RESI LI ENCY: L E R I G FROI\1 I DI CE 0 S \\'Ol\1E I SOC I AL WORK by B . \\ . l'nl\crc.,Jt\ of \'1ctona. 2002 "' THE J UB:vt iTTED I ~ P RTIAL FL' LFILL;v1E T OF 1 HE REQ UIREME TS F R THE DEGREE:, OF MA TER OF SOCIAL WORK UN IVERS ITY OF NORTHERN BRIT! H COLUMBIA AU!:,'U t 2015 c Sonya Row land, 2015 II b tract Thi e xpl o ratory ~ tud y \\ a .. undertaken to ga in a grea ter und c r~ t a ndtn g of the cx pcn cnces ofre tli cncy among Ind1 genou ~ \ \ O ll1 Cn pt actt cmg ~oc t d l '"ork 111 child \\ Clfat c A~ p cc t~ oflinda luhi,\ al rn1th · ~ ( 1999) and larga ret K o , ac h ·~ (~009) Ind1 gcn o u ~ Icscarch approaches were u ~ed to guid e th1 ~ 1e~ea rc h . and the n1 cthod of a n n l ;~ t ~ u~ed '' ns thctnatic analy i ~ T he e "\p en e nce~ ~b a red h; th e Ind1 genous '' orn cn '" ho parti cipated tn thi tud y revealed that per onal a ttnbut c~ and '"o rk en' 1ronrncnt ca n h1nder or pr on1ote re iliency The e '' o n1cn found th at ha\ rng a "trong ~c n ~c of tdentJty and be111g g1ound ed in culture and pin tu alt ty. along \\ 1th ~tr l\ tng to crea te \\ o rk -I1fe balancc and pt ac tJ cJng elf-care \\ ere impot1ant to mamtmntng a hea lthy\\ ell-he1ng. Othet facto rs 1dentdi cd as promoting rc iliency included· Il cx ibd ity in th e v. orkpl acc. and bc1ng abl e to practi ce ocial \\ ork in a v. ay that 1 refl ectl\ e of Indt gcnous \\ orldv tev. s Hav 1ng access to resource and support s. uch a clinical uper-v is1on. and crea ting space \\'here genUJne relation h1ps can be butlt with colleagues and clients were al o tdcntdi cd a signifi cant. Recon1mendations to better suppot1 social workers were derived fro1n the interviews, and furth er directi ons for re earch \.\ere also discu ed. ... Ill Tabl e of ontcnt ...................................................... J Chapter One lntroductt on .................................. .. Pcrso nall )Catton. Id cnllt)'. Culture. and ocwl \\'otk Pt ac ttce ................................... 2 Dcfi ni tio11 o f T c1111 ~ . .. . . . . . . . . . . • . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . 4 u rn111ary .. .. .. ... .. .. ............... .... .. ....... .. .. .... .. .. ......... ....... ..... .. .. ..... .. .. .. ..... ......... .. ... .. .. .. .. ... 7 tu(l y Over\ tew .. ... .. . . ........... .......................................................................... .. .......... 8 Chapter T\\ o 1 tterature Re\ t C \ \ ..................................................................................... ! J Chtld \\' cl rare A Cht onologtcal Canadian 0\ en. te\\ ................................................. 11 0\ crviev. of hi lei \V cl rare and Indtgcnou <, Peopl e .................................................... 14 In d1gc no u ~ \ \ ' t) tn c n .. .. .. .. ..... .. .. ............. ........ .. ........... .. ..... .. ..... .. .. ..... .. ....... .. .. ..... ....... I 8 Wcllnc and llealtng................. ................................................................................. 20 . . .. . . ... ..... .... .. .. .................................. .. .. ............. .. ..................................... 7? ..... .-... Rc~ tlt en c c .............................................................. . 22 Indtgcnous Re tlt cncc .......... . ocial Work a ~ a Profc s~ i o n tn Britt ~.., h Colu rnbw .................................................... 24 Chtld \\'elfare EducatJ on 111 Bntt h Colutnbw ............................................................. 26 Challenge and octal Work ... .. .................................................................................. 28 Per onal charactertstt c . .... ...... .... .. .. ..... .. ...... .. .. .. ... .... .. .. .. ..... .. .. .... ..... .. .. ..... .. .. ... ..... . 28 Ex tern a! et1\'irontncnt . ........ ....... ............. .... .. .. .. ....... .. .. ....... .. .. .. .. ..... .. ..... .. ............. 3 1 Organi?ational characteristics .......... ....................................................................... 32 Bu1nout . .. . . ...... . ....... ..... .... .. ... . .... .. ........ ... .. ..... .. ............ .. ... .... .. .. .. ..... .... .. ..... . ........ . 33 Overview of the Re ea rch ..... ... .... ...... ............... ... .... ... ......... ..... ..... .... ......... ..... ........... 13 Retention and Social Work .. .... ... .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. ... .. .. ................. ..... ... .. .. ........ 3 5 elf-Efficacy ......................................................... .. ............. .............. .......... ............ 35 Organizational culture ....... ...................................................................................... 36 Women in Social Work ....... ........ .. .. .. .. ...... ....... .......... ..... ..... .. ......... .... ... .. .. .. .......... . 3 7 lndi gcnou Women in Social Work ............................................................................. 38 SumJn ary ....... ......... ..... ... .... . .. ...... .. .. ............ .................. ................... .......... ....... .. .. .. .. 4 2. Chapter Three: Research Methodology ........................................................................... 44 Theoretical Orientation ................................................................................................. 44 Mctl1odology ....................................................................................... .. ......................... . .t.R San1pl e Selecti on ........................................ .. ........... .. ..... .............................................. 53 Participant Recruitrnent ............................................................................................... ')4 Ethi cal Considerations...... ................ ......... .. ................................................................ ') 5 Data Collecti on ........ .......................................... .. ........................................................ 57 Dctta Analysi5 .... ................................ ... ........ .......................... ...................................... .::;9 Integrity 111 Resea rch ............ .................................................. ...................................... () 2 Sun11nary .......................................... ......................................................................... 64 Chapter Fou r Research Fu1c.ltn g~ ......... ............................................................................ 65 IV Dcn1ographt cal In forn1at1 on .. .... .. .. .... . .. .. .. .. .. ........... ... ... . ......... .......... .... .. .. .. ... ... ... . .. .. . 65 elf-Identity ........ ........................................................................ ........................ 67 Indtgcnou<; \Vay of KnO\\ tng..................................................................................... 67 Culture and piritual1ty ................................... ............................................................ 70 Goodr1c ofFit ......... ........ ............................................................................. 7 1 Personal and Profe~ ~ t o n a l Values Allgntng ................................................................. 72 Workplace lnJ10\'att on ............................................................................................... 73 octal \\'o•·k Pt·actt ce ................................................................................................... 75 Accc. to R e~o urcc~ and upport. .................................................................. ......... 76 up en i 1011 and Dehtt cfin g ........................................................................................... 77 Trcllning and Cultural Rc o ut c c~ .................................................................................. 79 Thc Po\\'cr o rM ent<)r.. , htp ......................................................................................... Rl Relation l11ps .. ............ .. ...................................................................................... 82 elf-Care and Work-Ltrc Balance .......................... ..................................................... 84 tr·cs and l-1ca 1th .. ............. .. . ... .. .. .. .. ............... .. .. .. ..... .. ..... .. ..... .. .. ....... ..... .. .. .. . 8 7 1111dati tt c ~ 111 the Literature and Rc"'ca rch ............................................................ .... 9 1 S umtnary . .... ....... ...... .... ... .. ........... .. .. .. .. .. ..... .... ... ..... .. .. ..... .. ......... .. .. ... .. ..... .. ....... .. . 93 Chapter Fi\ e Concluding D i sc u ~ ~ • o n ............................................................................ 95 References ..................................... .. ...................................................................... ...... ! 07 Appendix A· Etnail Rec ruitment Po tcr .......................................................................... 