- 13 4. Effect of Lumber Size on Overrun โ€”. The percentage of log volume cut into rough lumber is not necessarily a measure of mill efficiency. The actual number of board cet of green lumber produced from a cubic foot of green lumber will 3 1ethor the boards were cut scant, full-size, or over-size. Table IV shows a comparison of three mills cutting logs of the le 7 > a co = yoy OQ same average diameter, TABLE IV. The elation of Overrun and Lumber Size SEEnEEEEEEeeeer eee es ac eere ' ! Diam. i Cut over Nominal Size Total Residue { =a ! 5 Ove soar eas eal Sn a esa โ€” Aye le ERD | Thickness | Width | (per cent of | i โ€˜ . eG e i ws inchs oe Ses i inches {| inches { cubic volume) ee es eee ae" |} = 20555 One| B15 { | ! | *ll.l 0.16 lo Ona sc 40.3 | { er 15e0 a loo | eno. | onsa == 3904 *This mill had an underrun. The percentage of residue in the three mills was fairly uniform. n Mill A thi lumber was cut heavily oversize resulting in an underrun. Wi11 C, which cut very close to nominal thickness, had the highest over- rune De Board Foot-Cubic Foot Relationships The percentages of the various forms of mill residue shown in the preceding tables are sed on the volume of the log sawn and measured s ba. in cubic SIE In commercial practice the log volume is measured by the sakes an allowance for slabs and sawdust and is Soe in bona feet. o apply the percentage of sawmill residue it t is necessary to conver a6 board feet as determined by the B.C. Log ratio between board feet and cubic feet varies Scale to cubic feet. The With diameter, taper, and | fee a al โ€œof a 156 western white spruce ividua 1 ae averages varied from a minimum of