocal appropriation requires that there be mutual benefits to both the Indigenous people and the researcher (Louis, 2007). Finally, rights and regulation refers to research that is collaborative and determined by Indigenous practices. This principle protects against the exploitation of Indigenous knowledge, and allows Indigenous peoples to maintain access to and control over dissemination of research fmdings (i.e. publications). Given these overarching claims, and because the 45 basis of this research was exploring relationships, it was important to build a relationship with the community to enter into this partnership in an equitable, authentic and respectfu l way. By having worked to achieve community support and relationship from the onset of the project, the research process in this project honors these principles mentioned above. Furthermore, and in deference to other modes of decolonizing research, Aboriginal knowledge development that favors narratives of lived experience rather than 'collection of facts or data translated into ' non-personalized' knowledge' (Bartlett et al., 2007) have been used in all aspects of data collection and analysis. In addition, efforts to include Aboriginal peoples in all aspects of the research process were made, acknowledging Aboriginal peoples as the experts in this research. For example, and as explored in the methods section, this research was heavily reliant upon a community partner who was very interested in having this research project done in his community. The community partner was vital in the research process as he helped organize logistics around the devised theatre workshop, and was the main point of contact throughout the entire research process. Indeed, the experiences, perspectives, and insights of Indigenous peoples on research questions and objectives are at the core of the research process and were part of the driving force when partnering with Indigenous peoples and communities around research activities, especially for this project. This collaboration was initiated through pre-established relationships with individuals in the Nass Valley. ln keeping with a CBPR and decolonjzing approach, the results of this project are acknowledged as the property of the youth participants and their community, and this work is clearly identified as Nisga'a First Nation knowledge. Including a decolonizing approach to health research was especially important because, as Goulet et al. (20 11) note, "the process of 46 decolonization is central in addressing health issues in Indigenous communities" (p. 90). In this project, a decolonizing approach informed the methods chosen (i.e. devised theatre), which allowed for conversation of experiences of First Nations youth with their healthcare providers. Data gathering methods employed in this project have been chosen with a decolonizing methodology in mind. As a non-Indigenous researcher I was continuously reflecting on how colonialism has, and continues to impact research agendas, norms, values and standards, and thus seeks research methods that challenge 'Western' ways of doing research. This was put into practice in this research through receiving approval of the project from the Nisga 'a First Nation, having a community partner to learn from and work with during the fieldwork process, and results validation from the participants. Indeed, decolonization " ... is concerned with having a more critical understanding of the underlying assumptions, motivations and values which inform research practices" (L.T. Smith, 1999, p. 7). The methods chosen for this project are further described in the following section. Part II: Methods As introduced in the methodologies section, the combination of a social determinants of health framework, community-based participatory research (CBPR), and decolonizing methodologies, informed the choice of using devised theatre, a qualitative method, for this study. When I use the term ' method ' I am talking about the ways in which knowledge and ideas were gathered. It is important to note that along with devised theatre, field notes and observations, a community interview, and an open dialogue were done as complementing tools to collect information. For a list of questions asked during 47 the open dialogue refer to Appendix IV. Furthermore, a snowball sampling technique was used to recruit participants, which will be discussed later in this section. Given the imperative of undertaking decolonizing research, which requires participatory methods, this project used such methods to create a space for youth to tell their lived experiences about relationships with healthcare providers in their community. In keeping w ith the goals and efforts of CBPR and decolonizing methodologies, devised theatre does not favor 'one' single way of producing knowledge (in this case of creating a play); rather, devised theater as a research method encompasses multiple ways of telling a story through various modalities, such as movement, sound, and visual technologies (Perry, 2010). At its core, devised theatre is an active, participatory form of theatre -and thus a research tool for gathering knowledge and ideas- that emphasizes collaborative creation and involves "processes of experimentation and sets of creative strategies-rather than a single methodology" (Govan, Nicholson & Normington, 2007, p. 7). Participants in this research were "script-makers" in their creation of a drama piece that told the story of their lived experiences of relationships with healthcare providers. The participants engaged in a process that brought together their lived experiences, with each story being important to the creation of the fmal product. The methods section of this chapter wi ll discuss bow the research was done. First an overview of devised theatre will be presented, fo llowed by a discussion on the research steps taken for this project including community relationships and collaboration building, the devised theatre workshop and open dialogue, and will fini sh with a discussion on the approval of completed thesis by the community partner, and results dissemination. 