121 Appendix B. Infotmauon Letter Con5cnt Fonn ............................................................ 124 Appendix C: Que tionnaire Guide ........ . ..................................................................... 128 Appendix D. Tran criber Oath of Co nfidentt altty ......................................................... 130 Appendix E: CSFS Letter of up port ..... ......................................................................... 131 Appendi x F: REB Letter of Support ................................................................................ 13I Li t of Table Table 1. Identifi ed Thcn1e ............................................................................................... 67 • Vl Li t of Figure Figure l Vi ~ ual d1 play of themcc;, ................................. ............ ... ............................... 6 1 \ 11 ckn o\\ lcdgcmcnt. There arc tnany people \\ ho ha\ c contnbutcd to the \\ I I tJ ng 0 r th I ~ the" I S and bel\ c supported n1 e personal!; throughout tht JOUrn e; I " ould like to ac knO\\ ledge the lnchgenou \\ on1cn '' ho (.., hat cd thctr ~ totJ e(.., and thetr tin1 e \\ tth me I \\ ould ltkc to ex pre~~ 111) gratJtud e tn n1 y the(.., JI.., ach 1 ~o r, .J oa nna P1erce and 1ny cotnn1tllcc n1 e tnhe r~o., fo r thc11 guida nce tht ough th e lea rn ing pt oc.c~o.,(.., of tht ~ the i . I \\ ould al o ltkc to extend 111) appreuct ti on to Chcr; l Tho n1a(.., and Mary 1eegce for thetr on-gotng n1e nto r~o., hip , support and encouragcn1cnt I could not ha' c '' eathcrccl the tonTll.., on th is JOurn ey \\'ithout th e love and support or n1y famd y and fn c nd ~o., Thank you to n1 y mother, grand Jn o th cr~, a untJ c~o.,, cousin and fri end who are all "tro ng wo n1cn 111 rn y Ide who conttnu c to chall enge and in pire me. l want to extend a spec wl thank you to my be~ t fn end, La ura, for her tnput and for her hours of phone suppori Thank you to m y parent and brothers for all o\\: tn g 1ne to rea ll/c my O'A- n potential. All the up port and love you ha\ e provided !TIC is one of the greatest gi n " I wd I . ever recetvc. To n1y husband, Cru·is, thank you for pati entl y editing thi s thes is, for always supporting 1ne. and for your constant love and strength through the years. To tny son, I ludson, to whon1 I dedicate this thesis, I atn trul y hi e sed to he vour tnom. 1 Chapter O ne: Introdu cti on This research stud y focu\ed on the e "Xpe lJ c nce~ of lnchgenou" \\On1en \\hom e ocial \VOrkcrs that ha' e practtced, or '' ho cuJTcntl y prac tt ce, \VJthtn the field of chdd welfare tn Bnttsh Colun1hJa \11 an} of the problen1" Indt gen n u ~ peo ple face tod ay ca n he linked to the hi\tOr) of "go, crnnle nt- \bnriginalt elatton"·· ( The \ho11gll1al Ju ~ tt ce Irnplen1cntatton Con1n1t\ston. 20 15. n p ) The tntntston hy chtld ' ' elf are autho1JtJ C<; 111 the past ha been paternalt stl c and colon1altn natut c lndJ gcnou" children \\C te taken frotn thetr fan111les and co1nn1unttte\. fir"t h) the re\tdenttal \c hool ~y\ t c n1 and later hy the child wclra re y tctn Both ") ~ t en1 . hcl\ e had eleva tatJng effec t\ on gencratt ons of lndigenou people and cotnmunttt es (\1cCa\ltn & Boyer, 2009) Today. fndt gcnous children continu e to be O\ er-rcprcsented '' tthtn the child '' el fare "Y"ten1 ( K<)/lov:\kt . Sinha, Hoey, & Luca. , 20 1 l ). Many Indt gcnou ati ons arc cstabltsh1n g thctr own child welfare agenc1cs . o they can dcll\ cr thctr O\\n chdd ,,e lf~lrc <;et'- JCe\, and a'> a '>tep towards self-determination. A quali tative, exploratory resea rch desjgn was chosen to help th e parti cipants share their unique experi ences. and to ex plore how the concepts of'' cline<; and resiliency are conn ec ted. Exploratory research is often favoured as a n1ethodology ""hen little is known about the topic under stud y (Ma rl ow & Boone, 2005 ). I wanted to explore the following que tion: What arc the experience of Indigenous oc1al '' o r~ er~ \\ or~tng in chi ld welfare? This resea rch stud y was guided by the fo llowing econdary question" What factors co ntribute to Ind1 genous ocial workers' resiltcncy \\ htl e \\'OJ ktng "1thin the child welfare systcn1') What coping strategies do Indi genous ~octa l '' ot kct" cn1ploy to pron1otc wcllncss and balance in their li ves while working in the fi eld of child'' elf:Hc·> 2 My goal \\a to pro\ 1de a "-pace that pr on1otcs th e ~ h a n n g of kno\\ ledge and the expenence o f lndtgenous '' 0n1 en v.ho ha' e \\ O J ked'' tth1n th e field of chtld ,,clfm e, and to re, eal ne'' kn o,,Jcdgc dnd p er ..., p cc tl\ e~ tcgardtng tht . ., top1c. purposeful "an1pltng "-lt atcg) '' a..., c1pplr cd to rn' ttc lndi gcnou" '' on1cn ~ ho ha\ e a degree 1n ocral '' ork and '' ho ha' c '' orkcd a~ ...,oc1al '' ork cr.. , for a 1111ntn1un1 of t\\ O y ea r~ tn the fi eld ofc.. hild ,, clfatc to ptll1tc. tpct tc in tht . ., ~ tud y. Dur ing th e rc...,ea1c..h to hi ghli ght so n1e of th e top1c..., that a1o...,c f1on1 the ex per1enc..c..., "harcd b) th e wo rn en who cho e to parttc 1pate 1n tht . ., ~tud ) Per o nal Location : ld entih , C ul ture, and S oc ia l\\ o rk Pra ctice ~ The'' ay '' c 'te\\ the '' orld and h()\\ \\ e relate to the c n v 1ro ntnc nt ~ around u.. , in1pact our cholarl y \\ ork and our areas or 1nterest S1n1th ( 1999) . ., tate..., 1t 1" 1n1p011ant for re earchers to ituate th e n1 ~ C I\ es tn relatr on to thetr famtl ), coin inunity. and cultural background. I will begin by offering rny gencalogtcal introducti on 1 an1 a mixed-race, Indi genous wotn an. My paternal grand father\\ a~ Cree from the Ia' e Lake area of Albet1a, and n1 y paternal grandn1other can1 e fron1 a Metis settl ement tn Portage La Prairie, Manitoba. My maternal grand1nother 1s pritnaril y of French ancestry and can1c fron1 Sas katc h e~ an. and n1y rn aternal grand rathe r· s fa rn i1:- ic; o f I:::nglish a n ce~ tr) . Although I have a trong connection to 1ny fan1ily and culture and feel grounded in 111) identity, it has been difficult to n1aintain a connecti on to my Indigc nou roots and traditi ons whil e living within an urban co n11nu ni ty , itu ntcd far fron1 rny traditionnl territory. Like rnany other [n(ll genous people, I did not grow up on tn y t1aditional territory. Several or n1y relatives were forced to att end church-based ~c hools a"' chddren. Generation of tn y extend ed famil y v. ere di ~ pla ccd and ass in1tlated tnto dotninant ~ oc t e t y. and when they returned to thetr hon1e co1nmuntttes th ey felt a ~cn ~e of dt ~c onn ec t and alien ation A a re~ ult. chtld \\ cl fare p o l1 c 1 e~ and prac t1ces hcl\ c 1111pactcd ~e\ era I gen erati o n~ of n1y fmnd ) Although it 1 ~ not c1 ~ unp le or ea~) p1 oce~ , I he he\ e 1t t'\ tn1po11ant to ackno\vl edgc the p os 1tt o n ~ of prJ\ degc clnd po\\ er \ \ C hold \\ tth in ~o c t e t y In addJtt on I belie\ e .. elf-refl cxt\ tty ~ ~ central to out grO\\ th a~ 111dt \ tdu a l ~. out 1e l a tt o n ~ h1p ~ w1th others, and our abJIJty to pron1otc equ1ty I td entJfy a~ a hetetoc;cxLtaL abl e bodtecl. edu cated, n1tddl c-cla s, n1r\ ed- race Indt ge n o u ~ \\ on1an. I \\ a~ fo11unatc to gro\\1 up tn a n1iddl e cia~ . hon1e free frorn a hu ~e and neglect. whtch offered 1nc a ~c n ~e o f <;ecul tty and belonging • O\\ a an adult. I an1 also prJ\ ilcged to he a moth er. \\ hi ch ha~ tntroduced new meaning into life I would not ha\ c cxpcncnced otherv.. 1 ~e Identity ca n be a hi ghl y charged subj ect for lndt ge nous peo pl e due to the ac ti on ~ taken by the government o f Canada to eradica te Indigenous Jd entitJ es In rn atnstrcmn society, power and pri\ ilege can frequ entl y be linked to the colour of our skin , colour that affects day-to-day social experience . The ways in wht ch Indigenous identity is experi enced because of skin colour is the source of many tensions tn di sc u ~s i ons of Indi genous issues between Indi genous and non-Indigenous people, as well as betv. ccn Ind1 gcnous groups (Crey, 20 15). As a light-sktnned Indigenous wo n1 an, 1 ha\ e not experienced the day-to-day burden of racisn1, or the le\ el of di scnn1tnat1on th at Indigenous people who arc darker- kinncd and visibl y recogn11ed a~ Ind1 genou~ htt\ c faced. 4 For the past thu1een yea r" I ha" c \\or ked as a "ocwl \\ orket. in the a1ea of child \\ elfarc tn a' anety of Indtgenou" cornn1untt1 c throughout R11t1 ~ h Cnlun1h1C1 I hrough these ex penences I ha\ c \\ 1tnessecl ho\v s ystcm.. contt nue to oppt e'-~ Indt gc n o u ~ population and perpetuate and pron1ote cultur al a~~ 11n i latt nn of In<.h genous children and vouth Into rnarn ~ t1 ea n1 ~octe t\ \!though there 1'- no "tt aiuhtf on.