January 24, 2000 Letter to the Editor: Re: Women’s Center Funding We would like to inform students of the latest developments between NUGSS and the Women’s Center. Although $3000.00 was approved by NUGSS for the Women’s Center fund- ing in November,1999, NUGGS has been unable to hand over the money based on the fact that the Women’s Center has not signed the new con- tract. NUGSS used pressure tactics to try and entice the Women’s Center to sign the new contract, Yet the Women’s Center continued to stall the process by not giving any input into why they won't sign or can’t sign the contract. The contract was sent to the Women’s Center over two months ago for their evaluation. At the time of LETTERS More News From NUGSS Meetings the board meeting in question and to this date, there had not been any response from the Women’s Center collective. NUGSS bylaws state that no funds can be released to the Women’s Center until a contract is signed. This is for the protection of all parties involved: you the student, NUGSS, and the Women’s Center. At the Board of Directors meeting of Jan.14th, 2000,the Women’s Center representative- Amy- brought forth a motion to have NUGSS pay the Women’s Center coordinator- Suzie- her wages from Sept.1st to Nov.5th 1999 in the amount of $1920.00. The objection was made that a contract still had not been signed and there was much debate on whether a motion could over ride a bylaw of our constitution. According to Robert's More Response from Page 4 Mr Low further justifies the behav- iour of the banks by pointing to the Return on Equity (ROE) which he says has been falling. Considering that the equity of the banks is calcu- lated on their inflating stock prices — which, in turn, are tied to expected future earnings, this is a meaningless measurement for this purpose. He is _ drawing a ratio of two interdependent variables and using it to claim that profits have been falling! Our Director of Finance and Operations further implies that we put more money into the economy by having NUGSS dollars in the Scotiabank than in the Prince George Savings Credit Union. Hogwash! He claims that “half of all working Canadians” hold stocks or mutual funds which directly benefit from high bank profits. Right. So if my pension fund has a share in the Scotiabank | should be satisfied that the bank pays me a pittance on deposits, robs me with fees and rips me off on loan interest. After all, | am just robbing myself. The truth is that the majority of bank stocks, like other equities are owned and controlled by the rich upper crust of society. We are not about to enter a socialist wonderland through the back door whereby all of the little people will own the big cor- porations. An area that Mr Low does not touch upon is employment.. For years the banks have been firing staff and clos- ing branches to “become competi- tive”. We see little of this competition as all the banks have similar rates and fees, but we do see that it is increasingly difficult to deal with a human being in a bank and harder to find a branch that is handy. The most recent casualty is the Third Avenue branch of the Royal Bank which seems to have served no purpose for the monster bank. The Royal claims that no one will be fired because of the closing but this begs the question of where the new entrants to the labour market (that’s you students) will find entry-level jobs in this decreasing job market. | don’t give a sweet damn whether Canada’s banks are “globally competitive”. | think that the Canadian banks should do business in Canada where they have been coddled by a friendly government. | cannot bank in Hong Kong or Taiwan so | don’t care whether the Royal Bank of Canada is competitive there. I think that my money in the Royal Bank should be invested in Canada and not put into a foreign market. When Canada’s domestic banks do not serve the people of Canada, it is time to force them to do so and not time to give in to their blackmail and allow them to merge to three, two or, god help us, one monster bank. Yours sincerely, James Loughery Rules this can’t be done, only at an AGM can the bylaw be changed. Mike Lau presented us with his solution of “creative paperwork” idea to get around our bylaws of our constitution in order to pay Suzie. The panic seemed to be that Suzie had quit as coordinator. Mike Lau motioned to take Suzie’s wages out of NUGSS budget and then release the remain- ing $1080.00 to the Women’s Center ‘under the title: Women’s Center Funding, upon signing of the contract. What we hope to inform the Women’s Center collective and the students in general, is of some of the problematic issues that can or do arise from this unethical “creative paperwork” In previous years, fund- ing for the Women’s Center has been based on the amount released the year before. What this motion has effectively done is to insure that next years funding will be based on the sum of $1080.00. Due to the fact that the Women’s Center has been negli- gent in their responsibility to either dispute or sign the contract, Suzie’s wages had to come out of NUGSS budget and is not visibly recognized as Women’s Center funding. Think winter's too cold, too barren and too long? Then catch a ride on Canada’s most spectacular rail route and discover just how exciting winter can be. With special pricing on trips 150 miles Williams Lake $65.00 100 Mile House 88.00 Lillooet Whistler or longer each way, its time for you Vancouver 196.00 to experience the coolest winter wonderland you've ever seen: { Ask about our 5 day package. | From just $1.195 per person {based an doubie occupancy), it includes 2 nights in Jasper and tips en Via Rail. ONE WAY RATES BETWEEN PRINCE GEORGE AND: B= Breakfast LeLunch De Dinner aD Over The Edge Page 5 Creating this loophole in our consti- tution has in effect made a mockery out of our constitution and is a prime example of unethical politics. It also gives a clear message to the Women’s Center and anyone else in the same position that they don’t have to take responsibility for the actions or lack of action ,as is true in this case, and that NUGSS will bend the rules in order to caretake the situation. It also takes away the students security that NUGSS has to operate within a set of rules or guidelines called bylaws. We the students created those guidelines as a way of protecting student inter- ests and assuring accountability. Why do we have a constitution if the only purpose it seems is to find ways to get around it? The AGM is 11:00AM, Feb.10th, ~ 2000. We strongly urge as many stu- dents as possible to exercise your ‘rights as a student to voice an opin- ion, demand accountability, and vote. Sincerely, Art Jory, Concerned Student Lisa Brzezinski, Concerned Student andDisillusioned Director, NUGSS ee A Regular Sale Meats. $42.25 8 57.20 B 132.00 79.20 B.L 167.00 100.20 BLL 117.60 B, L.D 00) PROSPECTER NOSE VANE RISER CNG@ER TRAIN riba, www. berailcom/berpass TRAVEL MUST 8E COMPLETED BY APRIL (JM), 2000. 2-DAY ADVANCE PURCHASE REQUIRED. RATES INCLULME GST, OFFER NON. REFUNDABLE