48 3.4 Devised T heatre: A participatory r esearch method and approach The main data gathering method for this project was devised theatre. Devised theatre is a genre of theatre that uses performers, participants, and/or artists' real-life circumstances to build an original non-fictional theatre piece (Oddey, 1994; Govan, Nicholson & Normington, 2007; Perry, 20 I 0). The "activity of devising" itself can be described as, [A] process of making theatre that enables a group of performers to be physically and practically creative in the sharing and shaping of an original product. .. There is a freedom of possibilities for all those involved to discover; an emphasis on a way of working that supports intuition, spontaneity, and an accumulation of ideas. The process of devising is about the fragmentary experience of understanding ourselves, our culture, and the world we inhabit. The process reflects a multivision made up of each group member's individual perception of the world ... Participants make sense of themselves within their own cultural and social context, investigating, integrating and transforming their personal experiences (Oddey, 1994, p. 1). Much like the drive behind Boa!' s ( 1979) Theatre ofthe Oppressed, devised theatre emerged as a response from those engaging in artistic creations wanting to work in an "artistically democratic way" (Oddey, 1994, p. 8). Devised theatre gained increased recognition in the 1970's due to the evolution of socio-political awareness and emphasis on democracy that emerged in the 1960's; innovations in media technologies; significant advancement of the fem inist movement; and, most importantly, a response to conventional art forms, these were all driving forces in the ascendance of the practice (Perry, 201 0). Unlike traditional literary theatre, which is dominated by "the often patriarchal, hierarchical relationship of playwright and director," (Oddey, 1994; p. 4) devised theatre is created and directed by the participants involved, and the process of play-building is continuously changing and morphing as the devising process unfolds. In 49 this research project, youth participants took on the roles of playwrights and directors, choosing how best to convey their stories and li ved experiences with healthcare providers. Indeed, devised theatre challenges the dominant ideology of"one person's text under another person 's direction" (Oddey, 1994, p. 4). It is precisely the flex ible, responsive, and inherently anti-colonial nature of devised theatre that made it appealing as a method to apply within a research project focused on trying to understand powerladen relationships between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal peoples in the settlerdominated lands of British Columbia. Over the past sixty years, many devised theatre companies have emerged, and continue to emerge, gaining a strong presence in theatre industries across the globe (Perry, 2010). Notable companies include: T he People Show (London, UK, est. 1966), Theatre de Complicite (London, UK, est. 1983), Sidetrack Theatre (Sydney, Australia, est. 1979), and Radix (Vancouver, Canada, est. 1988). With this history in mind, it is interesting to note that very little in the way of devised theatre projects have unfolded in British Columbia. Theatre projects have been deployed, with success, in at least one research project similar to this one (see Streigler, 2014) but the application of it within Nisga' a Territory is, to my knowledge, almost entirely novel. One significant component of devised theatre is the incorporation of multiple lived realities and perspectives. Rather than relying solely on the single vision of a playwright, devised theater privileges multiplicities and complex overlaying of voice (Perry, 2010). The component of incorporating multiple lived realities and perspectives was important for this project, as the participants all came from diverse backgrounds, bringing their own stories and lived experiences. Furthermore, devised theatre was an 50 ideal method to use for this research project as it provides a participatory and inclusive approach to theatre, and challenges power structures (i.e. playwrights/directors) present in traditional theatre. Through multiple discussions and theatre-based activities, participants collaborated with each other to build an original theatre piece, with each youth's ideas, input and stories being favoured. Devised theatre provided a physical space and means through which Nisga'a First Nations youth had the psychosocial space to share narratives about their lived experiences of encounters with healthcare providers. 