\did ~o lutton . It 1nav be ., • '-" '-' J po ~ tble to de\ clop appropnate "Y~tc n1 s of chtld \\el fare th at\\ Ill not only ~ upp o 11 Indigenous co n1n1unill c~. hut pcl11ap~ the larger Cc1 nadian ~ can be better su pported. and to protnotc and empower Indigenou social worker working within the fi eld of child welfare. Furthennore, I hope 1ny re earch findings\\ til infonn tn y O\\ n clinical practi ce and that the collective experi ence of the Indigenous won1en who par1icipatcd in the study are honoured and provide orne in ight to th o~c suppo11ing soc ral workers. Definiti on of Terms The fo llowing definitions arc given to provide clarity and context to thr~ rc~cdrch stud y: Indigenou s peopl es. There arc 1nany different tcrn1s used ae ro literature to c..knotc Indi gcnous popul ations, such as Incl igenous, Aboriginal. Na ti ve, lnd wn, First Nat1ons. Metis. and Inutt Many scholars hen e cho ~c n not to usc the tct 111 ·· \b01t g1nal .. hcc au ~c the concept 1 con. tructed \\ tlhtn colontaltsn1 dnd \\a defined thr nugh gcn cn1n1cnt legi lation (A lfred. 2005). l·or the purpoc:.e o fthi ~ paper the tcnn "' lndt gc nou t.;'' \\i ll be u ed to tnclude f tr\t at tons, \1 e ll ~. and Jnutt peo pl e\\\ ho ha\ c ance'-. tt al rootc:. V\ tthin Canada The tcnn ·· Ahongtnar· \\ dl -.,t tl! be u ed tn relation to go\ ct ntncnt poltucs. agenc tcs, and \\ 1th 1n d 1reel quote'-. Child \\ Cifarc. The tcnn "child \\ clfarc·· I\ u'-.cd throughout t ht ~ tcc:.cclrch c:. tucl} to relet to protcctl\ e . en ICC'-. for ch tl clt en. ) ou th. and (clln tlt cc:. pt ovid eel b) dc'-.tl!natcd go\ crnrn cn t and del ega ted Abongt na I agcnc tc'-. The tcn11 "ch tl d pt otectton.. 1~ al <.,o con1n1on 1y u<.,eel wtthtn lllcrature Child\\ clfare a<., a <.,tate tn Britt<.,h Colun1bta t<., re'-.pon<., lbl e foJ prO\ tdtn g safety. petmanency. anJ \\cll-be1ng for chdd ren Child \\elfa tc ~e r\t ccc:. are legally sanctioned by the pro\ tncw l go\ ernn1ent under the Child. Fa rndy and Comn1un1ty ervicc Act (CFC A). as \\ ell as other rclc\ ant lcgt<., ]ation <., uch as the Adoptton Act (Gough, 2007). Child welfare ervice can includ e receiving and Investigatin g reports of poss1 hie child abuse or neglect providing ~c rvices to families who need assi<.,ta nce 1n the protec tion and care of their children: arrangi ng for children to li ve v. ith kin. fo~ter fatnih es, or approved group hon1c facilities when th ey are not safe to be at hon1 c: arranging adoptive hom es for children in co ntinuing custod y: and prO\ iding tndcpcndcnt living support to youth in care (Canadia n Chi ld Wei fare Resea rch PortaL 2014 ). "'Child weifare \\ orker" or "'child protection worker" refer to a person delcgc1tcd under the CFCSA to provide child\\ elfarc services (Ministry of Children and Fatnily Devcloptn cnt, 2014 ). Chtld wei fare servi ces are provided direc tl y through the pn)\ inc tal go\ ctn 1ncnt knO\\ n as the Mtnt5try of Children and Farndy De\ clopn1ent ( 1 1· D), or through delegated horigtnal agencJe~ <...: <...: ad\ cr11 cn1cnts. con\ er~a tton . and C\ en at '' ork \ lth ough th et e 1~ no un 1' ct ~a II } accepted defin1tron of '' cline <;. Cha1le~ B Corhtn of \r liOnel ~tate Ill\ ersitv .. defines \\CIIne 5~ a<; .. a nlultJdmlcn ~lo nal . ., tate o f h~1ng dc(\trthiiH! the C\. l ~ t c nt e of po~Jlt\C health in an tndt\idual a e\. ctnpltli cd h): qualtt) of'ltfc an d a scn(\c o f \\cll-bciJlg .. (Dc finttJ on of \V cllne~5. n p ) \\' c ll n c<;~ ca n al . . o he de fined ac; an ac t1 ve. p1 C\ entd t1' e pt ot..c~~ to\\ at d ~ heahng'-' and balance.'' ht ch 1 not linlJtcd to the a b ~c n c.c of d1~cac:;e and til n ee:;~ (Definition ofWellnes . n p ). Re ili ency. There i tnuch debate among rc~ca rc h c r conccm tn g the cont..cpt of re !lienee: hov. e\ er Bottrell (2009) define rcsilJ encc. 1n the b1 oade<;t <;c n ~e. a~ a p o~ 1 tJ " e adaptation de pite ad\ er 1ty. The An1cncan PsychologJCa l A~~octatJon refers to resilience as .. the proces of adapting \\ ell in the face or ad\ crsit). traurna . tragcd:. threat\ or significant source of trec:;s- such as famil y and relatton hip probkms. ~cri o u " health problems or \VOrkplace and finan cial (\tresc:;or\·· (20 14. n.p.). Culture. Culture can be under tood as a net\vork of shared n1 eanings taken for granted as reality by those who interact within the net\\Ork (Zap[ 1993. p 696) Marginalization. Margi na Iization is "'an intcrd i c ipiina r} tern1 :· \\ h ich rc f'er~ to "the process in which a subj ect is rend ered n1arginal through the exercise of power \\'ith111 patriarchal cultures wotncn, despite thei r nun1eri cal n1ajority. are n1arginal11ed h): a range of practices and discourses includ ing ernp loyn1ent law and acaden1ic di~ciplinc..., .. (Andennahr, Lovell, & Wo lkowi tz, 2000, p. 150). 7 Burnout. Maslach, chaufcll . and Lettet (200 1) de\icn he burnout a\i .. a pt olongcd rc, pon c to chrontc etnollonal and 1nt e rper~o nal ~ ll e~so t \ion th e JOb. and 1\.i de fined hy the th ree ditncn ~ i o n~ o r C\.hau~llon. C) n1 1 ~ 111. and mcllicaLy .. (p I ) Cr~lliland and Janl e\i ( 20 13) ~ u gges t ~otne 1ca o n ~ fot bun1out 1ncl ude lc1rgc Ld~cloa d ~. Ide k of \\ orkct ~ e:xpcrt1 c. demanding ctnpln} Ct ~. unbend1n g 111 lltull ondl rules and p1 ocedure\i. co nttnu o u ~ papen\ o rk. and long'' ork da)' T ra uma . The tenn 1\ defin ed'' 1th1n co n ~t ru ctn J\l ~e lf- d e\ elopn1cnt theory 111 the foliO\\ ing'-' \\a\"' as the un1qu e 1ndl\ 1dual e\.pen cnce. d\~ouated '' 1th (111 e\ ent or en dun ng condition. in \\hi ch. ( I ) the inUJ\Jdual·~ ability to mtcgratc a fTec.tJ\C expc ri cn<..c i oven\ helmed or (2) the 1ndt\ 1dual e"X pe n e n cc~ a threat to I d e 0 1 hodJiy integrity . The pathognon1onic rc pon'c~ arc changes in the llldiv idu al'~ ( I ) frarne of reference. or u ual \.\'3) of under~tanding ~elf and \\ orld. 1ncludtng sptritual 1ty. (2) capacity to modulate affect and mat ntam benevolent inner conncct1on w1th ~elf and others. (3) ab ility to meet ht s psychological need tn mature v. ays. (4) central p ychological needs. which arc refl ected in di srupted cogni ti\ e chernas. and (5) memory systctn. including en ~o ry experience. (Pcarln1 an & Saak.\ itnc. 1995. p. 6 1) Surveys of th e general po pulation suggest that at least half of all adult~ tn the United States have experienced at least one n1ajor traun1atic strcs or S ummary Chapter one prov ided an overview or the purpose. questions, and ~1gni fictH1CC of th1s stud y. I suggest that the experiences of Ind igenous wotn cn need to he heard B: crcattng pace for\\ omen to hare their\.\ 1. do tn and kn O\\ ledge, I an1 hope fu l that\.\ c ca n ga in a better u n d c r~tanclJng of how to ()Upport ~ oc tal'' orkers '' ork1ng tn chtld wei fare Thts the 1. ~ ~ a ~ tat11ng p o 1nt in pt O\tdtng th at ~ p ace. ho\\ C\CJ, th er e ~ ~ c1 need fot n1orc re car h th attncludc lnd1 gc n o u ~ \\ O nl c n ·~ t<-.\UC\ anJ pcr()pC( tl\ e\ At the pre~e nt t1n1 e there arc (C\\ Ind 1ge nou() 'oual wot k.cr' pt act H... I ng 111 th e fi eld of child'' clf~1re 1 he h1. totJcalt clatton, htp o l dJq n.J <., t hel\\ ecn Indt gcnou<., Ln tn n1 unrtr e~ and the chtld \\ elia rc . y~ t c n1 ~ ~ \ lgndica nt. e~ p ccw ll } fot Inclt gcnou<-. \\Olllcn \vhn choo<.,e to \\Orkin tht s fi eld. L1ttlc tcsea tch has hccn con1plcted that ex plore<., the un tqu c expcn cnces or Indt gc no u ~ \\ Ol11Cn \\ ho practi ce \OC IC\ 1 \\ ork In chJld \\ cl f aJ e R c~ea rch Ill th1 area i. en tt ca I to und crstanch ng the connec t ton hct\\ cen Ind1 gc n ou~ <.,oc ial \.\ 0 1k theory and practtcc Ind igenous <.,OC tal '' o rker~ \\ ho arc dedt ca tcd to practJ c tng <.,oc ial work in child \.\. elfa re arc rare and hi ghl y coveted It j<., crucial that \\ c deve lop th e knowledge ncces ary to support Indi genous octal wo rkers worktng tn the Iicld oi child wo rk Thts qualitati ve tud y \\ as designed to ga 111 in ights into lnd igc nous \\ omen· s experi ence of re iliency \.\ hile \\ orking tn chtld welfare. and to begin to address the gap in the literature concerning Indige nous social ''- orkers · expen cnce S tudy O ve rview ~ This thesis is di vided into fi ve chapters that fo cus on the relevancy of this resea rch top tc and provide an overview o f the pertinent literature and re earch. My resea rch journey and proces , as well as the finding and recon1tnend at1 ons fo r futur c research and practice, arc also represented within these chapt ers. Chapter two includes an overv iew of th e literature, which C'\dtn inc-., the development of the child w e lt~1rc systcrn in BC and its irnpact on Indtgcnous people The 9 current delegation process that tnany lndt ge nou~ co n1n1unit1 e~ arc u~tn g to 1n1plctnent the tr own chtld ,,·clfarc agencies, and s ta tt ~ tt cs related to Indt genou ~ con1n1unJtJ es, arc also hJ ghlt ghtcd in th1 chapter 1 he petsonaL 0 1gant/d llonaL c1nd en\ 1ronn1 ental fa ctors that pre ent challenges fot ~ocw l \\ orke1~ practJc 1ng 1n child \\ d farc ate C"\ plot eel In additton. barn cr . ~ tru gg l e~. and the rc~t ll c n c) fdctor~ pet1dlning to Ind igeno u ~ won1 en practi ctng tn chtld " elfare c1 rc al~o di~cu~~cd Next, cha pter three o utlin e~ the n1ethoclolog1e~ th at gu1ded tht~ ~tudy and the n1cthod I ha\ c used to co n1plcte the research t\ qualitatl\ c explo ratory resea rch rnethodolog) \\a~ cho en tn thts ~tudy hecau~e Jt •~ an ep 1 ~ten1 olog i cally appropn atc chotec a the goal or thi. research~~ to gain knO\\ ledge abou t a pa11tcular g r oup·~ l1 \cd experi ence linda I uhi,\ai ~tnith· ~ Ind1 gcnou project~ and \l arga rct Ko\ach· lndigenou n1 ethodological characteri sti cs \VCJ e also considered and u~cd to guide n1y resea rch process. It was in1por1ant to u. c a process that respects Indt ge nou ~ ways of know tng as a rneans of honouring n1y ov. n va lues and bel i e f~. and to ~ h ow respect for the wo1nen who cho e to partiCipate 1n thi study In chapter three. self-refl exivity. tnaintmning transparency. and choos1ng to u~e an exploratory research design are described as n1 eans of rcrnaining accou ntab le and promoting integrity in the research process. An inductive thcn1 ati c analysis tnethocl V\ a-; compl eted u ~ ing Braun and Clarke· s (2006) step-by-step approach as descnhed 111 th1~ chapter. In chapter four. I present the then1e that emerged frorn the e1ght 1ntcn lC\\ s con1pl eted during thi s research process. The rnain therne include sclf-tdenttt) · subthen1es: Indigenous perspecti ves and child welfare, culture, and spt tttuctllty. Gooclncs..., 10 of fit subthcn1c. p er~ onal and profes tonal \ alucs a1Jgn1ng, \\ orkplacc 1nno\ alton, uhthcnle'-> '-> upcn J'-> lon and dcbncfing, traintng and cultural rcc.,ources. and the po d• c.,c uc.,c.,cd. Ftnall ), chapter fi, c 1ncludec., an mterprctdtton of th e key find1ngc.,, <:.,t ud y 1in1i tat1on , rccornrnenda ttons. and td eac;, fo t f uturc 1c<:.,earch. ·1he fi ncl111 g~ of th is the"' c., clearly show that spec di e factors ca n pron1 otc or h tndcr res l11 ency for c.,ocial worker<:., practic1ng in the fi eld of child\\ elf~1 rc The fi ndtn g~ al<:.,o Jn c!Jca ted that Ind1 gcnous <:.,Oc lal \Vorker 1nay benefit frorn suppot1c.,, uch ac., rnentorc;,h1p fron1 other Jnd1 genouc., c;,ocial • workers who hare comn1on expen ences and perspec ti ves, and t1n1 e to build relationships with tho~e they\\ ork with Although 1l \\-a<, not a top1c of focus\\ tthtn the rcc.,carch. rn oc.,t of the social worker ex pre ed feeling 'A ell suppor1cd while~ orktng ~ tthin delegated Aboriginal chi ld welfare agcncie . II haptcr T" o: Literature Rcvicn Child Welfare: hronologica l Canadian 0 ' ervic"'' Chtld \v elfare a a natt onal1 "suc ha" un oh ed Jn\a ~ l\ e and dJ ~ ruptl\ c go\ ct ntn cnt sanctioned 111lCf\ c nti O I1~ 111l0 the d o rn c~ tJ C <:;p ace~ o f fcll11Jl1 Ct.. rhe IJt et atUI C ~ u gg.c~ tS that one of the rnost 1ntrut.. 1\ e rc~ p o n t..c~ for d Lhtld at 11 ~k '" 1en1o' tng the Lhlld f'ron1 thcu· fmntl y Respondtng to chdd protcc t1 on co n ce rn ~ u ~ u a ll ] 111\ oh c<., ~ocia l \\ 01kc1" and other professionab. such a5 pollee offi cc1~.~c hon ! ~. and ho ~ plt a l <:; , oft en '' 1thout the parent or child . co n5cnt. I he \\ Oik . urroundm g an a pp1 ch e n ~ l o n 1 ~ t1n1e-co n ~ un11n g and can tn\ oh c ~oc tal \\ orkers. courh. I a\\ ) c r~. fa n1d y n1eciJat1 on prog ra n1 ~. and parental upcn 1 ion progratn requ1rc n1e nt ~ In tn ) ex pcltcnce. tht ~ procc<.,<:, ct ca tes addttJ onal tre • to fan1dy ystctn and parents De I eeU\\ (20 14 ) ~ t ate" th at children ha\ c oft en de cribcd the experience a<.; ..dcvat..tating" (p. 63 ). hild \\ elfa re poli c1cc; and th e oc wl workers who wo rk within the e . y tern .. n1u ·t balance the confli ctin g pressure of soc iety' s de ire to protec t children fron1 abu e and neglect \\Ith the larger society v1cw that the famil y unit i impot1ant and hould be presen eel whenc\ er pos ibJ e (de Lceuw. 2014 ). In March 190 L the first child \Ve l fare act wa pa ed in the BC Legt()lativc Assetnbly, supported by the Council of Wotnen o f Vancouver. This act gave the state authonty to retnovc children and place them with fo ster famili es to en ure th e chil dren were removed fro1n situations where they faced abu e, neglec t. or abandonn1 cnt. Ilt o..,tonc assesstnents were often subj ective and based on the hyg iene of the hon1e. n1tH alit) of parents, and the beha viour of parents and relativ e tO\\ arc! eac h other and thct r chtldrcn (Mora les, Shcafor, & Scott, 2007 ). ln early years, child wclf~1rc \\ Ork.cts \\etc n1ost 12 co n1rnonly vo lunteer. or n1 cn1berc;; of rell gtouc;; <;,oc t etJc~ Bet\\ ecn the 1 910~ and 1960s there \VCre stgnifi crmt chan ge~ that occ urred Within th e field or chdcl \\clfate Ill Ca nada. By 1939, unl\ cr tt y affil tated progtatns bec.an1 c tecognt;ed c1ncl thu~ '.Oc tal \\O tk a" a profcs~ 1on (Mo rale<;,, hec1 for. · Scott. 2007). In addtti on. the \ tate' <;, fo rn1 c.ll a~'.tlnilation pro<.C\\ o r lndt gcnou~ people\ lc.l go\ Cl11111ent pol icJC\ etncrged throu gh the <.. rca tton or church-bcl\ed ~<.. h oo l ~ and Indian rc idcnttal sc hools The nUJnhcr or rc~ tdcnttal ~c h oo l ~ 1cached XO tn 1911 The Go tdon Rc idcntial chool \\a s the last federal!] operated rc~ ld c ntt a l ~c hool and 1t c l o~cd 111 1996 in a~ katc he\\ an (Abton-o·connor. 20 I 0) The lndwn '\ct \\a~ an1enclcd tn 195 1 to tnclude child \\elfare and to pro' 1de the pro\ tnce \\ 1th the authont} to dcln et chtlcl welfare en. tee on re~e l\ e~ In the 1960 , the . i" th e pr ac ti ce of th1 t., p1ofec.,~ton 111 the foll o,ving \\a y: I Iutnan n ghts and ~octal JUc.,llcc arc the phtlo~ophtcal und erpinn ings or socia l \\ ork practtcc The untqu ene~o.,~ or c.,oual wo rk pt acll<.c 1~ 1n th e hI end o f ~o n1 e part1cular \ aluc , knO\\ ledge and sk tll ~. Jnclucltng the u ~c of rcla tt onsh1p a~ th e bas15 of all in ten entt on and tespect for the cl tcnt' cho Jce and 111volvcn1cnt (2015. n p ) Ethical co nduct and practice i at the core or rnost professions, includtng social work. -r he Briti h Colutnbia As ociat1on of octal ~· o rk cr (BC A \\' ) Code of Eth1cc., \\as adopted in 2003 and con i t of 11 principl e guiding the pract1 ce of soc tal \\- ork 111 BC. w h1ch include the folio\\ ing: 1. A ocial worker shall n1aintain the best Interest of the client as the pnmary profe ional obligation. 2. A social worker shall respect the intrinsic wot1h of the perso ns she or he scr\ cs in bet or his professional relationship with then1. 3. A social worker shall carry out her or his professional dutic and obligation" \\ ith integrity and objectivity. 4. A socia l worker shall have and rnaintain con1pctcnce in the pro\ t\ 1011 of a ~o.,ocial work service to a client. 2) 5. A social wo rker shall not C" ay, & chtntdt. 201 4) Recotntnendation 57 of the Gove Inquiry stnted that schools of social \\ ork tn BC ~ ho ul d increase child welfare content in their cuiTi culun1. In response, sc hools de\ eloped chtld 27 welfare spccialuation progrmn ~ to ~ p cc i fi cet out to exam inc the relati onship between veteran child protecti on \\ orkcr', · usc or coping Strategies and their levels of etnotiona) exhaustion, depcrsonali;atlon. and ~en ~C of 1I reduced p cr~onal a cco rnpll ~ hn1 ent. The stud } confin11 ccl that netther the u ~c o f nc lt \e not a\ oidant coping ~ tra t cg t c~ a\ ed the'c \\ ork cr' ft on1 \O tn c fo nn of cn1ott onal e '\lw u ~ tt o n I Iowever, when worker tndt ca ted that the)\\ ere U\l ng ae tJ\ c coptng ~l t clt eg t e~ ltkc focu. ed probl cn1 ~o h tng and U \C of \OCtal ' uppot1 . 11101e 0flen they t cpot1ed t educed fce ltng.. o f' d e p e r~o n a ll za tJ O il and an tncrea eel \C l1 e of pel ~()llCl l ,\CC0111 plt ~ hn1cn t E" tern aI envi ron n1cn t . l 1nrec\ It<;, ltc detna nd <;, nne! pet ccp tJ on<;, held hy cornrnunny or the larger oc tet) ahout the func tion and tole of \ncia l \\O t ker~ worki ng in child\\ elrare can cau~e <;, trc'' for ~on1e \\ ot kef\ and t<;, cl con1n1nn cxatnplc of an ex terna l en\ 1ronn1ental fac tor affectin '-'g ~oc t a l \\ orkcr' ( hter & Grahan1, 20 15) Soc tal wo rkers practi cin g 1n child \\ c 1fare arc com n1on I~ refe rred to a~ ··hah~ ~nate he r~ .. or kno\\ n f'o r rernoving children. and are often not tru. ted or are thought of in a ncgatJ \C \\ ay and di regarded for thetr fundan1 ental ro le tn co n1n1untttes Ch1ld protecti ve acttons arc frequent! ) ' ie\\ ed a .. too ltttle too la te .. and <;,tnlu ltancou I ~ a~ .. too tn tru<;i\e ... ~hic r and Graham (20 15) ugge t that ocietal pcrcep tt ons of oc tal worker<> and thetr \\ ork often conflict with the altruistic va lues that n1 otiva te indiv tduals to jotn the profession. The n se in regul ati on and increa ing preoccupati on \\ tth protccttng the profess ion· s reputati on ha resu Ited in another . hift tO\\ ards orga n izationa I defen~l\ ene~" and a new era of burden and stress on indivtdual social workers ( hi er & Graha n1, 2015) Change in the soc tal policy environtnent affect funding, resou rce , and social \\ orkcr~o~· ability to c(Tectivcly carry out their wo rk and interact with client in a supportt\e n1dnne1 D1rect practi ce implicati ons al o include a hilt where professional j udgn1cnt ~~replaced hy ''burea ucrati c" practi ce and a greater en1phas is on c h cc k.li ~ t ~ and procedure' (CdrdtnaL 2005). 