Free Volume 18 Issue 4 October 19, 2011 over-the-edge@unbc.ca web.unbc.ca/edge THE LEFT HAS OCCUPIED WALL STREET Thousands of protesters gather in financial districts fo voice their dissatisfaction HANNA PETERSEN NEWS EDITOR You don’t need to take Inter- national Studies or Political Science courses to know that, even in 2011, wealth distribution is far from equal. And for years people have been grum- bling about their dissatisfaction with government and the economy. After struggling through a dismal econ- omy and record high unemployment - especially in America - the day has finally come for the people who are fundamentally upset with the system. Apathy, it seems, has been taken off the table. ‘Occupy Wall Street’ is the name given to ‘the ongoing protests which began on Wall Street in New York City and have also begun to spread around North America. “Occupy Wall Street is a leaderless resistance movement with people of many colours, gen- ders and political persuasions,” says a statement on the Occupy Wall Street Website. “The one thing we all have in common is that we are the 99% that will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the 1%. We are using the revolutionary Arab Spring tactic to achieve our ends and encourage the use of nonviolence to maximize the safety of all participants.” The protest started by a suggestion in AdBusters (the left-wing anti-con- sumerist magazine) and was endorsed by a group of computer hackers called Anonymous who spread it to Twitter and Facebook. From there it picked up steam and people literally began flooding Wall Street. “On September 17, we want to see 20,000 people flood into lower Manhattan, set up tents, kitchens, peaceful barricades and oc- cupy Wall Street for a few months,” says the magazine. “We demand that Barack Obama ordain a Presidential Commission tasked with ending the influence money has over our repre- sentatives in Washington. It’s time for DEMOCRACY NOT CORPORAT- OCRACY, we’re doomed without it.” The number of people occupying Wall Street started in the hundreds, but has since grown to thousands join- ing in the protests. The movement has spread to Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Boston, Seattle, Austin, and Texas. In Los Angeles, 11 people were arrested during a march by hundreds of union members, students, and activists in a downtown financial sector. Similar protests were also planned in Can- adian cities. President Obama has responded to the protests. He says the protests re- flect the frustrations of the American public. Obama also summarized that the government must ensure the health of the financial sector but should not allow Wall Street to compete “on the basis of hidden fees, deceptive cock- tails that nobody understands and that expose the entire economy to enor- mous risks.” Some of the protestors found Obama’s reaction to be less than en- thusiastic, given their whole-hearted commitment to the cause. Some crit- ics of the movement say that it will soon fizzle or gain momentum. How- ever, because the movement has no leader, no easily definable solution, and a myriad of dissatisfactions, some experts have reported skepticism on the movement’s success. Communications director for John McCain’s presidential campaign, Dan Schnur, for example, has been quot- ed saying “the difference between an angry mob and a movement is a goal.” However, the momentum of the protesters can’t be denied as they are chronicling the protests with hun- dred of images on Tumblr. Speeches, cops, and those protesting the protest, are all chronicled on the blog. With the rapidity of social media, once a speech has been filmed and uploaded it’s in the hands of anyone interested. And people are interested. Some famous people like Kanye West are ONLINE SOURCE supportive of the protesting. On Oc- tober 10th, Kanye dropped by the main New York hub of the protests. He was in the company of the Rev. Al Sharpton and hip-hop mogul Russell Simmons. Kanye shook hands with the protesters, and Al Sharpton broad- casting on his radio show announced his inclinations regarding the pro- tests: “We are here today because we agree 1% should not be controlling the wealth. These are regular people trying to feed their families, trying to pay their rent and mortgages, trying to survive.” Whether or not the protests will incite any permanent change for the 99% depends upon two factors; the lasting enthusiasm of the protestors, and how they are received by those in government. Regardless of the out- come, in an age where virtually no one is voting, to see masses of people engaged and voicing their opinions is commendable. a