3.5 Research Steps This community-based research project unfolded in three stages, all being integral to the success and completion of this project. The stages of the research project are summarized in the table below and further explained in this chapter. Table 1 Research Stages Stage One Community Relationships and Collaboration Building Prince George, BC June-August 2015 Stage Two Devised Theatre Workshop and Open Dialogue New Aiyansh, BC September 2015 Stage Three Approval of final draft of thesis from WWNI and results sharing Prince George/New Aiyansh, BC April2016 Stage one: community r elationships and collaboration building. Respectful, ethical, sympathetic and useful. As discussed in the methodologies chapter of this thesis, the foundation of this research is anchored in a community-based participatory approach and decolonizing approach to research. As such, it was important that the research process included being respectful, ethical, sympathetic and useful (L.T. 51 Smith, 1999). For me, then, it was imperative that the research process be done in a respectful manner with the community; that it be ethical and receive approval from the community; that consideration and value be given to all voices involved; and that the research be useful and something of interest to the community involved. However, to achieve a research process anchored in CBPR and decolonizing approaches, time is essential to build relationships and trust with communities. This can become a challenge when researchers are working with a strict timeline. As a Masters student with limited resources and a strict timeline, I was unable to build a substantial relationship with the community before I began my fieldwork. Although this was an initial challenge, the research process remained respectful to the community, received community approval and continues to involve the participants and community throughout the duration of the research. A critical component of the project was finding interest and receiving approval from a First Nations community to undertake this research. After my thesis proposal received approval (on April 30th, 2015) I began making connections with First Nations communities in Northern BC who might be interested in pursuing this project with me. A snowball sampling strategy was used (Patton, 1990). A snowball sampling strategy enables the researcher to identify information rich cases through asking "well-situated people" (Patton, 1990, p. 176) to refer the researcher to those who could be interested or key informants for the research study in question. In May 2015, a contact in the Nass Valley was made through my supervisor's connection to a graduate student, who herself is from the Nass Valley. This contact directed me to the Wilp Wilxo'oskwbl Nisga'a Institute (WWNI), the main contact to 52 receive approval for this research. Following the protocols laid out by the Wilp Wilxo'oskwhl Nisga'a Institute (WWNI), J sent a formal letter and proposal of the research to the President and CEO of the Wilp Wilxo'oskwhJ Nisga'a Institute in early May 2015. The proposal was forwarded to the Board of Governors at WWNI for their review on May 25th, 2015. The Board of Governors is made up of six individuals from the Nisga'a First Nation. It was important that I submitted a proposal to the board by May 25th, as the board did not meet in tl1e summer months (July and August). A short time after, I received a letter of conditional approval from the Board of Governors on June lOth, 2015, two and a half weeks after submitting the proposal. ' Conditional approval ' was based on receiving approval by the Research Ethics Board at UNBC. On July 16th, 2015, I received approval from the UNBC Research Ethics Board for my research project in the Nass Valley and received subsequent full approval of the project by the WWNI Board of Governors. 1n line with a decolonizing approach, receiving approval from the WWNI had to be given before the research process began. Immediately after receiving approval from the WWNI for the project, I began to seek collaborations in one of the four Nisga 'a First Nations communities in the Nass Valley: Gitlaxt'aarniks, Gitwinksihlkw, L~alts ' ap and Gingolx (Nisga 'a Lisims Government, N.D). Throughout the month of July 2015, I sent e-mails to various people who work for the Nisga 'a Lisims Government, to make connections with various people who were able to direct me to community members in the four communities. Initially I did not receive many responses, but at the end of July 2015, I received an e-mail from an individual in the Nisga 'a Lisims Government who referred me to PC (name changed for anonymity purposes), a well connected individual. PC described his role in this research 53 and in the community as: engaging youth and "keep[ing] ... youth active and pretty much hav[ing] them utilize all the tools that they already have in the rec centre here and just keep on building on their leadership" (T3, lines 2-4). A research proposal was sent to PC by e-mai l, who immediately responded with his support for this project to be held in his community. PC was the main point of contact during the fieldwork portion of the research, and was essential in helping organize the weeklong drama workshop. In August 2015, contact was maintained with PC by e-mail to discuss the logistics of the workshop, and to decide upon a date to hold the workshop. Keeping in line with CBPR and decolonizing approaches, PC was asked to choose a date that best worked for his community to hold the workshop. This was a challenge, as the workshop was initially scheduled for the last week of August 2015, but bad to change to the third week in September 2015 due to unavailability of many youth during the month of August. This was a pivotal moment for me as I realized the incredible flexibi lity needed for community-based research. It is to be the community driving the project. As a principle community partner, PC led the way in organizing a space to hold the workshop and ensuring a catered dinner was provided for participants. Food was considered an important part of this youth-based project. In planning the workshop, I wanted to provide a meal to participants. This was primarily due to the workshop extending over dinnertime, but also to have time to socialize with participants, and get to know them personally. In conversations over dinnertime, I learned that participants, both women, considered the workshop a chance to have "me time", and to chat with other adults about issues important to them in their community. 