ITS GOT TO BE SOMETHING THAT Sez “were cute" YET ALLUDES TO Ou BAOASS SiSEe. YOURE RGHT MiKE / BOY BANDS Ree THE DARUNGS oF COP CULTURE I! ™T- ALMOST execoswe! PRICTICALY The me WANT SOME NOOKEsS O GET To THE KITCHEN , BY DE VERE YOu Oon NEEO TRENT | WHAT WE To 8€ IR A BAND TOOAY! WEY Awe AMIMORE BAND HIAMES. TMT-WE MIGHT GET HOT BUT Tt'S PRETTY UNLIKELY... FUN WITH KATHLEEN CONTINUED ON PAGE 14 __._ October 22, 2001 Alphabet Soup (Writing Poetry in the 21st Century) By: Simon Goring The world of poetry is a quickly and rapidly changing world. Poetry has come a long way since it was invent- ed in the early 1970s. Since its inception poetry has evolved from words on a page to words on a page that actually take the shape of an object, a major paradigm shift for any modern art form. Many of the more famous modern poets have taken to this style of “concrete” poetry including Longfellow, Samuel Beckett and Homer; indeed the original text of the epic- concrete poem “The Odyssey” takes the shape of the Adriatic Sea. The advan- tage of concrete poetry is that it lets the reader form mental images without hav- ing to read the actual poem, of course the words add sig- nificantly to the image. Recently | read an excellent poem called “My dog is pret- ty” by Timmy Westmoreland (b. 1994) which was written with such vivid imagery that | almost didn’t need the con- crete image of the dog to actually picture the dog; how- ever the multifarious purpos- es of concrete poetry should not limit us to just the one style. Ever since ee Cummings first experimented with acrostic poetry (in which the first letter of each line spells a word) in his well-known famous poem “robot mud- wrestling” many other poets and versifiers have been experimenting with the acrostic style. Some of the more avant-guard poets have even been combining and mixing other poetic styles with the acrostic form to produce new, novel and unique poetry, such as Ezra Pound’s Acrostic/Haiku poem “Wow”: Wowsers is that neat! Oh my gosh, look at that thing Wonderful neat thing. The obvious care and concern with which the poem was written is contrasted by the apparent frivolity of its subject. Those who have never heard of poetry before (I think of myself only one month ago) may think that this kind of superficial, shal- low pap is simply a waste of time (which it is to the ama- teur neophyte); however once you are initiated into the world of poetry the deep- er meaning of Ezra Pound's words become both clear and obvious. Initiation into the world of poetry is a simple matter. For one week | had to walk around Prince George smok- ing Galois (in the red pack- age!) wearing a black turtle- neck with a beret and carry- ing a bottle of Beaujolais with an orange candle stuck in the top. If confronted by Actual Poets | was forced to recite free-verse poetry to the 64/32 beat of a bongo drum. If my poetry didn’t rhyme | had to dance interpretively to the myth of Gilgamesh, king of Uruk. A difficult task if ever there was one. This brings me to my last point, rhyming. Many poets attempt poetry that has no rhyming pattern, but it fast becomes quickly apparent that these so-called poets are simply rank amateurs. Ezra Pound in “Wow” (above) rhymed the last two lines ina simple “abb” form, so why are these so-called alleged poets allowed to break from the chains that bind poetry to its rock of creativity? Compare the following two couplets by William Blake: “My mind is like this Wonder bread/Filled with preservatives” and “I like happy people/Quasimodo in a steeple.” Certainly the sec- ond rhyming couplet is more elegiac and poetic than the first. The meaning is obscurely concealed by the sudden abruptness _ of “Quasimodo in a steeple” but on closer examination we find that Blake is trying to tell us that “I [Blake] like happy people”. The meaning of the first couplet is unclear and not even worth analysis because it lacks any rhyming pattern. It is worth noting that Blake wrote the first cou- plet while poetry was still in its infancy, (Continued on page 15) (continued from page