12 Accordtng to Hansung and , toner (2008). the 1110 1c hu1 en ucrallc th e\\ 01ktng en\ ironn1crH. the tnore nan O\\ 1) de fin ed \\ 01ke1~ bcco n1c 111 theu knO\\ ledge and hO\\ they appronch thctr task . These h1 ghl y burea ucratic'' 0 1k ~e tt111 g~ ca n t c~u lt tn ht gh le\cl of.Joh . trc~ .. reduced le,cls of hohstt c thtnk1 ng. c1ncl tll1J1cllt da d\ ~ocial \\ Otk practice (1I an ung · . . toner. 200 ) 11 tical envi rontncnta I ~h 1ns can ta\. the copttH!. ~ k rll s of any chtld '' el fa re \\ orker I lo\\ C\ ct. Regeh r ct al. (2004 ) f ou ncl that the 0 1ga n u a ll onal en\ 1ronn1 ent '' a~ the ~ tro n ge~ t prcclt ctor in p1oduu ng po~t-trau n1cttic di~ tt c~~ an1ong chlld \\ elfare \\ orker Orga niza tional charac tcri ti c . A~ pre\ 1 0 u ~ l y Jn cnuo necL orga nuati onal e h a racten ~t t c and parttcul arl ; the orga niza ti onal truc tut e and 1nanagcn1ent of a child \\ clfare agency ca n 1n1pac t a ~ocial \\Orke r·<) \\e ll-be ing. Co l ling<) and Mu rra; ·<) ( 1996) tudy of British chlld protecti on v. orkcrs conc luded th at the n10<) t powerful predt ctor of O\ crall tre wa re lated to the pre~~ure tn\ohcd in pl anning and tnecllng ad nlmt~tra t l\c ca eload ex pectation . Thi '' as de cnbed by a . ocial \\ Orker in the foll O\\. tng \.\ ay The part I liked the least i the feeling th at the ad mini stratio n ga\e )O Uof don't spend too n1uch time and ITIO\ con nlO\ con, the constant rush, and alv. ay<) feeling that .,vo u co uldn't lin ge r long enough \\ith those rarn ili cs so that .,\O U cou ld <)ee '-' '- ~ thctn through connectin g with service<; ... I think th e issue that eA i ~ te d then \\a~ the size of case load ... 1 had 54. and I think the state· standard i ?. 7. You .1 u~t pu~h peopl e. You don' t ge t to do yo ur job ... People j ust don' t get th e ~e n ice <; the) need because )O U don' t have tin1 e to give - you ha ve ge nerati onal proble rn that )Ou·re ~ upposed to fi x in I 0 n1 inute~ and yo u don· t C \ en ha \ e I 0 m inute~ ( ~ 1 or"ve~ et a l. , 2 01 5, p. 238) . 11 rntth (2004) uggcsts that upport fo c u~ed on pt ornot tng \\01 k It lc balance affcch ~oc tal \\ orker , and that organt7atloncll factl ttnti on of \\Otk-ltf e balance tnuc cl ~c~ cl ~ocw l \vorkcr · abdtty to do thc1r \\Otk and d ec tca ~c~ ab c;c nt ce t~tn and turno\ er. Burn out. 1 he llte1ature ~ pcc tfi cdll) Jclt \\Ord<., in the indigcnou\ \\Orld.\ vocabulary" (p. 1). Research ha typically perpetuated Eurocc ntri c \ ie\\ s of Indi gcnou\ people through n1i srepre entation of hi story. It ha been u cd to deny the rights of Indigenous peoples to thetr land and resources, and ha not ~ uppo 11ed Indi gcnou \ co1nmunities· inherent ri ght to el f-detenninati on. Many co tnn1uniti c~ have felt re~earch cotnplctcd withi n their co1n tnuniti es ha not been relevant or helpful. cicnce, cu ltural arroga nce, and political power wi th1n re ea rch continu e to be a real threat to lndt gcnou~ people as they inhibit Indigenous alternative knowledge and the process or reclai1ning (Wilson, 2008). 4) I ha\ e per. onall y ~truggl ed ' ' 1th bcmg i:ln Inch gen o u~ ' ' otn an '' ho 15 tn\ oh cd ' ' 1th acad cn11 c resccu ch. 1 hen c a d e~ u e to ..... l!clt n a h1 ....ghet IC\ cl or educa t1 on through ... a rccogni7ed uni, c r~ Jl y, wht ch ts also supported h) nl\ fcllnd ) and con1n1u n1t) fl o\\ ever. 1t cannot be to the deti1111Cnl () f ha\ tng. to adJu~ t rny Ind 1g.enous va Iue~. () I I r it oppl c~"'e~ other Indt genous people \ ~a n In dJgc n ou ~ 1e"'earc het. I dill -.. i bi Iit} \\ here\ cr needed. l ou i ~ (2007) uggc~t ~ that ··ha \ I ng a ~ll ppo t11 \ e lnd igcnOUS C001111U n 1l) I11 c1Cadcl11 ia Ccln pnn Ide '-.lUdt:nl <:, \Vi th the oppot1uni l y for intJigu tng di5cu~~•o n about thctr 1c"carch and n1ak~ graduate work on Ind 1genou<;, t<;,~uc~ . feel less J5olattng .. (p . 136). A an Indtgenou per on 1t 1 tmponant I ren1a1 n hutnble and hone t by ackno"' ledging the limitation of thi tudy Although the research a1n1s to honour the experi ences of the Indi genous \VOtnen vvho have vo lu nteered to share thct r experi ence5, and I believe there were collecti\ e cxpencnccs that ctnerge V\ htch \\ tl l be' aluab le to others, there will not be furth er ex tensive cotrun unity co1laboration and action taken wi thin tny first graduate level research expen ence. This study IS not a repre entation or Indt gcnous peoples or Indigenous ltfc. My hopei that the ex peri ence~ shared\\ tthtn tht~ Study will capture SOme or the C0111plexities, real-li fe dileiTII11 aS, and strengths of a Ul1l<.}UC group that share cotnmon ex peri ences. Like Ko\ ach (2009), I con.. td ercd n1y role to be that of a fac ilitator rather than a 'knO\\ ledge-keeper' . and I \\ anted to help "crcc.lle entr~ points for Indi genous kn ow ledge to co n1 c through" (p. 7). 4R l\lethodology My intention \\a. to ~ hare a perso nal app1 oac h to 1 e~ea rc h that \\ a<5 culturall y , en iti\e, balanced. ha nnon1ou . ctrcular. holtstt c. and unfold <:,\\ 1th Ilutcl1ty and grace fo1 me and th o. e ' ' ho choo c to partt<..l pate 1n th i~ rc~c,trc. h ~tu u) "n1i th · ~ ( I 999) hoo k. ··occoloni;in g 1 cthodolog~t: R c~cJ rch and lnd1 gcnou~ People<' \\ J<:, \\ nttcn to su pport Indi genous re. . carcher. rl \\ enty- fi \ e prOJ cch arc de~Cll bed \\ I thIn the tex t and pl ()VIde sotne paratneters that . hould be con~ 1d ered \\ hen p1 oceedt ng \\ 1th a 1 e~ea rc. h p1 occsc; 1 he proj ec t de cribed do not cia 1m to be entt rei) Ind 1 gcno u ~. and . 1n 1th ( I 999) <:, uggec;t ~ that Ind igcnous mcth o d o l ogic~ a form of resistance, which I deliberately chose to engage in. It vvas very 11nportant to tne during thi s pro cc~s to build connec tions with the parti cipants throu gh f~l ce- t o-t:1 cc interaction s. Being respectful and transp8rent were at the foref'ront ore\ cry Interacti on 50 and dec t~ton lrnade regard1ng the research des tgn proccs I clear! } d e~c nb ed 1ny personal and profc~~ 1onal background and 111) purpose for do1n g th1 ~ 1cscclrch at the onset with each participant I belie\ e th1 . ts particularl y ttnportant '-'hen co1nplcttng re ~earc h \\ tth Ind1 gcn o u ~ people \\ ho ha\ e co ntinued to he n1 a1ginal11ed 111 the pctst tht ough research proce scs I ab o ensured pd11tcJpant\ had oppo11un 1t1e" to en!.!.cH!e 1n th e anal)' s1s proce .. s by creating opportun1t1es to share th e1r o h ~e n at io n ~ and th1 ough 1C\ 1evv and feedback of the1r transc nph I noted 111 n1y, JOUn1altng that sotne ol the\\ on1cn Interac ted 11101e freely\\ tth n1 e and shared n1ore personal experi ences once the fonn al tnterv te\v \Va~ con1pl cte and th e audio reco rding had stopped Although I hell e\ e I had e~t ahlt ~ h ed respectful and meaningful interac tion \\ nh the par11c 1panh, ~e \·e ra I Jndt genous \\ on1en \\ ere ~ till cautiou of what they hared during th e fonn al tnteJv 1ew process and asked that I not share orne of the torie they told n1e dunn g our n1cet1ng. The princ1p le o f protecting Indigenous peopl e, knowledge, and \\ ay or life \\ Cre at the forefront o r my thoughts throughout this research process. My resea rch process was found ed on the idea th at Indigenous people have something to offer the non-Indtgenous \\'Orld Several guiding principles for completing research with Indigenous people outlined in m ith · s ( 1999) works described above were adapted and incorporated into my re earch proce~s to promote research that is respectfuL relevant, and helpful to the Indigenous\\ on1cn \\ ho agreed to participate in this study. 1 a111 also optitnisti c that the outcotn cs of th1 s \\ ork \\ Jll he of benefit to other social workers practi cing in the fi eld of child we if~1rc. The tenets of qual ttatt \ c rcc;;carch pro\ tde a pro ccs~ o f tnqutry that tc; conducl\ e to all o'W tng the researcher an opponunJt) to dlun1Il1clle the e ~p c tt e n ce~ and t e ahll c~ o f t h o ~c \\ ho pa rtictpatc tn the rc<:,earch \\ ' tl ~o n (200 ) ~ t a t e~ Rc, earch \\tlhtn J\bot tgi nal co n1n1untt1 c~ ca n he pt ohlctna tic iftt 1 ~ not tnfon11cd b; Abon gtnal people th e m ~e h C<:,. b a~ed on ctlllccll k.nO\\ ledge and proce dure~\\ ht ch lt)ca te th e pro t ocol~ o f \\ ork.1ng \\ tth \hon ginal peoples \\ 1th1n th c tn ~eh e~ R e~ca t <.. h n1ust he approa<.. hed \\ tth 1nteg1tly and fid e lit) to thec;,c kno\\ ledge pt ocedurc<:, c1n d p ro toco l ~ ( p 54) Furtherm ore. \\' tlli ~ tatcs rc~ca rc h ~o., h o ul d co ntn hu te to c;,cl f-detenn tn a tJ on a~ defi ned hy the con1mun1ty 1t elf ctl (2000} d c~c n be borigi nal re~cmc h 1n the fo ll o'W Jng v.ay AboriQinal re carch i ~ re carch '' htch re fl ec t ~ the \ alu cc;, and belt clc;, or our ..... peoples. Hopefull y\\ hen Ahon g1nal re5earcher do re~ca rch. they v. tll keep th et r thinking broad in tcnn of 1nethods and approaches. and w dL at the same tun c be able to construct and conduct the1r re ea rch in a'' ay \v ht ch is tn accord ance v. tth their \V OrldYie\VS ( p. 145 ). eil also states In di ge n o u ~ research i not defin ed as such JUSt becau e you self- Jdent tfy as Indigenous, rather it can be defined thi s way when the methods used. the way the research has been conducted, and the way the theory is constru cted all refl ec t an Indigenous worl d view as given to us by our 1nothers and grancltn other . I belie' e I ha\ c a responsibility to my corn 1nuni ty to adhere to n1y cul tural teachings\\ hen conducti ng resea rch. The cultural teachings that guide n1y life, whi ch include honour and respec t lor allli vtng things and my ancestors. ~ h a p cd the approach I too k. \\ tthin 111 ) enti re rc~o.,ean: h . JOUrney. 