54 PC also organized my accommodation. Most importantly, PC helped recruit youth from the community to partake in the weeklong drama workshop. PC delivered posters I made, and, included the workshop in their calendar of events at the Rec Centre. It is important to note that PC 'paved the way' for this research to be done in the community ofGitlaxt'aamiks. He organized the logistics ofthe workshop, and informed community members of this project. Without the constant support of PC, I would have entered the community a complete stranger, without the ability to do such a project. Through building a purposeful and meaningful relationship with a community member, this research came alive. As mentioned in the methodologies chapter, CPBR generally works around a research question that comes from the community. Although the community of New Aiyansh did not create the research question for this project, the topic was of interest to PC and youth participants. The research was reflective of issues and concerns in the community. For example, at the end of the weeklong drama workshop I interviewed PC to ask questions related to the workshop. One of the central questions PC wanted to see answered, or wanted the research to address, was ability for information from the workshop to be used in his community. PC noted, "I kinda hope [the information from the workshop] can tum [the healthcare services] around, and somewhat help because you [can] only write so many letters to do so many things right?" (T3, lines 53-54). Indeed, while not following any ridged or prescriptive template for CBPR, this project followed what might be understood as the 'spirit of CBPR' - namely that the research, in line with decolonizing methodologies, is supported by community partners, that it is committed to 55 utility, and that it is ultimately endorsed as being relevant. To this end, the research, along with an "easy to read" version, will be returned to the Nisga 'a Nation. Stage two: devised theatre workshop and open dialogue. Drama workshop and discussions. The principal fieldwork for this project was carried out over four days (September 14'b -171h, 20 15) and involved a 4-day devised theatre workshop, with an open dialogue at the end of the fourth day. The drama workshop initially involved three female participants (which later became only two participants) between the ages of 19 and 25, took place in September 2015, and was organized over the course of four days for 4-5 hours each day. Using tecbillques, such as Image Theatre from Boat's ( 1979) Theatre of the Oppressed, discussions were bad about issues and experiences that Nisga 'a First Nations youth face when interacting with healthcare professionals and services. Methods anchored in Image Theater encouraged participants to, using nonverbal communication, "sculpt" each other into physical images (for examples see Figure 3, 4, and, 5, on p. 69-70). The basis oflmage Theatre is to explore issues of oppression by creating concrete or abstract "images" to depict a thought, feeling, issue, or moment. Participants are asked to reshape the image to show different perspectives. For this research, activities such as Image Theatre provided a nonthreatening context to speak about lived experiences in a deep cultural context. A decolonizing methodology demands the incorporation of more Indigenous ways of doing research. The drama workshop provided a research strategy more resonant with Indigenous ways of doing research, and as explored further on, this resonated with community. 56 Each day of the workshop focused on a different question about health and experiences of relationships with healthcare providers. Activ ities, games and discussions also focused around the specific questions (See Table 2). Table 2 Research Questions Explored during Drama Workshop Day Question Explored Day I How do First Nations youth understand ·health.? Day 2 What are youth perceptions of and lived experi ences with their healthcare providers? Day 3 What do Nisga ·a First Nations youth want to say to those who provide health services? Day 4 Devise strategies with Nisga·a First Nations youth for the healthcare system and providers that are consistent with youth· s perspectives and needs around health Theatre activities and games were taken from: The Health Arts Research Centre Art Worksheets (see Figure I) (Ward & de Leeuw. 20 15): Games for Actors and Non-Actors (Boal, 1992); Improvisation for the Theatre, 3rd Ed (Spolin, 1999); and. Theatre Games for Young Performers. Improvisations and Exercises for Developing Acting kills (Novelly, 1993). Posed Theatre -·----. ......._ ....., -......... .......................... ____ .....,....,...,.,.__ ..... .......... ................... ---............................,........,.._.... ....._............ ._. -~~~- - -- -----... - ............ --......... -......... ... ---~.-..., _._..,.__,. ~ .,:::;,.. .............. .. 246.\ \\ l'b!Jtt: ,.WftLIM:.nl Julia Petrasek MacDonald MSc (Convnulity Heallh) Candidate Health Arts Research Centre June 4, 2015 Northern Medical Program Dear Jule Petrasek MacDonald The Wilp Wlf!ooskwhl Nrsga a fY'N'/N) Board d GoYemors met May 25 2015 and I am pleased to 1nform you that your research prcposai'Stag1ng Relatoosl\1ps USIIlg Devised Theatre 10 Explore IndigenOUs Youths Expenenoes and Perceptions of their Relabooships with PtrySICians' had been approved pend1ng approval from UNBC Researdl EthiCS Board You wiU be expected as a c:ordtion of your research lD worit closely wdh 'WWN as ~• as p!O'IIde lhe findtngS from '((XX researd1 Please see attached motion: MSC!L_ Thew~ Wt(.o oskwhl N!Sga a lnsnMe Board d Olre<*WS approves Juia Petrasek MacDonald s research proposai ' Stag1ng Retanonshtps USIIlg Devised Theatre to Explore lndtgenOUS Youths Experiences and Pefrept10ns of ll'lN RelabOnshlps wrth Physicians' pendng approval of UNBC Reseatth EthiCS Board MSC14 Stephen Azak I Noah Guno Congratulabons' CC 'NNN F-. Letter of approval from the WWNJ Board of Governors 118 APPENDIX IV. OPEN DIALOGUE QUESTIONS I. Tell me about the scenes you made. a. What was it about? 