m ate = weer i+ Pr ve a! * 4 15D jt 5s). oA wee = : | have t COVERS Page 2 - Here kitty, kitty, kitty...Feral cats on campus! (Photo of Satan Kitty!) Page 4 - Letters to the Editor! Find out about the latest of inter- est to fellow students! Page 6 - Soundscape returns with music for your reading plea- sure! Page 8 - Kornered on Kampus is back after an absence from last issue! Page 10 - Sports! COME AND GET IT! By Jay Brunn The discussion revolv- ing around smoking is hardly a new issue. It has, however, taken a new twist on campus. As a result of many com- plaints by the general public, students and fac- ulty, the question of where smoking should occur on campus has been brought forward to the President's Council. In the past, smokers have had the freedom to smoke where they want- ed, as long as it was not indoors. Not anymore. After much thought about the issue, a sub- committee chaired by a smoker, Dennis Macknak (Director of Regional Operations) has suggest- ed the implementation of four recommendations. The first indicates that there will be no smoking in the Agora area. The second states that will be no smoking at the main entrance to the Conference Center. The third indicates that smok- ing at the two outside ke entrances to the Administration Building will not be allowed during peak arriving and depar- ture times for the majori- ty of people (8:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. in the morning and between 4:00 p.m. RESTRICTED SMOKING AT ENTRANCES MARKED 1G PaquedInd not amok’ fefain fom STROKING CT The two OuldKdo GeiteErneet fo the Agiinisition hulking between 6.00 cn ore 9:20 ary and between 4:00 gen ant & 20 pen Tom, a 2nd year Physics student, appears unintimidated by the signs dis- played by UNBC in their recent tactic to restrict smoking on campus. Photo by Jay Brunn and 5:30 p.m. in the evening). Finally, the fourth recommendation indicates that ashtrays at the existing entrances, as per recommendation 1 and 2, will be removed. These recommenda- tions have already been partially implemented with the erection of signs throughout campus, indi- cating where smoking is restricted and allowed. Godfrey Medhurst, Director of Facilities, claims “The whole pur- pose of doing it this way and not making it a uni- versity policy is that we were hoping that people would respect the fact that we do have a beauti- ful campus, we do have more people that do not smoke than do smoke, and we do have mem- bers of the public whose tax dollars built this uni- versity.” Cont’d on Page 2 The Myth of the Good Corporate Citizen and other Bedtime Fables By Nicole Larson The local chapter of the Council of Canadians brought Murray Dobbin, a Canadian author and activist, who lectured to a full Weldwood Theatre, to UNBC on Friday, November 6. Dobbin’s lecture was focused on the power that corporations have gained in the last twenty years and the effects they have had on gov- ernments, communities and individuals. Dobbin opened with the question, “Who here was born after 1975?” He explained that the generation born after that point has been more targeted by adver- tising than any other group in history. Dobbin said that advertisers have started focusing ads at children as young as 9 years old, about the time they Murrary Dobbin ponders his opening state- ment before beginning his lecture in the Weldwood Theatre. Photo by Jay Brunn have their first dispos- able incomes’ which usually take the form of paper routes or allowances. He stated that between 1993 and 1996 the amount of advertisements target- ed at this group increased by 50%. He also mentioned that children as young as 20 months can recognize products by their labels and brand names. Dobbin went on to explain the corporate changes which have occurred through out history. Beginning with the 1852 mandate in Pennsylvania — which shut down six banks because they did not serve any public pur- pose and ending with the $130 million lawsuit which Canada just set- tled with a chemical company, concerning the chemical MMT, an additive to gasoline. Canada had banned MMT for health and environmental reasons, but because of the law- suit, which under chap- ter 11 of the NAFTA agreement was perfect- ly valid, not only did Canada pay $20 million Cont’d on Page 3