52 It \N3 S 1n1peratl\ e that I matntatn a en ~ ttJ\ C and hurnbl c att1tudc clunng and aft er the re earch proce to ra 1~e a\\ arcnc s~ and rc ~ p cc t I nd i gcnous \\ om en· ~..o pcrspcct 1' cs Fu r1hen11orc. I bclte\ c the per pecll\ es ~ h ared by th e parti ci pant c., d c n1on ~..o t1 ate ~ tl cngth and rc illcnce A an lndt gcnou l e~..oc clt c h er . I c h o~..oe to uttlt ;c a q ua lit they po <)e()s ~o th ey can an \Ver que ti on about the toptc betng ex pl ored. I choc;c tht approac h as tt ~u pp o rt cd the election of parti cipants v. ho possess a ri ch body of kno\V ledge \vith reference to rn y research toptc. I v. anted to create a pace v., here th e parti cipant· knO\\ ledge and \\ J ~d otn could be honoured. I believe thi re ea rch process and analysis has strength ened rn y ov. n ocial work prac tice. and I think It" ill deemed as helpful tnfonnation by oth er ocwl workers working within the fi eld of child welfare. Refl ecting the diver ity of the current Indi genous populati ons and cotn 1n unrt1 cs tn this region, the participa nts are fron1 va ri ous ind igenous con1 1nuniti es~ howe\ er, they arc allltving in urban communiti es outside of thctr traditional co rn tnunllics \\r'1th the "cope o f thi s proj ect and the diffi culty o f fi nding pat1icipants who n1cct the pat1i cipati on cn teri a, tn y proposed an1pl e size was six to nine participants. I \\ as ab le to tntcn tC\\ c1ght Indigenous women who met the prc-detcnn ined selection critcn a. Participant Rccruitrncnt There were C\ Cral \\ ay 111 '' hH.;h 1 rec ru ited partJ ctpclnt<; fo1 n1 y 1 e~carc h I hegan the rcc tui tn1 ent proces ~ h.J etnall i ng 1111 rectut ttn ent p o~ t e r d 11 ectl ) to th e It ~ l en e tn cn1ber of the Bnti h Colun1 bia \ ~~oc t d ti o n o l \ oc tal 'A o tk c r~. " orth crn 'A o n1c n ·~ et\\'Ork. and ocial \\'ork. \lun1n1 (. ee J\ ppcndt'\ \ ) FJ\ e l nd tgc n ou~ '' nn1 en responded to 111 y call fo r pat1tctp a nt ~ through c nld tl I al~o cn1a i led tht ce In cil ge n o u ~ '' on1en dtrec ti .J. '' hotn I had had n1 ct p1 C\ tou~ 1 1. to cnq u ire " hcth et they '' ould he interc ted 111 partlctpallng 1n th e rc~car ch. In each ca e. I replied 'ia cn1 atl and a'-lkcd for p e rn1 1 ~~ t o n to p1 en tde n1orc infonnation about the re~cn rc h tu d) I attac hed a cop: or the "i nl on11atio n letter co n ~c nt fon11·· in m) rep!) and I encouraged potentia I part ic 1pant() to rc' ic'A th c~e docu n1 e nt ~ (Sec Appendix B) 1 al 0 a ked potenti al pat11Ctpant ~ I r they \\ ou ld prefer to eO I111TI Unica tc via telephone. etn aiL or tneet in per on to di cu the re earch stud y de ta Jl ~ and any qu c~ ti o n s they might ha\ e. Email was the preferred mca n5 of comn1unt cattng cho5e n by eac h pat1icipant. so interview were an·anged via en1 ail con espond enee and set up to occur within a month of the initial contac t tn ade. Al l pa11icipants indicated that they would prefer it if I travelled to their co1nmunity to conduct the intervie\V . ~o I Inade a n·angem ent~ to travel to conduct thc\c interviews. Interviews were an·anged in locations that the pm1ieipant identifi ed a~ be1ng the tnost cornfortable for then1. Each pm1icipant \Vas gifted at the end of the Inter\ tew process as a gesture to show n1y appreciation for their wi lli ngness to share their experi ence w1th rn e and those who read thi thcs 1 ~. 1 continued to\\ nte 111 a p e r~o nal JOUn1al dunn g tht ~ proce.;;s to 1efl ec t ITI }' thought . fee1Ing • and obsen at1ons I anti cipated th e rec ruttn1ent pt oce~~ to take longet than it did a~ child\\ e ) fare\\ o rke r~ c1re often\ cr\ hu~\ and alreadv tnundated \\ tth J J J papen~ ork., hO\\ e\ er, a)] o f the part tctpct nl. e\.p t C~~ed an tnlCJC~ l 111 111) I e~ca rc h topi c and \Ve re enthustastt c and e<~ge r to par1lctpate Throughout tht ~ pr occ~t,. I tn atnta 1ncd 1111 O\\ n self-ca re and ltnat ntatned balanced~\\ ell th1ou gh pta; er. srnud gtng. clnd ~ pe ndtn g tin1c 111 nature\\ htl c I \\a ga th cnng data. Ethica l Con idcrati on Becau e e"Xplorato ry tnquir; •~ a qualttatl\ c clnd tntcrprctt \ e appt oac h. thet c c d a\\- ay before \\ e could n1cct. I saw ho\\ the l o~~ of my ~ ~ ~ tc r affected n1 y rn othct and grandrnother. I ha' c a specra I place tn n1y heart fo r chtldren and ha\ c a I\\- ay~ wanted to Vv'Ork \\ tth them I wa late stat1ing m y career. but 1 wa~ detenn1ned to do 1t. I al o would hear fron1 fa n11lie \\ ho \\ere dealing\\ ith \\ elfare th at they dtd not like dealing with then1. 1 thought hav in g someone in the fi eld who could relate and show respec t would be benefi cial to the famll tes. The women all shared spcci fi call y how being Indi genous shapes the way they\ ieVv the world within all aspec t ~ of li fe. as well as in their child \\ elfare work Kall shared her experience in the fo llowi ng way: When you work fron1 an lndrgcnous pc r~pec ti\ e you ktnd of co n1e to the \\ ot k. wi th a different lens. Like you have that Ind igenous lens in C\ crythtng you do And so. I thin k that's en1bcddcd in e\C r)thing that )Oll do. hkc tn }OUr professional practi ce and your life. 70 Becau5c of the de\ astating effects the child \\elfare ~y<; ten1 had on l ndt ge nou ~ people tn Canada. tt Ccln be pat1tcul arly diffi cult for Indi genou s soc tal\\ orkers to '' ork with1n th ts opprc. Sl\ e systern . as de cnbcd In Jcs<; Jca · <; e\.pen ence I thi nk my practi ce i ~ ground ed 1n an Ahon glllal pc r~ pcc t i \ c ... I think kno\\ 111g \\ ho I am and ''here I co n1c from ha <; bee n rea lI) 1111 portant. . I th ink ha' 111g a strong sense. hut a calin <;en<;e of tdenttt )-. cl nd an u nd e r~ta nd1n g or th he wa truggling while working for MCFD. She shared tht s po'A erful re<..ponse rcga rd1n g the situation: It \\ asn · t the actua I \\ ork ... beca use r, e a I\\ a) s been able to do the \\ ork and tt' c:; just vvhether I wanted to do it that 'v\ay or not. And I' \ e ah\a) s chosen to do it tn ) 'v\ay and stay that 'v\ay. 1 hat' c:; \vhy it' s been ea ier fo r n1e to carr} on becau<.,c rn1 true to myse lf. I can leave n1y work kn o'v\i i ng that I' 111 a genu in c person. and that I' ve done e\eryth ing I could do fo r that da y ... and the [cli ent<.,]. Access to Resources and S upports Having access to resources and supports\\ as a then1c that cn1c1 red '' tthin all of the jntcrvicws. The subthctn cs that Cl11Crgcd Within all or the intcn ICW transcnpts 77 include· 1) ha\ 1ng access to chn1cal <:. upen 1 ~ 1 o n and dchn efin g. 2 ) hemg ah le to access trat111ng and cultura l re~ ource , and 1 ) the in1p0rtance of 111CJ1tOrSh1p Supervi ion and Debriefin g Ha\ tng acce~s to co n ~ 1 tent but adaptabl e cltnical ~ up er\ t<:. Ion appeared to he very in1p011ant to all the \\ on1 cn They all ~c1 1d that ~ up e n ic.,1on can c1thct help 0 1 Iunder your chtld \\ el fare '' ork l lcl\ 1ng accc~~ to ~ uppo rll \ e t earnn1 a t e~ and dchrt eling wcJe abo ~a Jd tO be a helpful rnea n ~ of \ Upport Taeya ~ atd that ~upc rY I S I O n '' a~ unportant to her co nttnu ed re~ Jit c n cy, and 1n supporting her as an tndt\ tdual \\hen <:. he\\ a~ ~ trugg lin g. ~h e stated .. good c;upcn t ~ t o n , c pec iall) ''hen ) ou arc do'' n on ) o ur~el f and ) ou \\a nt to gt \ e up. t h a t ·~ hec n <;trong at [agency] \ V i th the u pen i or I \\ ork with." Je ica de .. cnbed the need for co n ~ t ~ tcnt and n1all eablc upport. especw ll y fo r Ind1 gcnous women \vorking \\'ithtn their own lnchgcnous co tnrnuniti c~· Vv e \\ ou ld debric f C\ er; \\ eck ... 