2. Do you think the scenes accurately portrayed experiences you have had with physicians/healthcare services in your community? b. How does your personal experience differ from the experience/meaning portrayed in the scenes? 3. What is the main message you wanted the scenes to convey? a. What is the main message you think the scenes actually conveyed? 4. Did you enjoy the drama workshops? a. What part did you like the best? Why? b. What part did you like the least? Why? 5. How would you describe the experience of creating the scenes? 6. Were there any aspects of making the scenes that you found difficult? a. If so, what were they? b. If so, how did you overcome these challenges? 7. Were there any aspects of making the scenes that you found easy? a. If so, what were they? b. If so, why? 8. How did you feel about being involved in this project before the process began? c. During the process? d. After the process? 9. Would you use theatre to share your experiences and ideas again if you bad never participated in this process? 119 REFERENCES Adelson, N. (2005). The embodiment of inequity: Health disparities in Aboriginal Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health/Revue Canadienne de Sante'e Publique, S45-S61. Allan, B. & Smylie, J. (20 15). First Peoples, second class treatment: The role of racism in the health and well-being of Indigenous peoples in Canada. Toronto, ON: the Wellesley Institute. Retrieved from http://www.welleslcyinstitutc.com/wpcontent/uploads/20 15/02/Report-First-Peoples-Second-Class-Treatment-Final. pdf Allard, Y. E., Wilkins, R. , & Berthelot, J. M. (2004). Premature mortality in health regions with high aboriginal populations. Health Rep, 15(1 ), 51-60. and Mail. Toronto, ON: Crawley, P, 2014. Ballamingie, P., & Johnson, S. (2011). The vulnerable researcher: Some unanticipated challenges of doctoral fieldwork. The Qualitative Report, 16(3), 71I. Retrieved from: htt ://search. roguest.com/openview/85c66952c5f749e648284255db 146a0d/l ?pq -origsite=gscholar Bartlett, J. G., Iwasaki, Y., Gottlieb, B., Hall, D., & Mannell, R. (2007). Framework for Aboriginal-guided decolonizing research involving Metis and First Nations persons with diabetes. Social Science & Medicine, 65( II), 23 71-2382. Bechtel, C., & Ness, D. L. (2010). If you build it, will they come? Designing truly patient-centered health care. Health Affairs, 29(5), 914-920. Betancourt, J. R., Green, A. R., Carrillo, J. E., & Ananeh-Firempong 2nd, 0. (2003). Defining cu ltural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care. Public health reports, 118(4), 293. Bird, S., Wiles, J. L., Okalik, L. , Kilabuk, J. , & Egeland, G. M. (2009). Methodological consideration of story telling in qualitative research involving Indigenous Peoples. Global health promotion, 16(4), 16-26. Boa! A. 1979. Theatre of the Oppressed. New York: Theatre Communications Group. 197 p. Boal, A. ( 1992). Games for actors and non-actors. Psychology Press. Bombay, A., Matheson, K. , & Anisman, H. (2014). The iotergenerational effects of Indian Residential Schools: Implications for the concept of historical trauma. Transcultural psychiatty, 51(3 ), 320-338. 120 Browne, A. (201 0). Issues affecting access to health services in northern, rural and remote regions of Canada. Disponible ici: hlfp:llwww. unbc. ca/assetslnorthern_studies/northern/issues_affecting_access_to_ health_services_i n_northern. pdf (consulte le 13 mars 2013). Browne, A. J. (2007). Clinical encounters between nurses and First Nations women in a Western Canadian hospital. Social science & medicine, 64(10), 2165-2 176. Browne, A. J., & Fi ske, J. A. (2001). First Nations women's encounters with mainstream health care services. Westemjournal ofnursing research, 23(2), 126-147. Browne, A. J., Smye, V. L., Rodney, P., Tang, S. Y. , Mussell, B., & O'Neil, J. (2010). Access to primary care from the perspective of Aboriginal patients at an urban emergency department. Qualitative Health Research, 10497323 10385824. Caron, N. (2006). Caring for Aboriginal patients: the culturally competent physician. Royal College Outlook, 3(2), 19-23. Retrieved from: http://www.med.uottawa.ca/sim/data/ lmages/Aboriginal care Caron e.pdf Cass, A., Lowell , A., Christie, M., Snelling, P. L., Flack, M., Marmganyin, B., & Brown, I. (2002). Sharing the true stories: improving communication between Aboriginal patients and healthcare workers. Medical Journal ofAustralia, 1 76(1 0), 466-471 . Castleden, H. , Morgan, V. S., & Lamb, C. (20 12). "I spent the fi rst year drinking tea": Exploring Canadian university researchers' perspectives on community-based participatory research involving Indigenous peoples. The Canadian Geographer/Le Geographe canadien, 56(2), 160-179. CBC News. (October 51h, 2011). Nisga'a residential school survivors return home. Retrieved from: http://www .cbc.ca/news/canada/brit:ish-columbia/nisga-aresidential-school-survivors-return-home-1.1 081927 Chandler, M., & Lalonde, C. (1998). Cultural continuity as a hedge against suicide in Canada's First Nations. Transcultural Psychiatry, 35(2), 19 I - 2 I 9. doi: 10.1177/ 136346159803500202 Cheah, C. S., & Chirkov, Y. (2008). Parents' Personal and Cultural Beliefs Regarding Young Children A Cross-Cultural Study of Aboriginal and Euro-Canadian Mothers. Journal ofCross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 402-423.doi: 10.1177/00220221083 I 8130 Chen, J., Mullins, C. D., Novak, P., & Thomas, S. B. (2016). Personali zed strategies to activate and empower patients in health care and reduce health disparities. Health Education & Behavior, 43(1 ), 25-34. Cherry, C. (1997). Health care, human worth and the limits of the particular. Journal of Medical Ethics, 23(5), 310-314. doi:IO.I l 36/jme.23.5.310 121 Conrad, D. (2004). Popular theatre: Empowering pedagogy for youth. Youth Theatre Journal, 18(1 ), 87- 106. Czyzewski, K. (20 ll ). Colonialism as a Broader Social Determinant of Health. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 2(1 ). Retrieved from: http: 1/ir.Jib.uwo.ca/iipj /vol2/issl/S de Leeuw, S., Greenwood, M., & Cameron, E. (2010). Deviant constructions: How governments preserve colonial narratives of addictions and poor mental health to intervene into the lives oflnd igenous ch ildren and families in Canada. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8(2), 282-295. de Leeuw, S., Greenwood, M., & Lindsay, N. (20 13). Troubling good intentions. Settler Colonial Studies, 3(3-4), 381-394. DOl: 10.1 080/2201473X.20 13.810694 de Leeuw, S. D., Maurice, S., Holyk, T., Greenwood, M., & Adam, W. (20 12). With reserves: Colonial geographies and First Nations health. Annals ofthe Association ofAmerican Geographers, 102(5), 904-911. de Leeuw, S. D. (2015). Activating place: geography as a determinant of indigenous peoples' health and well-being. In Greenwood, M. , de Leeuw, S., Lindsay., N., and Reading, C. (Ed.), Determinants of indigenous peoples health in Canada: beyond the social. (pp. 90- 103). Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars' Press Inc. Day, L. (2002). 'Putting Yourself in Other People's Shoes': The use of Forum theatre to explore refugee and homeless issues in schools. Journal of Moral Education, 31(1), 21-34. Diaz, M., & Simmons, R. ( 1999). When is research participatory? Reflecti ons on a reproductive health project in Brazil. Journal o.fWomen's Health, 8(2), 175-184. Dovidio, J. F., Penner, L.A., Albrecht, T. L. , Norton, W. E. , Gaertner, S. L., & Shelton, J. N. (2008). Disparities and distrust: the implications of psychological processes for understanding racial disparities in health and health care. Social science & medicine, 67(3), 478-486. doi: I 0.10 16/j.socscimed.2008.03.0 19 Dugdale, D. C., Epstein, R., & Pantilat, S. Z. (1999). Time and the patient- physician relationship. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 14(S 1), 34-40. Ermine, W. (2007). Ethical Space of Engagement, The. Indigenous LJ, 6, 193. Retrieved from: https://tspace.librarv.utoronto.calbitstream/1807/ 17129/ 1/ILJ-6 .1Em1ine.pdf 122 Evans, M., Hole, R., Berg, L. D. , Hutchi nson, P., & Sookraj, D. (2009). Common insights, differing methodologies: Toward a fus ion of indigenous methodologies, participatory action research, and white studies in an urban aboriginal research agenda. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(5), 893-910. doi: 10.1 l 77/1077800409333392 First Nations Health Authority. (2015). Northern Region. Retrieved from http://www .fnha .ca/about/regions/north Fox, S., & Chesla, C. (2008). Living with chronic illness: A phenomenological study of the health effects of the patient-provider relationship. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 20(3), I 09-117. Galloway G. (20 14, November 20). Medical system told to examine why Aboriginal parents distrust it. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/li fe/health-and-fitnessfhealth./medical-systemtold-to-examine-why-aboriginal-parents-distrust-it/article21686603/ Gerlach, A. (2008). "Circle of caring": A First Nations worldview of chi ld rearing. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(1), 18-25. doi:l0.1177/000841740807500107 Goulet, L., Linds, W., Episkeoew, J. A., & Schmidt, K. (2011). Creating a space for decolonization: Health through theatre with indigenous youth. Native Studies Review, 20( I), 89- 116. Govan, E., Nicholson, H. , & Normington, K. (2007). Making a pe1jormance: Devising histories and contemporary practices. Routledge. Gracey, M., & King, M. (2009). Indigenous health part I: detern1inants and disease patterns. The Lancet, 374(9683), 65-75. Harper, M., & Cole, P. (2012). Member checking: can benefits be gained similar to group therapy?. The Qualitative Report, /7(2), 510-517. Retrieved from: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR./QR17-2/harper.pdf Hellin, T. (2002). The physician- patient relationship: recent developments and changes. Haemophilia, 8(3), 450-454. Hojat, M., Gonnella, J. S., Nasca, T. J. , Mangione, S., Vergare, M., & Magee, M. (2002). Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. American Journal of Psychiatry. Hole, R. D., Evans, M., Berg, L. D., Bottorff, J. L., Dingwall, C., Alexis, C., ... & Smith, M. L. (2015). Visibility and Voice Aboriginal People Experience Culturally Safe and Unsafe Health Care. Qualitative health research, 25(12), 1662-1674. 123 Isaak, C. A., & Marchessault, G. (2008). Meaning of health: The perspectives of Aboriginal adults and youth in a northern Manitoba First Nations community. Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 32(2), 114-122. Joffe, H., & Yardley, L. (2004). 4. Content and thematic analysis. Research methods for clinical and health psychology. California: Sage, 56-68. Kaba, R., & Sooriakumaran, P. (2007). The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship. International Journal ofSurge1y, 5( I), 57-65. Kelly, L., & Brown, J. B. (2002) . Listening to native patients. Changes in physicians' understanding and behaviour. Canadian Family Physician, 48( I 0), 1645-1652. Kelm, M. E. (2005). Diagnosing the discursive Indian: medicine, gender, and the "dying race". Ethnohistol)i, 52(2), 371-406. doi: 10.1215/00141801-52-2-371 Kendall, E., & Barnett, L. (20 15). Principles for the development of Aboriginal health interventions: culturally appropriate methods through systemic empathy. Ethnicity & health, 20(5), 437-452. Kirmayer, L. (2012). Rethinking cultural competence. Transcultural Psychially, 49(2), 149. DOl: 10.1 17711363461512444673 Kirmayer, L. J., Dandeneau, S., Marshall, E., Phillips, M. K., & Williamson , K. J. (2011). Rethinking resilience from indigenous perspectives. Canadian journal of psychiat1y. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 56(2), 84-91. Klopp, A., & Nakanishi, A. (2012). Art Days: Two medical students reflect on the value of cultural immersion and cultural safety. British Columbia Medical Journal, 54(3). Kumagai, A. K., & Wear, D. (2014). "Making strange": a role for the humanities in medical education. Academic Medicine, 89(7), 973-977. Kurtz, D., Nyberg, J., Van Den Tillaart, S., & Mills, B. The Okanagan Urban Aboriginal Health Research Collective (OUAHRC).(2009). Silencing of voice: An act of structural violence. Urban aboriginal women speak out about their experiences with health care. Journal ofAboriginal Health, 4(1), 55-63. Lo, M. C. M. , & Stacey, C. L. (2008). Beyond cultural competency: Bourdieu, patients and clinical encounters. Sociology a,( health & illness, 30(5), 741-755. doi: 10.1l l llj. 1467-9566.2008.0 109l.x Loppie, S., Reading, C., & de Leeuw, S. (20 14). Aboriginal experiences with racism and its impacts. Retrieved from: http://www.nccahccnsa.ca/Publications/Lists/Publications/Attachments/131/2014 07 09 FS 2426 RacismPart2 ExperienceslmP-acts EN Web.pdf 124 Louis, R. P. (2007). Can you hear us now? Voices from the margin: Using indigenous methodologies in geographic research. Geographical research, 45(2), 130-139. MacDonald, J.P., Ford, J., Willox, A. C., Mitchell, C., Productions, K., & Storytelling, M. W. (20 15). Youth-Led Participatory Video as a Strategy to Enhance Inuit Youth Adaptive Capacities for Dealing with Climate Change. ARCTIC, 68(4), 486-499. Marmot, M. , Friel, S., Bell, R., Houweling, T. A., & Taylor, S. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. The Lancet, 3 72(9650), 1661-1669. Marrone, S. (2007). Understanding barriers to health care: a review of disparities in health care services among indigenous populations. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 66(3). Mienczakowski J. 1995. The theatre of ethnography: The reconstruction of ethnography into theatre with emancipatory potential. Qualitative Inquiry. 1(3):360-375. Miller, T., & Bell, L. (2002). Consenting to what? Issues of access, gate-keeping and 'informed' consent. Ethics in qualitative research, 53-69. Minkler, M. (2004). Ethical challenges for the "outside" researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education & Behavior, 31(6), 684-697. Minkler, M. (2005). Community-based research partnerships: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Urban Health, 82, ii3-ii12. Morgan, L. L., & Reel , S. (20 12). Developing cultural competence in rural nursing. Online Journal ofRural Nursing and Health Care, 3(1 ), 28-3 7. Muirhead , A., & de Leeuw , S. (2012). Art and wellness: The importance ojartjor Aboriginal peoples' health and healing. Prince George, BC: National Collaborating Center for Aboriginal Health. National Aboriginal Health Organization. (2007). Broader detenninants ofhealth in an Aboriginal context. Retrieved from: http:/fwww.naho.ca/documents/naho/publications/determinants.pdf Nelson, S. (20 12). Challenging hidden assumptions: colonial norms as determinants of Aboriginal mental health. National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health. Ning A, & Wilson K. A research review: Exploring the health of canada's aboriginal youth. International Journal ofCircumpolar Health. 2012; 71( 1). 125 Nisga'a Lisims Government. (n.d.). Accomplishments and benefits of Nisga'a treaty. Retrieved from http://www .nisgaanation .ca/about-accompl ishments-and-benefitsnisgaa-treaty Nisga'a Lisims Government. (n.d.). Maps. Retrieved from http://www .nisgaanation.calmaps-3 N isga'a Lisims Government. (n.d.). The four vi llages. Retrieved from http://www.nisgaanation.ca/four-villagcs Nisga'a Lisims Government. (n.d.). Volcano. Retrieved from http://www.nisgaanation.ca/volcano Northern Health . (n.d.). Our services. Retrieved from https://northernhealth.ca/OurServices.aspx Novelly, M. C. ( 1985). Theatre Games for Young Pe1jormers: Improvisations and Exercises for Developing Acting Skills. Meriwether Publishing Ltd. , PO Box 7710, Colorado Springs, CO 80933. O'Neil, J. D. ( 1989). The cultural and political context of patient dissatisfaction in crosscultural clinical encounters: A Canadian Inuit Study. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 3(4), 325-344. Oddey, A. ( 1994). Devising theatre. A practical and theoretical handbook." London. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc. Peiris, D., Brown, A., & Cass, A. (2008). Addressing inequities in access to quality health care for indigenous people. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 179(1 0), 985-986. Perry M. 20 I 0. Theatre as a place of learning: The forces and affects of devised theatre processes in education. PhD diss. , The University ofBritisb Colombia, Vancouver, British Colombia. Public Health Agency of Canada. (20 11 ). What determines health? Retrieved from http://www.pbac-aspc.gc.ca/ph-sp/determinants/index-eng.pbp Pulla, S. (201 3). Building on Our Strengths: Aboriginal Youth Wellness in Canada's North. Ottawa: The Conference Board of Canada. Retrieved from: http://www.jcsh-cces.ca/upload/14-193 BuildingOurStrengtbs CFN RPT.pdf Raphael, D . (2009). Social detem1inants ofhealth: Canadian perspectives. Canadian Scholars' Press. 