1 th ink th ere need to be co nc; tstcnt support. and it needs to be a va iIa ble whenever it' needed. ot just on Tucsda; <:. . Like if yo u want people to work in thetr cotnmuniti cs. too that' c; another thing becau~c tt'<:.. hard to work in your con1 n1unity especially when yo u are from the same fa n1 dy. o it' s like have a better <:. upport tn anagen1 ent tea tn to he lp )O U th rough that. .. a better tea m attn osphere. So ) ou' re not fee ling Iike you were j u ~ t let out to the wolves. Brittany desc ribed the need for clinical supervision and dcbneiing in the fo lio\\ tng \\ ay. I cmn c across ~on1 e rea lly talented and '' onderful tca n1 leadct ~ c1nd defint tcl; debri cfwith thcn1 was helpful and being able to debncf,vith col le ague~. I don't 7R think there · enough clinical upen i', ion in child \\ elfarc that ~cparatc <; : our o ~n len frotn ''hat'. ou·re dcal111g '' ith . ~ Another\\ 0111an hared a sitnilar cx pcn cncc \\hen 5he touched on the llllpOt1ance or chni cal supcn tsion .. \\hen 1'111 talktn g about cl111t cal 5upcn t ~ i o n . l"n1 ~ pcc dica ll y. ta lkmg about bctng able to ~ tl dO\\ n and dt ~c u s. a ~ tlu a tt o n '' tth yo ur tcmn leader or yoUJ 1nanagcr and thcn1 bei ng able to help you bnng up th o u ght ~ . td ea~. ', lra t eg t e~ that yo u 1111ght not ha' c thought of on :our 0\\11 . Bcca u\c :ou·rc on I) one pcr\on You can onl y think of so much and n1 aybc hetng able to challenge yo u a little btt on ) OUr bia ~ e . I ended up gctttn g a lot of th at fron1 111 ) tca tn I dtdn "t ge t It rrnn1 ITI ) team leader ... • Melis a also bared her cxpen encc or\\ orktng 1n an en' tronn1ent 'A here 5uperv 1 ~ 1 o n \Vas Jacking: 1 had a team leader \\'ho watched over tn c like I 'A a~ Incompetent and evcJy Abori ginal ocial worker who worked with her ended up quittJng. I was th e only one who sta yed. Had I not 1110\'ed teatns I would have quit too The impot1ance of utiJ i/ing your tean1mates for support and to debri ef was al5o brought up by all the women. For exan1pl e. Kali sa id that ··kno\ving who I on your tean1 I kno\v I can tru st and who I think is a good critical thinker. Being abl e to turn to that p er~o n I think was a reall y in1p011ant coping strategy " Tacya shared a itndar cxpcn encc <111<.l stated, ~· I thi nk debri cfi ng, havin g good colleagues has he!ped too. Just to be a b lc to ha\ c the same cotnradery to be able to talk about ~ tufT That" ~ hccn good. \ nd good supcrv iston." 79 Jessica rnenttoncd the 11nportancc of ha\ tng a tearn that 1 tnv c~ ted 111 suppor1ing each other and de cri bed th ic; as. "hen rng a 1calI y supp0111' e tcatn at \\ 0 1k lla vtng a real I y suppot1J\ c up en tsor at '' ork. I think. 'er; support 1' e peer . '' c have a pt etty inve ted team . :· The'' omen al~o talked about the unporta nce of ha' 1ng a ~t ro n g peer ~ upp o rt network at '' ork, and '' ork.tng '' 1th ~upcn 1 ~0 1 ~ ctnd team n1ates '' ho tudy had worked for both MCFD and delegated Aboriginal agencie . Most \vomen expres ed ha ving more posi ti ve ex peri ences working in delegated Aborigtnal agencie O\er worktng for MCFD. Child \vel fare work is always difficult. but the Indigenous child welfare Iiterature and the women in this study suggest there is orne con1fort in doing th1 work with others who share your wo rldvicw and app roach to practi ce. Anonson. Desjarlais, ixon, Whi ternan, and Bird (2008) a~se11 that Indigenous stud ents and professio nals are often expected to adopt Western's soc iety beliefs, notms, and va lues which conflict with their Indigenous episten1ology. Furthetmore, they found that rectuitment and retention of Indigenous professionals improved when they worked within environn1ents where Ind igenous knowledge and pedagogy were interwoven into the culture of the institution. Recognition of self-care and work stress. Child welfare agencies and organizations supporting social workers practi cing in child welfare need to recognize and fom1ally acknowledge that self-care and maintaining healthy balance is difficult for social workers. Participants all expressed times when they struggled 111 their v. ork and felt isolated, ironicall y whi le working beside other helping professionals dally Creahng space for fonnal di alogue mnongst social \.vorkers where they ca n ackn<.nvlcdgc nnd 99 dtscuss \\ ork .. tres and how to encourage <;el f-ca re \\ ould help prornote rcstlt cncy and rmse a\\ areness lndt genous ~oc wl \\ o rke r~ tnay requtrc grea ter and unique suppo11s du e to thetr histo ry o f colonll at1on through the chtld \\ elfm e systetn C'o loni La ll on has been ~ u c h a de. tructl\ e force and so ingrained 111 soc ial ~y~ t cn1 ~ th at Jt can be hard to td cntify the oppre~s n e prac ti ce~ and undcrstancllngs tt h a~ c rea ted 1rcatcr care needs to be taken to en ure Inclt genous soc1al \\ o rkcr ha\ e ttcce~~ to su pp o 11~ they dccn1 a~ app1 opt wtc. such as c trclet.; to ch sc u s~ historica l and contcn1porary lnd tgcnou<; tssuc<, and to pro n1ote a procc()S of hen ltn g and tran fo rrna ti on 111 rela ti on to the chtl d \\e lfa re c;)() tctn. In Clo ne'<., rc carch rcgardtn g therapy and hea l1n g atnongst Indt gcnous popul ations in Ma nt toba, he noted that there needs to be a proacti \e shift nce & McdtcJnc, 48, 182 1- 1832. M rale . A., heafor. B. W , & cott, M. E (2007). Social H'ork: A pro{csszon of 1nany faces (I J th ed. ). Boston, MA : Al lyn and Bacon. Mora?es, J L., Benton, A. D , Clark, . J., & Jacquet. . E. (20 15). Views of pecially-trained child we lfare social wo rkers: A qualitat ive study of their motivation , perceptions. and retenti on. Qualitative Socl(d Work, 9(2), 227-247. doi : 10.11 77/1 473325009350671. NeiL R. (Ed.). (2000). Voice of t!te dnun: lndigenou.\ education and culture. Manitoba: Kingfisher Publications. Onwuegbuzie, A. (2003 ). Effect stzes in qualitati ve research: A prolegornenon. Qua !tty & Quanti~v. 37, 393-409. Pahner, S. , & Cooke, W . ( 1996 ). Understanding and countering racisn1 with first nations children in out-of-home care. Child 1Vel(arc. 75( 6), 709. Retrieved fron1 th e Child Developrnent & Adolescent Studi es database. Palys, T. (2003 ). Research d cclSIOI1S: QuantJ!atn·e and quahtatn·e perspectn C\ (3'd Ed.). Scarborough, Ontario : Nelson Thorn son Canada Lin11tcd Pappas, G. D (2004 ). Perceptions of coaching behavior, seasonal pcrfonnancc "u cce~s. and quality of life. Assessing relationship over the course or a season /)cpartmcnr of Physnal Education. 1/ealth and Sport Stud1cs 0\Jord, Oh1o f\tiluni University. 11 8 Pearlman, L., & aakvitnc, K. ( 1995). Trcuuna and th e therapis t: Countertran.~(eren ce and vicarious traumall::.ation in p.\)'chotherapy with incest s urvt vors. New York: W.W. orton & co n1pany, Inc. Pierce, J. L., Il ctning' ay, D., & Sclunidt, G. (20 14). Partn erships in social work edu cati on. Journal of Teaclnng 111 SoClal 1f'ork, 34(2), 2 15-226. doi: 10. 1080t08841 233 .20 14.8954 77 Pooyak, S. , & Gotnez. Y (2009). U ing a narrative approach to und erstanding the frontline practice and expenences of aboriginal and non-aboriginal chi ld protec ti on \YOrkers. Fzr\·t Peoples Clnld & FamzZv Rel'iC'-1', 4(2), I 0- J 7. Prilleltensky, I.. el on. G., & Peirson, L. ( Eds.). (200 1). Promoting faml Zv wei/ness and pre1 ·enting child maltreatn1ent. fundame ntals (or think1ng and action. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Ramirez, L. C., & Hamtn ack, P. L. (20 14). Surviving colonization and the quest fo r healing: Nan·ati ve and resilience atn ong Californi a Indi an tribal leaders. Transcultural P5:vchiatry, 5( 1), 112-133. doi: 10. 11 77/ 136346 1513520096. Razack, M. (2006). First Nations women workers speak, write and research back: Chi ld welfare and decolonizing stories. The First Peoples Child and Famzlr Rc n eH'. 2(1), 21-40 Regehr, C., Hemsworth, D., Lesli e, B., Howe, P., & Chau, S. (2004) . Predictor~ of trautn atic response in child welfare workers. Clnldrc:n and routh Sc1 l'iCC\' Rcwe-vt', 26( 4 ), 33 1-346 Regehr, C., Leslie, B., Howe, P, & Chau, S. (2000) . Stress and ruuiJJ/a in child we(far<: pract1ce ( 'anada '., ( '/uldren C'/uld Jl'e/fare Re,·earch in ( 'anada. 119 Sunm1cr. 12- 14 . Representative for Children and Youth. (20 13). lrVhen talk trumped sen·Tcc: A decade of lost opportunzty (or Aboriginal children and )r'Outh in B. C. Retrieved from http://www . rcybc. ca ' repot1s-and-publ ications/reports/n1on ito ring-reports/whentalk- trun1ped-service-decadc-lost Rycraft J. ( 1994 ). The pa11y Isn't over: The agency role in the retention of publi c child welfare caseVv orkcrs. So cud 1Vork. 30( 44 ), 7 5-80. Samuel , K . (201 3). Learning cluld H'el(are social H'Ork H'IIIiout learnzng to coloni::e. (U npubli shed master' s thesis). McMaster Univcrsity. llamilton. Saumure, K ., & Given, L . M . (2008). Ri gour in qualitative research. ln L .M . G iven, (Ed.), The saf:Ze enc:vclopcdta of qualitatn·e research method (p. 795-796 ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Shi er, M. L., & Grahatn, J. R. (20 15) Subjective well -being, social work, and the environn1ent: The itnpact of the socio-politi cal context of practi ce on socia l worker happiness. Journal of Soczal Tflork. 15( 1), 3-23. doi : 10. 1177/ 146801 73 13503449 Sinha, V ., & Kozlowski, A. (20 13 ). The stru cture of Aboriginal child welfare in Canada. The International Indigenous Pol!cv Journal, 4(2). Retri eved frotn: http: / /ir.li b.uwo .ca/i ipj/vo14/ iss2/2 Smith, B. D. (2004 ). Job retention tn child welfare: Effects of pcrcci\ cd organllational suppo11, supcrvis1on suppoti, and intrinsic job value Clu!t!J en and }ourh SoY!c c' Re\'iCH', 27, 153- 169. Sn1ith, L.T . ( 1999) . !Jccolont::lng m cthodologtcs Rc,·earch and huli!!,c. JllJU\ {){ 0f>h' 1 120 London: Zed Books. ocial Research A sociation (2004). Ethi ca l guidelines. Retri eved fron1 http://www .thesra.org.ukJdocuments/pdfs/ethies03. pdf. ookraj, D., Hutchinson. P., Eva n , M ., & Murphy, M. A. (201 0). Abori ginal organizational response to the need fo r culturall y appropri ate services in three srnall Canadian cities Journal of Social 11'ork, 12(2), 136- 157. doi: 10. 11 77 1468017310381366. Sreeje h. .. Mohapatra. .. & Anusree, M.R. (20 13) Business Resea rch Des ign: Ex ploratory, desc riptiv e and causa l Designs in Bus 1ness Research Methods. 25-103 . doi: 10. 1007 '978-3-3 19-00539-3 Stanley, N .. Manthorpe. J., & White. M. (2007). Depressio n in the profession. Social workers' experiences and perceptions. Brit1sh Journal qf Social Tflork, 37(2), 281-298. Stebbin, R . A. (200 1). Explorato1y research in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Stout, R .. & Peters, S. (20 11 ). Ki.">·kinohamatotapana.sk: Inter-generational effects of professional Fir.\ t Nations H'omen H·liose n1others arc re\·ldenflal \'chool \'llll 'n·ors Winnipeg. MB : The Prair ie Wotn en·s J Ieal th Centt e of [xce llence. The Aborig1nal Justice ltnpletncntation Con1n1tsston. The .Ju,·tice Systc111 and .1 horiginal People. Retrieved fron1: http://www aJ ic n1b ca 1vo lun1el chapter 14 httnl Thon1 as. R. (2009) . X\\ruln1U'\\V ')lhumlhcni ' and Pcoplchood. (lJnpubli~hed Paper). Victori a. BC: Un iversity ofYtc tona. Travis, D. .J ., & Barak, M. E. (20 I 0) Ftght or f1 tght f~tc tot s tnilu cnctng child \\ cl nuc 12 1 \vorker~ ' propensity to seck posttt\e change or disengage fro1n the1r JObs .Journal of Soual Sen 'ICC' Re"arch . 36(3). 188-205 . Truth and Rcconct liation Con1tntsston of Ca nada (20 15 ). Truth and Rcconci/l(t/lon ComJJnS.Hon of Canada. Call\· to ~ 1 ctJoll Rctn cved fro1n: http ://www.trc ca/ wcbsttcs trctnStJtUtJ OI1 Flle.20 15 I~ tndtn gs Calls to Action c ngllsh2. pdf \'at sn1orad t. M , Turunen. II . & B o nda ~. f . (20 13 ). Content analysts and th etnattc a n a l )'~ t s ltnpli ca tl o n ~ for conductlllg a qualttatr\ e descnptt\ e stud y 1\'rtr\/n~ and I h alth Sucncc\. 15. 39 -405 doi : 10 ll I I nhs 12048 Va kalaht. H. F. 0. & Starks, H. (20 10) The co n1plexities of becotnt ng \ tstbl e· Rcfl ccttng on the stori es of \\ otncn or co lor as social work edu cators Journal of 11'o mcn and Socud JT'orA.. 15(2). 110- 122. doi: 10.11 77/0886109910364141 • Van Den Hoonard. D K. (20 12) Qualt/atn ·e re.\ earch 111 acllon: A Canadf(lll pruner. Ontano. Canada: Oxford Unl\ cr~ tty Prc',S Van Manen. M. ( 1997). R c.\earclnnf.!,ln·ed c \fJCI'I£'11cc: Human \ucncc for an liLiion ,·en.\Jtn·c p edagof{l ·. London · The Althouse Press. Waldran1, J. B. (20 14 ). Hea ling hi story') Abori gtnal healing. htstorical traurna. and persona l responsibili ty. Transcultural Psrchiatrv. 51(3). 370-386 dot 10 l 177/ 136346 151348 767 1 Walrnslcy, C. (2006) ProtcclnH!, Ahollf!:liWI Lluldu.:n Yancou\ Cl. BC l BC P1c"~ W ex lcr, L. (20 14) Looktng aero~~ th1 ee ge n e rati on~;, ol Alaska tltt \ c" to L~\ plor c ht'W culture rosters tnclt gc nous t e~ tlt e n ce I rU/1\( ulruud pq clriall ~l'. 51( I). 7'~ 92. doi : 10 11 77/13614615 11497417. 122 Whitten1ore. R., Cha e. . K.. & Mandi e, C. L. (200 1). Validity in qualitati ve research. Qualitatn·e health research. 11(4 ), 522-537. Wilson, . (2008) Re.H!arch IS c eremon \·· lndigenou \' research n1c1hods. II ali fax & V\' innipcg, MB : Fern\\ ood Publl ~ hm g . ZapC M K. ( 1993 ). Rcn1otcr practice and culture shock: Social workers 1novi ng to tsolatcd northern rcgton() So u a/ lf'or k. 38( 6 ), 694-704 123 ppendix A: Emai l Recr uitment Po ter Are you a First Nations, Metis, or Inuit Woman? Do you have a Degree in Social Work? Are you a Social Worker who has worked, or currently works in Child welfare? You are invited to share your experiences and knowledge. My name is Sonya Rowland and I am a Master of Social Work student at the University of Northern British Columbia. You are invited to participate in a qualitative research study to explore the unique and collective experiences of Indigenous women who have practiced soci al work in the field of child welfare for two years or more, and have obtained a degree in social work. This study will also focu s on learning more about what factors may contribute to resiliency and promote wellness within this work. Due to the small pool of participants, your anon ymity can not be guaranteed should you choose to participate in this stud y. If you wish to participate in this study or would like fu r ther infornta tion please contact Sonya Rowland via cell phone at (250) 6-t0-0684 or via email at sheppa4(a)unbc.ca. 124 Appendix B: lnforn1ation Letter/Consent Form Resiliency· Lea rning fron1 Indi genous Wo1nan in Social Work G raduate tud ent The i Re ea r cher: onya Row land Uni crsity of orthern Briti h Colun1.bi a, chool of Social Work, 3333 Universit y Way, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9 Cell Phone: (250) 640-0684 E mail: shcppa4(a .unbc ca The i S up ervisor: Joann a Pierce, Assoc iate Professor, Schoo l of Social Work, UNBC Office Telephone: (250) 960-652 J E mail: joanna. pi ercera unbc.ca Dear Prospective Participant, I am conducting a thesis research stud y in pa11ial fulfilhn cnt of the requiren1ents fo r th e U niversity of Northern British Colu1nb ia Master of Social Work degree. The title of rny re earch proj ect is: ''Res iliency: Lea rning from Woman in 'oc ial Work". I would like to formally invite you to the research project as a research pcui icipant. The foll ow ing infotmati on will provide fu11her details regarding thi s resea rch and your role should you choose to parti cipate. II. INVITATION AND STUDY PURPOSE • You are bei ng invited to ta ke part in this research study because of your unique experiences as an Indi genous wo n1an (First Nations, MetJ s, and 1or Inutt) \\ tth t\\O or more yea rs of related social work experi ence working w1thin the field of ch ild welfare in British Colu1nb ia who possesses a degree 111 soc ta l \\ ork. • I want to learn n1ore about what fac tors contribute to Ind igenous fetnale soc1cll workers' rcsi I iency ~ h i le workin g \\ ith in child \\ e I fare. and \\hat coping strategies do Indi genous worncn who are socia l wo rkers ctnploy to protnote wcllness and balance tn their ltves \\ bile work1ng tn the field of chtld \\ di~u·e. • Thi s stud y wdl protnotc the sharing or knO\\ ledge and C'\J1C1 1CI1CCS or lndtgcnou\ won1en who have worked wt thm the fie ld or chdd \\ cl f~u c, ,HH.i \\ tll help create new know ledge and pcrspcctt\ cs I hope thts knO\\ ledge \\ til be u~cd to dt tl\\ 125 attention to the strengths of the participants. and to Jearn more about how to better ~upp o rt Indt genouc;; \\'On1 cn 'A ho arc social 'A orker . • on1c of the findin g pro\ ided '" 1th111 th1 ~ rc carch thesis 1nay 1ndtrectl y critiqu e or chall enge the p o lt c t e~ and practtccs of organi/ati ons a ffi It a ted w1th the child '' clfare y tctn in Bnllsh Colu n1bw E nd o r~e n1 c nt and pcn11 JSs ton to proceed wi th tht s re~ea rc h stud y has not been ~o ught by any go' e111n1ent orga ni i.all on as th e resea rch docs not rcquc~t any 111fo nn at1on related to any organization or Institution. • Parti cipat ion in thi s ~tud y 1'-» entirely \Oiuntary You are 111 no way obli ga ted to pat11c1 pate 111 tht re~ca rc h. and yo u arc free to \\ ithdra\\ fro1n tht ~ '-»tud y at th.ll '-I ' 1 ~ TC\ It'\\ CO) our rl' cmch th <>Is propo-.al rcg.srding lnd1gcnous \\0111 ·n nnd c:'ploring tl .... r t: ~,,,_nl'lh.l'S reblt'd to .... ,clltl ''otk pr.lc ticl· tn tht.> lidd •>1 child \\ell an: mtd n ha hl•t.:n d.: ...·rncd '"orth'" hJ!e u 1d hn., hL»t:ll upprm c:d h) the.:. 1g<.'I1C) \\ l" Ill\ Dr . l ra\1~ Hn l~k I CCUU\ e Dir~ctor R..-...c. r~ 11. P:-im:lr) Cur, an,! ~ tr .u..:g1c :-.en i.,.(', <'dltill '-uuni l nmil~ S~n1 l' 132 ppcnd ix F: R E B Letter of Supp ort ITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA RESEARCH ETHICS BOARD MEMORANDUM To: CC: Sonya Rowland Joanna P1erce From: M1chae1 Murphy, Cha1r Research Eth1cs Board Date: February 12 2015 Re: E2015.0112.001.00 _ _ _ __;_R:..:.e...:.. slllenc : Learning from lndi enous Women in Social Work Thank you for subm1ttmg rev1s1ons to the Research EthiCs Board (REB) regardmg the above-noted proposal Your rev1s1ons have been approved Wlth the request that pnor to commencmg your research, you. 1} correct the grammat1cal errors 1n the poster and Information Letter Consent Form 2) prov1de the REB w1th consents from the delegated agenctes as requ1red (e.g Carner Sekan1 Fam1ly Serv1ces) We are pleased to 1ssue approval for the above named study for a penod of 12 months from the date of th1s letter Cont1nua11on beyond that date w111 requtre further rev1ew and renewal of REB approval Any changes or amendments to the protocol or consent form must be approved by the REB If you have any quest1ons on the above or reoUtre further clanftcahon please feel free to contact Rheanna Rob1nson 1n the Off1ce of Research (reb@unbc ca or 250-960 6735}. Good luck w1th your research. Sincerely Or M1chael Murphy Cha1r, Research Eth1cs Board