126 Reading CL, Wien F. Health Inequalities and Social Determinants of Aboriginal People's Health. Prince George, BC: National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health. 2009. Richmond, C. A., & Ross, N. A. (2009). The determinants of First Nation and Inuit health: A critical population health approach. Health & Place, 15(2), 403-411. doi: 10.1 016/j.healthplace.2008.07 .004. Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage. Roter, D. (2000). The enduring and evolving nature of the patient-physician relationship. Patient education and counseling, 39(1 ), 5-15. Rutten, E. A., Biesta, G. 1., Dekovic, M., Starns, G. J. J., Schucngel, C., & Vcrweel, P. (20 I 0). Using forum theatre in organised youth soccer to positively influence antisocial and prosocial behaviour: a pilot study. Journal of Moral Education, 39(1), 65-78. Said, E. W. (1993). Culture and imperialism. Vintage. Schutt, R. K. (20 11 ). Investigating the social world: The process and practice of research. Pine Forge Press. Shah R. A Retrospective Analysis of an HIV Prevention Program for Men in Gujarat, India. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health; 2004. Shahid, S., Finn, L. D ., & Thompson, S. C. (2009). Barriers to participation of Aboriginal people in cancer care: communication in the hospital setting. Med J Aust, 190(10), 574-579. Shaw, A., Ibrahim, S., Reid, F. , Ussbcr, M. , & Rowlands, G. (2009). Patients' perspectives of the doctor-patient relationship and information giving across a range of literacy levels. Patient education and counseling, 75(1), 114-120. Simonds, V. W., Christopher, S., Sequist, T. D., Colditz, G. A., & Rudd, R. E. (20 11 ). Exploring patient-provider interactions in a Native American community. Journal ofhealth care for the poor and underserved, 22(3), 836-852. Sinclair, S., Norris, J. M., McConnell, S. J., Cbochinov, H. M., Hack, T. F., Hagen, N. A., ... & Bouchal, S. R. (2016). Compassion: a scoping review of the healtbcare literature. BMC palliative care, 15( 1), 1. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed books. 127 Smylie, J. (2009). The health of aboriginal peoples. In D. Raphael (Ed.), Social determinants of health: Canadian perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 280-3 01). Toronto: Canadian Scholars. Smylie, J. (2009). The health of Aboriginal peoples. Social determinants of health: Canadian perspectives, 280-301 . Spolin, V. ( 1999). Improvisation for the theater: A handbook ofteaching and directing techniques. Northwestern University Press. Statistics Canada. (20 13b). Aboriginal Peoples Reference Guide: National Household Survey, 2011. Ottawa, ON: Author. Retrieved on May 14, 2013 from http ://www 12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/20 II I ref/guides/99-0 11-x/99-0 llx2011 006-eng.pdf Striegler, L. (2014). Theatre for health: "Playing" the price of colonialism on the health of indigenous peoples in Saik'uz territory. Stubbs, M. (2007). Empowerment in middle-aged people with diabetes: the importance of working relationships. Journal ofdiabetes nursing, I 1(5), 190. Towle, A. , Godolphin, W., & Alexander, T. (2006). Doctor-patient communications in the Aboriginal community: Towards the development of educational programs. Patient Education and Counseling, 62(3), 340-346. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (20 15). Canada's Residential Schools: The Legacy. Ottawa: Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Retrieved from http://nctr.ca/assets/reports/Final%20Reports/Volume 5 Legacy English Web.p df Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (20 15). Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future. Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (p. 418). Ottawa: Truth and Reconciliation Commission . Retrieved from www.trc.ca United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (20 15). What do we mean by "youth"? Retrieved from http://www .unesco.org/new/en/social-andbuman-sciences/themes/youth/youth-definition/ Univeristy ofBiritsh Columbia. (n.d.). Indigenous Foundations: Terminology. Retrieved from: http://indigenousfoundations.arts.ubc.ca/home/ identity/terminology.html 128 University of Victoria. (20 11). The British Columbia Demographic Context. Retrieved from http://www .geog .uvic .ca/wellness/wellness20 11 /Chapter4 .pdf Varcoe, C., Browne, A. J., Wong, S., & Smye, V. L. (2009). Harms and benefits: collecting ethnicity data in a clinical context. Social Science & Medicine, 68(9), 1659-1666. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimcd.2009.02.034 Ward & de Lecuw. (20 15). Health Arts Research Centre Art Sheets. Retrieved from: bttps://www .dropbox. com/sblh2o8b4ct4 jeib70/ AAA t19jpz2xi XQxoCsmlFKasa/H ealth%2C%20Healing%20and%20wellbeing%20through%20creative%20arts/ Art%20Worksheets?di=O Wallerstein, N. B., & Duran, B. (2006). Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health promotion practice, 7(3), 312-323. Williams, L., Labonte, R., & O'Brien, M. (2003). Empowering social action through narratives of identity and culture. Health Promotion International, 18( 1), 33-40. Wilson, C. (200 I). Decolonizing Methodologies: research and indigeneous peoples. Social Policy Journal ofNew Zealand, 214-218. Retrieved from: https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-ourwork/gublications-resourcesfjournals-and-magazinesfsocial-p_olicy..: journal/sgj17/17 gages214 217.pdf Willox, A. C., Harper, S. L. , & Edge, V. L. (20 12). Storytelling in a digital age: digital storytelling as an emerging narrative method for preserving and promoting indigenous oral wisdom. Qualitative Research, 1468794112446105. Worthington, C., Jackson , R., Mill, J., Prentice, T., Myers, T. , & Sommerfeldt, S. (2010). HIY testing experiences of Aboriginal youth in Canada: service implications. AIDS care, 22(10), 1269-1276. 129